Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Science says experts configure man made global warming to fit what they want it to fit


calfoxwc

Recommended Posts

Anyone want to guess what you get if you Google Dr Patrick Michaels

 

A.) Someone paid by the oil industry

B.) A member of a conservative think tank

C.) A pro tobacco "scientist"/supporter

D.) Someone who has been repeatedly incorrect on climate predictions

E.) All of the above

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

Anyone want to guess what you get if you Google Dr Patrick Michaels

 

A.) Someone paid by the oil industry

B.) A member of a conservative think tank

C.) A pro tobacco "scientist"/supporter

D.) Someone who has been repeatedly incorrect on climate predictions

E.) All of the above

 

 

D) is reserved for pretty much every scientist who has made predictions regarding MMGW and the effect it would have on the Earth’s climate over the last 30 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

Anyone want to guess what you get if you Google Dr Patrick Michaels

 

A.) Someone paid by the oil industry

B.) A member of a conservative think tank

C.) A pro tobacco "scientist"/supporter

D.) Someone who has been repeatedly incorrect on climate predictions

E.) All of the above

 

 

F.) You can put temperature recording stations in an asphalt parking lot in Tucson Arizona.

You now have 65,000 square feet of global warming whenever you want!

8FB8D53C-E285-4CC7-8F19-333068F2DAA2.png

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MLD Woody said:

Anyone want to guess what you get if you Google Dr Patrick Michaels

 

A.) Someone paid by the oil industry

B.) A member of a conservative think tank

C.) A pro tobacco "scientist"/supporter

D.) Someone who has been repeatedly incorrect on climate predictions

E.) All of the above

 

 

Did you happen to look into the others?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no, he won't. He'll claim "he doesn't have any time" or something. That is why I posted more than one.

Regardless of where he works, woodpecker never once has addressed the content, just attacks the source.

Then he calls it "refuted".

just...

birdbrain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Trump says it's not real then mine more coal and get rid of the bird killing, cancer causing windmills. Everyone knows that is based on scientific fact, unlike climate change. How do I know that? because der leader said it and der leader knows more about everything than any stupid experts. Just ask him.🤴👺

And whatever you do don't listen to this guy. If you do you have to leave Never, never land a.k.a. Trumpworld and grow the fuck up. 🤣

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Anyone want to guess what you get if you Google Dr Patrick Michaels

 

A.) Someone paid by the oil industry

B.) A member of a conservative think tank

C.) A pro tobacco "scientist"/supporter

D.) Someone who has been repeatedly incorrect on climate predictions

E.) All of the above

 

 

Well that would seem to add Credence to the title of the thread wouldn't it?

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course there is climate change.  But we can't do anything about it.  Of couse we contriubte to it with polution, etc.  I call on all you liberals to immediately quit eating meat, drive electric cars etc.  Lets see what impact it has other than to hear your constant whining and bitching.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Of course there is climate change.  But we can't do anything about it.  Of couse we contriubte to it with polution, etc.  

This is my take. The US could halt all activity that would influence the environment (go amish) and the rest of the third world that wants to get to 2nd or 1st world status will still pump pollution into the environment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

This is my take. The US could halt all activity that would influence the environment (go amish) and the rest of the third world that wants to get to 2nd or 1st world status will still pump pollution into the environment. 

Not so fast there green boy.

😁

https://www.agweb.com/mobile/article/unique-study-harnesses-methane-from-cows/

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

This is my take. The US could halt all activity that would influence the environment (go amish) and the rest of the third world that wants to get to 2nd or 1st world status will still pump pollution into the environment. 

That’s always been my big bitch about the Paris accord. The US will cut its own carbon emissions, pay billions of dollars into the fund, just to watch China and India laugh and say “fuck you”!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said:

Of course there is climate change.  But we can't do anything about it.  Of couse we contriubte to it with polution, etc.  I call on all you liberals to immediately quit eating meat, drive electric cars etc.  Lets see what impact it has other than to hear your constant whining and bitching.

As I've said before I live in a town whose electricity comes from windmill farms and solar panels. I've driven past many a wind farm on the way to Colorado and back and I have yet to see massive dead bird bodies underneath. If fact I haven't seen any yet. Maybe they all died of cancer and just withered away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gorka said:

If all Co2 emissions on the planet would cease tomorrow, the earth would continue to warm for 2000yrs. then it would take 100,000 years for the CO2 levels to reach pre Industrial Revolution levels. Screw that.

.

 

Well you better go visit Glacier National Park before it's renamed Never Winter National Seashore.🤣🐳🐠🏝️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Anyone want to guess what you get if you Google Dr Patrick Michaels

 

A.) Someone paid by the oil industry

B.) A member of a conservative think tank

C.) A pro tobacco "scientist"/supporter

D.) Someone who has been repeatedly incorrect on climate predictions

E.) All of the above

 

 

how many precious seconds of your life did lord google extract from you as sacrifice for this gnosis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gorka said:

What purpose would that serve?

Truth in advertising. The glaciers there are are down by 39% on average in overall size in the past 50 years. 

https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock/science/retreat-glaciers-glacier-national-park?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...