Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Barr announces sweeping new sanctions, 'significant escalation' against left-wing sanctuary cities


Vambo

Recommended Posts

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-announces-new-sanctuary-policies

Charging that so-called "sanctuary" cities that protect illegal immigrants are jeopardizing domestic security, Attorney General Bill Barr announced a slew of additional sanctions that he called a "significant escalation" against left-wing local and state governments that obstruct the "lawful functioning of our nation's immigration system."

Speaking at the National Sheriff’s Association 2020 Winter Legislative and Technology Conference in Washington, D.C., Barr said the Justice Department would immediately file multiple lawsuits against sanctuary jurisdictions for unconstitutionally interfering with federal immigration enforcement, and implement unprecedented national reviews of left-wing sanctuary governments and prosecutors.

"Let us state the reality upfront and as clearly as possible," Barr began. "When we are talking about sanctuary cities, we are talking about policies that are designed to allow criminal aliens to escape. These policies are not about people who came to our country illegally but have otherwise been peaceful and productive members of society.  Their express purpose is to shelter aliens whom local law enforcement has already arrested for other crimes.  This is neither lawful nor sensible."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

If the locals vote in these politicians, it appears they want to live in a sanctuary city. That said, the feds can yank their funding like they threatened some states with doing with federal highway money if they didn’t comply with the 21 year old drinking age.

Exactly.

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

If the locals vote in these politicians, it appears they want to live in a sanctuary city. That said, the feds can yank their funding like they threatened some states with doing with federal highway money if they didn’t comply with the 21 year old drinking age.

except they went to a federal judge to stop the gov from stopping funding them. same thing with the satanic planned infanticide cult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

When did that happen with a fed judge stopping a cut off of fed funding to cities over sanctuary status? Legitimately asking.

 

A federal judge has permanently blocked President Trump’s efforts to bar cities that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration forces from receiving funding, the most decisive blow yet to the White House’s efforts to crack down on so-called sanctuary cities.

In a ruling issued Monday, U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick ruled Trump’s January executive order seeking to cut off sanctuary cities from federal funding unconstitutional. The same judge put a hold on the executive order in April.

https://thinkprogress.org/sanctuary-cities-permanent-ruling-d8a5ebe03d89/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep. never.....married.....he's 66?...

ObaMao commie appointee

....William Orrick III
Judge William H. Orrick, III.jpg
 
Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Assumed office
May 16, 2013
Appointed by Barack Obama
Preceded by Charles R. Breyer
Personal details
Born
William Horsley Orrick III

May 15, 1953 (age 66)
San Francisco, California, U.S.
Father William H. Orrick Jr.
Relatives Howard Christian Naffziger (grandfather)
Andrew Downey Orrick (uncle)
Education

Yale University (B.A.)
Boston College Law School (J

"

Notable cases

"On July 31, 2015, Orrick blocked the release of videos of Planned Parenthood, granting the injunction requested by the National Abortion Federation.[10]"

"On April 25, 2017, Orrick stayed the implementation of the Trump administration's Executive Order 13768 to withhold funding from sanctuary cities that limit cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement authorities, saying Trump had no authority to attach new conditions to federal spending.[13][14]"

"On June 9, 2017, during a segment of Tucker Carlson Tonight,[17]David Daleiden alleged that Judge Orrick had lied about his close association with a Planned Parenthood group during his 2013 U.S. Senate confirmation hearing."

****************************************************

Apparently? he's gay, an ObaMao- commie hack, and a liar, and is corrupt, should have recused himself.

the left knows who to go to judge wise for an automatic ruling that they want.

ObaMao PUT THEM THERE, all over our gov.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldBrownsFan said:

 

A federal judge has permanently blocked President Trump’s efforts to bar cities that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration forces from receiving funding, the most decisive blow yet to the White House’s efforts to crack down on so-called sanctuary cities.

In a ruling issued Monday, U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick ruled Trump’s January executive order seeking to cut off sanctuary cities from federal funding unconstitutional. The same judge put a hold on the executive order in April.

https://thinkprogress.org/sanctuary-cities-permanent-ruling-d8a5ebe03d89/

I guess that was ultimately overturned.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/us/sanctuary-cities-ruling.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

Lindsey Graham is queerer than a football bat and that doesn’t auto make him a liberal. 

so what? he wasn't appointed by obaMao commie either, as a judge.

and Graham isn't a judge.

It's about a judge making Presidential systems.

Not a gay senator.

a judge, that is the subject.

not a congressman.

a judge who was  appointed judge by obaMao commie.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

so what? he wasn't appointed by obaMao commie either, as a judge.

and Graham isn't a judge.

It's about a judge making Presidential systems.

Not a gay senator.

a judge, that is the subject.

not a congressman.

a judge who was  appointed judge by obaMao commie.

 

The point I was making is what does that guy being gay have to do with anything? Lindsey Graham is gayer than Elton John and Liberace sharing a spaghetti noodle Lady and the Tramp style but that doesn’t seem to influence his politics. 
 

His being appointed by Obama would have infinitely more bearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

The point I was making is what does that guy being gay have to do with anything? Lindsey Graham is gayer than Elton John and Liberace sharing a spaghetti noodle Lady and the Tramp style but that doesn’t seem to influence his politics. 
 

His being appointed by Obama would have infinitely more bearing.

Because sometimes the -isms and -phobias creep out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

The point I was making is what does that guy being gay have to do with anything? Lindsey Graham is gayer than Elton John and Liberace sharing a spaghetti noodle Lady and the Tramp style but that doesn’t seem to influence his politics. 
 

His being appointed by Obama would have infinitely more bearing.

gay marriage ring a bell? gay rights ring a bell? leftwing gay judges will always? rule in favor of the left -

not according to our Constitution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

So gays are just one giant hive mind? 

in terms of overall judges? who knows?

but the left knows who to go to. Look at their record - they shop easily for an agreeable hack for their cause, and they get it. again and again and again and....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

Because I am not seeing what this guy being gay has to do with anything. He was an Obama appointee which would have something to do with it. Graham eats pecker like he is at the Nathan’s Hotdog eating contest and that guy is conservative. 

Is that knowledge from personal experience?  How would you know that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

Because I am not seeing what this guy being gay has to do with anything. He was an Obama appointee which would have something to do with it. Graham eats pecker like he is at the Nathan’s Hotdog eating contest and that guy is conservative. 

When A Gay Judge Rules On Gay Rights : NPR

https://www.npr.org/2011/06/13/137109321/when-a-gay-judge-rules-on-gay-rights

Jun 13, 2011 · When A Gay Judge Rules On Gay Rights Opponents of gay marriage are challenging notions of judicial neutrality in a San Francisco courtroom on Monday. They're arguing that a federal judge …

gay judge deciding liberal matters? like gay marriage? prop 8 in california? they are predisposed to judge for their inherent bias.

the glaring need to recuse themselves is all for the public to see. Especially when their explanation doesn't have any legit reference to our Constitution/Bill of Rights.

Graham is NOT A JUDGE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

When A Gay Judge Rules On Gay Rights : NPR

https://www.npr.org/2011/06/13/137109321/when-a-gay-judge-rules-on-gay-rights

Jun 13, 2011 · When A Gay Judge Rules On Gay Rights Opponents of gay marriage are challenging notions of judicial neutrality in a San Francisco courtroom on Monday. They're arguing that a federal judge …

gay judge deciding liberal matters? like gay marriage? prop 8 in california? they are predisposed to judge for their inherent bias.

the glaring need to recuse themselves is all for the public to see. Especially when their explanation doesn't have any legit reference to our Constitution/Bill of Rights.

Graham is NOT A JUDGE.

Should a straight judge be ruling on issues related to straight marriages/divorces? This seems like a silly point. Even if, it was a gay straight guy ruling on an immigration issue so why would it matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

in terms of overall judges? who knows?

but the left knows who to go to. Look at their record - they shop easily for an agreeable hack for their cause, and they get it. again and again and again and....

The funniest part about the post above is the idea that only the left does this, bit not the right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

The funniest part about the post above is the idea that only the left does this, bit not the right

the stupidest part of your post, as nearly always, is your complete ignorance of knowing how to analyze issues.

You FEEL issues like an amoeba. that only slithers on wood. like a slimey woodypeckerhead.

if a judge is gay, and is afraid of the secret getting out, that judge is obviously (except to you, of course, and Tiam too) apt to be manipulated against his own judgement, by threats from the deep state to out him. So, that gay judge would "decide" based on not wanting to be outed.

   A normal heterosexual judge - doesn't have to worry about being outed. LOL it's really odd to have to explain that to a birdbrain, but it is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...