Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

Planned Babymurderhood and lib public officials lose - two investigative journalist ruled innocent


calfoxwc

Recommended Posts

the prosecutors dropped the charges, and it was ruled a political persecution with no merit.

 

it was the Harris County district attorney who colluded with Planned babymurderhood

...giving them privileged information..

 

and who violated the law.

 

democrat asswholes.

 

http://constitution.com/david-daleiden-vindicated-twice-turns-planned-parenthood-houston-da-broke-law/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

like the dirty da of Baltimore going after the police involved

with the freddie gray stuff.

 

leftwing misuse of our legal system. Obamao initiated all this racial

hostility acting out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bodies get donated to science all the time. Other than it being taboo, what reason is there for being upset over what happens with a fetus after an abortion? The damage is already done. I would rather medical research be done than to just throw away remains.

 

I am not asking this to wind people up. I just don't see the egregious act if the abortion has already occurred other than the mother didn't get her part of the proceeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bodies get donated to science all the time. Other than it being taboo, what reason is there for being upset over what happens with a fetus after an abortion? The damage is already done. I would rather medical research be done than to just throw away remains.

 

I am not asking this to wind people up. I just don't see the egregious act if the abortion has already occurred other than the mother didn't get her part of the proceeds.

Because nazis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the prosecutors dropped the charges, and it was ruled a political persecution with no merit.

 

it was the Harris County district attorney who colluded with Planned babymurderhood

...giving them privileged information..

 

and who violated the law.

 

democrat asswholes.

 

http://constitution.com/david-daleiden-vindicated-twice-turns-planned-parenthood-houston-da-broke-law/

Yes but it's too late for the court of public opinion. As far as most five minute thinkers are concerned this case was closed in favor of planned parenthood months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If some of the horror stories from PP and abortion clinics were being done to animals you would probably have the animal rights groups up in arms and demonstrating but since they are only human babies....no problemo

The people from PETA are basically ignored, if that's what you mean. People are free to protest, and people are free to ignore them doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bodies get donated to science all the time. Other than it being taboo, what reason is there for being upset over what happens with a fetus after an abortion? The damage is already done. I would rather medical research be done than to just throw away remains.

 

I am not asking this to wind people up. I just don't see the egregious act if the abortion has already occurred other than the mother didn't get her part of the proceeds.

Disclaimer: I'm just being the devil's advocate here.

 

That's a little bit like making it legal to sell copies of child pornography because the damage has already been done.

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: I'm just being the devil's advocate here.

 

That's a little bit like making it legal to sell copies of child pornography because the damage has already been done.

 

WSS

 

Actually that is a very good argument to make WSS....I see how the argument could be made it would be better to try and do some good after the damage (babies aborted) is done...for me I am against because it legitimizes the abortion industry but I like your argument too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: I'm just being the devil's advocate here.

 

That's a little bit like making it legal to sell copies of child pornography because the damage has already been done.

 

WSS

The difference is that the initial act is legal in the case of abortion and illegal in the case of the kid smut. Also, owning the biological material is not illegal where as the smut is most definitely going to be a continuous felony football until it is destroyed.

 

You didn't need a disclaimer. I don't think you are on the defense team for NAMBLA haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference is that the initial act is legal in the case of abortion and illegal in the case of the kid smut. Also, owning the biological material is not illegal where as the smut is most definitely going to be a continuous felony football until it is destroyed.

 

You didn't need a disclaimer. I don't think you are on the defense team for NAMBLA haha.

 

"biological material"...or leftovers from a murdered baby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"biological material"...or leftovers from a murdered baby

Or a science dept. cadaver which is the leftovers of some poor guy who died in a car crash. OBF, you believe that we all have souls, correct? Does it really matter then what happens to you after you have left your body? It isn't you anymore. It is a collection of body parts that you leave behind. I know I am an organ donor. That doesn't mean someone should be dramatic and tell the person who gets my heart, kidneys, etc. "sir, here are your leftovers from that loving husband".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or a science dept. cadaver which is the leftovers of some poor guy who died in a car crash. OBF, you believe that we all have souls, correct? Does it really matter then what happens to you after you have left your body? It isn't you anymore. It is a collection of body parts that you leave behind. I know I am an organ donor. That doesn't mean someone should be dramatic and tell the person who gets my heart, kidneys, etc. "sir, here are your leftovers from that loving husband".

 

The difference Logic is these babies did not have a choice...they were killed without their consent. We use terms today that try to sanitize what is actually happening..pro choice is just a sanitized word for legal murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that it is legal doesn't change the fact that many many people believe it's murder and the government has actually written into those laws certain Provisions for those with religious objections.

If that were not the case there wouldn't be any problem if Planned Parenthood actually did sell body parts of 6 month old aborted fetus is would it?

 

WSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The difference Logic is these babies did not have a choice...they were killed without their consent. We use terms today that try to sanitize what is actually happening..pro choice is just a sanitized word for legal murder.

How many people want to die? I am sure any unfortunate person who finds themselves being parted out later wishes they hadn't died. I am just saying that if the abortions are going to be legal, why lose out on medical breakthroughs you could get from "murdered babies"? If they can find a way for stem cells to cure childhood leukemia or some other ailment then I consider that making the most of a bad situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that it is legal doesn't change the fact that many many people believe it's murder and the government has actually written into those laws certain Provisions for those with religious objections.

If that were not the case there wouldn't be any problem if Planned Parenthood actually did sell body parts of 6 month old aborted fetus is would it?

 

WSS

You can not be religious and still have issues with abortion. I just accept the reality that it is legal and will remain that way. We could wring our hands and be pissed about it but that doesn't change the fact that it will keep going on. Until the impossible happens and abortion is ended, why decide that being in a biozhazard bag in a dumpster is somehow more noble than being used for medical research?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there laws allowing for us to go around and smack Mongo on the head with a mallet?

Laws are a matter of who's in charge, not morality. I mean, I'm with you, but slavery was *legal*, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No and that's the hypocrisy. Because you're killing a human and the law says it's cool. Not just a human but a baby who's being robbed of its entire life.

 

I am in no way religious. I find religion to be absolutely ridiculous.

I am not advocating for abortion at all. It is hypocritical. However, it is a hypocrisy that is going to occur whether anyone likes it or not. Might as well learn something from it then toss baby remains in a dumpster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laws are a matter of who's in charge, not morality. I mean, I'm with you, but slavery was *legal*, for example.

I was going to say that if so, and the law was unchanging, then you make what you can of a terrible situation and use the mentally Retarded who are killed for science. The alternative is that they chuck Corky in the landfill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"However, it’s clear that the demand for fetal tissue has created a financial incentive for abortion clinics to continue providing abortions in order to collect and sell organs. Planned Parenthood doesn’t have the best track record of looking out for women “just because.” In order to make more money, they are designed to entrap lower-income women into relying on abortion as a means of contraception. Banning labs from using and purchasing fetal tissue would reduce the financial incentive to provide abortions, and thus perhaps diminish the incentive to push them on women."

 

http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/10/states-should-follow-wisconsins-lead-and-ban-research-on-aborted-babies/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"However, it’s clear that the demand for fetal tissue has created a financial incentive for abortion clinics to continue providing abortions in order to collect and sell organs. Planned Parenthood doesn’t have the best track record of looking out for women “just because.” In order to make more money, they are designed to entrap lower-income women into relying on abortion as a means of contraception. Banning labs from using and purchasing fetal tissue would reduce the financial incentive to provide abortions, and thus perhaps diminish the incentive to push them on women."

 

http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/10/states-should-follow-wisconsins-lead-and-ban-research-on-aborted-babies/

There may be a reduction but not an outright stoppage. I don't think PP should profit from the sales but I am definitely not opposed to them donating the remains to science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: I'm just being the devil's advocate here.

 

That's a little bit like making it legal to sell copies of child pornography because the damage has already been done.

 

WSS

Wait....whhhuuut?? Lol you did not just attempt to correlate the two?

 

No, you did.

 

Right then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There may be a reduction but not an outright stoppage. I don't think PP should profit from the sales but I am definitely not opposed to them donating the remains to science.

 

It is a hard choice to make. I agree why not try to do something good here and make something good come out of something bad but my conscience won't permit it. It would be like condoning abortion in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...