Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Bloomberg pours $16M into Florida race to pay restitution for former felons to vote


Vambo

Recommended Posts

BLM should be focused on helping their community learn to raise their children properly so they grow up to be productive members of society instead of criminals...…

but what do I know?  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

Not only Bloomberg but LeBron James had some other left-wing liberal million and billionaires. Sounds Shady to me and I hope that it's illegal. Who knows.

https://nypost.com/2020/09/23/rep-gaetz-bloomberg-may-face-criminal-probe-for-paying-felons-fines/

I realize what the ultimate goal is, but as long as you're not straight up saying "you need to vote Dem" I'm not sure what the issue is.

Hell, the rule regarding fines and what not was probably pushed by the right for the exact opposite reason. To suppress left leaning votes.

This is just the left getting around that to bring back voters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

I realize what the ultimate goal is, but as long as you're not straight up saying "you need to vote Dem" I'm not sure what the issue is.

Hell, the rule regarding fines and what not was probably pushed by the right for the exact opposite reason. To suppress left leaning votes.

This is just the left getting around that to bring back voters. 

Of course it is. Voters that just happen to be the scum of the earth violent criminals rapists Etc who would naturally vote for Democrats. Birds of a feather, you know.

For instance if my goal was to see more family pets small children and adults human beings mauled or killed then I would naturally want to release as many pit bulls into the streets as I could. Not border collies.

WSS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

Of course it is. Voters that just happen to be the scum of the earth violent criminals rapists Etc who would naturally vote for Democrats. Birds of a feather, you know.

For instance if my goal was to see more family pets small children and adults human beings mauled or killed then I would naturally want to release as many pit bulls into the streets as I could. Not border collies.

WSS

 

So true.  I mean, the country needs to start considering rapists, murders, and other felons as the real victims in society.  It should be taught K-12...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are the people that preach equality and inclusion....no white felons?  Gee, I wonder why?  This is not a ringing endorsement of Republicans, by any means, but goddam Democrats are so blatantly trying to use minorities as human shields for everything. 

Sadly, from a historical context, minorities are going to be linked to every terrible policy these people aim for.  It's equally sad, however, that minorities continue to fall for this shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, htownbrown said:

These are the people that preach equality and inclusion....no white felons?  Gee, I wonder why?  This is not a ringing endorsement of Republicans, by any means, but goddam Democrats are so blatantly trying to use minorities as human shields for everything. 

Sadly, from a historical context, minorities are going to be linked to every terrible policy these people aim for.  It's equally sad, however, that minorities continue to fall for this shit.

One side trying to suppress their vote

One side taking the vote for granted and using it as a shield like you said

 

Sounds like we need a third party

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

One side trying to suppress their vote

One side taking the vote for granted and using it as a shield like you said

 

Sounds like we need a third party

 

I'm fine with a 3rd party, but is likely to be socialist Bernie nonsense.  No thanks.

Not sure having an ID and having to walk our lazy asses to the booth qualifies as suppressive.  Nor that it's applied by race.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, htownbrown said:

I'm fine with a 3rd party, but is likely to be socialist Bernie nonsense.  No thanks.

Not sure having an ID and having to walk our lazy asses to the booth qualifies as suppressive.  Nor that it's applied by race.

Unfortunately there's just more to it than that with very clear intentions. Of course the law isn't going to say "black people can't vote", but it is going to be something that effects democratic voting blocks more than republican. It's like gerrymandering but for the process of voting. It's shady shit. It's obvious what's going on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, htownbrown said:

I'm speaking from my perspective.  I'm not voting for that shit.

The OG Dems would shift more right and become the middle party 

A party with conservative financial views but one that doesn't have social views stuck in the 1950s. 

It would resonate with a lot of people

 

 

They might even get some of the "Biden Republicans" that are more moderate as well as the rest of the Rep party moves further right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

It's like gerrymandering but for the process of voting.

Expand please, this is the only part I'm interested in.  It means very little without real context.

The states decide how you register to vote.

https://www.ohiosos.gov/elections/voters/voter-eligibility-residency-reqs/

Show me where it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, htownbrown said:

Expand please, this is the only part I'm interested in.  It means very little without real context.

The states decide how you register to vote.

https://www.ohiosos.gov/elections/voters/voter-eligibility-residency-reqs/

Show me where it is.

A politically motivated, underhanded, but legal means to undermine the results of an election to benefit one party in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

A politically motivated, underhanded, but legal means to undermine the results of an election to benefit one party in particular.

I'm looking for specifics.  I guess we'll try this another way, are you talking about "purging the rolls"?  And if you are, show me the data.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...