Dividing Up the Yardage in 2017

[Flugel]

The old saying is you have to know where you've been to know where you're going. My favorite era of transition was in the mid 80s. After Mack & Byner both rushed for over 1000 yards in 85, Lindy Infante was hired as our OC to help a young, 2nd year QB Bernie Kosar come of age. We ended up going 12-4 with a young group of WRs almost equally in question to that of our group today. The numbers I am about to show you will reflect just that. In fact, the 2 guys with the most receptions (Brennan & Fontenot) got the majority of their catches on 3rd downs combining for 102 receptions.

 

Passing

Kosar 531 att 310 comp 58.4% 3854 yds 7.83 ypa 17 TD 10 INT 39 sacks 83.8 passer rating

 

Those are the numbers of the QB on our only team good enough to win 12 games in a regular season. Keep in mind, it wasn't like Kosar was handed a bunch of superstars on the perimeter (and Slaughter was only a rookie). Is this impossible for Kessler or Kizer to achieve this year? I understand it's a new era - but the numbers above show Kosar wasn't asked to do anything in possible in his soph year. IMO, his biggest strength was converting 3rd downs into 1st downs (almost exclusively w/ Brennan & Fontenot) and only giving up 10 INTs.

 

Rushing

Mack 174 att 665 yds 3.82 ypc 10 TD

Dickey 135 att 523 yds 3.87 ypc 6 TD

Byner 94 att 277 yds 2.95 ypc 2 TD

Fontenot 25 att 105 yds 4.20 ypc 1 TD

 

Nothing eye popping here and nobody matched Crow's 4.8 yards per carry this year. That said. another part of Infante's version of ball control was making sure all of his RBs caught the ball. They combined for 122 receptions as depicted below. Last year, Crow and Duke combined for 93 receptions. That said, our low ranked offense didn't possess the ball long enough to add more to the inventory.

 

Receiving

Brennan 55 rec 838 yds 15.24 ypc 6 TD WR

Fontenot 47 rec 559 yds 11.89 ypc 1 TD RB

Slaughter 40 rec 577 yds 14.43 ypc 4 TD WR

Langhorne 39 rec 678 yds 17.38 ypc 1 TD WR

Newsome 39 rec 417 yds 10.69 ypc 3 TD TE

Byner 37 rec 328 yds 8.86 ypc 2 TD RB

Mack 28 rec 292 yds 10.43 ypc 0 TD RB/FB

Dickey 10 rec 78 yds 7.80 ypc 0 TD RB

Weathers 9 rec 100 yds 11.11 ypc 0 TD WR

Holt 4 rec 61 yds 15.25 ypc 1 TD TE

Greer 3 rec 51 yds 17.00 ypc 0 TD WR

Tucker 2 rec 29 yds 14.50 ypc 0 TD TE

McNeil 1 rec 9 yds 9.00 ypc 0 TD WR

Kosar 1 rec 1 yd 1.00 ypc 0 TD QB

 

Not many big names at WR just yet. But the more important thing was - did they did they fulfill their specific roles? I already spoke about Brennan's productivity as well as what was asked of from our RBs in the passing game. Webster Slaughter was only a rookie playing all 16 games on a learning curve. The 9 year vet Newsome added leadership, reliability and consistency from the TE position but it was far from his Pro Bowl receiving numbers from 81,84 & 85.

 

Looking at the WR numbers above, besides era change - the biggest difference between that young group and our young group is - we don't have a Brian Brennan entering his 3rd year ready to ace the slot receiver role. Then again, it wasn't like a lot of people expected that type of climb from Brennan at the time. Will this role be from a WR or a TE/H-back or a combination of those from someone like DeValve? Also, look at the low volume of TD receptions from our WR Corps & TE position (above) especially for a team that won 12 games. Again, the hidden gem was how they aced very doable 3rd down conversions without turning the ball over. That was not a statistically sexy football team. It was just really efficient at extending drives on 3rd downs, which rested the D ranking #1 against the run.

 

Moving forward - we've addressed our Oline via free agency; added a 1st round TE we can line up inside or outside like a WR; added a QB in round 2; added a former first round WR (Britt) via FA coming off the best reception volume of his career; and everyone retained now has a year of experience in Hue's system. Can this equate to moving the ball better punctuated by points while Gregg Williams has our defense working to cause more turnovers? I think it can.

 

http://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/cleveland-browns/stats/1986

[TexasAg1969]

And never underestimate the importance of these telling stats which should dramatically improve in 2017.

 

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/givetake

 

EDIT: Only Chicago had less takeaways than we did last year. Pretty bad.

[The Gipper]

And never underestimate the importance of these telling stats which should dramatically improve in 2017.

 

http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/givetake

 

EDIT: Only Chicago had less takeaways than we did last year. Pretty bad.

Browns #1 in most sacks given up...by far. #31 in turnovers? That will lose you games.

 

So, my conclusion is: 1-15 was not due solely to not having talent. I think there was a lot of bad coaching going on....on both sides of the ball.

[Flugel]

Browns #1 in most sacks given up...by far. #31 in turnovers? That will lose you games.

 

It sho will.

 

That's why they've made numerous changes to combat that;but it might take a little bit longer than September to see it all gel. That said, I think we'll be competitive enough to get the young guys believing they can win enough to do so far more consistently than we seen the last 2 years.

 

Just like I told someone in a hurry to make all the conclusions about our draftees at the end of their first season - I think it'll be more important to grade stuff when we have at least a 2nd year to measure progress up against,

[Orion]

we don't have a Brian Brennan entering his 3rd year ready to ace the slot receiver role. Then again, it wasn't like a lot of people expected that type of climb from Brennan at the time. Will this role be from a WR or a TE/H-back or a combination of those from someone like DeValve?

 

Brennan was 5'9 at 178 lb.

DeValve is 6'3 at 254 lb.

 

One of them fits the slot position's requirements - quick & shifty. The other does not.

[The Gipper]

 

Brennan was 5'9 at 178 lb.

DeValve is 6'3 at 254 lb.

 

One of them fits the slot position's requirements - quick & shifty. The other does not.

Can it be argued that if you are playing a two TE offense, that your slot receiver is simply a different sort of animal...a TE, bigger, stronger, more capable in traffic?

[Flugel]

Can it be argued that if you are playing a two TE offense, that your slot receiver is simply a different sort of animal...a TE, bigger, stronger, more capable in traffic?

 

Yes, it can be to anyone with an open mind. A lot of H-backs are/have been used in lieu of a Slot Receiver like say Frank Wycheck who was built a lot like Seth DeValve without being any quicker or more agile. Below is the Superbowl Season he made the Pro Bowl in where he caught 69 of 108 targets for 641 yards and see how they list his positions. Also, look at the similarity in size to DeValve: Frank Wycheck. Height: 6-3 Weight: 253 Born: 10/14/1971 Philadelphia,PA

1999* 28 TEN FB/TE 89 16 16 108 69 641 9.3 2 35 4.3 40.1 63.9%

 

And we're even in an era where you see big TEs like Gronk in a 2 point stance out wide where a WR usually lines up. When Sean Payton coached Jimmy Graham - and against us in particular, we were shutting him down when he lined up inside with a hand in the dirt. So, he adjusted and lined Graham up outside in a 2 point on Joe Haden - who gave up 7 inches in height plus the bigger catch radius to the accurate arm of Brees. And that jumper cabled their passing game that day. Remember that thought, we'll revisit it.

 

Here's part of an article about by Andrew Gribble on clevelandbrowns.com called "Browns coveted Princeton TE Seth DeValve for his mismatch potential" as DeValve described it, he was an "H-back adjuster" who moved all across the field like a chess piece. On some plays he'd line up wide, on some he'd be in the slot and some he'd have his hand in the dirt like a traditional TE. "I was doing TE in various amounts depending on the year," DeValve said. "I was always used as a hybrid TE/WR so to say I'm making a transition from WR to TE isn't extremely accurate."

 

Is square pegging a round hole by lining him up inside and pretending he's Mark Bavaro with a hand in the dirt every play the mismatch potential the article speaks of? I don't think so. For those of us accustomed to seeing shorter/skinnier/quicker guys that can't break press coverage lined up off the ball in the slot - here's an article mentioning some bigger guys bucking trend in the top 10 as well as in the special mentions: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000706884/article/larry-fitzgerald-eric-decker-among-top-slot-receivers

 

I think the plan is to use Njoku a lot like Greg Olsen has been used. While seeing what DeValve can add in many of the same roles he provided at Princeton. I could be wrong on that but the article I read persuaded me in that direction. Didn't we also let our little Slot Receiver go? If I'm one arguing we have zero at WR - why wouldn't I be hoping/thinking DeValve could play slot receiver or H-back? I'm not doing that and I think some of our soph WRs can emerge/improve. We'll have injuries so the more a guy can do - the better he is for us. Why limit ourselves here?

[Flugel]

 

Brennan was 5'9 at 178 lb.

DeValve is 6'3 at 254 lb.

 

One of them fits the slot position's requirements - quick & shifty. The other does not.

 

Try to understand 1986 was 31 years ago and some things have been changing since then. You cut and pasted the carefully worded question I had but refused to answer it. I'm still waiting on your answer...

[Tour2ma]

I'll take a shot...

 

You can put any size body you want in the slot... anyone from Alford to Sterup. But if you put Sterup there and still have to start Alford, then Alford is going to be pressable at the LOS.

 

You use the slot to keep your WRs who have issues getting off the line out of reach of DBs. Generally these are the quick, but slight WRs.

[The Gipper]

I'll take a shot...

 

You can put any size body you want in the slot... anyone from Alford to Sterup. But if you put Sterup there and still have to start Alford, then Alford is going to be pressable at the LOS.

 

You use the slot to keep your WRs who have issues getting off the line out of reach of DBs. Generally these are the quick, but slight WRs.

And..you often put them in motion for just that reason.

[Orion]

 

 

You can put any size body you want in the slot...

 

Well, that was going to be my response. You can put a tackle in the slot if ya want.

 

If you're going slightly run heavy then a two TE set could see a TE in the slot.

 

Generally you need someone quick footed.

 

Track stars on the outside, quick footed in the slots, big lumbering TE's in close. - Doesn't mean you don't line up Gronk out wide now and again to create a mismatch......

[Flugel]

I'll take a shot...

 

You can put any size body you want in the slot... anyone from Alford to Sterup. But if you put Sterup there and still have to start Alford, then Alford is going to be pressable at the LOS.

 

You use the slot to keep your WRs who have issues getting off the line out of reach of DBs. Generally these are the quick, but slight WRs.

 

It used to be pretty exclusive to the quicker, smaller WRs Tour. Here's an article from last September saying this trend has been changing and you'll see 3 different guys that are 6'3" (Fitzgerald, Decker, & Jordan Matthews) in the top 10 with some more big WRs listed as special mentions (Boyd, Enunwa,Hurns and Sanu are all at least 6'2" while Boldin isn't tiny).

Larry Fitzgerald, Eric Decker among top slot receivers

 

By Chris Wesseling

• Around the NFL Writer
• Published: Sept. 21, 2016 at 01:16 p.m.
• Updated: Sept. 21, 2016 at 04:34 p.m.

When Percy Harvin became the first slot receiver to win the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year award in 2009, he was the exception to the prevailing wisdom that the position was solely the domain of smaller, shiftier wideouts unable to survive outside the numbers.

 

Seven years later, there's no such thing as a prototypical slot receiver along the lines of Wes Welker. We still see undersized joysticks such as Julian Edelman, Randall Cobb and Cole Beasley. We also see physical receivers who used to win primarily on the outside such as Larry Fitzgerald, Anquan Boldin and Eric Decker. Even skyscrapers along the lines of Vincent Jackson and Jordan Matthews frequent the slot these days.

 

One new player set to join the ranks of the great inside threats is Giants rookie Sterling Shepard, who has spent as much time in the slot as any receiver through two games.Shepard has been so impressive so early in his career that a rejuvenated Victor Cruz is now playing almost strictly on the outside. If Cruz and Odell Beckham are to be trusted, Shepard is a heavy favorite to join Harvin's exclusive company. "Lights out every game," Beckham said after Shepard's impressive Week 2 performance. "[shepard] comes up with the big catch, makes the big plays. He's going to be Rookie of the Year." With Shepard as the inspiration, let's examine the NFL's premier slot weapons:

 

1) Larry Fitzgerald, Arizona Cardinals: Let's pause to appreciate greatness 13 years into the extended prime of a Hall of Fame career. Once the NFL's gold standard as an "X" receiver consistently beating cornerbacks downfield, Fitzgerald has remade himself by using the greatest hands of his generation to come down with contested catches in tight spaces. The plaudits don't stop there. Fitzgerald is also the best blocking wide receiver, the most productive postseason star and perhaps the foremost model of stability as the face of the Cardinals franchise.

When will we learn to stop writing the 33-year-old legend off as a difference-making talent? Even after Carson Palmer posted a gaudy 119.5 passer rating on throws to Fitzgerald in 2015, conventional wisdom suggested younger teammates Michael Floyd and/or John Brown had surpassed Fitzgerald in Arizona's pecking order entering the 2016 season. Through two weeks, Palmer has increased his passing rating to 134.2 on Fitzgerald targets. He's the class of one of the NFL's most dangerous wide receiver corps.

 

2) Doug Baldwin, Seattle Seahawks: Embarking on his sixth NFL season, Baldwin has already earned his third professional contract with a four-year, $46 million deal that recognizes his status as a team leader and unheralded star. Responsible for the NFL's top passer rating when targeted (139.9) in 2015, Baldwin was the most efficient receiver in the league last season. Of the 87 receivers to play at least 25 percent of their teams' snaps and accrue an average depth of target beyond 10 yards, per Pro Football Focus, Baldwin's completion rate of 79 percent was No. 1.

A crafty route runner without fear over the middle, Baldwin has emerged as Russell Wilson's go-to target in high-leverage situations. While he plays nearly 90 percent of his snaps in the slot, he isn't limited to shallow routes. In fact, only Sammy Watkins scored more touchdowns on deep passes (20 or more yards in the air) in 2015 (Watkins had eight to Baldwin's five). Slot receivers don't just come in all shapes and sizes these days, they also have varying pedigrees. Baldwin went undrafted out of Stanford, while Fitzgerald was selected at No. 3 overall in the 2004 NFL Draft.

 

3) Julian Edelman, New England Patriots: It's no coincidence that Edelman has succeeded former Patriots receiver Wes Welker as the league's option-route master. High-profile veterans such as Joey Galloway and Chad Johnson quickly flamed out in New England because Tom Brady's offense is so heavily reliant upon reading coverages and improvising routes based on defensive tendencies in the crowded mid-section of the field. Edelman is a better athlete than Welker, which allows Brady to dial up man-beater routes whenever he sees a favorable matchup versus a bigger cornerback unable to match Edelman's trademark quickness off the line of scrimmage.

Consult the Super Bowl XLIX game tape and watch Edelman trash the greatest secondary of the 21st century -- all the while talking smack to remind Seattle's accomplished defensive backs that there was nothing they could do to stop him. A converted college quarterback, Edelman is the active leader in punt-return average -- and sixth in NFL history. He's a kamikaze with the ball in his hands, and his playing style too often results in injuries. Fortunately, the Patriots also boast Danny Amendola and Chris Hogan, two more receivers capable of excelling in the slot.

 

4) Jarvis Landry, Miami Dolphins: Landry is a polarizing receiver. Boosters point to his record-setting receptions pace (194 in Years 1 and 2, the most ever in a player's first two seasons), vise-grip hands, physical toughness and rare ability to force missed tackles when he has the ball. Detractors note that the majority of his catches are manufactured by the play caller near the line of scrimmage. Landry is excellent when he's schemed open on quick-hitters such as slants and bubble screens. Can an offense thrive with that limited skill set as the focal point?

Landry entered the league in 2014 with Hines Ward comparisons, but I see a more reliable, less explosive version of Percy Harvin. He can exploit openings and threaten deep on occasion. At the same time, he doesn't run a full route tree and rarely is tasked with beating press-man coverage. If he was paired with a true No. 1 receiver, Landry's volume numbers would drop -- and the Dolphins would start winning more games.

 

5) Eric Decker, New York Jets: The NFL's preeminent second fiddle for the past half-decade (with two different teams, no less), Decker is essentially a power forward in the red zone and down the seam. Since 2012, only Dez Bryant and Brandon Marshall (Decker's Jets teammate) have bested Decker's 43 touchdowns. Marshall and Decker found the end zone in the same game nine times last season, breaking the NFL tandem record set by Cris Carter and Randy Moss with the historically explosive 1998 Vikings. A picture of consistency, Decker has hauled in a touchdown in 15 of his last 18 games.

It's rare to see slot receivers doing as much downfield damage as Decker did to the Bills' cornerback duo of Stephon Gilmore and Ronald Darby last week. He generated five different plays of over 15 yards, not including a 53-yard reception that was nullified by penalty. For years, Decker's production was discounted as a byproduct of Peyton Manning's prodigiousness in Denver. But how many receivers would have been able to match Decker's prolific level of play catching passes from Kyle Orton, Tim Tebow and Ryan Fitzpatrick?

 

6) Randall Cobb, Green Bay Packers: Cobb is the trickiest evaluation on this list. Will this season more closely resemble 2014, when he was the best slot receiver in football, or 2015, when he was a season-long liability while playing through a painful shoulder injury?

At his peak, Cobb's greatest assets are his versatility (he aligns primarily in the slot, but also in the backfield and outside), the run-after-catch elusiveness of a punt returner and a mind meld with Aaron Rodgers on broken and improvised plays. That Rodgers-to-Cobb connection generated an NFL-high 134.3 passer rating in 2014, as Cobb finished in the top 10 in catch percentage, yards after catch and forced missed tackles, per Pro Football Focus.

Last season was a different story. Forced to play outside more often while drawing extra coverage with Jordy Nelson out of the lineup, Cobb contributed to the first dysfunctional offense of the Rodgers era. "Last year you had one guy [Cobb] for Aaron to throw it to," one NFL assistant coach explained this past offseason. "It was, OK, cover that guy, and after that [Rodgers] had to make everything up."

Four years ago, Rodgers predicted Cobb would ultimately be regarded as "one of the best picks in [Packers general manager] Ted Thompson's career, if not the best." Through two games this season, we've yet to see evidence that the sixth-year veteran has found his way back to that ascendant career path.

 

7) Sterling Shepard, New York Giants: Wide receiver guru Matt Harmon billed Shepard as not only the most NFL-ready route runner in the 2016 NFL Draft, but also as someone who is uniquely gifted for a slot prospect. Shepard has generated a steady stream of hype for his hands, speed and explosive athleticism since landing with the Giants in the second round.

"I just feel like I really know what he's capable of," Beckham raved in June, "and I'd rather let him just shock the world than spill his secrets. ... He was definitely a steal, a guy that could have gone first round."

It's telling that Shepard has already displaced Cruz, the league's most dangerous playmaker out of the slot in 2011 and 2012. Through two NFL games, Shepard boasts a 91.7 catch percentage -- behind only Travis Benjamin (100.0) and Quincy Enunwa (92.9) among receivers with at least 10 targets. With Cruz back on the field and Shepard replacing an inefficient Rueben Randle in the pecking order, the Giants now rival the Cardinals and Jets for the NFL's top wide receiver trios.

 

8) Jordan Matthews, Philadelphia Eagles: Former Saints star Marques Colston paved the way for Matthews as a large-framed slot receiver capable of beating the occasional cornerback over the top and safeties down the seam. Matthews -- a second-round pick in 2014 -- had a special role under former Eagles coach Chip Kelly the past two years, working between the numbers to exploit size mismatches as a possession receiver with long arms, huge hands and the ability to come down with contested catches in high-traffic areas.

Although he's lining up outside more often in new Philadelphia coach Doug Pederson's offense, Matthews is still primarily a slot receiver mixing spectacular catches with flagrant drops.

 

9) Willie Snead, New Orleans Saints: Drew Brees has found his new version of Lance Moore, a jack-of-all-trades wideout with a knack for finding open spaces against zone defenses. Uncanny route running allows Snead to move the chains underneath coverage and sneak up on safeties and linebackers with a double-move to separate on deeper and intermediate routes. Throws in Snead's direction led to a team-best 111.1 passer rating last season. Though two games this year, that mark has skyrocketed to 158.0. Even if we attribute the bulk of that to the Raiders' coverage woes in the season opener, Snead is here to stay as a productive slot receiver.

 

10) Cole Beasley, Dallas Cowboys: If you're looking for Beasley, you can find him at the sticks. Rookie running back Ezekiel Elliott and the dominant offensive line garner the spotlight for Dallas' ball-control offense, but it's Beasley who has been a first-down machine as rookie quarterback Dak Prescott's security blanket. Much like Edelman, Beasley wins with rare suddenness before and after the catch on option routes. It's Beasley -- not 2014 All-Pro wideout Dez Bryant or 10-time Pro Bowl tight end Jason Witten -- who leads the Cowboys in receptions as well as receiving yards early in the season.

 

SPECIAL MENTION: Allen Hurns, Jacksonville Jaguars; Quincy Enunwa, New York Jets; Mohamed Sanu, Atlanta Falcons; Anquan Boldin, Detroit Lions; Jamison Crowder, Washington Redskins; Kendall Wright, Tennessee Titans; Danny Amendola, New England Patriots; Eli Rogers, Pittsburgh Steelers; Tyler Boyd, Cincinnati Bengals.

[Tour2ma]

Two things:

1. The line, "We also see physical receivers who used to win primarily on the outside such as Larry Fitzgerald and Eric Decker," is key. If you can't win any more outside on the LOS, but can still play, then you move to the slot.
2. Shuffling the occupant (and location) of the "slot" can create mismatches. If the D's 3rd best CB (usually the "slot guy") ends up covering AJ Green, then Green needs to be hit that play, because odds are you are not going to get that match-up again.

But the skill set determination goes both ways... not too many slot DBs that are their teams best press-cover man.

[Flugel]

 

1. The line, "We also see physical receivers who used to win primarily on the outside such as Larry Fitzgerald and Eric Decker," is key. If you can't win any more outside on the LOS, but can still play, then you move to the slot.
2. Shuffling the occupant (and location) of the "slot" can create mismatches. If the D's 3rd best CB (usually the "slot guy") ends up covering AJ Green, then Green needs to be hit that play, because odds are you are not going to get that match-up again.

But the skill set determination goes both ways... not too many slot DBs that are their teams best press-cover man.

 

I agree with everything here, which is what makes it more intriguing to go bigger in the slot than the 5'7" we ho hummed the last 2 years. IMO Hawk needs a more experienced QB that sees the field better (so going to Brady in NE should be ideal). A lot of 3rd corners not only aren't physical; but many tend to be in the range of 5'9" to 5'11" under 190 lbs. Why not set up a blocking advantage here as well as a size/catch radius advantage the QB can track easier? Some offenses are beginning to exploit the 3rd corner assigned to the slot by putting bigger boys (that can also block as well as catch) like Fitzgerald, Decker, Matthews, and others named in the article out there. We don't have to show up to this fairly new trend late/after it gets stale.

 

I'm just trying to keep people open to how we can use DeValve similar to the way he was used at Princeton ranging from in the slot to H-back to TE to lining up outside in a 2 point especially while reading many complain that we don't have any WRs. I think his previous durability situation tells me he wasn't born to be a blocking TE but I could be wrong here.

[The Gipper]

What do I think the "slot" receiver is?: Simply a teams third receiver, regardless of size. I mean, if a team were to line up in a 4 recever set it could be said that they have 2 slot receivers on the field. It is simply a guy that lines up inside of the furthest wideout.

[Flugel]

What do I think the "slot" receiver is?: Simply a teams third receiver, regardless of size. I mean, if a team were to line up in a 4 recever set it could be said that they have 2 slot receivers on the field. It is simply a guy that lines up inside of the furthest wideout.

 

Looks pretty accurate - thanks Gips! I didn't mean to get us so sidetracked on just the slot receiver position or just DeValve.

 

The intention of this thread was to remind people that in the 2nd year of the Kosar era, we went 12-4 with a lot of young WRs learning a brand new offense with the arrival of Lindy Infante in 1986. Meanwhile, we were transitioning ball control from 2 RBs rushing for over 1000 yards in 85 to the RB position providing 122 receptions in 86. Kosar had 17 TD passes and only 10 INTs in this ball control offense that kept our #1 defense against the run well rested. He was also very efficient at converting 3rd downs.

 

The stats show there were no superstars - although it could be argued that 3rd year vet Brian Brennan was extremely productive for the percentage of plays he was on the field. The 4th round draft pick out of BC led our WRs in receptions, yardage and TDs. RB Herman Fontenot also contributed the 47 receptions almost exclusively on 3rd downs and he threw 1 TD pass. Slaughter was only a rookie teaming up with former Elizabeth City State WR Reggie Langhorne as our starting WR tandem that combined for 79 rec and 5 TDs.

 

Yes, it was a different era. That said, we had a young QB, young offense and brand new offensive system the only time we won 12 games in the last 40-50+ years. It was only 2 years removed from 5-11 football in 84. This shows us what is possible if you start getting the right personnel in place for an OC's/HC's plan. While we only see Hue as 1-15 for what he took over here - he was the OC of 12-4 football in Cincy in 2015. Their first year without Hue in 2016 was 6-9-1. This tells me he can do a good job here if we improve the personnel and get the right blend of experience on board. It's not as impossible as we've made it here since 99. I have my game face on and I will be Dances with Woofs in 2017!