WalterWhite Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 The parents of this spoiled little prick are not taking any accountability and blaming gun laws for theirs sons distress. Keep in mind, this kid killed innocent people because he couldn't get laid. (seriously) How about you step and be firm parents you neglectful yuppie scum bags? How about you actually talk to your fucking and play a role in their life? And wait a minute, isn't California already strict on gun laws? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 If I read that correctly, the parent of a victim was blaming the politicians and the NRA. There are no quotes from the shooter's parents Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Woody is correct. A victims parents. Do you blame them? Their son was just shot to death by a psychopath with his legal guns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 The shooter's father was a director for the movie "the Hunger Games." A movie that glorifies killing youths for sport/entertainment. How about lawmakers start "infringing" on the 1st amendment instead of the 2nd? The little 22 yr old kid was driving around in a BMW, with 3 Sig Sauer pistols. But go ahead, make it more complicated for me to own a gun. That'll solve the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadNewsBrowns Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Blaming guns for this is the same as blaming women for not giving the little pussy a little pussy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 He bought the guns legally so in this case making it harder for a "law abiding" citizen would have been a good thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 No, not if he didn't have any red flags that disqualified him. wouldn't have made any difference at all. But making him pay 300 dollars for a registration, now that would have prevented him from being a killer. right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 He bought the guns legally so in this case making it harder for a "law abiding" citizen would have been a good thing I included the make of his car and guns to speak more about his spoiled brat, rich-kid entitlement, not the make up of typical law-abiding citizens. His "psychiatrist" isn't really an MD, but contacted SB police regarding the kids youtube page well prior to the incident. For some reason, the protocol is to send police officers to interview the person rather than an actual licensed psychiatrist. If you're going to send police officers regarding a threat, at least allow them to conduct a search where they would have found his cache of weapons and writings on his intent. The kid breathed a sigh of relief in his "manifesto" regarding that encounter. link On Saturday, Santa Barbara Sheriff Bill Brown told CBS's Face the Nationthat because Rodger seemed normal enough, his officers didn't have grounds for searching the apartment. "And obviously, looking back on this, it’s a very tragic situation, and we certainly, you know, wish that we could turn the clock back and maybe change some things," he said. "You want to certainly intervene and obviously try to prevent a tragedy such as we've experienced here. On the same token, you don't want to stigmatize people who are seeking treatment for mental illness and you don't want to prevent them from doing so because of the potential stigma that's attached." But no, by all means, "stigmatize" gun owners at every opportunity. Stupid fucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Your vehement enraged tirades make me suspect you shouldn't be allowed to own weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 It's called a dissenting opinion. Remember your "enraged racist tirades"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 I'm never enraged and it's already been established a few years ago that nobody can own black people. Besides my opinion that black culture doesn't promote healthy behavior isn't racist. It would be racist If I said they were not capable of promoting healthy behavior. However I understand that you want to deflect this so have at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 I'm trying to discuss the real problem. Not echo cry-baby sound bites about guns. Keep fighting the good fight, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Here's a fact. Repeal of the Second Amendment and confiscation of every possible gun and severe prison terms for anyone associated with importing guns from overseas or other countries would result in less gun violence in the United States. There can't be an argument to that can there? So all in favor? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Who's going to pay for the mental health overhaul? Gun manufacturers? You? With taxes? If you're not willing to be taxed far out the ass to cover mental health then you have to start looking at keeping the guns out of their hands. You're going to have to give something up. Your money your guns or more kids lives. You go ahead and pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Here's a fact. Repeal of the Second Amendment and confiscation of every possible gun and severe prison terms for anyone associated with importing guns from overseas or other countries would result in less gun violence in the United States. There can't be an argument to that can there? So all in favor? WSS Severe??? Like life in prison, or execution?? If only that worked on murderers, rapists, etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Who's going to pay for the mental health overhaul? Gun manufacturers? You? With taxes? If you're not willing to be taxed far out the ass to cover mental health then you have to start looking at keeping the guns out of their hands. You're going to have to give something up. Your money your guns or more kids lives. You go ahead and pick. What has to be overhauled, exactly? The data is already there. Why not start using it? (e.g. This Rogers kid was dx'ed with Aspergers, had been under the care of a therapist since his early teenage years). I personally can't wait to read the list of medications he was taking. It seems like Hollywood is as equally un-excited about having the blame for this shooting rampage unfairly placed on them as gun owners are. Sucks being the scapegoat. link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 I read he was not diagnosed with aspergers. So now what? Turn this into a witch hunt for autism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 The ease with which this "known autistic" kid that had been "in therapy his whole life" was able to legally purchase firearms has to alarm you. If you don't have an ulterior agenda that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Yes hollywood hates it and the gun lobby hates it so let's scapegoat the pharmaceutical industry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Severe??? Like life in prison, or execution?? If only that worked on murderers, rapists, etc.. Yes that severe. I'm sure he knew I was being a bit facetious but there's always something we can restrict that would probably save some lives. I would imagine Sharia law would cut down on at least some crime? And it doesn't matter with most crimes because of the simple fact that 85% of violent crime is committed by repeat offenders. If I recall correctly. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 We have a few mentally ill people who kill under 100 people in a few years time period and the anti gun crowd goes nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 If anything it falls under the 4th Amendment(unreasonable search\seizures), while the therapist did the right thing and called the cops to check, the cops followed up but didn't think he met the criteria to search his house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 If anything it falls under the 4th Amendment(unreasonable search\seizures), while the therapist did the right thing and called the cops to check, the cops followed up but didn't think he met the criteria to search his house. So the 2nd amendment is disposable but not the 4th? I thought saving lives was the prime directive? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 So the 2nd amendment is disposable but not the 4th? I thought saving lives was the prime directive? WSS Have I ever said I wanted to dispose of the 2nd? The only sort of regulation of firearms I would want to see would be a license(kind of like a drivers license) that would show the purchaser at least knows how to safely handle and store a firearm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Have I ever said I wanted to dispose of the 2nd? The only sort of regulation of firearms I would want to see would be a license(kind of like a drivers license) that would show the purchaser at least knows how to safely handle and store a firearm. You have not. It was a rhetorical question.WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Yes hollywood hates it and the gun lobby hates it so let's scapegoat the pharmaceutical industry Not sure the industry is the one to blame. We live in a society that shuns life-saving vaccinations, yet slings ADHD meds to 2 year olds like they're vitamins. But yes he was treated for Aspergers, his family attorney confirmed it. Nobody is asking for a witch hunt. But the available data should be used and should inhibit his ability to own a gun. Because now where are we? Va Tech, columbine, sandy hook, aurora, Ft Hood, DC navy yard - now this, all shooters with documented mental health issues. Correlation doesn't imply causation but let's use some common sense. If not mental health, how about a previous history of violence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 And if anyone is keeping score: 3 Knife fatalities. 3 Gun fatalities. 8 Wounded with a gun (fired from vehicle) 4 Wounded with vehicle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Fan Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 Yes that severe. I'm sure he knew I was being a bit facetious but there's always something we can restrict that would probably save some lives. I would imagine Sharia law would cut down on at least some crime? And it doesn't matter with most crimes because of the simple fact that 85% of violent crime is committed by repeat offenders. If I recall correctly. WSS I was pointing out that these punishments aren't a deterrent for that criminal segment of the population already. Meaning, there will still be some who will ignore the punishments and commit the crimes (regardless of what they are). Enforce existing laws. Life sentence means Life. Get rid of "death row" And Sharia law? really? Did I hit my head on something and miss the Middle East becoming a bastion of tranquility and peace? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 The ease with which this "known autistic" kid that had been "in therapy his whole life" was able to legally purchase firearms has to alarm you. If you don't have an ulterior agenda that is. How is this different than what you said? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.