Kvoethe Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Love IT!!!!! BREAKING NEWS NFL1m Brady's 4-game suspension upheld by Goodell NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has upheld the four-game suspension imposed on Tom Brady for the the quarterback's role in deflating footballs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeonman Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Lost a bet that it would be at least reduced Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudfly Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Good.....glad they made a decision......didnt want to spend the whole spring hearing about it....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Brady should sue the NFL. I'm not sure how Goodell can use a report that isn't definitive, and ignores basic science, as reason to suspend Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Good on the NFL. Fucking cheater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombo Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 I just want him on the field week one when they play the Steelers, maybe if a court will suspend the suspension long enough for that to happen. Zombo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Brady should sue the NFL. I'm not sure how Goodell can use a report that isn't definitive, and ignores basic science, as reason to suspend Brady. It hurts his case badly that he destroyed his cell phone....apparently on purpose. Lets just say that in criminal defense terms, that is a major indicator of guilt. In fact, it would be an entire separate criminal offense in and of itself. Good thing this is not a criminal prosecution. Nevertheless....a judge hearing a civil case can apply the same principals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 I just want him on the field week one when they play the Steelers, maybe if a court will suspend the suspension long enough for that to happen. Zombo Well, Belichick can alway call on Todd Philcox to win him some games in the interim, no? (or the equivalent of Todd Philcox) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 the whole thing is friggin ridiculous. i'm no scientist but can't air pressure be affected by many different elements? and now what, do we have someone sticking a rectal thermometer up a ball's ass after every play? just more bullshit to add to what will soon become another thing to take away from the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 the whole thing is friggin ridiculous. i'm no scientist but can't air pressure be affected by many different elements? and now what, do we have someone sticking a rectal thermometer up a ball's ass after every play? just more bullshit to add to what will soon become another thing to take away from the game. You can always stop watching if you want. No? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 the whole thing is friggin ridiculous. i'm no scientist but can't air pressure be affected by many different elements? and now what, do we have someone sticking a rectal thermometer up a ball's ass after every play? just more bullshit to add to what will soon become another thing to take away from the game. Correct. It is the Ideal Gas Law. It can account for the fluctuation in psi. Pretty easily actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 FUCK BRADY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoeticG Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 There are too many balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudfly Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 There are too many balls. ...and not enough air..... FUCK BRADY. ...exactly.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Mike Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 My thoughts: 1) Wilson makes all balls to the same specs. Why so strict on the amount of air in 'em? BUT... 2) If Brady broke rules, he deserves to be punished. What concerns me is that, if he destroyed his phone, it makes me think that some texts may have been yet ANOTHER violation of another rule (ala Farmer?) & calling for additional penalties? Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob806 Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 It hurts his case badly that he destroyed his cell phone....apparently on purpose. Lets just say that in criminal defense terms, that is a major indicator of guilt. In fact, it would be an entire separate criminal offense in and of itself. Good thing this is not a criminal prosecution. Nevertheless....a judge hearing a civil case can apply the same principals. I hate the Patriots, but Brady's being smart. I'm not giving my cell phone to Goodell either, he's got no right to see it. Brady probably sought advice from a bunch of folks, including the NFLPA. Goodell's got no right to see those messages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 FUCK BRADY. until he plays for the browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 You can always stop watching if you want. No? just saying it'd be an annoyance. sorta like your trivia posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 I hate the Patriots, but Brady's being smart. I'm not giving my cell phone to Goodell either, he's got no right to see it. Brady probably sought advice from a bunch of folks, including the NFLPA. Goodell's got no right to see those messages. The NFL would have that right if Brady sued to be reinstated. Again, destruction of critical evidence is an indices of guilt. I think Brady had the right to destroy the phone....and the arbitrator has the right to assume he did so in order to destroy evidence of his "guilt". So, from my point of view, having destroyed the evidence....Brady should accept the punishment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 just saying it'd be an annoyance. sorta like your trivia posts. Have you tried this week's? Or does trying them deflate something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted July 28, 2015 Report Share Posted July 28, 2015 Have you tried this week's? Or does trying them deflate something? yep. my ego. lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bringbackbrownie2 Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 Brady should sue the NFL. I'm not sure how Goodell can use a report that isn't definitive, and ignores basic science, as reason to suspend Brady. Your Michigan is showing.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 Your Michigan is showing.. Oh, I can't have an opinion because I'm a Michigan fan? I assume that means no OSU fan can have an opinion either... 1) Innocent until proven guilty. Brady has yet to be proven guilty 2) Any incriminating texts would be on the recipients phone. Plus texts just don't disappear into thin air when the phone breaks. 3) The Wells report is incredibly flawed and isn't even sure of its own conclusion 4) The Ideal Gas Law accounts for all of the fluctuations in psi. It isn't complicated. Goodell decided the punishment. He wasn't going to ok an appeal ignoring his own punishment. He was in a lose lose situation. Now Brady and the NFLPA will sue his ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 He destroyed his cellphone. when you refuse to take a breath analyzer test.... you get cited. Brady refused to take a "check my cell phone" test. He got cited. The NFL doesn't go my mishitgan rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrb12711 Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 Oh, I can't have an opinion because I'm a Michigan fan? I assume that means no OSU fan can have an opinion either... 1) Innocent until proven guilty. Brady has yet to be proven guilty 2) Any incriminating texts would be on the recipients phone. Plus texts just don't disappear into thin air when the phone breaks. 3) The Wells report is incredibly flawed and isn't even sure of its own conclusion 4) The Ideal Gas Law accounts for all of the fluctuations in psi. It isn't complicated. Goodell decided the punishment. He wasn't going to ok an appeal ignoring his own punishment. He was in a lose lose situation. Now Brady and the NFLPA will sue his ass. The biggest thing that frustrates me with this logic is simple. the NFL isn't a court of law and it never will be. the NFL has the right to suspend its players for conduct just like any other employer does for its employees. I get there's a union but this is the truth all the same. Tom Brady has the right to sue the NFL just like I have the right to sue for wrongful employment. If he does go to court and this phone destruction is indeed true, that puts a TON of doubt in his argument he did not have any guilt. Tom Brady made the NFL look bad and tried to pretty boy and be arrogant to get out of it. It didn't work, plain and simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 Tom Brady doesn't need to try to make the NFL look bad. It makes itself looks bad easily enough. I'm not sure how it is "arrogant" to say you shouldn't be suspended for something when the main incriminating report isn't even sure if you're guilty. He fought a wrongful suspension, no arrogance involved. Again, I'll keep going back to the scientific evidence brought up in the response to the Wells report. This will go to court and it will make the NFL look evn worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 problem is the player's union signed off on goodell having ultimate power, so he, when it comes to the players is judge, jury and executioner. now if it was one of the owners under scrutiny and getting squeezed for some reason that would be swept under the rug in record time and long forgotten by now. i don't understand the hate some people throw at an accomplished player, team or coach etc. if it was bernie kosar or sam rutigliano or brian sipe we'd be defending them until our undying breath. BUT NO, brady is a cheater because the football he threw that ONE game against the colts was one scintilla of a scintilla off making him a cheater and scumbag. if that's what you people call a cheater and scumbag then ihop you have clean closets cuz most of you/us wouldn't pass muster when it comes to the squeeky clean that is tom brady. i don't love roethlisberger because he plays for the stoolers. but if he were a brown, we'd all be standing in line to catch a fart in the face from him. get over yourselves. geez, it's a fucking game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 bs. Brady even destroyed his cell phone. It wasn't just one game. Other players from other teams have chimed in on that. And rothrapistbarfsonhisburger? Speak for yourself. He's scum, and he would be scum regardless of the team he plays for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 ok mister i hate the gov't. you gonna give up your phone to have some guy lurk through your calls? doubt it. all the rights everyone screams for go out the window when it's someone you dislike. i get it. BTW, I'm not talking about off the field stuff, just on the field. Cuz we all know we can't defend what the browns all time HOF rb did off the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted July 29, 2015 Report Share Posted July 29, 2015 "rothrapistbarfsonhisburger" just rolls off the tongue, doesn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.