Vambo Posted February 2 Report Share Posted February 2 Judge announces Trump Jan. 6 trial in DC delayed indefinitely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 the jerk offs are panicking now .. they have Braggs NY procedural case to lead off this cavalcade of injustices done to one DJT. ANd a weak one at that - not exactly an image win (bidens campaign optics) considering the whole world knows that a New York City version of "jury of your peers" already hates Trump. And biden needs a BOOM to start with - aint gonna get one. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 They knew from the start and the only reason they got as far as they did was because of corruption. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 ~ Was there ever any doubt ? Super Tuesday ? ..... The trial was set to begin on March 4 — a day before the critical Super Tuesday primary contests, when Alabama, Alaska, American Samoa, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Vermont vote to select a GOP nominee. Washington, D.C., federal Judge Tanya Chutkan on Friday formally vacated the March 4 trial date, saying the court will "set a new schedule if and when the mandate is returned." ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 Yet no comments from our resident Biden Nut Swingers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 They're working on a way to twist it, post graphs, change the subject or woodys favorite, call us white supremacist claim he knows our response and reportedly tell us he's not posting again all the while not actually saying anything at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 What is it that you moron think happened? Cheetos is appealing on the grounds he thinks he is above the law. The case can't proceed until the appeal is completed. What stupidity are you moron falling for now? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 talk about moron (s) ^^^ when it was Jack off smith who asked the SCOTUS for a ruling ... WHY? because it was due to bad case prep by Smith - who had to know either way that DJT's rights were being violated.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 Just now, FairHooker11 said: talk about moron (s) ^^^ when it was Jack off smith who asked the SCOTUS for a ruling ... WHY? because it was due to bad case prep by Smith - who had to know either way that DJT's rights were being violated.... You mean Smith wanted to avoid the delaying the trial? No shit, prostitute. WTF are you talking about. Cheetos is the one that asked for the appeal on immunity. The appeal has NOTHING to do Cheetos's rights. He thinks he is above the law; appeal court has to rule on it. Then Cheetos will appeal to SCOUS. He needs to delay until after the election, because he knows he is guilty AF. A federal appeals court is considering Trump’s claim of presidential immunity from prosecution for his actions in office. A ruling from that court is expected, and the Supreme Court may eventually review the issue. - OP links Do you guys even read the links? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 this affects the biden campaign strategy TIMING cant get a verdict if you cant get the trials started and you have little to no steam left for this projection into their election interference when the sentiment for trial follies fatigue is already falling on Trumps side as far as the voters see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 1 minute ago, cccjwh said: You mean Smith wanted to avoid the delaying the trial? No shit, prostitute. WTF are you talking about. Cheetos is the one that asked for the appeal on immunity. The appeal has NOTHING to do Cheetos's rights. He thinks he is above the law; appeal court has to rule on it. Then Cheetos will appeal to SCOUS. He needs to delay until after the election, because he knows he is guilty AF. A federal appeals court is considering Trump’s claim of presidential immunity from prosecution for his actions in office. A ruling from that court is expected, and the Supreme Court may eventually review the issue. - OP links Do you guys even read the links? im sorry you cant read The delay comes after Smith in December asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether Trump can be prosecuted on charges relating to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 1 minute ago, FairHooker11 said: im sorry you cant read The delay comes after Smith in December asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether Trump can be prosecuted on charges relating to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Yes, he asked the SCOTUS to rule the immunity appeal so Cheetos could not delay the trial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 cccp back pedaling 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 So now, it comes out, that fani, and the corrupt nutjobs in NY, and dc.... all had contact with the wh about these fake prosecutions. that is how corrupt it all is. Oh, and Pres Trump was NEVER convicted of rape. Just fake sexual assault charges, with Zero evidence after dozens of years, with a hostile partisan judge etc etc etc etc. that 86 million will be tossed out, or dramatically reduced. It's a farce. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted February 3 Report Share Posted February 3 2 hours ago, calfoxwc said: So now, it comes out, that fani, and the corrupt nutjobs in NY, and dc.... all had contact with the wh about these fake prosecutions. that is how corrupt it all is. Oh, and Pres Trump was NEVER convicted of rape. Just fake sexual assault charges, with Zero evidence after dozens of years, with a hostile partisan judge etc etc etc etc. that 86 million will be tossed out, or dramatically reduced. It's a farce. It was all a farce from the very start.. President Trump might be the one getting "reparations" as it were... Ironic and comical to say the least... These "very smart people" as Trump calls them (his detractors).. Eventually out smart themselves... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 5 hours ago, calfoxwc said: So now, it comes out, that fani, and the corrupt nutjobs in NY, and dc.... all had contact with the wh about these fake prosecutions. that is how corrupt it all is. Oh, and Pres Trump was NEVER convicted of rape. Just fake sexual assault charges, with Zero evidence after dozens of years, with a hostile partisan judge etc etc etc etc. that 86 million will be tossed out, or dramatically reduced. It's a farce. 20+ women say different. Not that you care. The group is focused on a living leader to whom members seem to display excessively zealous, unquestioning commitment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 to whatever ccc spewed: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 I expected the SC to not take the case. Because the case is so stupid, but maybe they will want to make it clean to want-to-be-dictators. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vambo Posted February 6 Author Report Share Posted February 6 On 2/3/2024 at 7:28 PM, cccjwh said: 20+ women say different. Not that you care. The group is focused on a living leader to whom members seem to display excessively zealous, unquestioning commitment. All the Women Who Have Spoken Out Against Joe Biden Every Joe Biden Allegation & Accusation From Women (thecut.com) Below, here’s a running list of the allegations against Biden. Lucy Flores On March 29, in the aforementioned essay published on the Cut, former Nevada lieutenant governor nominee Lucy Flores alleged that Biden smelled her hair and gave her “a big slow kiss” on the back of her head at an event for her 2014 campaign. In that moment, she wrote, she felt “embarrassed” and “shocked.” “I wanted nothing more than to get Biden away from me,” she continued. In response to the essay, Biden claimed that he had no memory of having “acted inappropriately,” but added that if he was in the wrong, he would “listen respectfully.” Amy Lappos When Amy Lappos was a congressional aide for U.S. representative Jim Himes in 2009, she claims that Biden touched and rubbed his nose against hers during a political fund-raiser. “It wasn’t sexual, but he did grab me by the head,” she told Hartford Courant on April 1. “He put his hand around my neck and pulled me in to rub noses with me. When he was pulling me in, I thought he was going to kiss me on the mouth.” After the incident, Lappos didn’t file a formal complaint. “He was the vice president,” she told the Courant. “I was a nobody.” D.J. Hill D.J. Hill was one of two women to come forward with allegations in the New York Times, which referred to Biden’s conduct as “tactile politics” in a report published on April 2. At a 2012 at a fundraising event in Minneapolis, Hill alleges that Biden rested his hand on her shoulder, and then started to move it down her back, which left her feeling “very uncomfortable.” “Only he knows his intent,” she told the Times, adding, “If something makes you feel uncomfortable, you have to feel able to say it.” Caitlyn Caruso In the same Times report, a woman named Caitlyn Caruso claimed that after sharing the story of her sexual assault at a University of Nevada event in 2016, Biden hugged her “just a little bit too long” and laid his hand on her thigh. “It doesn’t even really cross your mind that such a person would dare perpetuate harm like that,” she told the Times. “These are supposed to be people you can trust.” Ally Coll On April 3, Ally Coll told the Washington Post that at a 2008 reception, Biden squeezed her shoulders, complimented her smile, and held her “for a beat too long.” A young Democratic staffer at the time, Coll said her initial reaction was to shrug it off. But she told the Post she now feels the alleged incident was inappropriate, adding, “There’s been a lack of understanding about the way that power can turn something that might seem innocuous into something that can make somebody feel uncomfortable.” Sofie Karasek In 2016, Sofie Karasek was photographed holding hands and touching foreheads with Biden at the Oscars, where she stood alongside 50 other sexual-assault survivors during Lady Gaga’s performance. It was a moment that soon went viral, and was described then by the Post as “powerful.” But in the Post’s report published this week, Karasek says she believes that Biden violated her personal space. She also told the Post that she wasn’t impressed with Biden’s two-minute-long video response to the growing unwanted-touching allegations against him — in which he never says he’s sorry — as he “didn’t take ownership in the way that he needs to.” “He emphasized that he wants to connect with people and, of course, that’s important,” she told the publication. “But again, all of our interactions and friendships are a two-way street … Too often it doesn’t matter how the woman feels about it or they just assume that they’re fine with it.” Vail Kohnert-Yount In the same Post report, Vail Kohnert-Yount alleged that when she was a White House intern in the spring of 2013, Biden “put his hand on the back of [her] head and pressed his forehead to [her] forehead” when he introduced himself, and that he called her a “pretty girl.” She was “so shocked,” she said, “that it was hard to focus on what he was saying.” Though she told the Post that she doesn’t believe Biden’s conduct constituted sexual misconduct, she described it as “the kind of inappropriate behavior that makes many women feel uncomfortable and unequal in the workplace.” Alexandra Tara Reade Alexandra Tara Reade told the Union that Biden touched her several times when she worked in his U.S. Senate office in 1993. The incidents, in which she said Biden would “put his hand on my shoulder and run his finger up my neck,” allegedly occurred when she was in her mid-20s. Reade told the Union that her responsibilities at work were reduced after she refused to serve drinks at an event — a task she believes she was assigned because Biden liked her legs. Reade reportedly spoke to U.S. Senate personnel about what was going on, and Biden’s office allegedly found out. She left his office two months later, after only nine months on the job. Reade told the Union that she didn’t feel sexualized by the way she’d been treated, instead saying she felt ornamental, like a lamp: “It’s pretty. Set it over there. Then when it’s too bright, you throw it away.” In March 2020, Reade expanded on her account, telling the podcaster Katie Halper that Biden sexually assaulted her in the spring of 1993. Reade reiterated her story in interviews with the New York Times the following month, telling the paper that — when she dropped off a gym bag with him one day — he pushed her up against a wall and started kissing her neck, before sliding his hand up her shirt and ultimately up her skirt. “It happened at once. He’s talking to me and his hands are everywhere and everything is happening very quickly,” she recalled. “He was kissing me and he said, very low, ‘Do you want to go somewhere else?’” Reade said Biden penetrated her with his fingers before she was able to pull away. When she did, she says he appeared confused. “He looked at me kind of almost puzzled or shocked,” she told the Times. “He said, ‘Come on, man, I heard you liked me.’” Through a spokesperson, Biden strongly denied this account. Reade also said Biden reprimanded her. “He pointed his finger at me and he just goes: ‘You’re nothing to me. Nothing,’” she said. “Then, he took my shoulders and said, ‘You’re OK, you’re fine.’” In a statement to the Times, Biden’s deputy campaign manager, Kate Bedingfield, said: “Vice President Biden has dedicated his public life to changing the culture and the laws around violence against women. He authored and fought for the passage and reauthorization of the landmark Violence Against Women Act. He firmly believes that women have a right to be heard — and heard respectfully. Such claims should also be diligently reviewed by an independent press. What is clear about this claim: It is untrue. This absolutely did not happen.” 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.