Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Browns 2018 Salaries by Unit


Sober Poet

Recommended Posts

Link to Article

Looking at the Browns' 2018 salaries by unit: offense, defense, and special teams
How much do the Browns have dedicated toward each position on the roster heading into the offseason?

This post is going to take a look at how much money the Browns have invested in offense, defense, and special teams leading into the 2018 NFL offseason, with the data being current as of March 5th and pulled from Over The Cap. When we look at the Browns' available cap space, we are only factoring in the Top 51 contracts on the team. For the purpose of analyzing money committed to all positions, we are looking at all 73 contracts on the team.

Note: This does not include any of the Browns’ UFA, RFA, or ERFA. It is expected the club will bring back guys like Josh Gordon and Austin Reiter, but until they do, those salaries cannot be factored in, since there is nothing to go off of right now.

Offense

The Browns have invested $63.50 million on offensive players, which is the sixth lowest figure in the NFL. The investments, in order from highest to lowest position, are as follows: OG ($18.96 million), OT ($18.35 million), WR ($7.38 million), C ($6.75 million), TE ($5.37 million), RB ($4.65 million), and QB ($2.05 million).

2018offense.png

Defense

The Browns have invested $60.35 million on defensive players, which is the 21st highest figure in the NFL. The investments, in order from highest to lowest position, are as follows: OLB ($21.28 million), CB ($14.39 million), DE ($11.61 million), DT ($6.73 million), S ($4.92 million), and MLB ($1.42 million).

2018defense.png

Special Teams

The Browns have invested $3,832,292 on special teams players (no ranking currently available).

Total

Cumulatively, the Browns have invested $127.68 million on players against the cap for 2018, which is ranked 28th in the NFL*. These figures do not include dead money toward players who are no longer with the team, but the pie charts should give you a general idea as to where the Browns stand in positional spending. Some figures are a little misleading, since defensive ends, nose tackles, and/or outside linebackers sometimes split work at different positions.

As stated earlier, these rankings do not take into account any free agents, restricted or unrestricted. Smaller contracts, like exclusive rights free agent deals, aren't included either, even though they will likely be tendered.

The Browns' most lucrative-invested position is offensive guard, thanks to the signing of Kevin Zeitler and extension of Joel Bitonio last year. On defense, similarly, outside linebacker is the most lucrative due to extensions last year for Jamie Collins and Christian Kirksey. Are there any position numbers that jump out at you?

*Special teams calculations are approximated to be the same for every NFL team, as Over the Cap's total amounts only include offense and defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like a weird cheap team. By the importance of the positions, there should be more investment in QB and DE. Most of the times those players get paid the most in other teams' rosters. It is also obvious that we should put some money into WRs and maybe RBs too. 

I'm happy with the production of the OLBs, thus I think they got a fair share, but the amount of salary that goes to that awful secondary is way too high considering its production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff.   Of course, the thing that jumps out at me is the limited amount of resources they have invested in the two central positions on each unit:     The QB....and the QB of the defense...i.e.  the MLB.   Except, on the other hand...I think both Kirksey and Collins would be MLBs in a 3-4 defense.....but we run a 4-3, so they have to play on the outside.

I think what we may want to say/analyze is:  

A. Where are they overspending

B. Where are they underspending. 

1.  While they are underspending at the QB position...I do NOT think they are underspending on the people we have at that position.

I think that there should perhaps be a bit of a more even mix between the offensive skill positions and the OL....but again...it comes down to the fact that none of our offensive skill players deserve any kind of huge contracts.   None of them seem underpaid.

2. And...as I said, it seems a bad mix between OLB and MLB....but as I said, those guys are playing out of position...though they are some of the more talented players on the defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Overspending at CB for sure. Not getting our moneys worth.

That is where the veterans are:  McCourty/Taylor.   So more money is spent on veterans than on players on their rookie contracts. 

Nevertheless, you are right....not getting our money's worth.   McCourty...OK...but not Taylor.

QB,   Safety, CB....top 3 needs....in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...