Westside Steve Posted December 23, 2017 Report Posted December 23, 2017 Ohio Gov. John Kasich signs down syndrome abortion ban https://search.app.goo.gl/GXcN As you know I'm not a pro-lifer but even if I was I would think it's fair to want to abort a child with Down Syndrome. I can't imagine wanting to spend the rest of my life caring for one but I suppose there are people who would want to. WSS
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 23, 2017 Report Posted December 23, 2017 We don't get to pick life out and decide what they will have. What's next? I don't want a girl, abort it. Brown eye? Abort it. Etc.
Clevfan4life Posted December 23, 2017 Report Posted December 23, 2017 A woman should be able to get what she wants when she wants. U dont get to tell people you MUST carry this child forward thats going to cost u a small fortune befire its a teenager in health care costs.....but then on the other hand say welfare is for bums that dont want to work. There are people on welfare who wouldnt be able to care for these special needs children without assistance. The same assistance some people want to do away with.
calfoxwc Posted December 24, 2017 Report Posted December 24, 2017 yet there are plenty of poor women, especially in the black community, that have babies to qualify for permanent support. crack babies - they don't care, and with no father in the life of the children... Heart condition? only three fingers instead of four? There are tough questions as to where you draw the line, if there is a line at all.
Westside Steve Posted December 24, 2017 Author Report Posted December 24, 2017 17 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: We don't get to pick life out and decide what they will have. What's next? I don't want a girl, abort it. Brown eye? Abort it. Etc. It's already legal for hair or eye color. Also legal if you just don't want to be bothered with a kid in the first place. WSS
DieHardBrownsFan Posted December 24, 2017 Report Posted December 24, 2017 Might be legal, but it's wrong.
MLD Woody Posted December 24, 2017 Report Posted December 24, 2017 4 hours ago, Westside Steve said: It's already legal for hair or eye color. Also legal if you just don't want to be bothered with a kid in the first place. WSS Any examples of parents using genetic testing to find out the eye color of their baby and then aborting it?
Westside Steve Posted December 24, 2017 Author Report Posted December 24, 2017 47 minutes ago, MLD Woody said: Any examples of parents using genetic testing to find out the eye color of their baby and then aborting it? I don't know. Could be. There could be people a boarding full-term children at eating them but that's at least against the law right? WSS
MLD Woody Posted December 24, 2017 Report Posted December 24, 2017 13 minutes ago, Westside Steve said: I don't know. Could be. There could be people a boarding full-term children at eating them but that's at least against the law right? WSS Well if you're admitting you're just talking out of your butt then ok.
Westside Steve Posted December 24, 2017 Author Report Posted December 24, 2017 3 hours ago, MLD Woody said: Well if you're admitting you're just talking out of your butt then ok. No just pointing out the fact that it's not illegal to abort a child because of hair color. It is illegal to aborted child because of something that would actually Shmuck up your family for decades. I have no beef if somebody chooses to spend the next 40 to 50 years caring for a Down syndrome child. I just wouldn't. WSS
Westside Steve Posted December 24, 2017 Author Report Posted December 24, 2017 https://books.google.com/books?id=Uq2dGW-BH5QC&pg=PA63&lpg=PA63&dq=can+I+abort+a+child+because+I+don't+like+its+hair+color&source=bl&ots=QBrPlnAoGd&sig=LUOb5DQVTozeuTthxoAKH_XIT7Q&hl=en&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwiMy7j6w6PYAhVEwiYKHS0qDEkQ6AEICjAA#v=onepage&q=can I abort a child because I don't like its hair color&f=false
MLD Woody Posted December 24, 2017 Report Posted December 24, 2017 I'm more zeroing in on the hair and eyes color. Hell, I thought that changed months after a baby is born. I have no problem aborting a fetus, within a reasonable time frame, if the parents know it will have a high risk of a bad disease or disability
Westside Steve Posted December 25, 2017 Author Report Posted December 25, 2017 4 hours ago, MLD Woody said: I'm more zeroing in on the hair and eyes color. Hell, I thought that changed months after a baby is born. I have no problem aborting a fetus, within a reasonable time frame, if the parents know it will have a high risk of a bad disease or disability Which would seem like a hell of a lot more serious reason than hair color but nobody thought to make that illegal. WSS
MLD Woody Posted December 25, 2017 Report Posted December 25, 2017 Well... Is that even something you can know pre birth? Like I said, it changes months after birth a lot of times.
Westside Steve Posted December 25, 2017 Author Report Posted December 25, 2017 33 minutes ago, MLD Woody said: Well... Is that even something you can know pre birth? Like I said, it changes months after birth a lot of times. I think the eyes change color not sure about the hair. Could be. how about sex or skin color then? WSS
ChicopeeJohn Posted December 27, 2017 Report Posted December 27, 2017 On 12/23/2017 at 1:56 PM, DieHardBrownsFan said: I am far from a 'Pro-Abortion' person. However, I do believe that this struggle/argument will end the day after the PLO and Israel hold hands and sing, "Kum Ba Ya" God/Jesus - alone - will be the final word.
One Post Posted December 27, 2017 Report Posted December 27, 2017 As being a grandfather of two beautiful twins I can tell you a child with a syndrome or disease falls in the responsibility of the parents. Its the luck of the draw...you play you pay. I wouldn't disown these kids for anything and to abort? It doesn't make any sense. Jerkoff or pull it out goddamn it.
LogicIsForSquares Posted December 27, 2017 Report Posted December 27, 2017 Yeah this law makes little sense to me. You can abort kids that would go on to be healthy as far as the doc is aware. But you can't abort a kid that would likely be a giant burden to their family and likely require life long care even after the parents pass away.
LogicIsForSquares Posted December 27, 2017 Report Posted December 27, 2017 I think this will just lead to docs telling the parents but not putting the fact that the baby has Downs on the books.
tiamat63 Posted December 28, 2017 Report Posted December 28, 2017 Bill is horseshit but hey, whatevs. Only thing it will lead to is higher mortality rate for pregnant women with botched "back alley" procedures. I will listen to anyone with a counter argument that has adopted a child, let alone a child with downs.
LogicIsForSquares Posted December 28, 2017 Report Posted December 28, 2017 Kasich has a hidden motive. He is starting a mongoloid carnival.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.