20 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

"selective prosecution", or whatever the right is calling it, has existed forever. The vast majority of the time it is negatively affecting minorities, poor people, etc... Not the typical rich, white, male Republican. 

It is funny that now, THIS is what makes one half of the country think there is some bias in our justice system 

"Whatever they are calling it" is exactly what it is. Your denial is glaring with this one. 

Aww.. here we go with those poor poor minorities again. Always a good backup plan.

By rummaging through all the statutes and laws, these prosecutors could have found dirt on nearly any rich white real estate mogul, but they chose to take such action against Trump.

Gee Woody, why do you suppose that is? Bet you won't answer, because you know the answer.

If it has been going on forever like you claim, does this mean Trumps case is excusable? Bet you won't answer that either.

This is clear cut election interference; it is precisely why you don't bring a case like this during an election cycle.

This has been the most egregious case ever of weaponizing the justice system in order to go take out a political opponent, but people like you give it a pass and look the other way....."well because it's Trump".

Don't ever come here denying that you're a flaming liberal.

21 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Wow, you don't say????

Haha good one Woody! Your wit, always gotta be on guard for it !!

8 hours ago, VaporTrail said:

Yes, and I'm pointing out that he's an unprincipled hypocrite who is only rooting for it this time because the people getting arrested are on the other team. 

While it's true that both "teams" engaged in violence and were arrested, it does not make them equal partners in crime so to speak. Those that stormed the capitol consisted of patriotic Americans that love this country, the other team supports an enemy of the US, appears to have a significant antisemite element, and are of the demographic hardly recognized as being patriotic Americans, but rather haters. They would and did literally shit on the flag.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying anyone should be kicked out of the country. But given the choice if anyone is more deserving of being "ejected", it's the other team.

Speaking of ..It's too bad those lefties that vowed to leave the country if Trump got elected didn't make good on their promises.

On Wednesday, Brandeis University President Ron Liebowitz put out a statement to the school community saying it no longer recognized the Brandeis chapter of the National Students for Justice in Palestine. It made the move over what the university said was the group's support of Hamas and its "its call for the violent elimination of Israel and the Jewish people," he wrote.

These kids, they know so much.

That isn't true. Good one Ronnie.

52 minutes ago, VaporTrail said:

You can't come up with an actual crime they've committed. 1A allows us the freedom to say offensive things without being jailed for it. You can't throw them in jail because they wished death/cancer/disease/rot on someone or some group. Please try again. 

Well you also did ask what the difference was between the Jan 6 people, and these rioters. He gave you the difference. Quite a few.

As far as what crime was committed, doesn't an arrest usually involve a crime being committed? That has always been my understanding.

Cals slip up was that he didn't narrow it down to those arrested.

Over 100 Arrested at Columbia After Pro-Palestinian Protest - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

So in both situations, Jan 6, and these protestors involved crimes and arrests. Cal had already outlined the differences as to why he feels these students should be shipped off to some socialist paradise.

17 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

This is the dumbest thing I've ever read. They're really trying to state that the Jan 6th rioters that stormed the capitol had no idea what was going on within the Capitol? That Trump just picked that day and location for fun?

 

Give me a fucking break ...

You picked a side note from some journalist to be outraged over. Fine.

But you must agree that there exists selective prosecution, including what is occurring with Trump.

Correct?

As far as those protesters, I would have assumed they couldn't have cared less if Congress was in session or not. But it's highly likely that every last one of them did because it was on the day congress was confirming the election results.

6 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Oh right this is where you can claim that all of your right wing sites that cal, vambo, etc constantly post on here don't actually count. Gotcha. 

They're legitimate when you need them to be and "not news media" when you need them ignored 

That is also false. They are always "not news media" regardless...in the sense that when the American public turns on the TV they won't get RED State News, instead they got Dan Rather lying about President Bush on ABC.

There is a reason the adjective "mainstream" is used to describe "media".

Another indicator..Google "Trump News"...you will immediately get "CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NYT...

There's a reason why the average liberal is so ill-informed and oblivious.  I doubt that the average liberal even knows that these right-wing sources exist or just dismiss them as tabloids. 

So you can say they are "not news media" to liberals as well.

Kamala may want to look into getting a pair.

4 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

 

Or conservatives rushing to claim damn near every shooter now is trans even when they aren't? They got the one and now claim it repeatedly. Because for some reason this is a core piece of their platform now....

For starters Diehard is correct. Your statement is highly an exaggeration, therefore false.

Secondly, this pertains to news media reporting, not what some conservative says.

There are a lot more than just 3.

15 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True (msn.com)

30 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True | Thought Catalog

And oh how the lefties love to mock any mention of a conspiracy as if it never happens.

We crazy right wingers told ya so.

Just waiting for the mainstream media to run this story anytime now....

Supreme Court exposes Biden’s selective prosecution of political opponents - Washington Examiner

During oral arguments on Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito exposed the Biden administration’s inexcusable practice of selective prosecution of protesters and rioters.

The point isn’t that the Capitol rioters should avoid all penalties but that the Biden administration is choosing for ideological reasons when and how to apply laws against illicit protests.

Ah yes, those "mostly peaceful protests"

Gorsuch pressed further. Using the catchphrase favored by liberal news media and others about urban riots, even ones where police were injured, cars were burned, and federal courthouses were significantly damaged, resulting in trial relocations or delays, Gorsuch somewhat mockingly asked why “a mostly peaceful protest … that actually obstructs and impedes an official proceeding for an indefinite period would not be covered.”

... while knowing they should not be in the Capitol, and thus being criminally liable for trespassing or disorderly conduct, were clueless about the congressional proceedings rather than intentionally trying to interfere with them. Yet this administration is throwing the book at scores of them.

 The Biden Justice Department tries to imprison innocent anti-abortion protesters while letting hundreds of attacks on pro-life centers go unpunished. It targets parents as domestic terrorists while refusing to enforce specific laws against demonstrations at the homes of Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices. Examples of double standards are almost countless.

Trump is also a victim of selective prosecution. You're an asshole of you deny it. I'm talking to you Hoorta and cccp. Not sure about Woody, he has kept quiet regarding this. He may have come to terms with the truth.

32 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said:

Kinda like whenever there’s a mass shooting the first thing the media looks for is race and gender of the shooter.

If the shooter happens to be a non-Caucasian, it gets downplayed big time.

The one that sticks out most for me to this day was that theater shooting in Aurora Colorado a number of years ago. The shooter had the same name as a Tea Party member, and oh how the democrat run media couldn't wait to report the shooter as having ties to the Tea Party. They of course had to recant the story.

3 hours ago, Ibleedbrown said:

Interesting response. I get that mental health stuff can be problematic, but dude’s burning themselves alive over it? I can honestly say the first words out of my mouth wouldn’t be “Good.”

Certainly a plus he didn’t take anyone with him l suppose. I dunno man. I’d like to think we as a culture would like for a less violent outcome for such people.

Good in that no one else got hurt.

This is a public defender in Seattle

https://www.instagram.com/p/C5Y8Kx2J02A/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=embed_video_watch_again

Thats how Joe got the idea.

6 hours ago, Jax said:

 

But not in these places either Joe.

58 minutes ago, Vambo said:

'UNPOPULAR'

Blue state (Groomers) closer to being haven for minors' gender transitions, abortion

If you watch Democrats and really pay attention to what they say and do, you will someday realize they are attracted to evil like moths are attracted to light. Like mutilating children for life with puberty blockers, hormone injections and irreversible "gender-affirming" surgery including castration and mastectomies.

That's why gender procedures on children must be outlawed by states and at the Federal level.

1). Children cannot give meaningful legal consent to have their bodies irreversibly transformed for the rest of their lives.

2). Parents or guardians cannot make the decision to have their child's bodies irreversibly transformed for the rest of their lives. It's the child's body, not the body or property of the parent.

On 4/14/2024 at 9:00 PM, hoorta said:

 

Hey dipshit, the evidence should be blinding to you by now.

When are you gonna ever come here to finally concede the truth that this entire Trump fiasco was not to go after a crime, but to go after a person?

15 hours ago, cccjwh said:

LOl...we're devastated by that one cccp.

What we believe is that this is not about going after justice, it's all about going after the person.

It is so crystal clear, that even liberal Trump haters believe it, but why should they care if this threat against democracy doesn't affect them. Just get Trump.

Do you believe it cccp?

That reminded me of this blast from the past..."imagine Mr. Speaker, a world without balloons"..

Where actual crimes were committed.

6 hours ago, cccjwh said:

Incase you missed it.

DJT Stock Crashes Again As Trump’s Stake Dips To $2 Billion (forbes.com)

It lost another 10% today(24 so far). I'm guessing it will be under 20 by the end of the week. Shit, maybe the end of the day. 👍

A senior editor at Forbes predicts that the stock of Donald Trump’s social media company “could go to zero,” and retail investors who bought it to support the former president could lose big.

“If you look at the fundamentals of the company, it’s poised to go down a lot more,” Dan Alexander told CNN’s Erin Burnett on Monday. “If you look at the number of users this company has, the amount of revenue that it generates, you know, its valuation should be measured in the hundreds of millions of dollars, at the most. Right now, the public markets are valuing it at 3.5 billion.”

 

I don't read the garbage you post. No one does.  I don't know how many times I must repeat myself.

When there is selective prosecution, none of what you post matters.

I prefer listening to Harvard Law professor and Constitutional scholar Alan Dershowitz who happens to be a liberal democrat and not a Trump supporter.

17 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

So, on a very minor point, they try to prosecute Pres Trump for a misdemeanor, except they make it into a phony "felony". Then they change the law, and retroactively negate the statute of limitations, and try to ruin biden's dominant political opponent.

Which, fani et others have coordinated with the WH that is stunk up by biden poopypants and his corrupt band of radical handlers.

The democratic party is no more.

https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2024/04/15/watch-even-cnn-legal-analyst-dismantles-weakness-of-unprecedented-criminal-case-against-trump-n2172789

Even CNN Legal Analyst Incredulously Wrecks 'Weakness' of Unprecedented Criminal Case Against Trump

Everything hinges on the makeup of the jury.

2 hours ago, cccjwh said:

Me after posting that! Yipee!