Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Impeachment Witnesses


Westside Steve

Recommended Posts

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schiff-bolton-lack-credibility-senate-impeachment-trial

I think reardless of Party Loyalty we can agree that the idea of fair trial is ridiculous in the first place. In my opinion if there are to be Witnesses there should be Witnesses for and against. I personally don't want to see everything devolve into a perjury trap like it did with white water but if it must with the geese and the ganders alike be sauced.

Second point that interfere a trial the jury is supposed to be impartial. I don't think anyone here would think that's the case in the senate or congress.

But my point here is that if these guys in the videos are your star Witnesses how much anxiety would you feel if you were the prosecuting attorney?

Try to keep it civil.

WSS

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The democrats in the House hurried the impeachment process and sent their shoddy impeachment over to the Senate expecting the Senate to do the work they didn't do. Pelosi thought they really had the goods on Trump over the phone call with the Ukrainian president but once Trump released the transcript it became apparent all those claims from the phony whistle blower were not true. If she would have waited a day or so to see the official transcript of the phone call she would have not have started impeachment proceedings but by then it was too late to turn back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This so-called trial is a sham and the democrats are all too happy to drag it on as long as they can.

 

They have lied so much they actually believe there lies.  In there tiny brains they have convinced themselves that they are doing this for ‘country’.

Jail time should bring them back to reality...

 

POTUS having to deal with this is unheard of, yet he continues to Make America Great Again.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Vambo said:

 

truth is, Rand Paul READ HIS QUESTION ALOUD later...

good for him. I'd say, splash their dirty names all over the internet, dammit.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/rand-paul-reads-the-question-he-was-forbidden-from-asking-in-senate-trial

Rand Paul reads the question he was forbidden from asking in Senate trial

'I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked.'

"I can tell you," Paul continued, "my question made no reference to any whistleblower."

Paul read the question aloud, "so that," he said, "it could be part of the public record":

Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President: Are you aware that House Intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the president before the formal House impeachment proceedings?

"I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked," Paul told reporters. "It makes no reference to anybody who may or may not be a whistleblower."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

truth is, Rand Paul READ HIS QUESTION ALOUD later...

good for him. I'd say, splash their dirty names all over the internet, dammit.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/rand-paul-reads-the-question-he-was-forbidden-from-asking-in-senate-trial

Rand Paul reads the question he was forbidden from asking in Senate trial

'I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked.'

"I can tell you," Paul continued, "my question made no reference to any whistleblower."

Paul read the question aloud, "so that," he said, "it could be part of the public record":

Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President: Are you aware that House Intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the president before the formal House impeachment proceedings?

"I think this is an important question. One that deserves to be asked," Paul told reporters. "It makes no reference to anybody who may or may not be a whistleblower."

PHOTO: Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella shakes hands with Barack Obama in Oval Office

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/alleged-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-shown-shaking-hands-with-barack-obama-in-oval-office-photo

image.png.9e1be60535e70440ccb160777598099d.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2020 at 3:33 AM, Westside Steve said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schiff-bolton-lack-credibility-senate-impeachment-trial

I think reardless of Party Loyalty we can agree that the idea of fair trial is ridiculous in the first place. In my opinion if there are to be Witnesses there should be Witnesses for and against. I personally don't want to see everything devolve into a perjury trap like it did with white water but if it must with the geese and the ganders alike be sauced.

Second point that interfere a trial the jury is supposed to be impartial. I don't think anyone here would think that's the case in the senate or congress.

But my point here is that if these guys in the videos are your star Witnesses how much anxiety would you feel if you were the prosecuting attorney?

Try to keep it civil.

WSS

image.png.7eaba5f437053b9a051aab2856a3fc0a.png

 

Actually, there were 18 (IC IG Atkinson).

 

image.thumb.png.7c8e9da8d92684354f4c43078d5557b4.png

https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-defenders-highlight-testimony-that-schiff-is-allegedly-covering-up-that-damages-his-case/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's been a complete asinine farce, especially after all the Pres Trump admin cooperation with the dirty Mueller 3 yr investigation..

which found

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

so the dems had to invent fraudulent witnesses and fraudulent charges...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.png.ce728ffaa1551263c337a86eb2e55617.png

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/01/31/whistleblower_censorship_in_facebook_and_in_senate_122223.html

 

image.png.ee1b8211e7efc2d7026479e3f09d185e.png

 

Pretty sure I've covered that Roberts is comped (O spying).

Basically everyone in DC is a victim ("The Hammer") of what O did.

 

Thing is, this isn't what I was aware of him being compromised on (there is something else)   .   .   .  

 

 

This just shows how close things are (corruption) :

 

image.png.067d53940de875a4e81b29c2978a9913.png

 

No crimes.

One sided.

 

That is what Justice has become in this Country ?

 

Just like Flynn.

If they can do this to these people with the resources they (POTUS/Flynn) have, what chance does the average schmuck have ?

 

image.png.3e6c4ba9cbd1a4fbac8d6221021d1af8.png

 

Truth.

"You're watching a Movie".

 

Why ?

 

This is all a Show to let people see the corruption and what Globalism is about.

 

This is not for the Right, they already see it.

The Left (far) are now Socialist/Communist, and are most lost.

The Centrist (major portion of the Country) are unaware of what has really been going on - this is for them.

 

It's can difficult too believe, it takes time.

That is why this is going as slow as it is.

 

The crimes are known and are on full display - time allows people time to adjust.

 

It's BIG.

 

Madman or not - you're witnessing History on an unimaginable scale.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Yep, nothing but Trumpettes left on this board.🎺🎺🎺🎺🎺🤴

It looks that way. You would probably be happier on Facebook, there are a lot of people that post a dozen times a day sharing occupy Democrats Salon MSNBC Etc. 

Anyway I thought you were going to re-enlist so you could fight the Russians?

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This impeachment farce should have been done by today. The votes are there for acquittal and there is no chance the democrats would ever get a 2/3rds vote to remove Trump. But........for political reasons the dems don't want Trump giving the state of the union speech having been just acquitted in the Senate. This impeachment was and is all about politics.

Just heard Chuck Schumer on tv crying about no witnesses and without witnesses Trump is not really acquitted. Uhm yes he will be acquitted and we had 17 witnesses testify and none of them were witnesses for the president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Yep, nothing but Trumpettes left on this board.🎺🎺🎺🎺🎺🤴

17903454_10158949965035725_3181251005684
 

Trump poll numbers are the highest since election, despite constant phony Witch Hunts! Tens of thousands of people attending rallies (which the Fake News never mentions) to see “The Greatest Show On Earth”. Fun because USA is WINNING AGAIN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Yep, nothing but Trumpettes left on this board.🎺🎺🎺🎺🎺🤴

yall can't handle the truth. Liberals never admit they were wrong, they just run and hide,

then come back later and talk about how "they were right all along". Then they find out they were wrong again. So, they leave again. Maybe we could label it the "woodpecker syndrome"...but it actually goes way, way back to the sheply and mz the pussy days.

etc.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said:

Yep, nothing but Trumpettes left on this board.🎺🎺🎺🎺🎺🤴

People like results and you may not like him personally Trump has been getting things done, unlike the Dems who only do unsuccessful investigations and then complain when they fail and then vow to investigate more.

Can you name anything the Dems have done positive for the USA since taking control of the House?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Gorka said:

Trump defense attorney Jay Sekulows mic drop moment!

 

Sekulow: “After 31 or 32 times you said you proved every aspect of your case… [pauses for response] That’s what you said.”

Schiff: “We did.”

Sekulow: “Well then I don’t think we need any witnesses.”

 

https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/01/30/774222/

That was a great mic drop moment. Schiff was probably the best lawyer of the entire House impeachment team but that is not saying a whole lot because that was a low bar.  Watching Trump lawyers vs the House lawyers was like watching a professional NFL football team playing a high school football team. The House impeachment team were badly outmatched. 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...