calfoxwc Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 the prosecutors dropped the charges, and it was ruled a political persecution with no merit. it was the Harris County district attorney who colluded with Planned babymurderhood ...giving them privileged information.. and who violated the law. democrat asswholes. http://constitution.com/david-daleiden-vindicated-twice-turns-planned-parenthood-houston-da-broke-law/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 They should be removed from public office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 like the dirty da of Baltimore going after the police involved with the freddie gray stuff. leftwing misuse of our legal system. Obamao initiated all this racial hostility acting out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkHole Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Stuart Not a surprise. Damning videos were made public. The only recourse was to claim the videos were doctored and arrest him on bogus charges in order to calm down the public.. Filthy democrat liberal scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted July 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 disagreeing with the libs is becoming similar to being in the middle of WWII and disagreeing with the nazis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Bodies get donated to science all the time. Other than it being taboo, what reason is there for being upset over what happens with a fetus after an abortion? The damage is already done. I would rather medical research be done than to just throw away remains. I am not asking this to wind people up. I just don't see the egregious act if the abortion has already occurred other than the mother didn't get her part of the proceeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Bodies get donated to science all the time. Other than it being taboo, what reason is there for being upset over what happens with a fetus after an abortion? The damage is already done. I would rather medical research be done than to just throw away remains. I am not asking this to wind people up. I just don't see the egregious act if the abortion has already occurred other than the mother didn't get her part of the proceeds. Because nazis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 the prosecutors dropped the charges, and it was ruled a political persecution with no merit. it was the Harris County district attorney who colluded with Planned babymurderhood ...giving them privileged information.. and who violated the law. democrat asswholes. http://constitution.com/david-daleiden-vindicated-twice-turns-planned-parenthood-houston-da-broke-law/ Yes but it's too late for the court of public opinion. As far as most five minute thinkers are concerned this case was closed in favor of planned parenthood months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 If some of the horror stories from PP and abortion clinics were being done to animals you would probably have the animal rights groups up in arms and demonstrating but since they are only human babies....no problemo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 If some of the horror stories from PP and abortion clinics were being done to animals you would probably have the animal rights groups up in arms and demonstrating but since they are only human babies....no problemo The people from PETA are basically ignored, if that's what you mean. People are free to protest, and people are free to ignore them doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Bodies get donated to science all the time. Other than it being taboo, what reason is there for being upset over what happens with a fetus after an abortion? The damage is already done. I would rather medical research be done than to just throw away remains. I am not asking this to wind people up. I just don't see the egregious act if the abortion has already occurred other than the mother didn't get her part of the proceeds. Disclaimer: I'm just being the devil's advocate here. That's a little bit like making it legal to sell copies of child pornography because the damage has already been done. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Disclaimer: I'm just being the devil's advocate here. That's a little bit like making it legal to sell copies of child pornography because the damage has already been done. WSS Actually that is a very good argument to make WSS....I see how the argument could be made it would be better to try and do some good after the damage (babies aborted) is done...for me I am against because it legitimizes the abortion industry but I like your argument too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Disclaimer: I'm just being the devil's advocate here. That's a little bit like making it legal to sell copies of child pornography because the damage has already been done. WSS The difference is that the initial act is legal in the case of abortion and illegal in the case of the kid smut. Also, owning the biological material is not illegal where as the smut is most definitely going to be a continuous felony football until it is destroyed. You didn't need a disclaimer. I don't think you are on the defense team for NAMBLA haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 The difference is that the initial act is legal in the case of abortion and illegal in the case of the kid smut. Also, owning the biological material is not illegal where as the smut is most definitely going to be a continuous felony football until it is destroyed. You didn't need a disclaimer. I don't think you are on the defense team for NAMBLA haha. "biological material"...or leftovers from a murdered baby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 "biological material"...or leftovers from a murdered baby Or a science dept. cadaver which is the leftovers of some poor guy who died in a car crash. OBF, you believe that we all have souls, correct? Does it really matter then what happens to you after you have left your body? It isn't you anymore. It is a collection of body parts that you leave behind. I know I am an organ donor. That doesn't mean someone should be dramatic and tell the person who gets my heart, kidneys, etc. "sir, here are your leftovers from that loving husband". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Or a science dept. cadaver which is the leftovers of some poor guy who died in a car crash. OBF, you believe that we all have souls, correct? Does it really matter then what happens to you after you have left your body? It isn't you anymore. It is a collection of body parts that you leave behind. I know I am an organ donor. That doesn't mean someone should be dramatic and tell the person who gets my heart, kidneys, etc. "sir, here are your leftovers from that loving husband". The difference Logic is these babies did not have a choice...they were killed without their consent. We use terms today that try to sanitize what is actually happening..pro choice is just a sanitized word for legal murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 The fact that it is legal doesn't change the fact that many many people believe it's murder and the government has actually written into those laws certain Provisions for those with religious objections. If that were not the case there wouldn't be any problem if Planned Parenthood actually did sell body parts of 6 month old aborted fetus is would it? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 The difference Logic is these babies did not have a choice...they were killed without their consent. We use terms today that try to sanitize what is actually happening..pro choice is just a sanitized word for legal murder. How many people want to die? I am sure any unfortunate person who finds themselves being parted out later wishes they hadn't died. I am just saying that if the abortions are going to be legal, why lose out on medical breakthroughs you could get from "murdered babies"? If they can find a way for stem cells to cure childhood leukemia or some other ailment then I consider that making the most of a bad situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Would it be ok to kill a re tarded person and sell their body to science because they can't speak up for themselves? Or because you feel they don't contribute to society? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 The fact that it is legal doesn't change the fact that many many people believe it's murder and the government has actually written into those laws certain Provisions for those with religious objections. If that were not the case there wouldn't be any problem if Planned Parenthood actually did sell body parts of 6 month old aborted fetus is would it? WSS You can not be religious and still have issues with abortion. I just accept the reality that it is legal and will remain that way. We could wring our hands and be pissed about it but that doesn't change the fact that it will keep going on. Until the impossible happens and abortion is ended, why decide that being in a biozhazard bag in a dumpster is somehow more noble than being used for medical research? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Would it be ok to kill a re tarded person and sell their body to science because they can't speak up for themselves? Or because you feel they don't contribute to society? Are there laws allowing for us to go around and smack Mongo on the head with a mallet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 No and that's the hypocrisy. Because you're killing a human and the law says it's cool. Not just a human but a baby who's being robbed of its entire life. I am in no way religious. I find religion to be absolutely ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Are there laws allowing for us to go around and smack Mongo on the head with a mallet? Laws are a matter of who's in charge, not morality. I mean, I'm with you, but slavery was *legal*, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 No and that's the hypocrisy. Because you're killing a human and the law says it's cool. Not just a human but a baby who's being robbed of its entire life. I am in no way religious. I find religion to be absolutely ridiculous. I am not advocating for abortion at all. It is hypocritical. However, it is a hypocrisy that is going to occur whether anyone likes it or not. Might as well learn something from it then toss baby remains in a dumpster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Laws are a matter of who's in charge, not morality. I mean, I'm with you, but slavery was *legal*, for example. I was going to say that if so, and the law was unchanging, then you make what you can of a terrible situation and use the mentally Retarded who are killed for science. The alternative is that they chuck Corky in the landfill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 "However, it’s clear that the demand for fetal tissue has created a financial incentive for abortion clinics to continue providing abortions in order to collect and sell organs. Planned Parenthood doesn’t have the best track record of looking out for women “just because.” In order to make more money, they are designed to entrap lower-income women into relying on abortion as a means of contraception. Banning labs from using and purchasing fetal tissue would reduce the financial incentive to provide abortions, and thus perhaps diminish the incentive to push them on women." http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/10/states-should-follow-wisconsins-lead-and-ban-research-on-aborted-babies/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 I am not advocating for abortion at all. It is hypocritical. However, it is a hypocrisy that is going to occur whether anyone likes it or not. Might as well learn something from it then toss baby remains in a dumpster. Yes i suppose you're correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 "However, it’s clear that the demand for fetal tissue has created a financial incentive for abortion clinics to continue providing abortions in order to collect and sell organs. Planned Parenthood doesn’t have the best track record of looking out for women “just because.” In order to make more money, they are designed to entrap lower-income women into relying on abortion as a means of contraception. Banning labs from using and purchasing fetal tissue would reduce the financial incentive to provide abortions, and thus perhaps diminish the incentive to push them on women." http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/10/states-should-follow-wisconsins-lead-and-ban-research-on-aborted-babies/ There may be a reduction but not an outright stoppage. I don't think PP should profit from the sales but I am definitely not opposed to them donating the remains to science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Disclaimer: I'm just being the devil's advocate here. That's a little bit like making it legal to sell copies of child pornography because the damage has already been done. WSS Wait....whhhuuut?? Lol you did not just attempt to correlate the two? No, you did. Right then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldBrownsFan Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 There may be a reduction but not an outright stoppage. I don't think PP should profit from the sales but I am definitely not opposed to them donating the remains to science. It is a hard choice to make. I agree why not try to do something good here and make something good come out of something bad but my conscience won't permit it. It would be like condoning abortion in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.