WalterWhite Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 Chris Cuomo @ChrisCuomo · 2h2 hours ago Chris Cuomo retweeted Brett MacDonald it doesn't. hate speech is excluded from protection. dont just say you love the constitution...read it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 Hate speech falls into a very grey area of the 1st amendment , we allow groups to protest, or express their opinions....but if it gets to the point where it could be consider "incitement" then it should be regulated by government to maintain the peace. For example Westboro Baptist Church is allowed to protest thier hate of soldiers and gays, but have to maintain a certain distance from proceeding to prevent fights\violence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 it goes back to the corruption of thought when liberals go dominantly emotional on issues. They get the political advantage if they condone THEIR free speech, but oppose others' free speech. If "net neutrality" came up under Bush or Reagan, all hell would break loose in the left and liberal media. Like ALWAYS "gloating" over our soldiers' deaths overseas, but keeping that quiet now that Obamao is "president". Like Shep "frightened" by Bush/Cheney, but not one word about Obamao's glaring overreach for power. Like libs going berserk over the Patriot Act, but happy with it as long as a dem is pres. And this dem pres make the Patriotic Act even stronger. All we get from those same libs, is the Sounds of Silence. Because they have the advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 Read those first two responses. Compare and contrast them. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opal312 Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 But Reverand Wright was glorified by the left wing loonies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 . Like ALWAYS "gloating" over our soldiers' deaths overseas, . excuse me, who the fuck was doing this now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 Every newspaper carried the deaths at least once a week, on Sundays, sometimes as a daily feature. It was reported on CNN, etc, but then when Obamao came into the WH... it stopped cold. Therefore, it's safe to figure that it was a happy-to-have-it political jab at Bush and Cheney. But when it didn't suit their politics... they stopped it immediately. If you don't believe me, go look it up - here's one link I went and found: http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2012/09/11/mainstream-media-ignoring-increase-in-deaths-wounded-in-afghanistan-under-obama/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 Oh so because breitbart said it, it must true eh? I can't speak for all media outlets but This week with George Stephanopolous was running it's weekly in memoriam for U.S servicemen well into Obama's presidency. Isn't it a nice thing? Isn't it supposed to remind us what servicemen are doing abroad? Do you see how basically your world is spun for you like a web? You're being trained like a dog. When they want a specific response from you they have the stimulus ready to go, and they get exactly what they want......every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 6, 2015 Report Share Posted May 6, 2015 Cleve translation: "dammit. Cal showed that what he said above was not just his opinion. I'm an idiot" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted May 7, 2015 Report Share Posted May 7, 2015 Cleve translation: "dammit. Cal showed that what he said above was not just his opinion. I'm an idiot" No actually I know for a fact that ABC was doing it well into OBama's term. It's just a fact sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted May 7, 2015 Report Share Posted May 7, 2015 I know facts are so inconvenient, especially when you're trying to weave a bullshit narrative spoon fed to you by others. Sucks I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 7, 2015 Report Share Posted May 7, 2015 Sure, and I knew you knew that. So why the whining? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryfine Posted May 7, 2015 Report Share Posted May 7, 2015 Chris Cuomo @ChrisCuomo · 2h2 hours ago Chris Cuomo retweeted Brett MacDonald it doesn't. hate speech is excluded from protection. dont just say you love the constitution...read it Hi nerd. ?Here is a question for you. Why did your mother dress you up like a girl till you were 16? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Hi nerd. ?Here is a question for you. Why did your mother dress you up like a girl till you were 16? she was insane? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalterWhite Posted May 8, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Hi nerd. ?Here is a question for you. Why did your mother dress you up like a girl till you were 16? You're fucking embarrassing. I hope you get killed tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Hi nerd. ?Here is a question for you. Why did your mother dress you up like a girl till you were 16? Dude, your mother left you in a dumpster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Liberals hate everything that stands in their way of controlling everybody else who is not liberal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrownsfan Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Hi nerd. ?Here is a question for you. Why did your mother dress you up like a girl till you were 16? she was insane? You're fucking embarrassing. I hope you get killed tomorrow. Dude, your mother left you in a dumpster. Liberals hate everything that stands in their way of controlling everybody else who is not liberal. No actually I know for a fact that ABC was doing it well into OBama's term. It's just a fact sorry. Cleve translation: "dammit. Cal showed that what he said above was not just his opinion. I'm an idiot" This is why we can't have nice things..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Liberals hate everything that stands in their way of controlling everybody else who is not liberal. that is def pot calling the kettle black or vice versa. Acting as if conservatives don't want to control everyone as well is astoundingly myopic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 baloney. things like moveon.org, etc etc etc thrived under Bush and Cheney. Then look at all the political, legal and economic tort maneuvering by Obamao and co. against any group they disagree with. Even Christian churches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mohican Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Hate speech falls into a very grey area of the 1st amendment , we allow groups to protest, or express their opinions....but if it gets to the point where it could be consider "incitement" then it should be regulated by government to maintain the peace. For example Westboro Baptist Church is allowed to protest thier hate of soldiers and gays, but have to maintain a certain distance from proceeding to prevent fights\violence. Text of the first amendment to the Constitution For The United States Of America Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Text of the tenth amendment to the Constitution For The United States Of America The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. the first 10 amendments were ratified in 1791, so from that point forward there should be no abridgment of freedom of speech from the Federal Government. Of course, Congress violated this in a major way in 1798 with the Alien and Sedition Acts. Several states (Notably Kentucky and Virginia) interposed and nullified these laws inside their states. Under the original intent and operation of the Constitution that was only a chain on the Federal government, and states could impose speech codes, just as states could have their own established religions. If you operate under the language of the day and original intent then your premise falls apart. If you operate under the "living document" premise then you might as well throw the Constitution and it's amended Bill of Rights out the window. Oh wait, that's what Federal Jurisprudence since FDR has done, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mohican Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 I would modify the title and premise of the thread to "lovers of big government hate free speech". Or lovers of a consolidated versus truly federal government hate free speech. Our second president, a big government stooge signed a bill into law that prohibited criticizing the Federal Government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 gays hate free speech too, when it isn't them who are speaking and wearing rainbow t-shirts. emotional, corrupt knee jerks. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/05/08/suspensions-handed-out-after-students-wear-chick-fil-a-attire-on-lgbt-day-but-its-not-what-you-think/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 Chik fil a is fine for supporting traditional marriage but I wish people like you would stop using it as s passive aggressive anti gay statement. You can disagree with gays without being a gay hater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 I like chik fil a and I also like just about every gay person I know. They should also be able to enjoy chik fil a without cal throwing waffle fries at them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 You go Cal. We need a medical treatment to fix their defective gene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 It's like this - we enjoy watching "Survivor" on TV. One time, they had one guy on there who was gay, and walked around naked a lot. A bit annoying, but who cares. We enjoyed every series. Then another gay came on, whatever his name was, and he wasn't just gay, he talked and talked about it, used it in converations and whined and played the victim, cried, more and more and more.... that was sickening, he quit the show. Then, he ended up coming on again. And that show, spouses/partners were also on the show with them. Sure enough, he had his whatever on the show as his partner. Sure enough, they did nearly everything they could do to make a big splash about it, ad nauseum, again and again and again, blah blah blah..., far worse than any guy/gal or husband/wife will ever do. and the same idiot quit the show again. We started only watching it after being recorded to fast forward past the gay whining and feigned victimization and flaunting etc etc etc. And the other gay guy got booted. Probably sued the show because of "discrimination", regardless of what that is what the show ends up being a whole lot about - people being booted off the island with votes. Shoving perversion into peoples awareness is what is the problem. I don't care that some people are either dna or psychologically warped into perversion. It's sad, but hey, just don't try to force the rest of normal, heterosexual America into accepting said public perversion in part of the culture war, like the left always does. That's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted May 9, 2015 Report Share Posted May 9, 2015 You go Cal. We need a medical treatment to fix their defective gene. They found a medical break through for it. The saliva of old homophobes applied to gay dongs has been proven to turn them around. Put on the chapstick. You are on a mission from God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted May 9, 2015 Report Share Posted May 9, 2015 It's like this - we enjoy watching "Survivor" on TV. One time, they had one guy on there who was gay, and walked around naked a lot. A bit annoying, but who cares. We enjoyed every series. Then another gay came on, whatever his name was, and he wasn't just gay, he talked and talked about it, used it in converations and whined and played the victim, cried, more and more and more.... that was sickening, he quit the show. Then, he ended up coming on again. And that show, spouses/partners were also on the show with them. Sure enough, he had his whatever on the show as his partner. Sure enough, they did nearly everything they could do to make a big splash about it, ad nauseum, again and again and again, blah blah blah..., far worse than any guy/gal or husband/wife will ever do. and the same idiot quit the show again. We started only watching it after being recorded to fast forward past the gay whining and feigned victimization and flaunting etc etc etc. And the other gay guy got booted. Probably sued the show because of "discrimination", regardless of what that is what the show ends up being a whole lot about - people being booted off the island with votes. Shoving perversion into peoples awareness is what is the problem. I don't care that some people are either dna or psychologically warped into perversion. It's sad, but hey, just don't try to force the rest of normal, heterosexual America into accepting said public perversion in part of the culture war, like the left always does. That's all. You are the only person I have EVER heard of that liked survivor. I watched 2 minutes of it, after a superbowl, 10+ years ago, and knew it was garbage If you are still watching that show, you need help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.