USFBrown Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 We now only have 1 player left on our roster from the 2011 Falcons trade. In the 2011 Draft we traded away the #6 pick to the Falcons for three 2011 selections: the Falcons’ first-round pick (No. 27), the Falcons’ second-round pick (No. 59) and the Falcons’ fourth-round pick (No. 124). We also received the Falcons’ No. 1 pick in 2012 (No. 22) and their No. 4 pick in 2012 (No. 118). The Browns moved up to No. 21 in the 2011 draft to take Taylor. With the next pick from the Falcons (No. 59), the Browns took Little. The final Atlanta pick of 2011 (No. 124) was used on fullback Owen Marecic. Brandon Weeden was selected with the Falcon's 2012 first draft pick (No. 22). The Falcons’ fourth-rounder (No. 118) was used in conjunction to trade up to get Richardson (No. 3). Julio Jones or Taylor, Little, Marecic, Weeden, and Richardson. In retrospect, we got FLEECED!!! In the end, it's what the Browns have done best for years, draft horribly. I still believe you take the stock pile of picks especially if you're a team that needs some rebuilding. But in this case, we lost out big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 I think in the actual terms of the trade, we probably got a little less than value, but if we'd hit on those picks we'd all be saying how amazing they were. Of course, you can cling on to the Richardson trade as getting us Manziel...but yeah, Julio Jones or Phil Taylor isn't a tough choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 There's a difference between "getting fleeced" and fleecing yourself. We got great value for the pick. That our then FO squandered much of that value on what many of us could see at the time were poor and/or overvalued prospects, e.g., TR and Wheezy, is a separate issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cambridgeho Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 The other question is what has Julio done for ATL? We should have been better in hind sight, but we do have Taylor still and he is pretty good. I bet Atl would have liked to have some of those picks back as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utzie Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 There's a difference between "getting fleeced" and fleecing yourself. We got great value for the pick. That our then FO squandered much of that value on what many of us could see at the time were poor and/or overvalued prospects, e.g., TR and Wheezy, is a separate issue. Right. At the time of the picks, I'm sure we were saying something along the lines of, "well, we got a beast DT, a great WR prospect in Little who has the size and makeup to good/great, a QB who has the ideal size/arm and is mature to make the transition to the pro game fast, and the consensus top impact RB in the draft." I'm still fine with the trade as far as value of picks is concerned, but boy oh boy did the previous regimes miss big time on the players they drafted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 I hate when people do this. Firstly, as it's been stated the Browns are the one who "fleeced" themselves. You can have a million draft picks and if you pick awful players it looks bad. Secondly, it's apples and oranges to say what Julio Jones could have been in Cleveland. Julio went to an established franchise QB with an arguable #1 WR in place in Roddy White. Jones would have come to an awful QB and no other playmakers for the Browns. Also, Jones is coming back from a serious injury so who knows how he might play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utzie Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 The other question is what has Julio done for ATL? We should have been better in hind sight, but we do have Taylor still and he is pretty good. I bet Atl would have liked to have some of those picks back as well. http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/13982/julio-jones Honestly, it's not as one sided as you would think. Yes, he has a lot of TD's and has been more productive than any WR the Browns have had in that time (except Gordon's season last year, obviously), but when you look at the Falcons' offense of having Matt Ryan throwing the ball to Julio, Roddy and Tony G, you have to think that Julio got a lot better looks than he would have if he was here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 We now only have 1 player left on our roster from the 2011 Falcons trade. In the 2011 Draft we traded away the #6 pick to the Falcons for three 2011 selections: the Falcons’ first-round pick (No. 27), the Falcons’ second-round pick (No. 59) and the Falcons’ fourth-round pick (No. 124). We also received the Falcons’ No. 1 pick in 2012 (No. 22) and their No. 4 pick in 2012 (No. 118). The Browns moved up to No. 21 in the 2011 draft to take Taylor. With the next pick from the Falcons (No. 59), the Browns took Little. The final Atlanta pick of 2011 (No. 124) was used on fullback Owen Marecic. Brandon Weeden was selected with the Falcon's 2012 first draft pick (No. 22). The Falcons’ fourth-rounder (No. 118) was used in conjunction to trade up to get Richardson (No. 3). Julio Jones or Taylor, Little, Marecic, Weeden, and Richardson. In retrospect, we got FLEECED!!! In the end, it's what the Browns have done best for years, draft horribly. I still believe you take the stock pile of picks especially if you're a team that needs some rebuilding. But in this case, we lost out big time. someone has always got to bring up the woulda shoulda coulda cards. time to move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 but we do have Taylor still and he is pretty good. pretty good? the guy is the foundation of our DLine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 pretty good? the guy is the foundation of our DLine. He may be as good at what he does as Jones is at what he does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cambridgeho Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 pretty good? the guy is the foundation of our DLine. Sorry, pretty good as in better then good, but not yet great. I was kinda going off of the Rubin stats of 9.0 sacks, 227 total tackles, 4 passes defended, 1 interception, 3 forced fumbles, and 1 fumble recovery in 5 years as a 6th round Nose tackle. Rubin has been pretty good also. I do hope we resign Taylor though. I watched him last training camp in Berea and he was fun to watch, funny guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tml1138 Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 Good trade, bad choices made with that trade. Even in retrospect, I'm not holding on to this. I agree Julio Jones wouldn't have made a difference here. But that's speculation too, which still isn't very interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 The trade was good at the time, but with the people that were running things, all the picks we got were bound to fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louisville Slugger Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 If we would have taken Richard Sherman instead of Owen marecic, this wouldnt even be a discussion. Bottom line is we squandered those picks and the trade was good one for us. Julio would have been a bust if he came here given our QB situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 Who gives a shit? I mean it's not like you or I can change anything, so why moan about a bad deal like a little bitch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoeticG Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 We now only have 1 player left on our roster from the 2011 Falcons trade. In the 2011 Draft we traded away the #6 pick to the Falcons for three 2011 selections: the Falcons’ first-round pick (No. 27), the Falcons’ second-round pick (No. 59) and the Falcons’ fourth-round pick (No. 124). We also received the Falcons’ No. 1 pick in 2012 (No. 22) and their No. 4 pick in 2012 (No. 118). The Browns moved up to No. 21 in the 2011 draft to take Taylor. With the next pick from the Falcons (No. 59), the Browns took Little. The final Atlanta pick of 2011 (No. 124) was used on fullback Owen Marecic. Brandon Weeden was selected with the Falcon's 2012 first draft pick (No. 22). The Falcons’ fourth-rounder (No. 118) was used in conjunction to trade up to get Richardson (No. 3). Julio Jones or Taylor, Little, Marecic, Weeden, and Richardson. In retrospect, we got FLEECED!!! In the end, it's what the Browns have done best for years, draft horribly. I still believe you take the stock pile of picks especially if you're a team that needs some rebuilding. But in this case, we lost out big time. I would also add that Richardson was traded for a first rounder that was used in conjunction with a third rounder to move up from #26(from INDY for Richardson) to acquire Mr. Johnny Football. So, all in all this ATL trade hasn't played itself out yet. If MANZIEL turns out to be the Franchise QB that we've been looking for over the course of over a decade then I'd say do it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 I would also add that Richardson was traded for a first rounder that was used in conjunction with a third rounder to move up from #26(from INDY for Richardson) to acquire Mr. Johnny Football. So, all in all this ATL trade hasn't played itself out yet. If MANZIEL turns out to be the Franchise QB that we've been looking for over the course of over a decade then I'd say do it again. Amazing how a trade can still have an impact 3 years later :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 Right. At the time of the picks, I'm sure we were saying something along the lines of, "well, we got a beast DT, a great WR prospect in Little who has the size and makeup to good/great, a QB who has the ideal size/arm and is mature to make the transition to the pro game fast, and the consensus top impact RB in the draft." I'm still fine with the trade as far as value of picks is concerned, but boy oh boy did the previous regimes miss big time on the players they drafted. That's been the Browns #1 problem- horrible drafting in general since 1999. If we would have taken Richard Sherman instead of Owen marecic, this wouldnt even be a discussion. Bottom line is we squandered those picks and the trade was good one for us. Julio would have been a bust if he came here given our QB situation. That was one of the monumental whiffs. Spurgon Wynn or Tom Brady? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 If we would have taken Richard Sherman instead of Owen marecic, this wouldnt even be a discussion. Bottom line is we squandered those picks and the trade was good one for us. Julio would have been a bust if he came here given our QB situation. To be fair I didn't dislike the Marecic pick at the time. The guy was a Swiss Army knife player who played offense and defense in college. He looked like he had potential to be a solid ultility player but of course it didn't turn out that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 Isn't it time we let go of the pitiful drafting, coaching, general manager-ing past? seriously. We now have a 5 star GM, and a coaching staff that is the same. This board isn't a time change thing. "Spring forward, Fall back" is time change. Talking about our current Browns should be about moving forward. And that is what the Browns are doing, bigtime. They know what pieces to the puzzle they need, and if the pieces don't fit, they make a change. But not a time change. I do NOT CARE about what the lizard-lipped, tuna-headed, kumquat-brained ratbirds, squeelers, or boondoggles did, or do. I do NOT CARE about what all the fools did when they ran the Browns before. Farmer and Pettine are very well respected across the NFL.They are nobody's fools. It shows in their veteran FA signings, it shows in their moves in the draft, and it shows in how they are finally rebuilding this team to win. It shows in their sense of humor, and their intelligent comments to the media. They, apparently for the first time in recent Browns history, have a consistent, very, very, very smart philosophy about how to build a winner, and they know the moves they need to make. I think if I were going to get a "Bighead" mural for our computer room wall, it would be Farmer. Maybe we need ONE, "poor, poor pitiful past" thread, and we can all get it out of our psyches. And, so, lamenting the history of losers who ran the Browns before is (***CRAP***)2. (that's my contribution to lightening up on all the foul language on the board). Further, I apologize to anyone who is offended, or feigns offense, by this post, but I had to get it out of the way, because I have 2 or 3 hrs of rototilling the garden to do. It ordinarily wouldn't take so long, but we have permanent walkways created between the planting rows now. And that's the way it is, here on the Brownsboard, in upbeat Calfoxland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cambridgeho Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 Thumbs up cal. Much agreed with what you say, to many times when people say the Browns are at it again it pisses me off, because this is not the same Browns through and through as it was in the past. This is 2014 Browns. Hell, we even have a core value "Play like a Brown" now. We have Probowlers and young and up and coming talent at most key positions. Looks like we will be bulit to last now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFBrown Posted May 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 Its great to look forward but if you ignore the past then the same mistakes will be made. I thought now was a good time to review the trade because you can't review it until time passes. To all those bitching about the post... Fuck off and make another Manziel thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 Thumbs up cal. Much agreed with what you say, to many times when people say the Browns are at it again it pisses me off, because this is not the same Browns through and through as it was in the past. This is 2014 Browns. Hell, we even have a core value "Play like a Brown" now. We have Probowlers and young and up and coming talent at most key positions. Looks like we will be built to last now. I agree it's time to look forward- but let's not forget "In Savage we Trust" either. Yeah- he brought us Joe Thomas, but he also brought Brady Quinn and a bunch of other stiffs along for the ride. Just sayin' yes- it looks like Farmer & Pettine know what they're doing- but let's not be too hasty to say that's the case for sure. (Ah, the eternal optimism of Browns fans) We won't know for sure until several years have passed, just like the Julio Jones draft trade. Exact same reason I'm taking a wait & see attitude on Manziel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 I'm optimistic... more so now than in a long time. You can see this team developing... with not only the promise of better coaching and starters, but also better depth. Rehashing past failures does not diminish my optimism. If anything, doing so reinforces it. Ditto when it comes to reliving the "good old days". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 "Ignoring the past" doesn't lend to us repeating mistakes for the Browns. we aren't in charge of nothin. Farmer, Pettine and co. don't operate on ignorant levels and they don't make stupid decisions. You can read up on every draft pick, and see the difference. I mean, what next? "Sure, Farmer and Pettine and co won a superbowl, but look at all the mistakes and screwups savage and other coaches made in the past"... ??? nah. Not buyin it. The pitiful past has nothing to do with Farmer and Pettine and co. Let it go, imho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USFBrown Posted May 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2014 "Ignoring the past" doesn't lend to us repeating mistakes for the Browns. we aren't in charge of nothin. Farmer, Pettine and co. don't operate on ignorant levels and they don't make stupid decisions. You can read up on every draft pick, and see the difference. I mean, what next? "Sure, Farmer and Pettine and co won a superbowl, but look at all the mistakes and screwups savage and other coaches made in the past"... ??? nah. Not buyin it. The pitiful past has nothing to do w ith Farmer and Pettine and co. Let it go, imho. Its been let go. Just an observation. I'm not ready to crown the new regime as gods gift to football. We go through this every year. Every year the new regime is the one that will change everything. I do have more faith in this crew in charge than many in the past. But as I said before, like analyzing the draft, you can't really see how well it was until years afterwards. Its not bitching or complaining. Just an observation / different topic that I didn't see come up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted May 21, 2014 Report Share Posted May 21, 2014 well anyone with half a brain knew that holmgren was a charade before he even hit the tarmac at hopkins. haslam didn't make the same mistake as some of the lerners and when smelled shit, flushed the toilet. that writing was on the wall as well before if even got a chance to rise from the murky depths of disparity. this is totally different. a GM brought up from the scouting ranks who was brought up from the player ranks (ozzie newsome anyone minus the scouting attribute?). a HC who was brought in from great defensive teams. both playing defense? hard hitting smash mouth football? now they're calling the shots? sign me up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeonman Posted May 21, 2014 Report Share Posted May 21, 2014 If we would have taken Richard Sherman instead of Owen marecic, this wouldnt even be a discussion. Bottom line is we squandered those picks and the trade was good one for us. Julio would have been a bust if he came here given our QB situation. I would have to disagree there. Didn't Gordon come into the same QB situation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Couch Pulls Out Posted May 21, 2014 Report Share Posted May 21, 2014 We now only have 1 player left on our roster from the 2011 Falcons trade. In the 2011 Draft we traded away the #6 pick to the Falcons for three 2011 selections: the Falcons’ first-round pick (No. 27), the Falcons’ second-round pick (No. 59) and the Falcons’ fourth-round pick (No. 124). We also received the Falcons’ No. 1 pick in 2012 (No. 22) and their No. 4 pick in 2012 (No. 118). The Browns moved up to No. 21 in the 2011 draft to take Taylor. With the next pick from the Falcons (No. 59), the Browns took Little. The final Atlanta pick of 2011 (No. 124) was used on fullback Owen Marecic. Brandon Weeden was selected with the Falcon's 2012 first draft pick (No. 22). The Falcons’ fourth-rounder (No. 118) was used in conjunction to trade up to get Richardson (No. 3). Julio Jones or Taylor, Little, Marecic, Weeden, and Richardson. In retrospect, we got FLEECED!!! In the end, it's what the Browns have done best for years, draft horribly. I still believe you take the stock pile of picks especially if you're a team that needs some rebuilding. But in this case, we lost out big time. I would still take that trade in a heartbeat. You're getting a two first round picks, a second round pick and two fourth round picks. That's three (should-be) starters, and probably two depth players. Unfortunately, our scouting department was shit and our GM's were equally as bad. I know hindsight is 20/20, but we could have taken: Cobb (No. 64) instead of Little (No. 59) Julius Thomas (No. 129) instead of Marecic (No. 124) and Reilly Reiff (No. 23) instead of Weeden (No. 22) All of those players were available right around where we made our (shitty) picks. Evaluating a draft trade isn't all about evaluating the players drafted. The team had needs all across the board in 2011, not just at the WR position. Picking up an additional first round pick, second round pick and two fourth round picks could have gone a long way in building a solid roster. IUnfortunately, the people in charge were shitty drafters. (If you want to go second level, we then traded Richardson for a first round pick, which was used to trade up and grab Johnny Manziel.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.