calfoxwc Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 coming soon - they will start beating republicans and their wifes up with bats, etc. closer and closer to nazi brownshirts. https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/09/24/left-wing-agitators-disrupt-ted-cruz-dining-with-his-wife-and-proudly-post-video Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 calm down snowflake, even "the blaze" didnt use the word "attacked" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 George Soros's "useful idiots". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted September 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 I'll assume an ignorant retort from the board wasteland troll... https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Verbal+assault assault (redirected from Verbal assault) Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Idioms, Encyclopedia. Related to Verbal assault: Verbal Abuse Assault At Common Law, an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal or civil liability. Generally, the common law definition is the same in criminal and Tort Law. There is, however, an additional Criminal Law category of assault consisting of an attempted but unsuccessful Battery. Statutory definitions of assault in the various jurisdictions throughout the United States are not substantially different from the common-law definition. Elements Generally, the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim. The act required for an assault must be overt. Although words alone are insufficient, they might create an assault when coupled with some action that indicates the ability to carry out the threat. A mere threat to harm is not an assault; however, a threat combined with a raised fist might be sufficient if it causes a reasonable apprehension of harm in the victim.Intent is an essential element of assault. In tort law, it can be specific intent—if the assailant intends to cause the apprehension of harmful or offensive contact in the victim—or general intent—if he or she intends to do the act that causes such apprehension. In addition, the intent element is satisfied if it is substantially certain, to a reasonable person, that the act will cause the result. A defendant who holds a gun to a victim's head possesses the requisite intent, since it is substantially certain that this act will produce an apprehension in the victim. In all cases, intent to kill or harm is irrelevant. In criminal law, the attempted battery type of assault requires a Specific Intent to commit battery. An intent to frighten will not suffice for this form of assault. There can be no assault if the act does not produce a true apprehension of harm in the victim. There must be a reasonable fear of injury. The usual test applied is whether the act would induce such apprehension in the mind of a reasonable person. The status of the victim is taken into account. A threat made to a child might be sufficient to constitute an assault, while an identical threat made to an adult might not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 Assault and assault and battery are two different charges. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 I didn't see the restaurant do much to throw out the protesters. Like the Red Hen restaurant who refused service to Sarah Huckabee Sanders and suffered business loss this restaurant needs to be identified so conservatives can avoid it and boycott it. If they are not going to protect their own customers from being assaulted they should be boycotted. *Odd how there are no " protesters" who are so concerned about women doing any protesting of democrat Keith Ellison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 TWITTER REFUSES TO ACT OR EVEN COMMENT ON THREATENING MESSAGE SENT TO SEN. TED CRUZ After a group of Antifa and socialist protesters drove Sen. Cruz out of the high-end restaurant Fiola on Monday night, the account “Smash Racism D.C.” promised future harassment from their members. (RELATED: Antifa Sends Threatening Message To Cruz After Disrupting His Dinner: ‘You Are Not Safe.’) “You are not safe,” they wrote. “We will find you. We will expose you. We will take from you the peace you have taken from so many others.” p6. This is a message to Ted Cruz, Bret Kavanaugh, Donald Trump and the rest of the racist, sexist, transphobic, and homophobic right-wing scum: You are not safe. We will find you. We will expose you. We will take from you the peace you have taken from so many others. — Smash Racism DC (@SmashRacismDC) September 25, 2018 Twitter’s rules prohibit “behavior that crosses the line into abuse, including behavior that harasses, intimidates, or uses fear to silence another user’s voice.” “You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone, or incite other people to do so,” Twitter’s rules state. “We consider abusive behavior an attempt to harass, intimidate, or silence someone else’s voice.” After an inquiry into the status of the “Smash Racism D.C.” account, Twitter told The Daily Caller that they “don’t comment on individual accounts for privacy and security reasons.” Twitter did not respond to an additional request for comment after this reporter pointed out that the tech giant commented about Infowars and Alex Jones’ accounts on multiple occasions. The threatening tweet has been on the platform for 12 hours as of the publishing of this article. https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/25/twitter-refuses-comment-threatening-message-ted-cruz/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted September 25, 2018 Report Share Posted September 25, 2018 twitter needs to.shut that acct down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.