gftChris Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBrown Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G. Tyler Boyd or Malcom Mitchell in the 3rd please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Tyler Boyd or Malcom Mitchell in the 3rd please Or Sterling Shepherd, Charone Peake, or a bunch of other guys that can be had later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Of course you jackoffs don't want Lynch. You didn't want Roethlisberger or Petersen either. God forbid the Browns pick a play maker. Let's draft more OL. Who the fuck are you talking to? I have more or less been on your side, saying Lynch may be the guy. (and from radio reports, Hue Jackson may also be on your side) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I think be prepared for a continuation of the Ray Farmer approach to wide receivers. I don't think so. I don't think one is in play at #8....but certainly if the Browns move down they could be....and clearly for #32 and #65 they would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 What I mean is, I see us going for the traditional hard-to-get positions early on - QB, tackle, pass rusher. Those guys are pretty hard to find later on, unlike RB, WR, DT, G. sure.....but that is also because those positions are nearly just as much a need for the Browns.....and there appears to be more top flight talent available at those spots than at WR. That is why the WR spot may go 2d/3rd round, not anti-WR philosophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Wait until the end of next season then I can prognosticate in hindsight. That's always a sure way to look smart. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Wait until the end of next season then I can prognosticate in hindsight. That's always a sure way to look smart. WSS Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opal312 Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Smith and Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 After finding time to watch tape late last night, I'll still maintain that I don't want Ramsey - but I'll switch out Buckner for Lynch now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wargograw Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 After finding time to watch tape late last night, I'll still maintain that I don't want Ramsey - but I'll switch out Buckner for Lynch now. A fellow Buckner hater?! Welcome! What do you dislike most? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike H Posted April 27, 2016 Report Share Posted April 27, 2016 I'm upgrading to 3. Darron Lee joins Jack and Lynch. I'd be most happy with Buckner, Bosa, Ramsey or trade down for an OT or WR.+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted April 27, 2016 Report Share Posted April 27, 2016 Even then, a rookie class cannot be evaluated after just one year. Oh sure they can. Is this your first visit to the Browns board? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingfooldoug Posted April 27, 2016 Report Share Posted April 27, 2016 I don't want a RB from Bama and I damn sure don't want pick 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoorta Posted April 27, 2016 Report Share Posted April 27, 2016 Treadwell in a trade down, or Jack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted April 27, 2016 Report Share Posted April 27, 2016 A fellow Buckner hater?! Welcome! What do you dislike most? Slow step, plays high, very inconsistent hand usage, too often he hand fights with the lineman and doesn't try to get skinny in the gap, motor and burst question, too often because of playing high he loses his feet from under him... How far did you want me to go here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 27, 2016 Report Share Posted April 27, 2016 Oh sure they can. Is this your first visit to the Browns board? WSS Ha! Excellent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joedawg69 Posted April 27, 2016 Report Share Posted April 27, 2016 Bosa because he is a 4-3 player and Lynch because I don't think he is worth a first round pick but would not hate it if we got him in a later round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted April 28, 2016 Report Share Posted April 28, 2016 Had no idea why Tour said no to Conklin in the first. Then I saw him across from Buckner this past season. Dialed up more film... I might have to say no to Lynch and Conklin now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted April 28, 2016 Report Share Posted April 28, 2016 Slow step, plays high? This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted April 28, 2016 Report Share Posted April 28, 2016 This. He's high on the mocks cause of his physical potential but his fundamentals are lacking. Any 4-3 team that takes him as DE over bosa is straight up high. I've seen nothing from his tape that ma.kes me interested in him as a 5 tech for the Browns either. Not at 8 at least. If we drop back more and pick him up later along with more picks than yeah I'm ok with that I think he's being projected inside in the 4-3 and at 5-tech in the 3-4. Side note - say that to 99% of my friends here, even the ones that follow the game, and they have no idea, it's like I'm talking a different language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted April 28, 2016 Report Share Posted April 28, 2016 Had no idea why Tour said no to Conklin in the first. Then I saw him across from Buckner this past season. Dialed up more film... I might have to say no to Lynch and Conklin now. Took your good old time didn't ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted April 28, 2016 Report Share Posted April 28, 2016 I think he's being projected inside in the 4-3 and at 5-tech in the 3-4. Side note - say that to 99% of my friends here, even the ones that follow the game, and they have no idea, it's like I'm talking a different language. No team would put him at the 3spot in four down looks unless it's absolutely an obvious passing situation. Buckner would be abused on the interior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.