JewDago Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 what, about the scheme and the personnel we have, makes the 4-3 a much better fit for us than the 3-4? rogers has been an absolute beast in the 3-4. statistically, he's on par with his career averages and has impacted games far more than simple stats can tell. corey williams has been hurt and would be ineffective no matter what. d'qwell is coming on nicely. he's making tackles all over the field and even has a few picks. his impact is equal regardless of scheme. wimbley would be rushing the passer and getting manhandled in the 4-3. andra davis is done no matter what. shaun smith would be even less effective. athyba rubin would also be ineffective in a 4-3 (too slow). if we're worried about the future, it looks like this year is one of the best years possible to draft personnel for the 3-4. there are a ton of guys with mad scheme versatility. why change now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.