Guest mz. Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 This is very, very strange. Does anyone have any explanation, as I cannot come up with one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titleist585 Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 This is very, very strange. Does anyone have any explanation, as I cannot come up with one. Some have said it may have something to do with the fact he is scheduled to be on Shaq's ABC Reality show (as I'm sure you know ABC owns ESPN). Also, he was featured on the ESPYs as well (which I didn't watch so I'm not sure if it's true). I don't know if that's why but I agree it's awfully strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 I thought of the ESPY connection, but that was in the past, so I doubt it was much pf a factor, if at all. The future Shaq-show-on-ABC-featuring-Ben connection feels exactly right. Filthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegasdogg Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 They should cover the story - if it were somebody not appearing on their ABC show with Shaq, they'd have already had lead in stories. But I will say this - and I rarely pull this card - if he were black? Forget about it. All over the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samoth Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Exact same thing happend with Isiah Thomas last year and they turned it into a major story so race probably plays a role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riffer X Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Exact same thing happend with Isiah Thomas last year and they turned it into a major story so race probably plays a role. Yeah but Zeke was always a little shithead who had the masses fooled that he was some sort of class act. His antics finally caught up to him. Ben doesn't really have a track record yet of being a toolbox is all I can guess. I don't think race has that much to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mz. Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Here's ESPN's explanation, fellas... ESPN explains position on Roethlis.berger Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on July 22, 2009 10:48 PM ET Wednesday night, we noted that ESPN has finally decided to start covering the Ben Roeth.lisberger civil case. Now the network wants to explain their decision. ESPN spokesman Bill Hofheimer sent PFT a statement Wednesday night detailing the network's position. "Based on the sensitive nature of the story and other factors we mentioned, we initially exercised caution and did not report it," the statement reads. "Since then, we've been observing how the story has progressed, monitoring other news outlets, and doing our own reporting. We decided to report the story tonight." The hot button issue has inspired more than 850 comments in less than three hours on ESPN's AP article about Roethlis.berger, most of which aren't worldwide leader friendly. The network says they aren't just caving to public pressure, but made the decision because they feel "it is the right thing to do." We wondered earlier what changed Wednesday night and Hofheimer has an answer. "It is not one specific thing. The criminal news today is part of the ongoing evolution of the story we've been monitoring. We will lead our reports tonight about this with that news, that there will be no criminal investigation into the allegations." In a PFT first, our fearless leader Mr. Florio requested to be quoted with his response. From a Green Day concert. "They are twisting the facts," Florio writes. "The story is not that there will be no investigation. Its that there won't be one absent a criminal complaint" via here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 The police are waiting on Linda Tripp to produce the dress. Who knows maybe Art Rooney's sons the ones that own the casinos have some input on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 "They are twisting the facts," Florio writes. "The story is not that there will be no investigation. Its that there won't be one absent a criminal complaint" Make a note of this for all women!!!! Even though i 'dislike'; steeler 'nation' DNA is a bonus when trying to convince a jury. The photo's shown of this gal are not that great, i hope that does not influence our opinions.(She sounds like a wack job though) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medicineman Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 As A life long Browns fan I must say GUILTY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosar_For_President Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 Because they are dealing with the Erin Andrews naked peep hole video. Hot... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns2405 Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Because they are dealing with the Erin Andrews naked peep hole video. Hot... Call me a perv but where is the damn link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.