mjp28 Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 ■ TRUMP IS -NOT- IMMUNE FROM PROSECUTION. [ PER APPEALS COURT. ]. AND OTHER INTERESTING ITEMS TODAY.■ ■ AND NEAR THE END OF THIS THREAD .... INTERESTING TRUMP LAWSUITS, among the 4,000+ since 1970 . ▪︎--> WOW ! <--▪︎ ~ [ JUST IN ] - Mr Trump can NOT go and write his own laws and rules as HE would like them. ( lol ) ●~~~~~~~~~~▪︎~~~~~~~~~~▪︎~~~~~~~~~~▪︎~~~~~~~~~~● Trump Capitol Riot Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media at a Washington hotel, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, after attending a hearing before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals at the federal courthouse in Washington. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) ASSOCIATED PRESS Less WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals panel ruled Tuesday that Donald Trump can face trial on charges that he plotted to overturn the results of the 2020 election, rejecting the former president’s claims that he is immune from prosecution. The decision marks the second time in as many months that judges have spurned Trump’s immunity arguments and held that he can be prosecuted for actions undertaken while in the White House and in the run-up to Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol. But it also sets the stage for additional appeals from the Republican ex-president that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial was originally set for March, but it was postponed last week and the judge didn't immediately set a new date. “We conclude that the interest in criminal accountability, held by both the public and the Executive Branch, outweighs the potential risks of chilling Presidential action and permitting vexatious litigation,” the judges wrote. The trial date carries enormous political ramifications, with the Republican primary front-runner hoping to delay it until after the November election. If Trump defeats President Joe Biden, he could presumably try to use his position as head of the executive branch to order a new attorney general to dismiss the federal cases or he potentially could seek a pardon for himself. The appeals court took center stage in the immunity dispute after the Supreme Court last month said it was at least temporarily staying out of it, rejecting a request from special counsel Jack Smith to take up the matter quickly and issue a speedy ruling. The legally untested question before the court was whether former presidents can be prosecuted after they leave office for actions taken in the White House related to their official duties. The Supreme Court has held that presidents are immune from civil liability for official acts, and Trump’s lawyers have for months argued that that protection should be extended to criminal prosecution as well. They said the actions Trump was accused of in his failed bid to cling to power after he lost the 2020 election to Biden, including badgering his vice president to refuse to certify the results of the election, all fell within the “outer perimeters” of a president’s official acts. But Smith’s team has said that no such immunity exists in the U.S. Constitution or in prior cases and that, in any event, Trump’s actions weren’t part of his official duties. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the case, rejected Trump’s arguments in a Dec. 1 opinion that said the office of the president “does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass.” Trump’s lawyers then appealed to the D.C. appeals court, but Smith asked the Supreme Court to weigh in first, in hopes of securing a fast and definitive ruling and preserving the March 4 trial date. The high court declined the request, leaving the matter with the appeals court. The case was argued before Judges Florence Pan and J. Michelle Childs, appointees of Biden, a Democrat, and Karen LeCraft Henderson, who was named to the bench by President George H.W. Bush, a Republican. The judges made clear their skepticism of Trump’s claims during arguments last month, when they peppered his lawyer with tough questions and posed a series of extreme hypotheticals as a way to test his legal theory of immunity — including whether a president who directed Navy commandos to assassinate a political rival could be prosecuted. Trump’s lawyer, D. John Sauer, answered yes — but only if a president had first been impeached and convicted by Congress. That view was in keeping with the team’s position that the Constitution did not permit the prosecution of ex-presidents who had been impeached but then acquitted, like Trump. The case in Washington is one of four criminal prosecutions Trump faces as he seeks to reclaim the White House this year. He faces federal charges in Florida that he illegally retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate, a case that was also brought by Smith and is set for trial in May. He’s also charged in state court in Georgia with scheming to subvert that state’s 2020 election and in New York in connection with hush money payments made to porn actor Stormy Daniels. He has denied any wrongdoing. View article source Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 6 Author Report Share Posted February 6 ~ And if that is NOT good enough ..... AND MUCH MORE TO COME ! Trump not immune from criminal charges in 2020 election case, prosecutors say. ..... yes old news from 2023 with NEW news today, how nice. By Jack Queen October 19, 20238:19 PM EDTUpdated 4 months ag ( I deleted out the distorted Mr Trump picture for everyone's benefit. ) Former U.S. President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers remarks to supporters at the Club 47 USA event in West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S. October 11, 2023. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo Acquire Licensing Rights, opens new tab Oct 19 (Reuters) - Donald Trump does not have immunity from criminal charges for trying to reverse his 2020 U.S. presidential election loss, federal prosecutors said Thursday, opposing his bid to dismiss the case. "No constitutional provision or historical practice supports conferring absolute immunity from criminal prosecution on a former president," Washington prosecutors said in a court filing. Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, has claimed in legal filings that he has sweeping immunity from criminal charges for actions he took while serving as president from 2017 to 2021. Advertisement · Scroll to continue He was charged in August by U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith with four felony counts for attempting to interfere in the counting of votes and to block the certification of the 2020 election, which he lost to Democratic President Joe Biden. In an Oct. 5 court filing, Trump’s lawyers said he cannot be prosecuted for his efforts to ensure “election integrity” because they were “at the heart of his official responsibilities as President.” ▪︎--> AND MUCH MORE CONTINUED. ▪︎--> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 6 Author Report Share Posted February 6 And so much NEW breaking news today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 6 Author Report Share Posted February 6 OH, the Trump Capitol Riot above did not come out too clear above I will check it out ....... for all of the political people here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 On to the Supreme Court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 so much baloney. It shows how corrupt this obamao/biden gov is. Bogus prosecutions are not illegal, they just take a lot of money to defend against. that is the corrupt political tool this dirtbag "deep staters" are using. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 "a federal appeals court" doesn't say which one? or did I miss it? typical: https://redstate.com/mdempsey/2024/02/06/9th-circuit-court-of-appeals-overturns-stay-against-ca-allowing-ca-doj-to-enforce-ammo-restrictions-n2169719 9th Circuit Court Again Shows Its Illegitimacy by Overturning Stay Against CA Ammo Purchase Restrictions ************************************************** regardless, the question of "can he be prosecuted" is dwarfed profoundly, by the question of "SHOULD THIS POLITICAL FARCE BE ALLOWED IN THE FIRST PLACE" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 1 hour ago, calfoxwc said: so much baloney. It shows how corrupt this obamao/biden gov is. Bogus prosecutions are not illegal, they just take a lot of money to defend against. that is the corrupt political tool this dirtbag "deep staters" are using. Baby Cow if they ruled for Cheetos. ByDon could have military kill Cheetos and he would be immune from criminal charges. You really can't be this stupid. Of course you are. MAGA the stupidest cult in modern history. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 38 minutes ago, Axe said: This him in Russia? He is lining up some new sponsors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 7 Author Report Share Posted February 7 (edited) 1 hour ago, cccjwh said: This him in Russia? He is lining up some new sponsors. Oh yes ....... when ever you see redstate "stuff" or pictures of that "tucker guy" you know just how far to the RED/right you have really gone in the reliability zone. ...... edit add. ..... Just expand out to get a better read on this. Edited February 7 by mjp28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 I just can't believe they keep walking into these traps. Amazing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 12 hours ago, mjp28 said: ■ TRUMP IS -NOT- IMMUNE FROM PROSECUTION. [ PER APPEALS COURT. ]. AND OTHER INTERESTING ITEMS TODAY.■ ~ [ JUST IN ] - Mr Trump can NOT go and write his own laws and rules as HE would like them. ( lol ) Trump Capitol Riot Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media at a Washington hotel, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, after attending a hearing before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals at the federal courthouse in Washington. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) ASSOCIATED PRESS Less WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals panel ruled Tuesday that Donald Trump can face trial on charges that he plotted to overturn the results of the 2020 election, rejecting the former president’s claims that he is immune from prosecution. The decision marks the second time in as many months that judges have spurned Trump’s immunity arguments and held that he can be prosecuted for actions undertaken while in the White House and in the run-up to Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol. But it also sets the stage for additional appeals from the Republican ex-president that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial was originally set for March, but it was postponed last week and the judge didn't immediately set a new date. “We conclude that the interest in criminal accountability, held by both the public and the Executive Branch, outweighs the potential risks of chilling Presidential action and permitting vexatious litigation,” the judges wrote. The trial date carries enormous political ramifications, with the Republican primary front-runner hoping to delay it until after the November election. If Trump defeats President Joe Biden, he could presumably try to use his position as head of the executive branch to order a new attorney general to dismiss the federal cases or he potentially could seek a pardon for himself. The appeals court took center stage in the immunity dispute after the Supreme Court last month said it was at least temporarily staying out of it, rejecting a request from special counsel Jack Smith to take up the matter quickly and issue a speedy ruling. The legally untested question before the court was whether former presidents can be prosecuted after they leave office for actions taken in the White House related to their official duties. The Supreme Court has held that presidents are immune from civil liability for official acts, and Trump’s lawyers have for months argued that that protection should be extended to criminal prosecution as well. They said the actions Trump was accused of in his failed bid to cling to power after he lost the 2020 election to Biden, including badgering his vice president to refuse to certify the results of the election, all fell within the “outer perimeters” of a president’s official acts. But Smith’s team has said that no such immunity exists in the U.S. Constitution or in prior cases and that, in any event, Trump’s actions weren’t part of his official duties. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the case, rejected Trump’s arguments in a Dec. 1 opinion that said the office of the president “does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass.” Trump’s lawyers then appealed to the D.C. appeals court, but Smith asked the Supreme Court to weigh in first, in hopes of securing a fast and definitive ruling and preserving the March 4 trial date. The high court declined the request, leaving the matter with the appeals court. The case was argued before Judges Florence Pan and J. Michelle Childs, appointees of Biden, a Democrat, and Karen LeCraft Henderson, who was named to the bench by President George H.W. Bush, a Republican. The judges made clear their skepticism of Trump’s claims during arguments last month, when they peppered his lawyer with tough questions and posed a series of extreme hypotheticals as a way to test his legal theory of immunity — including whether a president who directed Navy commandos to assassinate a political rival could be prosecuted. Trump’s lawyer, D. John Sauer, answered yes — but only if a president had first been impeached and convicted by Congress. That view was in keeping with the team’s position that the Constitution did not permit the prosecution of ex-presidents who had been impeached but then acquitted, like Trump. The case in Washington is one of four criminal prosecutions Trump faces as he seeks to reclaim the White House this year. He faces federal charges in Florida that he illegally retained classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate, a case that was also brought by Smith and is set for trial in May. He’s also charged in state court in Georgia with scheming to subvert that state’s 2020 election and in New York in connection with hush money payments made to porn actor Stormy Daniels. He has denied any wrongdoing. View article source Poor widdle Donnie... So much losing... As CCJ said, the MAGAs aren't exactly the brightest bunch. Yeah, if his pals in the SCOTUS say a president is totally immune from criminal prosecution... (they won't) You go Joe... Just have Seal Team 6 pay a visit to Maga Retardo... Ya know, Mango needs to keep those donations coming to pay for his $50 million- and counting legal bills. The Orange Kool-Aid isn't enough anymore I think, to keep the Cult in line. He need a new grift TRAITOR ADE © . 25% of the proceeds to help out on his legal bills. 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 7 Author Report Share Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, hoorta said: Poor widdle Donnie... So much losing... As CCj said, the MAGAs aren't exactly the brightest bunch. Yeah, if his pals in the SCOTUS say a president it totally immune from criminal prosecution... (they won't) You go Joe... Just have Seal Team 6 pay a visit to Maga Retardo... Ya know, Mango needs to keep those donations coming to pay for his $50 million- and counting legal bills. The Orange Kool-Aid isn't enough anymore I think, to keep the Cult in line. He need a new grift TRAITOR ADE © . 25% of the proceeds to help out on his legal bills. 😉 Hey Larry .... this is getting more fun every time. And the MAGAs are falling into traps like flys to a sticky trap. Good evening pal. ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 9 hours ago, mjp28 said: Hey Larry .... this is getting more fun every time. And the MAGAs are falling into traps like flys to a sticky trap. Good evening pal. ..... of course, none of you are serious, you are just po'd you can't screw with people who have different opinions. Pretty low, but that is how you and your "pal" go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, calfoxwc said: of course, none of you are serious, you are just po'd you can't screw with people who have different opinions. Pretty low, but that is how you and your "pal" go. You are the one saying POTUS should be able above the law. I thought would were just trolling, but it looks like you are just that stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 15 hours ago, mjp28 said: Oh yes ....... when ever you see redstate "stuff" or pictures of that "tucker guy" you know just how far to the RED/right you have really gone in the reliability zone. ...... edit add. ..... Just expand out to get a better read on this. And the most trusted, the weather channel, is only correct 50% of the time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jax Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Remind me, how did Trump try to stop the 2020 election?? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cccjwh Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 18 minutes ago, Jax said: Remind me, how did Trump try to stop the 2020 election?? Pretty sure he isn't charge with that. I know it's hard to keep track, since there are 91 counts. Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States) Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAFBF Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 15 hours ago, JAFBF said: I just can't believe they keep walking into these traps. Amazing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 7 Author Report Share Posted February 7 3 hours ago, Jax said: And the most trusted, the weather channel, is only correct 50% of the time. <--▪︎ for just what time period do. you want ??? Not really ..... depending on how far out you want to go. I'm very good with from 5 to 7 days, they readjust it every single day you know. But just look at almost EVERY single expert service out there. ........ A seven-day forecast can accurately predict the weather about 80 percent of the time and a five-day forecast can accurately predict the weather approximately 90 percent of the time. However, a 10-day—or longer—forecast is only right about half the time........ TEN DAYS ? Who needs that ? Get serious now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 7 Author Report Share Posted February 7 4 hours ago, cccjwh said: Pretty sure he isn't charge with that. I know it's hard to keep track, since there are 91 counts. Count 1: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States) Count 2: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 3: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2), 2 (Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding) Count 4: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights) Mr Trump has a lousy track record with things like court appearences and the like ..... and that is carrying on through ALL of his current and future ones. ▪︎--> Remind me again just how many has he won now, including the 2020 race ? ♥︎ YOU HAVE TO READ THIS, Mr Trump. ...... edit add #1 of ?? (lol) ...... OMG ! Since 1970 mr trump involved in OVER 4,000 lawsuits ??? What a freakin' low-life loser. You can tally that up .... if you want. "THE Mr Trump file" .... yes OMG ! Over 100 business tax disputes ? Really ? How many of his former lawyers, CFOs, etc. have. already pled -GUILTY- ? And more to come. OH YES ! ...... He's my guy ! And oh-so honest every single day, over 4,000 lawsuits ...... yeah he's my guy alright. How many presidents have been in OVER 4,000 lawsuits : A). None. B). Only Mr Don John Trump. ■ "Legal affairs of Donald Trump" redirects here. For lawsuits arising from his presidency, see Legal affairs of Donald Trump as president. ■ From the 1970s until he was elected president in 2016, Donald Trump and his businesses were involved in over 4,000 legal cases in U.S. federal and state courts, including battles with casino patrons, million-dollar real estate lawsuits, personal defamation lawsuits, and over 100 business tax disputes. He has also been accused of sexual harassment and sexual assault with one accusation resulting in Trump being held civilly liable. In 2015, his lawyer Alan Garten called this "a natural part of doing business" in the United States. While litigation is indeed common in the real estate industry,[5] Trump has been involved in more legal cases than his fellow magnates Edward J. DeBartolo Jr., Donald Bren, Stephen M. Ross, Sam Zell, and Larry Silverstein combined. ■ Numerous legal affairs persisted during Trump's presidency. Since he left office, multiple investigations focus on him: Between October 2021 and July 2022 alone, the Republican National Committee paid more than $2 million to attorneys representing Trump in his capacity as president and in his personal and business capacities.[8] The New York Times published an overview of his legal involvements as of September 2022.[9] In January 2023, a federal judge fined Trump and his attorney nearly $1 million, characterizing him as "a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries."[10] ■ On December 6, 2022, Trump's company The Trump Organization was convicted on 17 criminal charges. ■ On March 30, 2023, in People v. Trump, he was indicted on 34 felony counts by a grand jury in Manhattan, New York. He was arraigned on the charges on April 4, 2023, and pleaded not guilty to all counts.] On March 25, 2024, Trump is scheduled to stand trial. on state criminal charges of falsifying business records related to hush money payments to an adult film actress prior to his election to the presidency. On May 9, 2023, regarding E. Jean Carroll's claims of defamation and sexual assault, an anonymous jury[17] found Trump liable for sexual abuse (but not rape) and defamation against Carroll and ordered Trump to pay her $5 million in damages.[4][18] ■ In June 2023, Trump was indicted on federal criminal charges relating to his handling of classified documents and was arraigned in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Miami. On May 14, 2024, there will be a pretrial hearing. ■ ■ On August 14, 2023, he was criminally indicted by a grand jury in Georgia on similar state election-related charges. Fulton County, Georgia, district attorney Fani Willis investigated his efforts to overturn that state's 2020 presidential election results. ■ On September 26, 2023, a New York judge issued a summary judgment finding Trump and his two adult sons liable for fraud. The judge canceled the business certification of the Trump Organization. This partially resolved a civil lawsuit over fraudulent overvaluation of The Trump Organization's assets and Trump's net worth.[21] On October 2, further details will be addressed at trial.[22][23] ■ On January 26, 2024, he was ordered to pay E. Jean Carroll an additional $83.3 million in damages. ■ ■ On January 29, 2024, he was to face trial regarding an alleged pyramid scheme, but on January 12, the case was dismissed from federal court, with plaintiffs recommended to file cases in state courts. ■ ▪︎--> ■ AND, In 2024, he will face trial on federal charges related to the 2020 election. ■ COMING RIGHT UP ! <--▪︎ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 7 Author Report Share Posted February 7 (edited) 5 hours ago, Jax said: Remind me, how did Trump try to stop the 2020 election?? <--▪︎ got a pen or pencil ? ● We will not .... have to wait long for that, you can watch it live on TV or you can tape it and watch it later. ▪︎--> Mr Trump's very busy partial 2024 court schedule mark your calendars now ! ■ On January 26, 2024, he was ordered to pay E. Jean Carroll an additional $83.3 million in damages. ■ ✔️ (and now the check Mr Trump .... you do have it, right) ■ On January 29, 2024, he was to face trial regarding an alleged pyramid scheme, but on January 12, the case was dismissed from federal court, with plaintiffs recommended to file cases in state courts. ■ ▪︎--> ■ AND, In 2024, he will face trial on federal charges related to the 2020 election. ■ COMING RIGHT UP ! <--▪︎ ........ edit add #2 ...... Relax Jax, We are here to help. No problems, right ? ;-- ) Edited February 8 by mjp28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 8 Author Report Share Posted February 8 ~ And who here remembers this one, Trump University, yes that's right good ol' "TRUMP U." ! ---◇--- Trump University litigation. And $798,774.24 Trump U. paid out for lawyer fees and expenses for the "other side". Huh ? ( ▪︎You have to read this stuff. ) Trump lawsuits divided by decades, years, Federal, State and anything else you can think of. ▪︎--> Main article: Trump University § Allegations of impropriety and lawsuits In 2013, in a lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, Trump was accused of defrauding more than 5,000 people of $40 million for the opportunity to learn Trump's real estate investment techniques in a for-profit training program, Trump University, which operated from 2005 to 2011. Trump ultimately stopped using the term "University" following a 2010 order from New York regulators, who called Trump's use of the word "misleading and even illegal"; the state had previously warned Trump in 2005 to drop the term or not offer seminars in New York. Although Trump has claimed a 98% approval rating on course evaluations, former students recounted high-pressure tactics from instructors seeking the highest possible ratings, including threats of withholding graduation certificates.[62] In addition, the high reviews were solicited before the courses ended, when the students still anticipated receiving benefits that ultimately never materialized. Subsequently, more than 2,000 students sought and received course refunds before the end of their paid seminars. ▪︎--> In a separate class action civil suit against Trump University in mid-February 2014, a San Diego federal judge allowed claimants in California, Florida, and New York to proceed; a Trump counterclaim, alleging that the state attorney general's investigation was accompanied by a campaign donation shakedown, was investigated by a New York ethics board and dismissed in August 2015.[64] Trump filed a $1 million defamation suit against former Trump University student Tarla Makaeff, who had spent about $37,000 on seminars, after she joined the class action lawsuit and publicized her classroom experiences on social media. Trump University was later ordered by a U.S. district judge in April 2015 to pay Makaeff and her lawyers $798,774.24 in legal fees and costs. Donald Trump was found to have defrauded students, and was forced to pay $25 million in restitution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 8 Author Report Share Posted February 8 ~ There are so many catergries of the 4,000+ lawsuits "since 1970" of the DJ Trump group. ● AND FINALLY ... here's just one more : Outside the U.S., yes the USA isn't enough. --◇-- Mr Trump making friends everywhere he goes. In 2003, the city of Stuttgart denied TD Trump Deutschland AG, a Trump Organization subsidiary, the permission to build a planned tower due to questions over its financing. Trump Deutschland sued the city of Stuttgart, and lost. In 2004 Trump's German corporate partner brought suit against the Trump Organization for failure to pay back a EUR 2 million pre-payment as promised. In 2011, Donald Trump sued Scotland, alleging that it built the Aberdeen Bay Wind Farm after assuring him it would not be built. He had recently built a golf course there and planned to build an adjacent hotel. Trump lost his suit, with the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom unanimously ruling in favor of the Scottish government in 2015. In October 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that Trump, together with two principals of a connected developer, could be sued for various claims, including oppression, collusion and breach of fiduciary duties, in relation to his role in the marketing of units in the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Toronto, Canada. A subsequent application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court of Canada in March 2017. Also in October 2016, JCF Capital ULC (a private firm that had bought the construction loan on the building) announced that it was seeking court approval under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act to have the building sold in order to recoup its debt, which then totaled $301 million. The court allowed for its auction which took place in March 2017, but no bidders, apart from one stalking horse offer, took part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 8 Report Share Posted February 8 LOL Hey Mike 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjp28 Posted February 8 Author Report Share Posted February 8 11 minutes ago, FairHooker11 said: LOL Hey Mike LMAO .... That's good hooker ! One question is it A. Viagria or B. birth control ? ( I might only need one. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted February 8 Report Share Posted February 8 haha viagra is blue and quite possibly so is birth control ... so dont be blue pilled !! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted February 8 Report Share Posted February 8 so, Pres Trump isn't immune from fake, politically damaging? lawsuits with fake dishonest "witnesses".... neither was Kavanaugh. It's the left that does this garbage. It's sad, but in the long run, they will fail. Meanwhile, what they are trying to avoid is talking about who the non-present president is..... These leftist fake lawsuits/prosecutions won't cause WWIII. but this bunch of losers in our WH might very well cause it to happen: https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/02/08/new-biden-claims-he-spoke-to-yet-another-dead-person-n2169803 NEW: Biden Claims He Spoke to Yet Another Dead World Leader - This Is Scary Stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.