htownbrown

Thankfully, I never saw it. I cringe everytime I see Waters....and anytime someone says the word 'divine'.

The most offensive movie of all time is Pink Flamingos. It will scar you for life.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-union-requires-white-teachers-be-fired-before-educators-of-color-to-remedy-past-discrimination What happened to job performance? Anything the government gets involved with just goes to shit. At least lie and say black teachers outperformed white teachers, no one would have a leg to stand on. But to say we're doing this to you because of your ancestors is quite silly, when the goal is to create smart kids. I would like to create a new term...polite segregation. That's what it is. Maybe they are all great teachers in this district, but that's not how it reads. We're slowly moving in a direction where it will be racist to compete with anyone that doesn't have your skin tone, over the simplest things.

Dammit, I thought you were going to convince me.

How many panels do you own?

That's not what I said, your just trying to find a tributary out of your own logic.

I'm simply following your logic. So supporting the 2nd amendment is progressive/liberal? You're all over the place today.

Considering the advancements in pregnancy prevention, it could be considered progressive under your definition.

I don't think you thought this out very well. The status quo was roe vs wade not that long ago, but according to your logic you have to own the "change" in policy?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/elizabeth-warren-everyone-tells-me-they-would-vote-for-me-if-i-had-a-penis At least about the primary. If she had surgically acquired a penis beforehand, she could've been running for the presidency. Instead, she went native american and found out her base didn't give a shit. I hope Stacy Abrams sees her opening. (No pun intended)

I still have no earthly idea what you're talking about, but congratulations.

I wouldn't suggest it was ridiculous, just woefully out of place considering how hard you stump against whataboutism. I guess the lesson here is I should stay away from your comments lest I might find myself in the middle of a domestic dispute I don't understand. Good to know.

It's gross no matter who does it, but I think everyone stands in solidarity against pedophilia in the churches. Just because someone is gay doesn't make them a child molester, just like someone supporting a church doesn't mean they support pedophilia. If a priest wants to teach your kid about homosexuality, you should be equally concerned. By your own standard you're engaging in whataboutism.

This has been the best strategy to date. It's not the only reason California is collapsing, but it is certainly a contributing factor. AOC can hand out the gift basket.

Well morality is a relative term. Obviously, their morals drive them. For example, you and I may believe it's morally correct to keep children away from people whose whole identity is based on their sexuality. They certainly have a different moral take.

They won't take that bet, they know better. From what I can tell, the whole appeal of the leftist perspective is morality. At least what they perceive that to be. A capitalist economy can't approach any of their moral goals, theoretically, so they have no interest in it's success.

What has changed that makes it "safer" now for unvaxxed people? So they were responsible for the death of millions including themselves, suppossedly, but now they can play with the herd again? It must take a lot of rope to tie both ends of that argument. I think it's not a stretch to suggest you would be ranting about wearing masks and getting the shot if the CDC recommended it under the current statistics. For the record, I never suggested anyone deserved to die friend-o. I did, however, suggest they didn't deserve priority.

Well the CDC put it out there, not I, so it's as good as gospel. Just find it incredible, to be honest, that people like yourself advocated for shutting the world down to save smokers and obese people, and now they're just overly flippant about it all without an actual "cure". That's a seismic shift.

Sounds super scary! Millions may die!

That sums up their plan very nicely. "Damage"

You could have it all...

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-reverses-course-will-close-gaps-in-areas-of-border-wall-as-crisis-hits-d-c-elections-loom I thought walls were stupid?

So Griner and Whelan for the "Merchant of Death". A few years ago this would be considered collusion, but I'm sure Biden thinks he's swapping Cornpop for Brittney from Grindr and Captain Ahab.

So I have a few questions for any qualified climate alarmist... If the US goes completely green on energy usage without the other major energy consumers also going green (i.e. China), how will the end result be positive unless we have the capability to transport green energy to the world market? If we stop consuming fossil fuels and CONTINUE to produce them, would we drop the price so low that it would actually be a disincentive for others to make the switch? If we stop consuming fossil fuels and STOP producing them as well, where is the revenue to fill that void from the most traded commodity in the world? A lot of people bring up the jobs green energy would create domestically, but where are we in the world market? Would it damage our "buying power" globally? The last question may sound greedy, but it's more or less the catalyst of mmgw. If you can, eventually, transport green energy to the world market how do you see that playing out economically and geopolitically? I wouldn't consider a trade off of global warming for global war a net positive.

Biden just sold 5 million barrels of reserve oil to Europe and China, while republicans tried to stop him. You voted for Biden and typically I vote for republicans. Are you more responsible for damage caused from that oil because you voted for Biden? That seems to be your logic...