Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

FY56

REGISTERED
  • Posts

    2,609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Posts posted by FY56

  1. 59 minutes ago, cccjwh said:

    Yes, I have no problem listening to the other side. Again, is Cheetos innocent or is he above the law? You nut jobs seems to have a problem answering this question.

    SECTION 175.05 & SECTION 175.10

    State of New York. 

    Who cares?

    All those memes and you still haven't got the message.

    Until both you assholes can admit to this being selective prosecution then anything you say or post here is moot, worthless, null and void, in this discussion.

    Oh, did you listen to the Alan Dershowitz video posted here?  He talks all about "no one is above the law".

    Your take on that would be a gem. Don't keep me in suspense.

  2. 10 hours ago, hoorta said:

    Yeah it was Johnnie Cochran who famously said "if the glove doesn't fit you must acquit". However, Dershowitz was right there getting OJ off the hook for obviously offing his wife. Guess he thinks Donnie needs a little free legal advice.  :D  

    Yeah, I certainly get it, let your pals lie away for you. Donnie figured out a way to get around his gag order.  Get his sycophants to blast away outside of court. 

    The only fraud there is DJT.  So sad- you're actually one of the more intelligent ones here FY- but still in serious denial of reality. 

    Nitpicking something about Dershowitz now.  That was as lame of a counter argument as it gets. Not even a good try you liberal piece of garbage.
    Did you watch the video, or are you afraid to know the truth?

    There was no crime, but crime or no crime, it is so clearly evident that Trump has been the subject of selective prosecution in order to take out a political opponent. Unless you free yourself of your TDS and come to terms with that fact, there's no talking to you nicely. I don't take too kindly to idiots.

    • Upvote 2
  3. 10 hours ago, cccjwh said:

    I listened, he repeated the same lies that Cheetos does everyday. 

    What is it that is so difficult for you nut jobs to understand about falsifying business records? Legal services is not paying off a porn star. When Cheetos has to pay Carrol from raping her, he will not put it as "legal services". 

    They are not saying he should have used campaign fund instead of personal funds. Sorry I'm not a moron, he doesn't know what he is talking about. 

    MAGA the stupidest cult in modern history.

     

    Let me know if your think Cheetos is innocent or just above the law.

    Nice try. He knows exactly what he's talking about, so does Alan Dershowitz. You in turn remain a dimwit in denial.

    Did you watch the video on Alan Dershowitz as well?

    None of what you're trying to sell matters. It is crystal clear. What we are witnessing is weaponizing the judicial system to take out a political opponent. But you'll twist and squirm your way out of coming to terms with it.

    You assholes tried to take Trump out even before your Russian Collusion scheme.

    You don't remember in 2016 the Democrats going so far as to stage a 2016 Electoral College coup by persuading electors to reject Trump?

     

    • Upvote 2
  4. 12 hours ago, cccjwh said:

    This is a joke right? If anyone other than Cheetos violated the gag order 12 times, they would have had their bond revoked and be in jail for the trial. If Cheetos hadn't won in 2016 he would have gotten time along with Cohen when he pleaded guilty for this crime.  You assholes know he is guilty AF so you fall back on "everyone does it" and "selected prosecution". Law and order party, what a joke. Right up there when you nut jobs thinking you are patriots.

    Thinking you are above the law is what dictators do, you moron.

     

     

     

    No, you're a joke.  None of that matters (whatever the fuck that was all about.)

    That prosecutor from NY ran her re-election campaign on the promise that she "get Trump".

    What does that tell you?

    The fact that he is running for president and millions want to vote for him is the reason you DONT bring a case during an election, you wait until after the election.

    I had just paraphrased a renowned Harvald law school professor, a liberal, a Jew, and not a Trump supporter.

    I listen to him, not anything you assholes have to say:

    Learn something kid:

     

     

     

     

    • Upvote 4
  5. 11 hours ago, cccjwh said:

    You law of order guys are OK with Cheetos cheating on his taxes. What a surprise. Cheetos wrote off a loss of 650 million on his Chicago Cheetos tower. Yet another one of his business failures. But writing off massive lose is legal and is what Cheetos is best at. But two year later, Cheetos change ownership if the building from one of his shell companies to another one if his shell companies. Then he wrote off the same loss again at 160 million. That is what your hero does. Cheats at everything. No criminals' charges though, cause the IRS is so underfunded and those damn statute of limitation have run out. But they can still make him pay it back the money with a penalty and interest. You guy can yell hoax and fake trial like the well train dogs you are.

    Trump Tower Retail | Trump International Hotel & Tower (therealdeal.com)

     

    It's not a matter of cheating on taxes. No one cares because it's worse than that. It's a matter of selective prosecution and weaponizing the justice system to go after a political opponent. 

    They can rummage the records and statutes to pin shit on any big-time real estate mogul if they choose to. They chose Trump. Gee I wonder why. 

    You assholes cry over the absurd notion that Trump is a threat to democracy while watching the threat to democracy come to fruition before your eyes and think nothing of it.

    Targeting political opponents is what dictators do you moron.

    • Upvote 1
  6. 10 hours ago, hoorta said:

    Poor Donnie... Yes Steve the border is a problem. Who told Johnson to (successfully) kill the Border Bill? Who said Covid will be gone by Easter? Talk about saying, doing anything to prop up his reelection possibilities.  

     

    Um ...it was the White House COVID task force. You know, the group responsible for advising Trump.

    Yes, Trump has been accused of saying off the wall stuff, but only TDS morons who can't put aside their hate believe the April projection was solely his own making. 

    You still believe Trump told Americans to drink fish tank cleaner too, don't you? Idiot.

    • Haha 3
  7. 5 hours ago, hoorta said:

    Poor Donnie... Yes Steve the border is a problem. Who told Johnson to (successfully) kill the Border Bill? Who said Covid will be gone by Easter? Talk about saying, doing anything to prop up his reelection possibilities.  

     If your bold is true, then that brings me back to my original point- calling out Red State for propagandizing scare tactic bullshit.About border jumpers spreading horrible diseases to our population.  So the question is- if they have all that stuff- why do they want to come here?  

     I have to believe you know who my post in the topic was directed at- Mr. Paranoia.

    Your BOLD is complete delusional bullshit Nickers... :D :D :D Got any proof?  ALL? My ass they do. 

    "If" I said was true? You haven't seen any of the countless photos available?

    We all want to better our lives. The majority are coming here to better their lives, as are millions of others worldwide who are waiting their turns, so don't try play your bleeding-heart liberal "the poor and tired" card. Your concern is fake, and you know it.

    In turn let me call out you hypocritical demonrats who for years have denied that there even is a border crisis, your "nothing to see here" approach... until now, with an election approaching as the American public becoming "woke" to the fact that there are serious border issues.

    With a stroke of a pen, Biden could stop the invasion. We don't need no stinking bill. But he won't...better political strategy is to just blame the Republicans.

    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 2
  8. On 5/8/2024 at 12:44 PM, MLD Woody said:

    I don't give a shit what Al Gore says

    I give a shit what a consensus of climatologists and reputable scientific organizations across the globe say

    I give a shit what the data says

    Obviously you didn't watch any of the video.

    Forget the drama and skip ahead to about 3:40. There you will hear from 4-5 highly reputable scientists and meteorologists, who teach at institutions such as Harvard, MIT, NYU who do not buy into the climate change hype.

    Climate change is not a settled science.

    Let me know your thoughts.

    • Upvote 1
  9. On 5/8/2024 at 3:06 AM, hoorta said:

     

    "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!  
    We've seemed to have forgotten\ignored that- at least in some quarters.  😡

    That again.

    In addition to the whipping Vapor gave you ...When you look at these border jumpers, is that what you see? "The poor", "the homeless"?

    I see people dressed in decent clothes, shoes, backpacks, all in good condition and hardly looking like they miss meals.

    You've gone full libtard. What you should be doing is to go the border to warn these people they're making a mistake...that this in a racist and highly oppressive country toward brown and black people....to turn back.

    Thats what you also believe don't you?

     

     

  10. On 5/7/2024 at 1:55 PM, Ibleedbrown said:

    There are times l can’t help but wonder if the money trail leads back to some shady left wing group with the intention of getting conservatives to paint themselves as the anti-environmental group, and it seems to be working. I would argue that in everyday practices conservatives are just as much pro-environment as liberals, if not more so. If more of us could live like Cal then it would be a net positive. 

    But this manufactured mental association linking anything to do with it to “global warming” has really done a number on us. I don’t understand it. 

    https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/politics/2024/05/06/desantis-blocks-climate-change-efforts-a-partisan-fight-in-election/73546118007/

    I found this recent article on DeSantis, who has done some really positive pro-environment things in Florida, but he’s also shot himself in the foot over this mental association to “climate change.” He actually wants to erase the term “climate change” from state law. Which is fine, whatever, but can we still have bike lanes and roundabouts? Bike lanes promote a healthier populace and roundabouts reduce wear and tear on cars. Those are good things, and jobs get created in the process. Another good thing. 

    The article ends with a point l’ve used before. “I’m a conservative. And conservative and conservation have the same root word. When did conservationists become the bad guy?”

     

    I've always perceived (and maybe wrongly) climate change and the environment as two different issues.  Everyone wants clean air and water.

    After all it was Nixon that established the EPA. I don't think it had anything to do with climate change.

    Having said that, they can be linked...less auto pollution= cleaner air = less Co2 emissions, except today as it pertains to cars, the emphasis is on climate change. There's been more than enough demands on automakers to produce efficient cars and restrict air pollutants. 

    Republicans are perceived anti-environment because the environment is at the bottom of their priorities. The economy is at the top.

    The majority favor expanding drilling, obviously that makes them anti-environment too.

    Well, what a surprise, it turns out they do care after all. And as you presumed, there is some common ground.

    Republicans also favor more solar power and wind turbines. The majority also favor carbon capture technology. Now that sounds interesting.

    By a 58% to 42% margin, Republicans say expanding production from fossil fuel sources like oil and gas is a greater priority for the country than expanding renewable sources like wind and solar.

    Not bad.

    Republicans’ views of climate change, energy issues | Pew Research Center

    Republicans support expanding fossil fuel and renewable energy sources. Burning fossil fuels for energy is the source of most U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Climate scientists have urged countries to rapidly reduce their reliance on fossil fuel energy while transitioning to renewable sources to help limit the rise in Earth’s temperature.

    Among Republicans, large shares back increasing the production of fossil fuel sources: 73% favor more offshore oil and gas drilling and 68% favor more hydraulic fracturing.

    At the same time, comparable shares of Republicans support renewable energy production, including more solar power farms (70%) and more wind power (60%). In addition, two-thirds said they favor building more nuclear power plants, according to a June 2023 survey.

     

    A dot plot that shows a majority of Republicans favor providing a tax credit to businesses for developing carbon capture technology.

    • Upvote 1
  11. On 4/30/2024 at 1:23 PM, MLD Woody said:

    And the effects of slavery and systemic racism still exist in American society today, correct? Much more recent that 1500 years ago

    I could name a half dozen black scholars that would disagree with you. Many more if I looked.

    "Systemic racism" rhetoric in 2024 is an excuse and a copout.

    I would tend to believe them over some white guilt liberal. Black trash loves you.

    please.png.483570e8aa8530e00083249623613379.png

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...