Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Partial radio exchange between Iran and British warship


Recommended Posts

the next step is armed escorts. The Brits should have seen this as a possibility. Good for the Brits - most all? of the crew was different other countries - was a Swedish ship running the British flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Problem is the British Navy is a joke.  Way to small.

I didn't know how badly they let their military go. That is what happens when a liberal government gets in place.

they go welfare state, cut military. Iran could go to war with them and not worry much about it.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/iran-loves-royal-navy-doesn’t-have-enough-ships-patrol-persian-gulf-67232

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_state_in_the_United_Kingdom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world

Hey dipshit, I think I know a hell of alot more than your punk ass knows about the Navy or the military.  So shut your fucking piehole.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Hey dipshit, I think I know a hell of alot more than your punk ass knows about the Navy or the military.  So shut your fucking piehole.

well go on then  De Ruyter,  tell us how the 5th strongest NUCLEAR POWERED navy in the world wont be able to deal with a flotilla of rubber dinghies coming at them? tits up for this cool story!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world CLEVISgiphy.gif?cid=790b76115d350d02662e524e32

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world

**************************************************************

   RUN FORREST, RUN !

giphy.gif?cid=790b76115d3510ce716f456d45

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://irannewsupdate.com/news/general/4782-iran-loses-its-biggest-warship-and-is-much-weaker-than-it-claims.html

 

"INU - Iran has lost its biggest warship - the 1,500 ton Damavand – in the Caspian Sea.

The ship ran aground on rocks in January, after attempting to enter a harbour during bad weather. Iran initially tried to downplay the incident, but it soon became clear that the wreck was unsalvageable, leaving Iran with only one large surface warship in its enti"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gulf Tanker Seizure: Senior UK Politician Says Britain Did Not Take Up US Offer of Assets

A senior British Conservative Party lawmaker said Sunday he understood that the United States had offered the use of its assets to protect British shipping in the Persian Gulf, but the offer had not been taken up.

https://www.cnsnews.com/video/gulf-tanker-seizure-senior-uk-politician-says-britain-did-not-take-us-offer-assets

They have had what two tankers now seized by Iran? but guess they didn't want any help from the Trump administration..Oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

I actually like that they didn’t take us up on it. We have people already beating the drum to go to war with Iran. If an Iranian sent a strongly worded email, we would be destabilizing another Middle Eastern dump.

You have to respond to a bully. Trump showed good restraint in calling off an attack on Iran when he found out the estimated deaths of Iranians would be over 100 and that that was an over reaction response to their shooting down a drone of ours. Instead he went with more sanctions. How England handles the seizures of their tankers by Iran is their business but I doubt if they just sit back and take it. Let's remember too It is Iran that is pushing the envelope and being the aggressor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

You have to respond to a bully. Trump showed good restraint in calling off an attack on Iran when he found out the estimated deaths of Iranians would be over 100 and that that was an over reaction response to their shooting down a drone of ours. Instead he went with more sanctions. How England handles the seizures of their tankers by Iran is their business but I doubt if they just sit back and take it. Let's remember too It is Iran that is pushing the envelope and being the aggressor.

So what acronym are we going to use for the terror org that fills the Tehran power vacuum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

So what acronym are we going to use for the terror org that fills the Tehran power vacuum?

If you want to fight a war and do some nation building like we have tried in Iraq and Afghanistan that might apply but there are other ways to punish Iran and not going for regime change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OldBrownsFan said:

If you want to fight a war and do some nation building like we have tried in Iraq and Afghanistan that might apply but there are other ways to punish Iran and not going for regime change.

We seem to be incapable of not totally botching punishing ME countries. We didn’t put boots on the ground and still found a way to turn Libya into a complete disaster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

We seem to be incapable of not totally botching punishing ME countries. We didn’t put boots on the ground and still found a way to turn Libya into a complete disaster. 

those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

something like that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

something like that.

That is how Israel does it and they have lots of experience dealing with terrorism. In Libya we really didn't have any business getting involved and hindsight being 20/20 Libya was better off with the dictator anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, calfoxwc said:

those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

something like that.

Overthrowing the dickheads that were in charge didn’t make us any safer. Instead of terrorists focusing on the dictators (i.e. Assad) they were left with lots of territory to control and only the West to think about. I would rather they stay in perpetual conflict in their shitty sandbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

Overthrowing the dickheads that were in charge didn’t make us any safer. Instead of terrorists focusing on the dictators (i.e. Assad) they were left with lots of territory to control and only the West to think about. I would rather they stay in perpetual conflict in their shitty sandbox.

Northern Iran:

 

Image result for IRAN BEAUTIFUL PLACES PICS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Clevfan4life said:

wheres my strategic analysis of the uk's navy vs irans?

You shoulda stopped while you were never ahead, otherwise I wouldn't have bothered to embarrass you again.

You sourced a link that ranked Great Britain 5th.

I sourced two links. Neither rank GB in the top 10...the 1st link GB is ranked 32nd LOL.

Iran blows GB away,  both consistent in ranking Iran 4th.

https://www.globalfirepower.com/navy-ships.asp

https://www.businessinsider.com/biggest-navies-in-the-world-2018-4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Gorka said:

Look up. ^^^ You might want to check the post right above this one.

Dig into the numbers supplied by that site. They count a patrol boat the same as you would an aircraft carrier.

Iran has zero aircraft carriers, zero destroyers, 88 patrol boats, and a ton of auxiliary and amphibious vehicles that make up the bulk of the 398. The site also said it doesn’t account for technology level. I don’t think the Brits would be concerned.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...