miktoxic Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 I'll be disappointed with Claiborne at 4. We desperately need skill position players that are studs and if we blow that chance for Claiborne it will suck. But the other side of the coin is that Claiborne along with Haden and Ward would be an EXCEPTIONAL secondary. Top 3 in the league for sure. I COULDN'T ever fully hate it we got Claiborne, but like I said, I'd be disappointed that we didn't snag Richardson, Blackmon, or even to a lesser extent Floyd. well then how about claiborn @4 and martin (RB) @22? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob806 Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 I want an OLB by pick #37, or I'll be pissed. We are too damn slow on the edge, and desperately need LB help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Buffalo Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 What would piss me off the most is either drafting Tannehill with the #4 instead of Richardson, Blackmon, or Claiborne who are the only real options for the pick. What would piss me off as equally is taking Weeden any sooner than the 3rd or 4th if we DIDN'T draft Blackmon. I think the only way for Weeden to be relatively successful he will need his college #1 WR to go with him (it would also increase Blackmons production as well). I could live with Blackmon by himself but not Weeden by himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawginIT Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 1. Taking ANY QB before round 4! 2. Trading back and not getting any of Kalil, Blackmon, Claiborne, Richardson, or Floyd. 3. Taking Hill over Wright at 22. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 too many player based list items... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Bone Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 Drafting Tannehill or Claiborne at 4 Drafting Weeden earlier than the 4th round Not getting a difference maker at RB WR and RT +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDBrownsFan Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 I have strong opinions on this one... 1. Drafting Tannehill at 3, 4, 7 or even 22. 2. Trading our #4 overall Like the idea of trading the #22 back though. 3. Drafting Claiborne at 4. He's not Patrick Peterson. 4. Selecting a WR at 22- after Floyd you can interchange WRs rated in the 3-10 range. Meaning a team will likely draft a 3rd round Wr and he will probably out produce a guy like Wright. 5. Taking Weeden at 22 or moving into the first round to take him. I think Weeden is solid, but I'd rather have Wilson in Round 4 and I think he will be just as good as Weeden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Husky Dog Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 1. Drafting Tannehill or Weeden before the 4th round 2. Not drafting Richardson at #4 3. Drafting Adams before the 3rd round 4. Not drafting RB, WR, OT, OLB with first 4 picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 Drafting Claiborne at 4. He's not Patrick Peterson. yeah. he's better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCDawgFan13 Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 Here's one you all will love. I was shuffling through the mocks on WalterFootball.com, and the third mock on there today had the stupidest picks I have heard yet...possibly ever. Here are his first three picks for the Browns... 1A - Ryan Tannehill 1B - Kendall Wright 2 - Brandon Weeden I am hoping that he was seriously high or completely plastered when he posted that mock. Nobody can really be that dumb can they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jibz Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 What would piss me off the most is, Colt stays as our starter and he sucks again for another year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Represent Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 Taking a QB ar 4 22 37 or at all would /wrist. Why would i want a 5th best QB in a draft as a rookie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 Taking a QB ar 4 22 37 or at all would /wrist. Why would i want a 5th best QB in a draft as a rookie. Oh, I dunno. Ask the Bengals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Represent Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 Oh, I dunno. Ask the Bengals? Like saying ask every team who finds a diamond in the rough... are you willing to roll the dice again on those later selections 2010 3 RD 85 selection Colt McCoy QB 2007 1st RD 22 selection Brady Quinn QB 2005 3 RD 67 selection Charlie Frye QB 2004 4 RD 106 selection Luke McCown QB How about i Just ask the Cleveland Browns Vapor. I have no Interest in trying the 5th best or later projected QB because picks Like Tom Brady aren't an everyday luxury hit in the NFL and neither is taking the projected best BUT AT LEAST YOU HAD THE BALLS to select the best fucking rated QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuwoohio Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 Moving down more than 4 spots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClevelandFanForLife Posted April 25, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 If someone traded up to 3 to take Richardson it would poss me off. Don't let someone snake us again FO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 If someone traded up to 3 to take Richardson it would poss me off. Don't let someone snake us again FO I have an eerie feeling it's happening as we speak. We held all the cards this offseason. Problem is ... we're still holding them. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills-n-Browns-Fan Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 PoeticG mentioning Trent Richardson ONE MORE TIME!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 if we stay at 4 we're still going to get an impact player be it richardson, blackmon or claiborn no matter what minn does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 if we stay at 4 we're still going to get an impact player be it richardson, blackmon or claiborn. Claiborn can blow me. And if Blackmon isn't as impactful as the top three then we fucked up. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoeticG Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 I have a sick feeling in my gut that tells me that some FO is going to pull up a trade to get ahead of us to draft Trent Richardson. Trent Richardson is the best player in this draft outside Andrew Luck. Richardson is a beast, Trent can do it all! Richardson will likely be the rookie of the year. Can you guys just imagine the boost that Trent Richardson will bring to our offense. If you thought Peyton Hillis was gold then Richardson is enriched Plutonium locked, loaded and ready to be unleashed on the AFCN! Richardson could put Alex Mack on one shoulder and Joe Thomas on the other and still pick up 3-4 yards easy. Trent Richardson is one-of-a-kind. Trent Richardson is a unique specimen that has all the tools to break records and be the piece that the Browns need to finally break into the playoffs. Richardson this, Richardson that, Richardson, Richardson, Richardson...TRENT RICHARDSON! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoeticG Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 Just for the record: I have NEVER called on the Browns to Draft a runningback, ever. I've called for WR, OL, LB, DB, DL, QB, TE, and S. This is the only time I've ever campaigned for runningback. If the FO lets me down this time... I'll be pissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 could you quit reiterating the same bullshit over and over please! "TR is a beast, he's gonna run over ray lewis, he can do it all...." give it a fucking rest for god's sake. the only people that do not know you have a hard on for another man, coincidentally, also do not know what the internet is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cambridgeho Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 I have a sick feeling in my gut that tells me that some FO is going to pull up a trade to get ahead of us to draft Trent Richardson. Trent Richardson is the best player in this draft outside Andrew Luck. Richardson is a beast, Trent can do it all! Richardson will likely be the rookie of the year. Can you guys just imagine the boost that Trent Richardson will bring to our offense. If you thought Peyton Hillis was gold then Richardson is enriched Plutonium locked, loaded and ready to be unleashed on the AFCN! Richardson could put Alex Mack on one shoulder and Joe Thomas on the other and still pick up 3-4 yards easy. Trent Richardson is one-of-a-kind. Trent Richardson is a unique specimen that has all the tools to break records and be the piece that the Browns need to finally break into the playoffs. Richardson this, Richardson that, Richardson, Richardson, Richardson...TRENT RICHARDSON! Im sure the FO thought of this senario a month ago. We are still in good shape man, if they do draft him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoeticG Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 PoeticG mentioning Trent Richardson ONE MORE TIME!!! "I have a sick feeling in my gut that tells me that some FO is going to pull up a trade to get ahead of us to draft Trent Richardson. Trent Richardson is the best player in this draft outside Andrew Luck. Richardson is a beast, Trent can do it all! Richardson will likely be the rookie of the year. Can you guys just imagine the boost that Trent Richardson will bring to our offense. If you thought Peyton Hillis was gold then Richardson is enriched Plutonium locked, loaded and ready to be unleashed on the AFCN! Richardson could put Alex Mack on one shoulder and Joe Thomas on the other and still pick up 3-4 yards easy. Trent Richardson is one-of-a-kind. Trent Richardson is a unique specimen that has all the tools to break records and be the piece that the Browns need to finally break into the playoffs. Richardson this, Richardson that, Richardson, Richardson, Richardson...TRENT RICHARDSON!" ***It was a joke Dick, go take a cold shower.*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Buffalo Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 What would you guys do if Tannehill fell to us at #22? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClevelandBigDawg Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 What would you guys do if Tannehill fell to us at #22? Try to trade him to the Phins for next years first and this years 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 man we've got so many holes that i just wouldn't use a pick this year on a qb unless some gem fell to us in the 4th or later. if we draft richardson @4 then we still need wide receiver but what's the dropoff from the first tier wrs? can we gamble and wait to the second round and pick a good wr? if so, where do the OL rank? i'd take the OL or WR or RB (if we didn't draft richardson). these first and second round picks are too important to be spending on a project QB. yeah i saw polian on espn talking about how he'll be great. all i know is we haven't had great in cleveland since kosar at that position. everything this team touches turns to stone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. T Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 Trading our first round draft picks away in a trade for Brady Quinn. That would piss me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cribbs is the man Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 man we've got so many holes that i just wouldn't use a pick this year on a qb unless some gem fell to us in the 4th or later. if we draft richardson @4 then we still need wide receiver but what's the dropoff from the first tier wrs? can we gamble and wait to the second round and pick a good wr? if so, where do the OL rank? i'd take the OL or WR or RB (if we didn't draft richardson). these first and second round picks are too important to be spending on a project QB. yeah i saw polian on espn talking about how he'll be great. all i know is we haven't had great in cleveland since kosar at that position. everything this team touches turns to stone. I completely agree. Its unfortunate that we have more holes coming into the draft than I anticipated before last season. We made a hole by letting Hillis go (I'm not against that, just wasnt expecting it) and we only filled one hole on defense with the DE signings. It would have been really nice to get a serviceable OLB and RT in free agency as well. I understand we are building through the draft but we have so many holes that some just need a patch or a stop gap cause we cant fill them all through the draft. That being said, Id rather build with young players on offense to work on the chemistry (WR, RB, and RT), I think defenders can be picked up in free agency or later rounds and suffice for now. But then a part of me wants to go BPA and if its a defender at 22 then we should probably take him. I totally agree on the QB front, lets get that with our first rounder next year if Colt doesnt develop, lets not waste a pick on a backup or project QB. Mayyybe go with Weeden at #37 but I would much rather wait... Oh and I know he is an "expert" but I have disagreed with almost everything that Polian has been saying since he was fired. He doesnt seem like the kind of guy I would want in my front office, idk if any of you have felt that way too, just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.