Gorka

Great news Woody! Washington State Signs Nation’s Earliest Gas Car Ban Into Law | GearJunkie 12 States Seek To Kill Gas Cars Nationwide (motorious.com)

Oh how I remember those days.

Speaking of avoiding, when will you answer the question as to why diversity is important? What should be discussed is missing in this thread. You're just parroting a liberal cause because it makes you feel good about yourself.

He parrots liberal agendas and talking points and just goes with that. Providing reasons and explanations is not required.

From an Obama cultists point of view, and without any help from Google, explain in your own words why you think diversity is important.

It's not his reading ability, it's the poor way you articulate things and your bad grammar. It reflects your immaturity a lot. I would be more beneficial for everyone that you take some courses.

You can't have it both ways Woody. So you don't believe any of the below as well?... which by the way was written not by those you call morons, but rather those you side with. I wouldn't be going out on a limb to suggest that Putins main motive in invading Ukraine is to stop the infestation of Western influence culture with all it's wokeness diversity, and LBGT nonsense from moving into his neighborhood. In his mind there is no way to stop it, other than the way he is going about it, by funding extremism and an all out invasion. Put two and two together. This why he declined any invitation to peace talks or compromise. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine Wednesday night, far-right personalities have declared Russia a beacon of anti-wokeness and Putin a strong ethnonationalist. In their minds, Ukraine is just a corrupt pawn in a vast “globalist” conspiracy. Russia has also been courting—even funding—ultranationalist and neo-fascist movements for almost a decade. Kremlin-owned banks have reportedly lent money to far-right political movements in Europe, including Greece’s Golden Dawn, Italy’s Northern League, and France’s National Front. In 2015, far-right extremists from the U.S., including a lawyer for the Ku Klux Klan, joined fringe right-wingers at the “International Russian Conservative Forum” in St Petersburg. During that conference, according to the New York Times, attendees and speakers fawned over Putin, celebrated his hard-line anti-LGBTQ stance, and railed against what they called “the degradation of white, Christian traditions in the West.” While ultranationalists and “anti-globalists” (a phrase often containing antisemitic dog whistles) have an ideological affinity for Putin, their position doesn’t necessary hold true for the American far-right writ large. Militant white supremacists and hardcore neo-Nazi accelerationists, who advocate violence to speed up the collapse of social order, are split on where their loyalties lie. Others, meanwhile, are cheering on Russia in the hopes that defeating Ukraine will destabilize NATO and imperil peace across Europe. The 2014 annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by Russian forces turned the region into a playground for war tourists, mercenaries, and far-right extremists from around the world. An estimated 15,000 foreign fighters flocked to that conflict between 2014 and 2019, 3,000 of them siding with Ukraine, versus around 12,000 who sided with the Russian-backed separatists, according to a report by the Soufan Center. Then there’s the Russian Imperial Movement, a white supremacist group designated as a foreign terrorist organization by both the U.S. and Canada. In 2014, they sent members to fight alongside pro-Moscow separatists. The following year, their leader, Stanley Vorobyov, participated in a conference of international far-right groups in St Petersburg, donated to the Nordic Resistance Movement (a Scandinavian neo-Nazi group) during a visit to Sweden, and took part in a right-wing extremist gathering in Madrid.

In other words "move along nothing to see here" Oh but there is Tex, there is!

Liberalism is gonna put The Onion out of business.

“We recognize we have seen progress on some fronts,” said Rooney, chairman of the league’s Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee, “but we still have a way to go on other fronts.” NFL adds requirements to Rooney Rule to aid minority hiring (cnbc.com) Thats good Mr. Rooney, keep focused on your diversity crusade rather than on putting together a respectable team. I like it.

You reap what you sow bozo. Thats what you get when people like you believed that Jussie Smollette was attacked by Trump supporters, that Tawana Bradley was raped by a white boys lacrosse team, that white racists hung a noose in black race car driver Bubba Wallaces garage, that white cops are evil, that Mason Rudolph called Myles Garrett a n****r, that white milk is racist, that slavery was the white mans invention, that the NFL owners are slave owners and players are slaves, that Nick Sandmans behavior was racially motivated... need I go on? As a happy reminder, and a lesson to you assholes. Washington Post settles $250M suit with Covington teen Nick Sandmann (nypost.com)

Was that ever. Proven lies, no recollection of any details, not a single witness to corroborate anything. Kavanaugh's only "baggage" was that Trump appointed him. It was a character assassination by vile demonrats and whatever else it took that would deny a Trump appointee.

NFL Adds Women To 'Rooney Rule' Language, Mandates Teams Hire Diverse Offensive Assistant – OutKick Beginning this season, all 32 clubs must employ a female or a member of an ethnic or racial minority to serve as an offensive assistant coach. This opens the door for the NFL to further evolve by expanding from "ethnic and racial minority" to include those with gender dysphoria.

You really can't help being an idiot can you. . It's quite amusing.

If he were white, Chris Rock would have certainly pressed charges. Staged or not.lol

That's not a reason to stop letting blacks off the hook in 2022. In case your not aware, which you aren't because the "First Step Act" Trump signed wasn't reported by The View. Trump Releases 3,000 People from Prison, Many of Them Black. Where’s the Press? – White House Dossier

The underlying reason Biden nominated this liberal piece of crap. Being soft on child porn, she's probably soft on child gropers as well.

I sense some hanky panky goin on, seems Biden and the judge go back a long way.

Being a judge does not automatically qualify for the job . Thats why there are hearings. An activist for one side or the other is grounds for disqualification. Unlike what you demonrats tried to do with Kavanaugh, we have put in front of your face VALID reasons why her record does not exemplify the character required to be on the SCOTUS, yet you'd rather just go with another display of narrowmindedness and ignorance and play the tired "its about race" race song and dance. Sadly, your one track mind prohibited you from not even once considered the fact that if a black conservative leaning woman was nominated, that all of us here would be on board. How about you, yes or no? You'd be on board with a female black conservative leaning judge? It's not about race you moron.

And look who always brings up race....a lefty. Actually, it's because she has a record of being a liberal activist judge that lets child porn offenders go free and can't define "woman". But go ahead and make it about race. You're boring.

If you two want to play that game, then lets go back to Bush. Lest we forget how he was blamed for everything. "It was Bush's fault" came to mean that Obama could do no wrong. You two forgot about that too I bet. What you two people are refusing to admit to is that the treatment of Trump was above and beyond what anyone any president before him had to deal with. It is a fact that the decision to impeach him was made prior to him placing his hand on the bible to take the Oath of Office. From the time he took office the Democrats were committed to being obstructions and rendering his presidency illegitimate through bogus impeachments and a Russian collusion hoax.

What they did to Trump. IMPEACH! Except this time there may actually be grounds for it.

And guess who the media would have torn to shreds if he had said the same things. I can just hear it. "Irresponsible"! "Not fit to be president"! "WWIII now imminent"! "Impeach"!

What does the Constitution say about life and liberty? .... No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws .. The constitutional guarantee that no person or class of persons shall be denied the same protection of the laws that is enjoyed by other persons or other classes in like circumstances in their lives, liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness. From 1823 forward, the phrase “pursuit of happiness” from the Declaration of Independence appeared in ninety-four United States Supreme Court cases. The pursuit of happiness was used by litigants to argue for everything from the right to privacy to the right to pursue one’s chosen occupation, and it was invoked by the Court to uphold the same. The most recent edition of Black’s Law Dictionary cites to that case law as it defines the pursuit of happiness as the “constitutional right to pursue any lawful business or activity . . . that might yield the highest enjoyment, increase one’s prosperity, or allow the development of one’s faculties.”1 While this definition reflects how the pursuit of happiness has been cited in Supreme Court case law from the 1820s forward, it does not tell us how the phrase was understood in its historical context.