Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Now It Will Get Interesting


TexasAg1969

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

I remember when you fucks on the left thought Edward Snowden was a hero. One man's whistleblower is another man's rat, especially if you uncover with some dirt about a Democrat.

WSS

why so testy steve? 

Posted
2 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

I remember when you fucks on the left thought Edward Snowden was a hero. One man's whistleblower is another man's rat, especially if you uncover with some dirt about a Democrat.

WSS

Reminds me of the old adage,  "my enemy's, enemy is my friend".

Posted
3 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

It will get interesting, but not in the way you think.

Oh I think it will get interesting for both sides of the coin, not just Trump's side.

Posted
3 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

I remember when you fucks on the left thought Edward Snowden was a hero.

WSS

Who ever thought that?

Posted

But speaking of the good old days when the Liberals just loved the whistleblowers you can probably look up an interview between Keith Olbermann and Michael Moore praising Julian Assange for being a hero. Now in the blink of an eye he's the prince of fucking Darkness.

Funny how things change Like the Wind

WSS

Posted
2 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

But speaking of the good old days when the Liberals just loved the whistleblowers you can probably look up an interview between Keith Olbermann and Michael Moore praising Julian Assange for being a hero. Now in the blink of an eye he's the prince of fucking Darkness.

Funny how things change Like the Wind

WSS

so that interview was slmost a decade ago. Wind changes are a bit more frequent right steven?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

so that interview was slmost a decade ago. Wind changes are a bit more frequent right steven?

There's a pH in there. Regardless.

Now that Julian Assange apparently did something to hurt poor little Hillary everybody hates him.

And you won't find a single post of mine saying that doesn't happen on both sides. But this is the issue at hand in this thread.

WSS

Posted

Here’s a question:

 

If you supported Barack Obama pardoning Chelsea Manning, do you also support a pardon for Julian Assange?

Posted
28 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said:

Here’s a question:

 

If you supported Barack Obama pardoning Chelsea Manning, do you also support a pardon for Julian Assange?

that depends on what comes out. I beleive manning did what he felt was right, i watched those videos he helped get out to wikileaks....they're objectively horrific.i get it, it was highly embsrrassing for the u.s....but still.

now if assange helped hack the dnc cause he wanted leverage to get him out of a rape charge....well......no. But if he's got some more interesting info like our resident tin hat suggests, then lets wait and see

Posted
56 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Tranny fag should still be in leavenworth, for life.  He was on active duty and gave away classified information.  Obumfuck let him off.  A traitor.  

Agree 100% though i won't condemn his life choice. That makes no difference to me, but what he did should not have been pardoned.

Posted

put Americans and Afghanis at risk, let to deaths of some of them, per a Republican congressman i heard on Fox News today, who used to be active military over there. The traitors had no idea what the damage is that they did.

Jul 28, 2010 - But the 75,000 documents WikiLeaks put online provide information about .... to have worked with allied forces and wanted to continue doing so. ... In another 2007 report, American troops met privately with an Afghan official, ...

WikiLeaks Reportedly Outs 100s of Afghan Informants - CBS News

 
 
Jul 28, 2010 - Hundreds of Afghan civilians who worked as informants for the U.S. military have been put at risk by WikiLeaks' publication of more than 90,000 ...
Missing: americans ‎| ‎Must include: ‎americans
Posted
15 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said:

88E67992-F696-4BA3-A15F-FFF4267B96F5.jpeg

 

well, if he helped release the names of Iraqi informants, which I didn't know.....cmon dude, that's more than just exposing some admittedly bad actions by American military personnel. 

Posted
On 4/11/2019 at 5:19 PM, calfoxwc said:

put Americans and Afghanis at risk, let to deaths of some of them, per a Republican congressman i heard on Fox News today, who used to be active military over there. The traitors had no idea what the damage is that they did.

Jul 28, 2010 - But the 75,000 documents WikiLeaks put online provide information about .... to have worked with allied forces and wanted to continue doing so. ... In another 2007 report, American troops met privately with an Afghan official, ...

WikiLeaks Reportedly Outs 100s of Afghan Informants - CBS News

 
 
 
Jul 28, 2010 - Hundreds of Afghan civilians who worked as informants for the U.S. military have been put at risk by WikiLeaks' publication of more than 90,000 ...
Missing: americans ‎| ‎Must include: ‎americans

Believe there is more to it than just these.

The original info was exposing war crimes against civilians.

Story may have been twisted or info also had side effects resulting in the above.

 

Keep in mind MSM vs Wikileaks has not been a friendly relationship - look at what we've learned about MSM's reporting the past few years.

 

 

On 4/12/2019 at 2:59 PM, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Hang this child molester.

That was a false accusation that was withdrawn by the accuser.

 

Fact is, JA used to work with LEO's exposing and taking down Pedo networks.

Once the heat started getting too close to the big dogs things took a turn against JA.

 

Kinda paints a different picture when info anti-narrative comes to light.

 

Doubt any of us will know the true story on this for quite some time if at all.

 

 

image.png.c7e82582d01cabec7b5759c0645acccf.png

 

Yes, he seems deeply concerned   .   .   .  

 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, JAFBF said:

Believe there is more to it than just these.

The original info was exposing war crimes against civilians.

Story may have been twisted or info also had side effects resulting in the above.

 

Keep in mind MSM vs Wikileaks has not been a friendly relationship - look at what we've learned about MSM's reporting the past few years.

 

 

That was a false accusation that was withdrawn by the accuser.

 

Fact is, JA used to work with LEO's exposing and taking down Pedo networks.

Once the heat started getting too close to the big dogs things took a turn against JA.

 

Kinda paints a different picture when info anti-narrative comes to light.

 

Doubt any of us will know the true story on this for quite some time if at all.

 

 

image.png.c7e82582d01cabec7b5759c0645acccf.png

 

Yes, he seems deeply concerned   .   .   .  

 

 

maybe the poopie story has merit?

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...