The Gipper Posted January 27, 2021 Report Share Posted January 27, 2021 https://sports.yahoo.com/ranking-us-cities-host-2026-153758168.html Below we rank the 17 venues vying for the 10 host stadium spots in the U.S., and share our thoughts on who we think deserves to have 2026 World Cup games. Ranking potential 2026 World Cup venues Host cities 1. New York/New Jersey 2. Los Angeles (Rose Bowl Stadium or new Inglewood NFL stadium) 3. Washington, D.C. 4. Miami 5. Seattle 6. Atlanta 7. San Francisco/Bay Area 8. Dallas 9. Boston 10. Denver Missing out 11. Philadelphia 12. Kansas City 13. Houston 14. Nashville 15. Orlando 16. Baltimore 17. Cincinnati Analysis The first six cities on this list pick themselves. New York, LA, Washington D.C., Miami and Seattle are all cities entrenched with rich soccer culture and they are spread in all four corners of the U.S. But then it starts to get tricky, Atlanta has jumped to the top of the list due to the success of Atlanta United in MLS, while logistically it makes sense to have games in the Bay Area, Dallas and Denver to link up the west coast and midwest respectively, while Boston’s rich sporting heritage has to be factored in. The likes of Baltimore, Cincinnati and Nashville seem like outsiders and even Orlando can be put in that category as Miami will likely get the nod in Florida. So that leaves Houston, Philly and Kansas City as the three cities who could be interchangeable with Denver, Dallas and Boston, depending on how their site visits shake out. Remember: the location of venues as well as transport, hotels and other local infrastructure all plays a big part in picking host cities. Tens of thousands of extra fans will flock to the city where the game is being played without tickets just to be there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.