cccjwh Posted June 18, 2020 Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 Basically they didn't following the correct steps and procedures when trying to end DACA. So they are too stupid to end DACA. So much winning... https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-rules-against-trump-administration-attempt-to-end-daca-a-win-for-undocumented-immigrants-brought-to-us-as-children/2020/06/18/4f0b6c74-b163-11ea-8758-bfd1d045525a_story.html “We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies,” Roberts wrote. He added: “We address only whether the [Department of Homeland Security] complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients. That dual failure raises doubts about whether the agency appreciated the scope of its discretion or exercised that discretion in a reasonable manner.” Nearly 800,000 people over the years have participated in the program, which provides a chance for enrollees to work legally in the United States as long as they follow the rules and have a clean record. https://thehill.com/regulation/503356-supreme-court-blocks-trump-plan-to-end-daca-program Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted June 18, 2020 Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 Doesn’t that mean it was illegal in the first place? Of course the Obammy nuthuggers would disagree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted June 18, 2020 Author Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 11 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said: Doesn’t that mean it was illegal in the first place? Of course the Obammy nuthuggers would disagree. I doubt that it was legal, but we won't know any time soon now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted June 18, 2020 Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 On Deck ? Guy has a pretty good record on his predictions. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted June 18, 2020 Report Share Posted June 18, 2020 Thank you Benedict Roberts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted June 19, 2020 Report Share Posted June 19, 2020 Donald J. Trump d1tS9sp oginshorersaodm · The recent Supreme Court decisions, not only on DACA, Sanctuary Cities, Census, and others, tell you only one thing, we need NEW JUSTICES of the Supreme Court. If the Radical Left Democrats assume power, your Second Amendment, Right to Life, Secure Borders, and Religious Liberty, among many other things, are OVER and GONE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted June 19, 2020 Report Share Posted June 19, 2020 5 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: Donald J. Trump d1tS9sp oginshorersaodm · The recent Supreme Court decisions, not only on DACA, Sanctuary Cities, Census, and others, tell you only one thing, we need NEW JUSTICES of the Supreme Court. If the Radical Left Democrats assume power, your Second Amendment, Right to Life, Secure Borders, and Religious Liberty, among many other things, are OVER and GONE! My, my- the hysteria... Too bad you can't fire those pesky justices Donald.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted June 19, 2020 Report Share Posted June 19, 2020 4 hours ago, hoorta said: My, my- the hysteria... Too bad you can't fire those pesky justices Donald.... Three more coming I believe . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted June 20, 2020 Report Share Posted June 20, 2020 10 hours ago, JAFBF said: Three more coming I believe . . . True, assuming he gets reelected. Ginzberg doesn't have another four years left in her for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.