Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Gen Milley promised to committ treason and alert communist china if we attacked

calfoxwc

By calfoxwc
in POLITICAL DISCUSSION

 Share

Recommended Posts

calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
Posted

what a political lowlife.

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/09/14/huge-mark-milley-pledged-to-the-chinese-to-commit-treason-in-order-to-undermine-donald-trump-n442812

HUGE: Mark Milley Pledged to the Chinese to Commit Treason in Order to Undermine Donald Trump

 
By Bonchie | Sep 14, 2021 2:15 PM ET
 
 
dcd00331-71e3-42a4-9bb5-8f8addb11870-860x475.jpgAP Photo/Andrew Harnik

In political settings, the word treason is thrown around a lot, and in almost every case it’s used in a way that does not legally meet the definition of the world. Yet, courtesy of Gen. Mark Milley, the disgraced Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Joe Biden, we finally have a situation where the term is applicable.

 
 

In a jaw-dropping report, it’s been revealed that Milley pledged to the Chinese military to commit treason in order to undermine Donald Trump.

This report claims Milley pledged to alert his CCP counterpart in the event of a U.S. attack, quoting Milley as saying: “General Li, you & I have known each other for now five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.” https://t.co/YSpp5X9wjm

— Jerry Dunleavy (@JerryDunleavy) September 14, 2021

 

The move to alert the CCP would have taken place via a secret backchannel set up by Milley and not sanctioned by the White House. For those who want to quibble with the term treason being used, here’s the legal definition of the act under 18 USC Ch. 115.

§2381. Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Let’s think about this. This is a top US general secretly contacting a top Chinese general pledging to notify him of any coming attack without the Commander in Chief’s knowledge. In doing so, he would be betraying the American service members who would be carrying out such an attack, almost certainly leading to more casualties. Keep in mind in the event of an attack, we would then be at war with the Chinese, making them an enemy nation at that point.

 

I realize the fact-checkers are going to do their best to defend this, but assuming the report (courtesy of a new book by WaPo associate editor Bob Woodward and political reporter Robert Costa) is true, that’s treason, folks.

There is no “Well, I didn’t agree with the president” exemption to the law. And even putting aside the legal ramifications of what Milley pledged to do, it’s still an incredibly disturbing, disgusting act on its face. I understand he hated Donald Trump, but to promise to give aid and comfort to the enemy in response to that hatred is next-level stuff. It’s the kind of thing you’d expect to have read in a spy novel, not be admitted to by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Something has to happen here. Milley already needed to resign over the catastrophe that transpired in Afghanistan. Heck, he should have resigned for pushing woke-ism in the military. But this is far beyond any of that. This is a US general telling our top military and geopolitical enemy that he’d take their side in an attack and put American service members in grave danger to do so, all while hiding it from the president.

Can we also note that this is another example of America’s establishment class being subservient to China? Does anyone think a Chinese official would give us a heads up in the event of a surprise attack? Of course, they wouldn’t. This is dangerous stuff.

 

We do not elect generals and they do not have the right to operate this way. Milley, whether he likes it or not, is supposed to be accountable to elected officials. That he essentially set up his own military dictatorship while serving under Trump is one of the scariest things I’ve seen in a very long time

 
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neo Mentor

Neo

Posted
Posted

Fuck, are you kidding? They should be building this guy a statue to put in place of the white trash traitor statue they just tore down. If you really want to bring the nation together, there's a good place to start.  A guy who prevented a demented power hungry vindictive old man from going full Retard and starting another war.👏

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Westside Steve Grand Master

Westside Steve

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Neo said:

Fuck, are you kidding? They should be building this guy a statue to put in place of the white trash traitor statue they just tore down. If you really want to bring the nation together, there's a good place to start.  A guy who prevented a demented power hungry vindictive old man from going full Retard and starting another war.👏

So you believe President Trump was capable of launching an attack single-handedly and in complete stealth? Well then you really are stupid but I wouldn't guess that news shocks anybody here.

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DieHardBrownsFan Rookie

DieHardBrownsFan

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Neo said:

Fuck, are you kidding? They should be building this guy a statue to put in place of the white trash traitor statue they just tore down. If you really want to bring the nation together, there's a good place to start.  A guy who prevented a demented power hungry vindictive old man from going full Retard and starting another war.👏

You're a fucking piece of human shit.:D

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jbluhm86 Enthusiast

jbluhm86

Posted
Posted

Legally speaking, it wasn't treason:

US Constitution, Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court".

China cannot be legally considered an enemy in this context, because the United States has not declared war or any formal hostilities with China.

Douchebag move by the General, though. Time for him to resign, because I certainly wouldn't trust him at this point.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
14 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Legally speaking, it wasn't treason:

US Constitution, Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court".

China cannot be legally considered an enemy in this context, because the United States has not declared war or any formal hostilities with China.

Douchebag move by the General, though. Time for him to resign, because I certainly wouldn't trust him at this point.

Communist China is most certainly our most dangerous enemy, and he gave assurances of an advanced attack, which would have

resulted in mass casualties of our troops, along with mass civilian casualties. "aid and comfort" falls under those lines. It's very serious. "loose lips sink ships" - and he determined opposition to Pres Trump to get mass casualties of AMERICANS?

He's a turd, and should be court-martialed. It's treason.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DieHardBrownsFan Rookie

DieHardBrownsFan

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Legally speaking, it wasn't treason:

US Constitution, Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court".

China cannot be legally considered an enemy in this context, because the United States has not declared war or any formal hostilities with China.

Douchebag move by the General, though. Time for him to resign, because I certainly wouldn't trust him at this point.

 

 

 

 

 

That's your weak opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Fauci is right there with Milley in the treason charge possibility.

https://redstate.com/scotthounsell/2021/09/14/revealed-fauci-ignored-obamas-ban-on-gain-of-function-research-ordered-coronavirus-studies-to-continue-n442198

REVEALED: Fauci Ignored Obama's Ban on Gain-of-Function Research, Ordered Coronavirus Studies to Continue

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gorka Collaborator

Gorka

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Legally speaking, it wasn't treason:

US Constitution, Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court".

China cannot be legally considered an enemy in this context, because the United States has not declared war or any formal hostilities with China.

Douchebag move by the General, though. Time for him to resign, because I certainly wouldn't trust him at this point.

 

 

 

 

 

An upvote for your last statement.

Consider this explanation:

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Let’s think about this. This is a top US general secretly contacting a top Chinese general pledging to notify him of any coming attack without the Commander in Chief’s knowledge. In doing so, he would be betraying the American service members who would be carrying out such an attack, almost certainly leading to more casualties. Keep in mind in the event of an attack, we would then be at war with the Chinese, making them an enemy nation at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calfoxwc Grand Master

calfoxwc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

I guess that's the Founding Father's "weak opinion" too, since that's literally what the Constitution defines as treason, but 🤷‍♂️

but you are assuming definitions of words that are not correct. "Aid and comfort"..... is a wide-reaching definition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...