Booker Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Especially in 3 years. That's a boat load of picks. This isn't quite Hershal Walker or Ricky Williams stuff, but both the Vikings and Saints lost out on the "get a superstar/give up a bunch of picks" deal. I know I'm missing something, but can someone give an example of a superstar for a ton of draft picks deal which worked out better for the team receiving the superstar? The few I can think of are: The Rams getting Marshall Faulk for some picks in 98 or 99. Also, didn't the Stoolers get Jerome Bettis for some picks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Not really. There are more trades left to be made. Do you really think Orton will be the starting QB is Denver? They still have a QB need and alot of draft picks in their hip pocket. I agree... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosar_For_President Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Broncos made out like a bandit. Now they signed Pace, the Bears look like a new team. Good for them, never really had anything against them. We'll except the Superbowl Shuffle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.