htownbrown

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/17/boaty-mcboatface-makes-major-climate-change-discovery-maiden/amp/

That actually made me laugh a little. But it's gross. Nothing wrong about feeling that way.

Just honesty.

I'm just curious who gets to decide what is disgusting these days? Forget Religon. I don't care about their demeanor or flamboyant characteristics. They can act however they want, but it's not like I don't know they're doing gross shit or that I have to find it all intriguing. If we want to talk statistics they have higher STD rates, higher promiscuity rates, and higher suicide rates among gay men. If STD carrying, emotionally unstable dudes (%statistically%) are appealing to you, life is probably hard on you. Do what you want to do. Get married. Get your little joint tax filing break. Whatever anyone else gets to do, you get to do as far as I'm concerned. That's all fine and shit, but you're a gross mfer in my book. That goes for men who do it to their wives and vice versa. I just can't instantly tell who they are to know they're just as gross. I'll stand for the rights of gay people, but I sure as fuck don't want to stand next to their nasty ass. I'll sell them a cake, but sure as hell not buying one of theirs. I was just born this way, so you MUST accept my rights to believe this. Sorry. This topic makes me want to clean my doorknob.

Ignore a grown man jacking in your hotel room or ignore the article?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/deadspin.com/report-kellen-winslow-ii-couldnt-stop-masturbating-in-1835493794/amp How does everyone just deal with this?

"If he would have came, it would have helped us, if not, we’re fine where we’re at,” defensive tackle Sheldon Richardson said. “I like our potential already. And no one’s taking my spot.” https://www.brownszone.com/2019/06/05/browns-cut-desmond-harrison-who-started-1st-8-games-at-left-tackle-last-year/ Best response yet.

Mr. Maza likes to call everyone he disagrees with a Nazi. Wonder who's dick you have to suck to get the ability to judge someone else's content without having yours judged in the same capacity. But then you realize he probably sucked them all.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/48029/breaking-cowardly-broward-deputy-arrested-multiple-ryan-saavedra Hope it sticks....

But the price of dog is way cheaper in Compton....

If his report is a referral for impeachment, what in the constitution says he can't say as much? Publicly, he's talking like a hermit crab.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/you-dont-have-commit-crime-be-impeached-647926%3famp=1

If I had to guess, Nancy told him not to and he rolled over for a belly rub.

Yeah....to him recommendation means Mueller acting as a prosecutor. Logic be damned.

I hope we at least learned today that a recommendation is not a charge, boys and girls.

Ok boss, it was fun. Toodles.

You're oblivious to what I'm saying here. We're moving farther away from the point with every post. "If we had confidence the president didn't commit a crime, we would have said so." Those are his own words, not mine. Now follow me here: If what he said was "We have confidence the president committed a crime, there appears to be sufficient evidence to meet the burden of impeachment requirements" it would be well within his ability to do so. It's been done before. He can tell Congress whatever his heart's desire and Congress can impeach a president on almost any act of bad faith, if they feel like it. Mueller is the evidence gatherer, Congress is the prosecutor, and the Senate is the jury. To suggest a detective can't give a recommendation to a prosecutor is stupid AF. The detective doesn't have to and he probably shouldn't, but there is no restrictions in that regard. I never suggested for one second that anything Mueller would say to Congress was in anyway a formal charge. That seems to be your contention and it's a mystery to me as to why.

You are aware you don't have to break a law to be impeached, right? He's well within his ability to recommend impeachment. The "charges" are irrelevant.

Let me correct you before someone loses it around here. Ken Starr had evidence of crimes, he could not bring charges for the same reason Mueller can't.

I said RECOMMEND impeachment, not charge him with a crime. FFS

Two things to note here. 1. Ken Starr recommended impeachment and laid out the evidence for it himself. Mueller did not, despite his ability to do so. 2. Mueller did not say Barr purgered himself, nor misled the public.

Well the, I assume, black woman's voice was rather uppity for someone who just had a gun pointed at them then.

What........now she's gangsta, right? OG Gram Gram. Or is that only when you point a gun at your own people for having a different colored snot rag? Well I guess I answered myself because she never pointed it at anyone. Btw, in my younger days that happened to me (and a lot of others) more than once. I'm sure that wasn't her first rodeo. Welcome to Texas Youngblood!

Luck in a Rolls could be used for the next Geico caveman commercial.

Oh....he's all in now. You have to be to do that to a Rolls.... https://mobile.twitter.com/br_nfl/status/1133597946518200320