Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Your attempt to make me faulable is futile as I was being coy. Many names will come up as draft day inches forward as we all know but I'm in for a QB. Faulable? Im trying to make you faulable? Ok. Can anyone help me out here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jiggins7919 Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 The Eagles' pick is actually sliding further down, and if the right teams WIN, and THEY lose, we could be the luckiest team in the universe (about time) and theoretically have the 1st and 5th pick of the first round. I'll have to check once again to see who everyone plays in order to determine the exact outcome scenarios, but a few 5 win teams won, and they are now behind the Eagles. After watching the Eagles, I don't really see them losing out, but they do play the Giants and Cowboys to finish the year, and they are favored to lose in both. The Cowboy game is interesting because I don't think the Boys NEED to win to improve anything, but I believe they already said they will play their starters. So we'll see how their mindframe is. Again, it's very, VERY unlikely that our Eagles pick will be that high, but that's with EVERYTHING going "our way". Keep in mind, if that scenario DOES happen, it's very likely we can get Garrett/Allen at #1, and then Mitch at #5. Well, at least possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Allen and trubisky would be a hell of a draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingfooldoug Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Faulable? Im trying to make you faulable? Ok. Can anyone help me out here? Laafuble? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jiggins7919 Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Fallible is what he meant. "capable of making mistakes or being erroneous." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Fallible is what he meant. "capable of making mistakes or being erroneous." Yes, I discerned that already ty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Wait....what? Ummmm... that's my line... Our o line is min 2 years away from being able to keep a rookie from dying before our 1st bye week. So im in no mood for a QB with the 1st pick Agree with the conclusion even tho I disagree with the premise. If healthy, I see the needed OL talent already on our roster... and we can add better depth, if we are willing to make a hard choice with a big contract... something our FO has demonstrated it is willing to do. Add that we have good PassPro RBs. TEs that can block? OK... a little help there is warranted. But people will say that someone moving up for a QB proves there is a QB worth taking in this draft. And most agree that if there is one, we should take him. And if we take one, people will say there wasn't one worth taking... people will question whatever we do... even if we take the consensus BAA (Best Aggie Available) in the draft, "people" will find a way to question it. Trade ups, like any pick, only define a player's value for one team. Miami defined Tannehill's value and was pretty much high, and alone, in doing it. WSH did the same for RG3... Philly for Wentz... only difference was more saw the logic in the WSH and PHI examples. In a smaller stakes way, we did the same for Kess. He just did not cost us added picks... ... as did Wheezy... ... and Quinn... ... and JFF... ... and... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 Ok so looking at the keyboard ic that the "e" is on the other side from "o".....so u really think that name is spelled with an "o"? Srsly? And dont claim typo ive already closed the investigation on that He went to Jarod? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingfooldoug Posted December 20, 2016 Report Share Posted December 20, 2016 He went to Jarod? The jeweler or the pervert? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted December 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2016 But people will say that someone moving up for a QB proves there is a QB worth taking in this draft. And most agree that if there is one, we should take him. When the Niners move up, it means if you've done the opposite you're 99% certain to be doing it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stillmotion Posted December 22, 2016 Report Share Posted December 22, 2016 The jeweler or the pervert? hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.