beare Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 For me its conklin and buckner if we stay at 8 id like jack or zeke if possible RD 2 i think we need best wr left a position we def need upgrade or try moving back into 1st to get a wr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 In the first round I would not like them to select Ka'imi Fairbaim K UCLA. Nor would I like to see them draft Rudy Ruetigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Anyone expected to sign as an undrafted free agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 Conklin and Stanley... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miktoxic Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 paxton lynch and his mom paxton lynch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 For my honest answer, I don't want any of the OTs. I prefer that JT stay right where he is for the next 8 years or so....and for a ROT....we can get that later. Also, no DTs. Not if we are going to continue with the 3-4. If this team was to commit to a 4-3, then yes, perhaps. At NT we have Shelton. And he has to come of age and man that position. If we need another backup besides Meder, we can get one later. What DO I want us to consider in round 1?: DE....need edge rusher LBs both inside or out.....ditto WR or two. We have backups starting for us. Safety. Losses of Gipson/Whitner hurt. Need replacements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 anyone who can help us simply 'win' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gumby73 Posted April 22, 2016 Report Share Posted April 22, 2016 For my honest answer, I don't want any of the OTs. I prefer that JT stay right where he is for the next 8 years or so....and for a ROT....we can get that later. Also, no DTs. Not if we are going to continue with the 3-4. If this team was to commit to a 4-3, then yes, perhaps. At NT we have Shelton. And he has to come of age and man that position. If we need another backup besides Meder, we can get one later. What DO I want us to consider in round 1?: DE....need edge rusher---#8 BUCKNER LBs both inside or out.....ditto ---#65 CORREA OLB WR or two. We have backups starting for us.--#32 Michael Thomas/Doctson Safety. Losses of Gipson/Whitner hurt. Need replacements--#99 MILES KILLEBREW Gip, been on it for weeks, agree top 4 needs. combined drafttec & CBS & hope it falls our way. think ILB Blake Martinez or Dominique Alexander is doable at 138, Grab C Tuerk or Jack Allen at 141. WR-C. Peake @172. I'd be feeling pretty good.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Post Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Would LOVE picking M. Jack at 8 then getting Jaylon Smith at 32. Talk about a defense for the future !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Johnny Manziel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LBC mike Posted April 23, 2016 Report Share Posted April 23, 2016 Two worthy starters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 Would LOVE picking M. Jack at 8 then getting Jaylon Smith at 32. Talk about a defense for the future !!! I certainly wouldn't use the 32 on Jaylon Smith. I would pick him late on potential alone. http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/draft/2016/04/22/jaylon-smith-knee-nerve-injury-draft/83416394/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 Lynch and a CB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcam222 Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 The only thing that would make my head explode is an OT at 8. If we do they better have a high pick for this year lined up for JT in order to still get an impact playmaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 Wentz and Goff oh hey! Go us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Mike Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 OT & OG. Give me a PLAYMAKER! Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyin J Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 If we draft an offensive lineman at 8 or 32 ill flip out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darren15 Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 For my honest answer, I don't want any of the OTs. I prefer that JT stay right where he is for the next 8 years or so....and for a ROT....we can get that later. Also, no DTs. Not if we are going to continue with the 3-4. If this team was to commit to a 4-3, then yes, perhaps. At NT we have Shelton. And he has to come of age and man that position. If we need another backup besides Meder, we can get one later. What DO I want us to consider in round 1?: DE....need edge rusher LBs both inside or out.....ditto WR or two. We have backups starting for us. Safety. Losses of Gipson/Whitner hurt. Need replacements With you Gip...that is why in our mock draft for Cleveland I went DE, OLB, WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Lynch and Ramsey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I knew you'd come around... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike H Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Myles jack and Paxton lynch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wargograw Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Buckner and... Well, really just Buckner. I hate Buckner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBrown Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 At 8 Lynch and Elliott. I desperately hope we dont trade up late for Michael Thomas too, there are better receivers than him on day 3. He runs routes slowly too often, bust material for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 No fat ass OL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Buckner and... Well, really just Buckner. I hate Buckner. I haven't watched any tape on the guy. PFF seems to have a giant chub for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillerInstinct3 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I think it's easy to say WR needs to be considered in an early pick. There's no way we go in this with Hartline as our 1. I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wargograw Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I haven't watched any tape on the guy. PFF seems to have a giant chub for him. I know. Makes me doubt everything they do I watched his taps and saw pretty much nothing elite about him at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBrown Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers. There is no way Hue allows that to continue, he'll have a big say on who we draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers. I'd be shocked if we were still Farmer-rigid concerning WRs... especially ones that will actually attempt and execute downfield blocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.