Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

For those who could not support Donald Trump


Recommended Posts

"So, TexAG - why do you think that is? Because that has long been a fundamental part of me questioning

who McCain really is."-calfoxwc

 

 

You asked my opinion and I clearly stated it was conjecture. That means I don't know the real answer because I never asked McCain to tell me. So I made a conjecture and labeled it clearly that way based on my experience with other ex-POW's. What was so hard to understand about this?...."Here is strictly a conjecture based again on my experience with former POW's."

 

con·jec·ture
/kənˈjekCHər/

noun

 

And I have provided two names of POW's who knew McCain personally while in prison and someone else provided a third. And all were unanimous that McCain's time in prison was honorable and some even used heroic. If that isn't clear enough then it's falling on intentionally deaf ears to meet your own political agenda.

 

Here are my questions for you cal. Why is it so important to you to destroy McCain's reputation as best you can? What do you gain from that objective?

 

Here is one thing I am willing to do if you wish. It has been a number of years now since I helped those two ex-POWs. I will do my best to try to track them down again and ask their opinions both about McCain the POW as well as McCain now. And I will specifically ask about information you provided about his role in blocking information. I do know for sure that both felt there was no one else left alive there, but if those opinions have changed I'll relay it here if given permission. It's required before I put anything here they say that I have to have specific permission to do so. So I can't promise anything other than a valid attempt. If they agree to be quoted I'll say so. If they say it's ok to relay information without their names on the internet, I will do that. If they just flat out say this is just for you and no one else, that ends the discussion for me here of what they tell me. I have said already as much as I can that still keeps confidentiality. Thems the rules even though I'm retired and gave up my license to practice when I did so. I can't lose my license for violating confidentiality, but it would violate it nontheless to go into anything further than I've already said that was not found on the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If I had been a pow, I would be on McCain's side simply because he really was tortured,

probably every one of them was.

 

My beef with him is because there is smoke in other reports, some apparently not true,

but some may be... but things about his life, added to the fact that he has kept those other POW's a secret.

Especially the ones who never came home.

 

I'm just not going to dishonor THOSE HEROES who never made it home, by guessing

that they were at fault for embarrassing information or some crap, to defend McCain

not allowing ANY of those hundreds of pages to be release.

 

See my point about "redacted". So, given the op to REDACT any embarrassing information that you suggest

might be the case, why not release the REST of the information on those other hundreds of POW's ?

THEIR FAMILIES DESERVE TO KNOW THAT INFORMATION. It doesn't have to be release publicly.

 

But God Bless America, over all these years, why the hell not release SOME of those hundreds of records

PRIVATELY TO THE FAMILIES who lost husbands, fathers, uncles, sons, nephews, etc over there?

 

That is the truer question I'm asking. I'm a veteran, too - I would never dishonor veterans. I'm simply looking

at one politician, and questioning his keeping all those POW's who never came home a secret.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

 

My comments about McCain are directly related to McCain's mysterious hiding of ALL hundreds of records of those

POW's who never came home. I've known about this for many years.

 

Let's put it this way. My cousin was an advisor to S. Vietnamese squads in 67/68. He was over there in Laos and Cambodia,

around the borders. He got hit by shrapnel once, healed and went back. A tank he was riding in hit a mine,

and he got hurt. And he went back. Years later, I heard from his younger brother about my older cousin's reluctance to

talk about it. It was in part because some of his friends became POW'sMIA and never came back.

 

And the information was hidden all these years. I'm saying "what....the....hell".... It's like it's convenient to John McCain

to make all those guys who never came home..... just disappear from history. That took a toll on my cousin.

There. That is the truth I really didn't want to get into. It took my cousin many, many years to get past it. So yeah, I doubt McCain's motives for that, and that leads

me back to McCain's story. I don't believe he is on the up and up about something. Too many things about him don't make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.intellihub.com/john-mccain-is-no-war-hero-he-has-covered-up-pows-left-behind-in-vietnam-for-years/

 

https://youtu.be/uYhfjTOj9s8

 

so I'm bitter at John McCain.

 

so are a lot of vets who know the secret about

not all of them came home - many died after

not being released....

 

some may still be there alive today. we don't know.

 

Because filthy Mccain and fraud "hero" John Kerry.

 

both of them have forced the secrecy on the POW's who never came home.

 

https://www.amazon.com/Unfit-Command-Swift-Veterans-Against/dp/0895260174

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK-I was able to speak to one of the Ex-POW's and I have a few things he said it was alright to say without using his name. He has attended reunions over the years of the Vietnam Ex-POW's and he has never heard one negative word about McCain about this or any other thing. He also does not believe any were left there alive. Additionally he said that probably to a man every ex-POW does not personally see himself as a hero, but they were very upset with Trump's negative comments about McCain as not his kind of hero. I'm sure you all know what Donald said by now. He says the ones he knows felt like that attack on McCain by then candidate Trump was an attack on all of them. As to the accusations of blocking information he said he was unaware of it and that if it was real it would have come up at reunions. "I think there is a lot of stuff out there people throw out to promote their own agendas".

 

If the other Ex-POW contacts me back and wants to be heard, I'll put it up here too. No promises. Strictly up to each of them what they want to say or not. This one gave me permission to place it on the internet so long as he is anonymous. "I don't want any billionaires coming after me."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, that information on those left behind IS being kept secret, so....

 

I hope and pray there weren't any left behind. Seems that it's true though.

 

that's so tragic. No excuse to keep all whatever hundreds of pages of information

a secret.

 

Sounds like political CYA to me. and the A, in my dumb opinion....belongs to Mccain and Kerry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well no one who has known me ever thought I was anything but an honest, straight shooter regardless of consequences. My wife would sometimes get upset with me for telling supervisors at work my opinion whether it agreed with theirs or not. Led to a few "standoffs" but to be an effective counselor, you just have to say it like it is as they say. But it's why I still get calls now and again from vets I've helped who later appreciated me telling the sometimes very harsh truth.

 

All that is a preamble to the second Ex-POW who got back to me late last night. It's hard to say everything he said without tipping off who he is, so some timeline things just have to be left out. His opinion on McCain is not as glowing as the other one. He does think it is possible McCain got records sealed to protect himself, though he does not know that for certain. He has not talked to McCain directly about anything since they were released together and contact between them in the camp was minimal. He holds a grudge because McCain has compartmentalized the POW experience and never attends the reunions that have been held. He understands it but doesn't like it nonetheless. He does think McCain got extra medical help that kept him alive that he would not have gotten if he was not the son of an admiral. They wanted to use that for propaganda purposes which they did. He does not know personally what they may have put him through to get him to "sing", though he acknowledged they could break just about whomever they wanted to break with few exceptions. As to whether anyone else remained alive his answer was certainly very different. As far as anyone being left in Vietnam alive the answer was the same as the other guy, very unlikely. But he says that there were Cubans who showed up and he felt a couple of POW's with highly technical skills and information may have been shuttled back to Cuba for interrogations by them and never returned, nor acknowledged. He knows they were Cubans because they, "certainly were not Vietnamese and they spoke Spanish." Interesting huh?

 

Unfortunately during my time spent tracking them down I was unable to contact another counselor I had worked with in our outreach center and eventually a mutual friend had to tell me he had died of a heart attack last year. That was personally very sad news for me. But one of the Ex-POW's took some of the sting out of by saying they had become best of friends over the last several years "and you'll be happy to know I made him as miserable as I could (with a heartfelt laugh) before he died."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See how predictive Trump was by a professional neuro-pyschologist way back in Jan 2016. Don't be afraid to actually read the article to get details that have come true including the standoff with Kimchi. I had not read this way back then, but I was certainly saying the same thing about his mental status and where it might lead. Just came across it this morning after hearing a reporter say she had talked to two former highly placed Republicans who described Trump as a "crazy narcissist you can't even talk to about changing anything". A bit of a paraphrase on the quote, but essentially accurate.

 

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/a-neuroscientist-explains-trump-has-a-mental-disorder-that-makes-him-a-dangerous-world-leader/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

however, as president, he has kept his promises, tried like all get out to get Congress to compromise

and solve the hc and tax problems, and endeared himself to about half the country that voted for him,

over Gorsuch and protecting our 1st and 2nd Amendments.

 

it's your liberals/demoquacks/socialist sombeitches that want "net neutrality", want to censor Fox news,

or ruin major stars on the network, who want to destroy our 2nd Amendment, undermine our military

readiness, and want to use mm goober warning as a tool to far more control over everyday

citizens, and what money they have earned over their careers, and they want to teach American kids

that gay/trans/humping telephone poles/whatever, is perfectly normal.

 

The "we lost the election and we're going to civil war to stop the undoing of our leftism" derangement syndrome

is there for all to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See how predictive Trump was by a professional neuro-pyschologist way back in Jan 2016. Don't be afraid to actually read the article to get details that have come true including the standoff with Kimchi. I had not read this way back then, but I was certainly saying the same thing about his mental status and where it might lead. Just came across it this morning after hearing a reporter say she had talked to two former highly placed Republicans who described Trump as a "crazy narcissist you can't even talk to about changing anything". A bit of a paraphrase on the quote, but essentially accurate.

 

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/a-neuroscientist-explains-trump-has-a-mental-disorder-that-makes-him-a-dangerous-world-leader/

 

Tex if you look at my posts back in the GOP primary I was very much opposed to Trump and said much of this as well. I was wrong. Trump I believe does have some character faults but he is exactly what this country needed at this time. I voted for Cruz in the primary but if I had it to do over I would vote for Trump. Some of it is because he has been good on the issue of religious freedom but also he is not attached to the hip with the GOP and is not afraid to go against the GOP when necessary and I credit him for that. The fact of the matter is the republicans were hypocrites with all their meaningless votes to repeal Obamacare when they knew Obama would veto it but now there is a president who will sign repeal of Obamacare and they cannot get a bill to his desk.

 

If Trump can get himself surrounded with good advisers (and I really like General Kelly as COS) I think he will do a lot of good things for this country as he is not tied to special interest groups and lobbyists like most of our politicians are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

odd. guess what...

 

http://www.hope-of-israel.org/psychoobama.html

 

A Psychologist On Obama -- Food for Thought?

Dr. Sam Vaknin has written extensively about narcissism and has this to say about President Obama.

by Dr. Sam Vaknin

Dr. Vaknin states "I must confess I was impressed by Sen. Barack Obama from the first time I saw him. At first I was excited to see a black candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident -- a wholesome presidential package. I was put off soon, not just because of his shallowness but also because there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture and his body language were louder than his empty words. Obama's speeches are unlike any political speech we have heard in American history. Never a politician in this land had such quasi 'religious' impact on so many people. The fact that Obama is a total incognito with zero accomplishment, makes this inexplicable infatuation alarming. Obama is not an ordinary man. He is not a genius. In fact he is quite ignorant on most important subjects."

Barack Obama is a narcissist.

Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of the Malignant Self Love, believes "Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist." Vaknin is a world authority on narcissism. He understands narcissism and describes the inner mind of a narcissist like no other person. When he talks about narcissism everyone listens.

Vaknin says that Obama's language, posture and demeanor, and the testimonies of his closest, dearest and nearest suggest that the President is either a narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Narcissists project a grandiose but false image of themselves. Jim Jones, the charismatic leader of People's Temple, the man who led over 900 of his followers to cheerfully commit mass suicide and even murder their own children was also a narcissist. David Koresh, Charles Manson, Joseph Koni, Shoko Asahara, Stalin, Saddam, Mao, Kim Jong Il and Adolph Hitler are a few examples of narcissists of our time. All these men had a tremendous influence over their fanciers. They created a personality cult around themselves and with their blazing speeches elevated their admirers, filled their hearts with enthusiasm and instilled in their minds a new zest for life. They gave them hope! They promised them the moon, but alas, invariably they brought them to their doom. When you are a victim of a cult of personality, you don't know it until it is too late. One determining factor in the development of NPD is childhood abuse.

"Obama's early life was decidedly chaotic and replete with traumatic and mentally bruising dislocations," says Vaknin. "Mixed-race marriages were even less common then. His parents went through a divorce when he was an infant (two years old). Obama saw his father only once again, before he died in a car accident. Then his mother re-married and Obama had to relocate to Indonesia, a foreign land with a radically foreign culture, to be raised by a step-father. At the age of ten, he was whisked off to live with his maternal (white) grandparents. He saw his mother only intermittently in the following few years and then she vanished from his life in 1979. She died of cancer in 1995."

One must never underestimate the manipulative genius of pathological narcissists. They project such an imposing personality that it overwhelms those around them. Charmed by the charisma of the narcissist, people become like clay in his hands. They cheerfully do his bidding and delight to be at his service. The narcissist shapes the world around himself and reduces others in his own invented image. He creates a cult of personality. His admirers become his co-dependents Narcissists have no interest in things that do not help them to reach their personal objective. They are focused on one thing alone and that is power. All other issues are meaningless to them and they do not want to waste their precious time on trivialities. Anything that does not help them is beneath them and do not deserve their attention.

If an issue raised in the Senate when Obama served there did not help Obama in one way or another, he had no interest in it. The "present" vote was a safe vote. No one could criticize him if things went wrong. Those issues were unworthy by their very nature because they were not about him.

Obama's election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review led to a contract and advance to write a book about race relations. The University of Chicago Law School provided him a lot longer than expected and at the end it evolved into, guess what? His own autobiography! Instead of writing a scholarly paper focusing on race relations, for which he had been paid, Obama could not resist writing about his most sublime self. He entitled the book Dreams from My Father.

Not surprisingly, Adolph Hitler also wrote his own autobiography when he was still nobody. So did Stalin. For a narcissist no subject is as important as his own self. Why would he waste his precious time and genius writing about insignificant things when he can write about such an august being as himself? Narcissists are often callous and even ruthless.

As the norm, they lack conscience. This is evident from Obama's lack of interest in his own brother who lives on only one dollar per month. A man who lives in luxury, who took a private jet to vacation in Hawaii, and who raised nearly half a billion dollars for his campaign (something unprecedented in history) has no interest in the plight of his own brother. Why? Because, his brother could not be used for his ascent to power.

A narcissist cares for no one but himself. The election of 2008 was like no other in the history of America. The issues were insignificant compared to what was at stake. What can be more dangerous than having a man bereft of conscience, a serial liar, and one who cannot distinguish his fantasies from reality as the leader of the free world? I hate to sound alarmist, but one is a fool if one is not alarmed. Many politicians are narcissists. They pose no threat to others. They are simply self serving and selfish.

Obama evidences symptoms of pathological narcissism, which is different from the run-of-the-mill narcissism of a Richard Nixon or a Bill Clinton for example. To him reality and fantasy are intertwined. This is a mental health issue, not just a character flaw. Pathological narcissists are dangerous because they look normal and even intelligent. It is this disguise that makes them treacherous.

Today the Democrats have placed all their hopes in Obama. But this man could put an end to their party. The great majority of blacks also decided to vote for Obama. Only a fool does not know that their support for him was racially driven. This is racism, pure and simple. The downside of this is that if Obama turns out to be the disaster I predict, he will cause widespread resentment among the whites.

The blacks are unlikely to give up their support of their man. Cultic mentality is pernicious and unrelenting. They will dig their heads deeper in the sand and blame Obama's detractors of racism. This will cause a backlash among the whites.

The white supremacists will take advantage of the discontent and they will receive widespread support. I predict that in less than four years, racial tensions will increase to levels never seen since the turbulent 1960s.

Obama will set the clock back decades. America is the bastion of freedom. The peace of the world depends on the strength of America, and its weakness translates into the triumph of terrorism and victory of rogue nations.

It is no wonder that Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Castroists, the Hezbollah, the Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists and virtually all sworn enemies of America were so thrilled by the election of their man to the White House. America is on the verge of destruction. There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological narcissist as president.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

psychobaMao.

 

http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/is-obama-a-psychopath/

 

David Freeman, in an Huffington Post science piece, quotes clinical psychologist Dr. Stout, who points out that though the psychopath may not feel “higher emotions” like love and guilt, they may not have actual consciences, but they study those of us who do – and “simply pretend.”

Psychologists say early signs of psychopathy include compulsive lying, blaming others for any failures or shortcomings and often torture of animals for curiosity sake. Psychopaths tend to do things to study consequences, without concern for long-term impact. I know, it sounds like most politicians today. And it probably is, not to mention any names.

As Mr. Freeman points out in his article, psychopaths make a great first impression. He points to other characteristics, too. He points to the initial popularity of Pol Pot, Hitler, Ceausescu and others, but the golden boy image quickly fades to one of a ruthless, inhumane manipulator with very dark intentions.

Order Gina Loudon’s book “Ladies and Gentlemen: Why the Survival of Our Republic Depends on the Revival of Honor” – how atheism, liberalism and radical feminism have harmed the nation.

No one can make a mental diagnosis from afar, and I am certainly not qualified to make that diagnosis. But it is interesting to consider some characteristics when combined with actions of President Obama since he took office. He certainly had the initial charisma and likability. He had the perfect-looking family with the perfect-looking face at the perfect time for America to fall for him. No matter what his opponents pointed to, no one questioned him for fear of being labeled racists.

Psychopaths often act audaciously, without regard for those affected. They get away with actions that others in their positions haven’t, because of their ability to remain calm even when committing atrocities, and their ability to manipulate whole groups of people.

Obama has taken more luxury vacations than any other president, and he has done so as the American economy was in collapse for his policies. He has taken his entire family and spent tens of millions of dollars in exotic, luxe locations like Hawaii, Vail, Europe and Africa. His predecessors made Americans increasingly familiar with places like Camp David and Martha’s Vineyard or their own vacation homes such as the Bushes’ Kennebunkport, the Kennedys’ Cape Cod, the Reagans’ Rancho Del Cielo in California or George W’s exotic locale, Crawford, Texas. Other presidents were exceptionally sensitive to the state of the American people, foregoing vacations when the American people were mourning or hurting economically – not the Obamas. When the economy was at its worst, gas prices were at record highs, and Americans were going without vacations and other needs, Obama extended his wife and daughters’ vacation in Spain.

But luxe vacations are just the beginning. Obama has golfed more than any other president. On days when America has been under attack, on days when military heroes have died, on days when the nation is mourning – still Obama finds time for a game of hoops with a hip-hop star or a round of golf with a key contributor. His advisers had to pull him off the golf course to talk him into taking out Osama bin Laden.

When conservatives decry this point, the statist media scoff. Tone deafness and personal excesses are only relevant when Republicans are accused. Remember the ridicule over the fake issue over Bush 41’s apparent introduction to the grocery store scanner? Such media protection emboldens.

Nothing has changed.

After the second round of murders of government-guaranteed defenseless Fort Hood soldiers last week, Obama mustered a tear or two for cameras before slipping out the back door to head to a $32,000-per-plate party for himself.

This pattern of inauthenticity would be very difficult, even debilitating for someone with an intact conscience, in my opinion.

But audacity is a manifestation of psychopathy, and Obama is a master of audacity. He has exacted more items into law by the capricious act of executive order than any other president in such a short period of time. Traditionally, this is only done in very rare instances, because presidents know that the American people will not stand for that sort of tyranny. In Obama’s case, it is explained away, if mentioned by media at all, with whinings of “the other party’s obstructionist acts” or “someone else forced the president to act so cavalierly.”

That brings us to another habit of the psychopath – blaming others. First, Obama and his cronies blamed President Bush for just about everything. They blame the tea party for any bad press, the Koch brothers for any mishaps and Congress for Obama’s tyrannical executive orders and the removal of the filibuster as a means of defense against Obama’s imperial appointments.

The truly skilled psychopath can make his own biases look like they are the shortcoming of his opponent. When the New Black Panther thugs with clubs were intimidating voters during the 2008 election, those who voiced concern were called racist and alarmist for even bringing up the issue. Once elected, Obama had his attorney general, Eric Holder not only drop all charges but actually drop convictions! President Obama accuses others of racial bias, when it is he who is one of the worst.

One of the psychopath’s favorite tactics is the pity party. In a recent interview with New Yorker Magazine, the president continued to complain about those who hate him for his race. The psychopath will use those who call them out for their actions to gain sympathy and President Obama is adept at using anyone who criticizes him to get the public to feel sorry for him. As mentioned earlier, he is able to blame his tyrannical abuse of the executive order power on those terrible obstructionist Republicans who hate him because he is black.

Another common trait of the psychopath is a mysterious and shady past. We know very little about President Obama’s formative years and little about his college years. Records are sealed or withheld, and requests for them are dismissed as ridiculous requests from paranoid detractors.

The psychopath is great at connecting personally with people and convinces everyone that he is just like them. President Obama is just a normal guy who likes movies, basketball, golf and likes to play video games. Experts call it mirroring.

Perhaps the most frightening symptom of the psychopath is to kill while keeping their own hands clean. Obama takes full credit for killing Osama bin Laden to the point of both stealing the glory from our Navy SEALs and at the same time betraying the existence of SEAL Team Six and exposing them to unwarranted assassination risk – risk that resulted in the worst catastrophic loss of life in the history of the SEALs. Did Obama take responsibility for that? He certainly spent far less time mourning their loss or taking responsibility for their deaths than he did taking credit for being tough dealing with terror.

While he did take credit for bin Laden, he has not taken any responsibility for deaths resulting from Fast and Furious, the gun-running operation that has put guns in the hands of Mexican drug cartels that have most certainly cost American and other lives. He has not only never expressed any sense of responsibility for that, he has shown no remorse. And worse, he capitalizes on the situation by singing the praises of gun control.

Perhaps most flagrant act of this president, if we are looking at evidence of psychopathy, is the lack of any substantive remorse, or responsibility shown for what happened to two Navy SEALs, an American ambassador and an information management officer, at the hands of vicious terrorists in Benghazi. The American public has repeatedly expressed outrage and fury for the lies and manipulations that cost these precious American lives, but the administration has arrogantly dismissed, excused and ignored any culpability or held anyone to account.

No one knew that Pol Pot, Hitler or Ceausescu were psychopaths until they knew. Could America be more perceptive, more insightful, more predictive of a psychopath in leadership before it is too late?


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/is-obama-a-psychopath/#gKxt6EAYOhzT5TKc.99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

from the above link:

 

a poll. you choose, and then see the results. My choice was by far #1

 

Is Obama a psychopath?

  • Yes, he's narcissistic, callous, selfish, arrogant, controlling, blames others for his failures, takes credit for others' successes, and he's a pathological liar (46%, 267 Votes)
  • Yes, and it becomes increasingly obvious with every passing year of this living nightmare of an administration (25%, 147 Votes)
  • There's no question Obama fits the bill as both delusional sociopath and dangerous psychopath (6%, 34 Votes)
  • Yes, but it's only because of the mainstream media that he gets away with his behavior (4%, 23 Votes)
  • I don't know, but he seems to exhibit most, if not all, of the main symptoms (3%, 20 Votes)
  • Yes, but what does that say about all the people who elected and re-elected him? (3%, 18 Votes)
  • Actual clinical diagnosis would require in-depth, in-person examination by psychiatrists, not armchair pundits (3%, 16 Votes)
  • If not, how else can you explain screwing up a country so badly while pretending to love and care for it? (2%, 13 Votes)
  • No, he's just evil (2%, 11 Votes)
  • No, and Obama doesn't deserve that hateful mischaracterization (2%, 10 Votes)
  • No, you're giving him too much credit. He's controlled by psychopaths, and he does their dirty work (2%, 9 Votes)
  • Other (1%, 6 Votes)
  • No, but that word does describe George W. Bush perfectly (0%, 2 Votes)
  • No, and the allegation is both outrageous and blatantly racist (0%, 2 Votes)

Total Voters: 578


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/is-obama-a-psychopath/#gKxt6EAYOhzT5TKc.99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Trump can get himself surrounded with good advisers (and I really like General Kelly as COS) I think he will do a lot of good things for this country as he is not tied to special interest groups and lobbyists like most of our politicians are.

 

That was my hope too but as long as Bannon & Co. were in there everything positive that was possible was counterbalanced by them. That's why I have been adamant that if Trump has any chance at all, then he needs to rid himself of Gorka and Miller as well. They are only there to build his ego and support some of his/their craziness. The quicker he has quality people around him, without the presence of the loonies, the better off he and the country will be.

 

cal-- the posts on Obama mean nothing now. He is not the one trying to guide this country through dangerous waters anymore. You hang onto him like Trump does Hillary. It's an obsession for both of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So tex what is it that you hate about Bannon besides the fake news about him being a white supremacist and shit? Are any of the things that he advised bad things?

 

I don't doubt that slate or Salon has a list you can look at but as far as your own observation?

WSS

 

All the players that showed up from Breitbart had in common the willingness to twist truth and Bannon in particular had some kind of Svengali hold over Trump to the point that every time Trump spouted off "alternative facts", a euphemism for lies, he he would continue to enable Trump into sticking to those lies despite all evidence to the contrary. Over time that has eroded all credibility in the WH. Now he has folks like Kelly and McMaster who hopefully can rein in Donald and make a real president out of him by helping him correct things when he gets them wrong. I don't have a lot of hope he will change because the main problem with any narcissist is they have almost zero ability to face anything different than what they say. Bannon supported that flaw and it has been a disaster. Gorka and Miller do the same thing so they need walking papers too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2017 at 10:10 PM, TexasAg1969 said:

 

cal-- the posts on Obama mean nothing now. He is not the one trying to guide this country through dangerous waters anymore. You hang onto him like Trump does Hillary. It's an obsession for both of you.

No, the point is, you have well over 6,000 posts - and you never venture to say anything about obamao. you joined the board

in 2014. Not ONE POST complaining about obamao for the same things that you are "outraged" about with Trump. That is

not good. Pardone, monsier, but your parlay vou slip is showin....:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again the President does what he does in his Arizona speech tonight, one lie of omission after another about what he said last Saturday. "many sides, many sides" and reference to "alt-left" parts of those comments were left out of what he read to the crowd. He is never going to change and the sooner this pathological liar is impeached the better. You will be able to read all about it or hear all about it tonight and tomorrow. It isn't "fake news". He's just a despicable amoral person  that this country does not need. Remember what I said elsewhere. He is an unprincipled man. 25th amendment time.

a·mor·al

/āˈmôrəl/

adjective

  • 1. lacking a moral sense; unconcerned with the rightness or wrongness of something: "an amoral attitude to sex" synonyms: unprincipled, without standards, without morals, without scruples, unscrupulous,
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...