shepwrite Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Well, finally some good news... http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/...erback_c_9.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Buffalo Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Just read that and it made my day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MudratDetector Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 made my day as well. i have a healthy chunk of optimism about sunday now. GO BROWNS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Thrilled to hear the Colt is back in the saddle. Still have no idea why Wallace is third string. None. Coaches always say the "best players will play" ... not one person in 100 would say that Jake Delhomme is a better QB than Seneca right now, or better for our team. Even if Seneca sucked as much as Jake (he clearly doesn't), at least he'd be mobile! Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepwrite Posted December 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Thrilled to hear the Colt is back in the saddle. Still have no idea why Wallace is third string. None. Coaches always say the "best players will play" ... not one person in 100 would say that Jake Delhomme is a better QB than Seneca right now, or better for our team. Even if Seneca sucked as much as Jake (he clearly doesn't), at least he'd be mobile! Zombo Adding to that... I feel about 99 percent certain we'll have a new OC next year (new coach or not) and it'll be Holmgren's version of the WCO run by a Holmgren guy (perhaps Haskell). Guess what backup played in that offense for a lot of years? Yeah, Seneca Wallace. He'd have to be considered the absolutely IDEAL backup for next year. I couldn't care less that McCoy likes Joke Delhomme. Who doesn't? He's a likable guy. So's Trent Dilfer (and a damn fine analyst)... but I don't think we'll bring him in as a #2 either. Anybody else watch "Year of the QB" on ESPN? That was awesome. Dilfer is a really smart and eloquent guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClevelandBigDawg Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Thrilled to hear the Colt is back in the saddle. Still have no idea why Wallace is third string. None. Coaches always say the "best players will play" ... not one person in 100 would say that Jake Delhomme is a better QB than Seneca right now, or better for our team. Even if Seneca sucked as much as Jake (he clearly doesn't), at least he'd be mobile! Zombo I guess one person would, and that is why Delhomme was starting... Though I dont think that is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pizzadeliveryguy Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Thrilled to hear the Colt is back in the saddle. Still have no idea why Wallace is third string. None. Coaches always say the "best players will play" ... not one person in 100 would say that Jake Delhomme is a better QB than Seneca right now, or better for our team. Even if Seneca sucked as much as Jake (he clearly doesn't), at least he'd be mobile! Zombo You obviously haven't conversed with CantonLegend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedyd900rr Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Wont we have to give up a draft pick or something if Wallace hits a certain number of passes? If so, I can see why he isn't starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CantonLegend Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 You obviously haven't conversed with CantonLegend. if colt starts.......sweet if jake starts......sweet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfsane Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Maybe it has something to do with Seneca being frustrated that is he isn't ahead of Jake on the depth chart. I wouldn't want to give up a draft pick just to win a couple of games with Wallace right now either. Holmgren would take that into consideration when he decides what to do (Eric and Mike may have already talked about it). IMO, it would take an insane man to fire Mangini, as the team is much improved. The rational minds guessed 6 - 8 wins this year.... and look where we are at, sitting at 5 with 3 games to play. We also guessed the record expecting Jake and Seneca to stay healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClevelandSound Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Maybe it has something to do with Seneca being frustrated that is he isn't ahead of Jake on the depth chart. I wouldn't want to give up a draft pick just to win a couple of games with Wallace right now either. Holmgren would take that into consideration when he decides what to do (Eric and Mike may have already talked about it). IMO, it would take an insane man to fire Mangini, as the team is much improved. The rational minds guessed 6 - 8 wins this year.... and look where we are at, sitting at 5 with 3 games to play. We also guessed the record expecting Jake and Seneca to stay healthy. We also guessed the record without knowing how bad Jake was and how Colt wasn't gonna start this year, as well as having no idea who Peyton Hillis even was. much improved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 We also guessed the record without knowing how bad Jake was and how Colt wasn't gonna start this year, as well as having no idea who Peyton Hillis even was. much improved. Sure, but we figured that Jerome Harrison would probably be doing for us what Hillis is doing, given his production at the end of last year. I agree that we are right about where most people thought we would be at the end of the year. Its just that we got there a little differently than expected. We didn't expect wins over NE or NO, but we did think we would take Buffalo and Tampa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepwrite Posted December 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 It's tough to NOT improve on most of last year... although we've never won 4 straight this season. We had a nice offseason and got lucky again (last year, Moore and Roth, this year, Hillis). We had a pretty good draft and added some veterans who helped a lot (Fujita, Gocong). But I don't know if we're much improved, except for a three-game stretch (Saints, Pats, Jets). Since then, we've been less than scintillating. Chances are decent we'll go from 5-11 to 6-10. I'm not planning any parades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pizzadeliveryguy Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 But I don't know if we're much improved, Seriously? I haven't had to stop watching any games after the first half this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfsane Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 This Shep guy is a douche. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MudratDetector Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 if you don't think that we're improved, you obviously haven't watched any games. even on bad days, we are still in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepwrite Posted December 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 This Shep guy is a douche. Funny. Thanks for visiting. This Halfsane guy is hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepwrite Posted December 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 if you don't think that we're improved, you obviously haven't watched any games. even on bad days, we are still in the game. I think we're improved. The Rams are MUCH improved. So are the Chiefs and Bucs. That's not really the question, though. The question is whether we improved enough to save Mangini's job. I suspect that's right on the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawgTracker Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Concerning seneca maybe it has something to do with his mental command of the offense. Maybe they couldn't count on seneca to audible out of certain plays like they can jake and colt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pizzadeliveryguy Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 I think we're improved. The Rams are MUCH improved. So are the Chiefs and Bucs. That's not really the question, though. The question is whether we improved enough to save Mangini's job. I suspect that's right on the line. The Browns have improved just as much as any of those teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITHIKA Posted December 15, 2010 Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Looks as though Colt got the majority of practice snaps today and will be healthy enough to start this weekend vs the Bengals barring any setbacks! Woohoo! Nice to know I wont have to watch Dellhommo piss the game away, I've got great seats and am excited to see the Colt! Bring on the Bungles.. http://twitter.com/#!/joereedy/statuse...141787811184640 QB Colt McCoy was listed on the browns practice report as having full participation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 Thrilled to hear the Colt is back in the saddle. Still have no idea why Wallace is third string. None. Coaches always say the "best players will play" ... not one person in 100 would say that Jake Delhomme is a better QB than Seneca right now, or better for our team. Even if Seneca sucked as much as Jake (he clearly doesn't), at least he'd be mobile! Zombo I agree....unless Senecas attitude is pushing him down. He was making a lot of those, 'I just play when I am told to play" and "you'll have to ask the coach" type answers a few weeks back. I am not saying I don't understand his frustration, or even disagree for that matter, but there is a reason not evident to us why the guy is low man on the totem pole.....and I don't think it is because the entire Browns coaching staff doesn't get it. I know I have worked with people talented as hell but in the end they were more of a pain in the ass than anything. I am not saying I know that to be the case here, but apply what you have learned in your line of work and start connecting the dots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 IMO: Colt is the future for this team and the more reps that he can get this year the better he will be for us next season. Seneca will just have to show the coachs something that will make them want him to be the starter. Until then Lets see what Colt has to offer. If he turns out to be a dud then we can pursue somebody else in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepwrite Posted December 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 Who changed my thread title and how?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 Who changed my thread title and how?? Blame it on the Christmas Elfs. They are notorious for creating pranks at this time of the year. They are over worked and underpayed and seem to cause grief with some of the messes that they make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gips Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 Good maybe the browns will be bearable to watch again... He seems to be the only QB we have that can somehow execute a daboll gameplan, cant wait to see what he can do with a real OC in place! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 Who changed my thread title and how?? someone had started a similar thread and i think the mods incorporated the two.....just prob kept his thread title because of the delhomo reference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 someone had started a similar thread and i think the mods incorporated the two.....just prob kept his thread title because of the delhomo reference. Thanks. Multiple threads on the same topic sucks and makes a site unreadable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich4eagle Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 Who changed my thread title and how?? do not get upset this thread is now nearly 9 months old...................Go Colt utherwise the whole discussion is irrevelant and we need to get a real QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepwrite Posted December 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 someone had started a similar thread and i think the mods incorporated the two.....just prob kept his thread title because of the delhomo reference. Ah. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.