Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Trump associate Roger Stone arrested, faces obstruction charge


jbluhm86

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

More process crimes created by Mueller. 

Roger Stone arrested by FBI on Mueller probe on alleged ‘process crimes’ ; not charged with colluding with Russians

Stone is charged in a seven-count indictment with what are called “process” crimes – that is crimes that have nothing to do with crimes under investigation but were allegedly committed during the process of the investigation.

Stone is charged with witness tampering, obstruction and false statements about his interactions related to the release by WikiLeaks of allegedly hacked emails during the 2016 presidential election. Some of those alleged false statements were made to the House intelligence committee, according to the indictment.

Stone is not charged with colluding or coordinating with the Russian government’s election interference in 2016, the key matter under investigation in the Mueller probe.

In the 19 months he’s been at work, Mueller has not yet indicted any American for collusion with Russians to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.

https://artvoice.com/2019/01/25/roger-stone-arrested-by-fbi-on-mueller-probe-on-alleged-process-crimes-not-charged-with-colluding-with-russians/#.XEswQlVKiG4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

More process crimes created by Mueller. 

Roger Stone arrested by FBI on Mueller probe on alleged ‘process crimes’ ; not charged with colluding with Russians

Oh have no fear. The best is yet to come on this nest of vipers that was elected into the WH. Been saying since day one just let them work it legally through the courts. So far every canary has sung to one extent or another. It's the way it's done when you go after organized crime. Start with the process charges and let them sing or wear orange. How about a little music for the latest canary. "We know that Mr. Mueller will not leave any stone unturned so to speak."-Congressman Raji Krishnamoorthi (D) House Select Committee on Intelligence.😁

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh, shut up with that crap, Tex - manafort was never elected to the WH, cohen was never elected to the WH,

Stone was never elected to the WH.

These are players who have been players for many, many years.

obama/biden WH manafort connection:

Manafort's pro-Ukraine lobbying campaign reached Obama, Biden ...

Sep 14, 2018 - Paul Manafort’s pro-Ukraine campaign reached the top of the White House, with one of the members of his lobbying effort meeting President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden in 2013, according to new court documents released Friday. ... Manafort, President Donald Trump’s ...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

now, Roger Stone was always? a dirtbag unscrupulous power player. from Wikipedia

"

Early life and political work

Stone was born on August 27, 1952,[30] in Norwalk, Connecticut,[31] to Gloria Rose (Corbo) and Roger J. Stone.[32] He grew up in Lewisboro, New York, in a family of Hungarian and Italian descent. His mother was a small-town reporter, his father a well driller[33] and business owner. He has described his family as middle-class, blue-collar Catholics.[31]

In the first grade, Stone claims, he broke into politics to further John F. Kennedy's presidential campaign: "I remember going through the cafeteria line and telling every kid that Nixon was in favor of school on Saturdays ... It was my first political trick."[33]

When he was a junior and vice president of student government at his high school in northern Westchester County, New York, he manipulated the ouster of the president and succeeded him. Stone recalled how he ran for election as president for his senior year:

I built alliances and put all my serious challengers on my ticket. Then I recruited the most unpopular guy in the school to run against me. You think that's mean? No, it's smart.[34]"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at these asshes defending witness tampering. Stone obstructed the investigation into collusion, odc tgats a crime if u destroy evidence, bully potential witnesses. Thats more than "process crimes". Some of u are teetering on the edge of becoming non americans. Ur starting to become ok with illegal behavior that our criminal justice system has prosecuted for cebturies now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MIchael Cohen - another dirty, unscrupulous player who has been around for many, many years.

from Wikipedia:

"

Politics

Cohen volunteered for the 1988 presidential campaign of Michael Dukakis,[5] was an intern for Congressman Joe Moakley,[11] and voted for Barack Obama in 2008, though he later became disappointed with Obama.[5]

In 2003, he unsuccessfully ran as a Republican for the New York City Council from the Fourth Council District (a Manhattan district).[22] Cohen received 4,205 votes, and was defeated by Democratic candidate Eva S. Moskowitz, who received 13,745 votes.[31] In 2010, Cohen briefly campaigned for a seat in the New York State Senate.[11][32] He was a registered Democrat until he officially registered as a Republican on March 9, 2017.[33][34][non-primary source needed] On October 11, 2018, Cohen re-registered himself as a Democrat in an effort to distance "himself from the values of the current" administration.[35][36]"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so the slurs against Trump can also apply to democrats like dukakis, obamao/biden, JFK...

but right now, it's all about trying to ruin Pres Trump and reverse the election.

Sure, throw cohen, manafort and stone in the pokey if they are guilty of crap.

Trouble is, higgardly, mueller, comey, page, strzok, etc etc etc are also guilty of crap but

are escaping prosecution ...so far.

But the whole reason for the fraud "special counsel" was about russain collusion. After over two years, there is absolutely nothing.

If cohen, manafort and stone were in higgardly's camp, you would never hear their names. They would be protected.

that is the deep state privilege.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

these long time dirty scumbags have been around for decades on both sides of the aisle.

dirty scumbag obamao put dirty scumbags in charge of our FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS and DOJ.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

Look at these asshes defending witness tampering. Stone obstructed the investigation into collusion, odc tgats a crime if u destroy evidence, bully potential witnesses. Thats more than "process crimes". Some of u are teetering on the edge of becoming non americans. Ur starting to become ok with illegal behavior that our criminal justice system has prosecuted for cebturies now

They are process crimes per the definition of a process crime. I'm not defending Stone if he is guilty just saying this is more evidence that there is nothing (yet) behind the reason for the Mueller investigation of Russian collusion but people are getting caught up in process crimes due to the investigation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

They are process crimes per the definition of a process crime. I'm not defending Stone if he is guilty just saying this is more evidence that there is nothing (yet) behind the reason for the Mueller investigation of Russian collusion but people are getting caught up in process crimes due to the investigation. 

Dude, go read what he's accused of...

"In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election."

 

 

Its process alright, the process of collusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

Dude, go read what he's accused of...

"In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election."

 

 

Its process alright, the process of collusion.

Mueller makes a lot of story telling.  Everything he's charged with happened after Mueller was put in as Special Prosecutor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Mueller makes a lot of story telling.  Everything he's charged with happened after Mueller was put in as Special Prosecutor.

He was dispatched to obtain the emails from wiki leaks. If thats true, thats pretty self exolanatory. And "top official" is likely one of trumps boys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

He was dispatched to obtain the emails from wiki leaks. If thats true, thats pretty self exolanatory. And "top official" is likely one of trumps boys

I'm not sure that is even a crime if true. It might be dirty politics but news flash the Clinton campaign was chock full of dirty politics. If Stone was going to wikileaks to get dirt on Clinton how is that any different than the Clinton campaign who were dealing with a foreign spy who gave them fake information on Trump which started this whole investigation as well as being used to get FISA court warrants to spy on an American citizen. This whole thing is so one sided it is beyond belief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

I'm not sure that is even a crime if true. It might be dirty politics but news flash the Clinton campaign was chock full of dirty politics. If Stone was going to wikileaks to get dirt on Clinton how is that any different than the Clinton campaign who were dealing with a foreign spy who gave them fake information on Trump which started this whole investigation as well as being used to get FISA court warrants to spy on an American citizen. This whole thing is so one sided it is beyond belief.

Because he cant claim he didnt know it was the russians that gave wikileaks the emails. So in essence he went to the russians. If this happened after the gen election it actually makes this worse. Because then tbey cant deny outright collusion. They feigned ignirance in the beginning, "we're outsiders we didnt know". But during the gen election its documented tbet were explicitly told dont touch this shit. But it appears they did. Mueller is also investigating potential acts of collusion from 17 and 18......inconceivably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Julian Assange had 'physical proof' Russians didn't hack DNC: Rep ...

 

 
Apr 19, 2018 - So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, and 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should call this place "Denial City" and not "Political Discussion".

There is always an excuse for uncle Donny, everyone not Trump is of poor character if they turn on him,  no one wants to logically follow where Mueller is eventually taking this with the unindicted co-conspirator "Individual #1" and if none of that works let's just pretend "process crimes" are legal for everyone, don't count and cannot be used as the springboard to "real crimes". Totally laughable. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

 

Julian Assange had 'physical proof' Russians didn't hack DNC: Rep ...

 

 
 
Apr 19, 2018 - So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, and 

"Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, left a meeting with Julian Assange believing the WikiLeakspublisher had “physical proof” Russiadidn’t supply his website with leaked Democratic National Committee emails it released during the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Mr. Rohrabacher made the comment in a interview with Breitbart Radio published online Thursday in which he spoke about his August 2017 visit to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London."

So rohrvacher woild then know who it was. Tbis is all bullshit. People are straight up liars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...