Clevfan4life Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 I would laugh so hard. But obama would pardon her quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 I would laugh so hard. But obama would pardon her quick. How do you pardon someone that hasn't been charged? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 How do you pardon someone that hasn't been charged? There was talk of a pre emptive pardon. Beats me how that works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 I don't believe Richard M Nixon was convicted of anything but he was pardoned by Gerald Ford. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 When he's president will Trump still be allowed to have a Twitter Account? Still? Has he been allowed back in to his account now then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dste Ace Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Proclamation 4311 gave Richard Nixon a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes he might have committed against the United States while president... Historians believe the controversy was one of the major reasons Ford lost the election in 1976, an observation with which Ford agreed. Obama doesn't have to worry about another election, and for that reason alone I believe that before leaving office he will give HRC a full and unconditional pardon as a final 'Fuck You' to Republicans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Proclamation 4311 gave Richard Nixon a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes he might have committed against the United States while president... Historians believe the controversy was one of the major reasons Ford lost the election in 1976, an observation with which Ford agreed. Obama doesn't have to worry about another election, and for that reason alone I believe that before leaving office he will give HRC a full and unconditional pardon as a final 'Fuck You' to Republicans. Yes that's what I thought about Nixon. Of course pardoning Hillary, you may well not even be prosecuted, should put a stink on the clintons and the Democrats for a good long time whether there's anything she could be charged with or not. Until she hooked up with Jill Stein for this recount horseshit I don't think the Republicans had much interest in f****** with her. Maybe this is change things. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Not to mention that by the time Trump takes office our current justice department, if you call it that, will have had plenty of time to completely sanitized whatever evidence there might have been against Hillary. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Yes that's what I thought about Nixon. Of course pardoning Hillary, you may well not even be prosecuted, should put a stink on the clintons and the Democrats for a good long time whether there's anything she could be charged with or not. Until she hooked up with Jill Stein for this recount horseshit I don't think the Republicans had much interest in f****** with her. Maybe this is change things. WSS Maybe, but would Trump want to flip flop on his flip flop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Maybe, but would Trump want to flip flop on his flip flop? Well as for myself I didn't take a lot of the election rhetoric seriously. Don't care if they lock Hillary up or not. Most of the talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results. She's probably no longer really a threat, so what would be the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Frankly if it could be proved that the DNC set up any of these phony claims of groping or sexual misconduct I'd like to see those people locked up. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Well as for myself I didn't take a lot of the election rhetoric seriously. Don't care if they lock Hillary up or not. Most of the talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results. She's probably no longer really a threat, so what would be the point? "...talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results." Erm, what? Trump then: "If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation" Trump now: “It’s just not something that I feel very strongly about. ... I think it would be very, very divisive for the country.” What is that if not a flip flop? As even OBF called it. Perhaps flip flop is too pejorative a term - how about "campaign to presidency policy streamlining"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Frankly if it could be proved that the DNC set up any of these phony claims of groping or sexual misconduct I'd like to see those people locked up. WSS I'm not sure about locked up but certainly have nothing to do with politics and be punished in some way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Oh sure it's probably a flip flop even though I maintain it's just over the top campaign rhetoric but fair enough. Like I said I don't care. It's just part of the Litany of the left which includes hey he's not really going to build a wall and hey he's not going to completely rescind Obamacare. Plus if the DNC it really set that s*** up that's some serious dirt. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 By the way who controls the election boards (IOW Republicans Or democrats) in Wisconsin or any other state in which there will be a cry for a recount? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted November 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 By the way who controls the election boards (IOW Republicans Or democrats) in Wisconsin or any other state in which there will be a cry for a recount? WSS Well you'd hope they're independent... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Well you'd hope they're independent... I hope I can f*** Jennifer Aniston. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 so, soros is involved in funding, and the green candidate - she was convinced to do the recount, so the higgardly camp wouldn't look like hypocrites and be made to look like the fools they were. if Trump wins, they were fearing that they'd face legal prosecution. which is obivous to do, when you are freaking corrupt and breaking laws. https://youtu.be/ycnka17BtK8 https://youtu.be/S-KOIhE87AU https://youtu.be/G6eBKIuLzWc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 I really love this one. Idiots laughing at Trump running and winning... https://youtu.be/zT0Rjc6jKCg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 https://youtu.be/jr_4VrtxkBI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 back to the recounts... https://youtu.be/wfvZQUIA37U Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Post Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 I hope I can f*** Jennifer Aniston. WSS Me too it would be awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkin Eater Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 It's too late for a recount in PA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 It's too late for a recount in PA Yea but a law suit can still be filed to try to get one or something something. Also Jill Stein just said the Wisconsin recounts are going to cost $3 million, more than the anticipated $1 million. In other words, give me more money because I want marble floors in my beach house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 30, 2016 Report Share Posted November 30, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted November 30, 2016 Report Share Posted November 30, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted November 30, 2016 Report Share Posted November 30, 2016 YAY ! A Wisconsin real judge told Jill Franen Stein "NO RECOUNT BY HAND". which was a ploy to have it take longer - a lot longer, and be far more expensive. demowackic helter-skelton out of anger of losing, despite being "entitled to win because they are so ..special" http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/11/29/wisconsin-judge-rules-recount-by-hand-isnt-necessary/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.