calfoxwc Posted August 6, 2019 Report Share Posted August 6, 2019 no, she said it crassly, but forced to resign over saying stuff the left doesn't like? that is typical corrupt left. Basically, the left is fine with obamao's "bring a gun to a knife fight" and "The Boston police acted stupidly", etc etc. and blaming violence by crazies on the NRA, and all Americans who own guns. that is just fine with the left. They won't say a word about how obaMao phrased things. And no associate of Pres Trump's went and bombed police buildings like ObaMao's friend did. Yep, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernardine_Dohrn but let Pres Trump tweet anything, and that is "unpresidential". while obaMao denied knowing his pastor of many years was a hard core leftist America hating radical. (remember, obaMao's political career started in Bill Ayers' father's house in Chicago) and jblu - "blood on the hands of voters..who voted for him the SECOND TIME" is the point. Voting for higgardy after Benghazi is the point. Read the link about obamao's policy. and yes, don't forget that many liberal school systems would still abide by that obamao leniency policy regardless of when Pres Trump had it ended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 6, 2019 Report Share Posted August 6, 2019 furthermore - undermining morality in our schools, especially taking God out of our schools, etc.... and advocating perversion etc... is teaching some kids that they are in charge of the world, that there is no right or wrong - except for what the kid decides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted August 6, 2019 Report Share Posted August 6, 2019 "and jblu - "blood on the hands of voters..who voted for him the SECOND TIME" is the point." Because I posted that both sides should tone down the rhetoric and we shouldn't be blaming other people for the actions of another Jbluhm took the quote above and (in essence) demanded I denounce what you said. I was being a hypocrite if I didn't. First of all I am speaking generally not some ironclad rule that you cannot make that connection between one person's rhetoric being the cause of someone else's actions . I am saying it can be a slippery slope argument that takes away free speech rights. If a valid connection can be made that is another thing. Trump using the word invasion to describe what is happening at the border is not hate speech nor inciting anyone to violence but in fact an accurate description of what is happening on the border. To say by using the word invasion (no matter how many times he says it) and that the shooter in El Paso used the word invasion in his manifesto and now making Trump guilty of inciting the shooter to do what he did is a just politics of trying to blame Trump for everything which the left constantly do. Jbluhm was taking one statement you made and demanding I denounce it when I knew nothing of all the facts. In fact you have laid out the case in detail for what you said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 6, 2019 Report Share Posted August 6, 2019 yep. Jblu shows up when he thinks he has a "gotcha" and then goes away again til next time. They spewed out in glee over the texas murderer and "white supremist" and relating it to Pres Trump. but the dayton murderer was a hardcore bernie sanders/socialist supporting dem. THEN, their attitude changes. along with their emotional flippity-flippity. A LOT of folks believed obaMao might very well bring us past racism, etc. He did the opposite with a vengence. He said Marriage was between a man and a woman, then went the opposite with a vengence. He said "if you like your hc, you can keep it..." which admitted by them to be an intentional necessary LIE. The left wouldn't admit or comment on any of those. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted August 6, 2019 Report Share Posted August 6, 2019 One of the things the left constantly hammer Trump for is being "divisive". I think I would be safe to say that gay marriage was a controversial issue when the Supreme court narrowly ruled it the law of the land in a 5-4 vote. If that case were before the Supreme Court today with Kennedy retired and Kavanaugh taking his place that decision could have easily went 5-4 the other way. So what did Obama do after the Supreme court ruled narrowly in favor of gay marriage? A controversial and divisive issue. One that millions of Americans do not support. Obama's idea of being a uniter and not a divider was to light up the White house in rainbow colors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted August 6, 2019 Report Share Posted August 6, 2019 yep ! glad you brought that up. That was "in your FACE, Real America !!! We got a huge political victory" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.