Orion Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 # player - measurables - age - exp - shcool 15 Alford, Mario WR 5-8 177 25 2 West Virginia 82 Boyce, Josh WR 5-11 205 26 2 TCU 18 Britt, Kenny WR 6-3 223 28 9 Rutgers 19 Coleman, Corey WR 5-11 185 22 2 Baylor 16 Hall, Rannell WR 6-0 200 24 2 Central Florida 81 Higgins, Rashard WR 6-1 198 22 2 Colorado State 11 Leslie, Jordan WR 6-1 209 25 1 Brigham Young 80 Louis, Ricardo WR 6-2 215 23 2 Auburn 83 Mullaney, Richard WR 6-2 204 24 1 Alabama 84 Payton, Jordan WR 6-1 209 23 2 UCLA 13 Wright, James WR 6-1 201 25 4 LSU NFL career catches & yardage Alford = 1 catch 15 yards Boyce = 9 for 121 Britt = 309 for 4881 (avg of 38.6 catches / year) Coleman = 33 for 413 Hall = zero Higgins = 6 for 77 Leslie = zero Louis = 18 for 205 Mullaney = zero Payton = 1 for 3 Wright = 18 for 197 ------------------ Give's ya the warm fuzzies doesn't it........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickers Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 # player - measurables - age - exp - shcool 15 Alford, Mario WR 5-8 177 25 2 West Virginia 82 Boyce, Josh WR 5-11 205 26 2 TCU 18 Britt, Kenny WR 6-3 223 28 9 Rutgers 19 Coleman, Corey WR 5-11 185 22 2 Baylor 16 Hall, Rannell WR 6-0 200 24 2 Central Florida 81 Higgins, Rashard WR 6-1 198 22 2 Colorado State 11 Leslie, Jordan WR 6-1 209 25 1 Brigham Young 80 Louis, Ricardo WR 6-2 215 23 2 Auburn 83 Mullaney, Richard WR 6-2 204 24 1 Alabama 84 Payton, Jordan WR 6-1 209 23 2 UCLA 13 Wright, James WR 6-1 201 25 4 LSU NFL career catches & yardage Alford = 1 catch 15 yards Boyce = 9 for 121 Britt = 309 for 4881 (avg of 38.6 catches / year) Coleman = 33 for 413 Hall = zero Higgins = 6 for 77 Leslie = zero Louis = 18 for 205 Mullaney = zero Payton = 1 for 3 Wright = 18 for 197 ------------------ Give's ya the warm fuzzies doesn't it........... It look's like our WR's are small, wimpy and non physical... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 It look's like our WR's are small, wimpy and non physical... I guess that is a debate now, isn't it. Once upon a time, smurf like WRs were anathema to the game (I am talking pre late 70s/early 80s rule changes). You needed a big ass body to resist the bump and run defenses that were allowed. Now, with the rules, smurfs can play.......but still....which is better? Antonio Brown is a Lilliputian...but Calvin Johnson is the Brobdingnagian (Big Ass MotherFucker) type that you may want. Randy Moss like. (Terrelle Pryor like?). But, if a guy is fast and elusive and able to get open...is that better than having a Brobdingnagian to throw to? Of course....that all could depend on your QB. Tom Brady has done pretty well with smurfs.....but I don't know if the Big Ostrich could do so well. Dink and dunk Kessler may do OK...if they are open on shorter, quick hit passes. He has not shown as much capability when it comes to mid range or deep passes. So...maybe the idea is to have some of each? Lilliputians and Brobdingnagians? (see Gulliver's travels) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flugel Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 # player - measurables - age - exp - shcool 15 Alford, Mario WR 5-8 177 25 2 West Virginia 82 Boyce, Josh WR 5-11 205 26 2 TCU 18 Britt, Kenny WR 6-3 223 28 9 Rutgers 19 Coleman, Corey WR 5-11 185 22 2 Baylor 16 Hall, Rannell WR 6-0 200 24 2 Central Florida 81 Higgins, Rashard WR 6-1 198 22 2 Colorado State 11 Leslie, Jordan WR 6-1 209 25 1 Brigham Young 80 Louis, Ricardo WR 6-2 215 23 2 Auburn 83 Mullaney, Richard WR 6-2 204 24 1 Alabama 84 Payton, Jordan WR 6-1 209 23 2 UCLA 13 Wright, James WR 6-1 201 25 4 LSU NFL career catches & yardage Alford = 1 catch 15 yards Boyce = 9 for 121 Britt = 309 for 4881 (avg of 38.6 catches / year) Interesting path of focus you selected on behalf of Kenny Britt who is coming off the best reception volume of his career with 15 starts 68 rec 1002 yds 5 TD. Here's his career that was as easily distracted as Josh Gordon's up until the last few years: 2009 6 starts 42 rec 701 yds 3 TD 2010 7 starts 42 rec 775 yds 9 TD 2011 3 starts 17 rec 289 yds 3 TD 2012 11 starts 45 rec 589 yds 4 TD 2013 3 starts 11 rec 96 yds 0 TD 2014 13 starts 48 rec 748 yds 3 TD 2015 13 starts 36 rec 681 yds 3 TD 2016 15 starts 68 rec 1002 yds 5 TD That turns out to be 4.4 receptions per start over his career with a 2016 trend of 4.53 receptions per start. While not terrific, it doesn't look as bad as your preferred angle. Another thing we notice in his last 3 years (if we want to) is he had double digit starts all 3 years he was a Ram (and 4 of the last 5 years). It looks like he's grown up a lot; and consequently, he's been more helpful to his team. I swore I'd never do this; but if Josh Gordon ever returns - we could be looking at the following receiving options for the OC to place in various formations: HB - DeValve,TE - Njoku, WR - Britt, WR - Gordon, WR - Coleman, WR - Higgins,WR - Hall, RB - Johnson, etc Even if he doesn't return, let's see what role experience plays in making some of the sophs better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tour2ma Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 It look's like our WR's are small, wimpy and non physical... Eleven WRs listed... Three are under 6'0 with one at 6'0... Three are under 200# with one of those merely an extra helping of mashed taters shy of 200#. POP Quiz: What's the average size of NFL WRs? You may use google... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 Eleven WRs listed... Three are under 6'0 with one at 6'0... Three are under 200# with one of those merely an extra helping of mashed taters shy of 200#. POP Quiz: What's the average size of NFL WRs? You may use google... 6'0" 200 lbs.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 And poor ole TB @NE has been using big TEs and little tiny smurph WRs for years. Go figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted July 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 Our WR position is very lacking in experience (exception is Britt) and lacking in production (exception Britt and to some extent Coleman who missed 6 games - he may have reached 50 catches). We're counting on a bunch of 3rd day draft picks to make production jumps in their 2nd season. The unit is not as smurfy as it used to be...after letting Gabriel and Hawkins go at the start and end of last season. - I would like to have a tall (but talented) WR on the roster....and I'm not even going to mention Josh Gordon's initials because he's such a long-shot - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 Our WR position is very lacking in experience (exception is Britt) and lacking in production (exception Britt and to some extent Coleman who missed 6 games - he may have reached 50 catches). We're counting on a bunch of 3rd day draft picks to make production jumps in their 2nd season. The unit is not as smurfy as it used to be...after letting Gabriel and Hawkins go at the start and end of last season. - I would like to have a tall (but talented) WR on the roster....and I'm not even going to mention Josh Gordon's initials because he's such a long-shot - Or TP whom we let go....or who decided to leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flugel Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 Or TP whom we let go....or who decided to leave. Pryor didn't have any prior starts at WR heading into 2016. The previous regime cut him until mid December of 2015 wasting almost an entire year of his development at the position - while 31 other NFL teams also didn't deem him worthy of a chance to play WR. In the 3 games remaining, he played just enough to get 1 reception in 2015 while Dwayne Bowe was collecting his guaranteed 12 million $ for the same volume of sweat on game day. Not a bad gig if you don't even sweat in your jock strap enough to wash it once in a 16 game season... While many like to blast Hue and/or the FO for all of the first year WRs that didn't emerge in 2016, are we going to give anyone any credit for being the only franchise willing to give Pryor a shot to play and succeed as a first year starter at WR? Going from not good enough to make the team and/or contribute in 2015 to 77 rec 1007 yards 4 TDs just 1 season later says that somebody turned a light switch on for 1 of the first year starters in our WR Corps. I'm looking forward to seeing which of our soph WRs improve. Since Kenny Britt will start at 1 spot, and the former Biletnikoff Award winner Corey Coleman will have another spot - I'm looking for Higgins to step up and snag himself the slot receiver spot. I think Higgins is the guy to watch. I know it's not very popular to type anything good about Coleman; but I like that he organized offseason work with his WR teammates and Cody Kessler. As deceptive as it can be, you gotta bust some tail to score 20 TDs in 1 season. It could have been a lot more if Baylor wasn't down to their 3rd string QB with about 4-5 games to play. I'll swim against the current here thinking there's some goodies to tap. I've certainly been wrong before though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wargograw Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 The fact we cut Pryor after 2015, no one signed him, and then he was good sounds like an argument for giving DGB a shot to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flugel Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 The fact we cut Pryor after 2015, no one signed him, and then he was good sounds like an argument for giving DGB a shot to me. The difference here is DGB disappointed 2 college programs before he showed zero heart to his first 2 NFL franchises in desperate need of help at WR (TN & Philly). DGB is Josh Gordon minus the talent. Big and tall with a War of the Roses divorce going on between his last 2 brain cells. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 The fact we cut Pryor after 2015, no one signed him, and then he was good sounds like an argument for giving DGB a shot to me.Pryor actually tried...Beckham doesn't. As was said of Gilbert...he like what football does for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Couch Pulls Out Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 The fact we cut Pryor after 2015, no one signed him, and then he was good sounds like an argument for giving DGB a shot to me. Pryor wasn't a second round pick (at WR) who was cut/traded by two teams kinda bad at WR. Pryor was cut as a QB multiple times and I seem to remember a rather large portion of this board shitting on the acquisition at the time, saying things along the lines of "dude was a shitty QB and has been cut multiple times". Maybe DGB should switch to QB and become the anti-Pryor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudfly Posted July 6, 2017 Report Share Posted July 6, 2017 And, lets be honest guys,....the fact that Pryor had 1000 yds does not make him a #1 star WR....... When you're on a team w/o ANY receiver threats, someone is gonna get all the targets.....and that someone "should" get a 1000 yds(at least)... Looking back....last year was Pryor....year before that was Benji(who returned to average immediately).....Barny had a 1000 too and returned to avg immediately.....before that it was Hawkins......before that it was JG. - The only "legit WR" of the group and he had 1600(because he was the only target....like Barny, Benji, Hawk and Pryor...... This year, the Browns should pass for 3000 to 4000 yards and "someone" is gonna catch those passes.....and if they get 1000, it'll be more due to being the only(primary) target and not because they instantly became great..... Lets talk when one of these guys actually looks dominant and can consistently get open and catch passes with ease.....right now, none of them have shown they can do that.....but NO ONE is saying they cant.....just saying they have yet to show they can....(big diff)..... So.....it's all about how many targets you get and if there is another player on your team that also demands targets......right now(and the past several years) the Browns have basically targeted one guy.....and the numbers back that up....strongly And....Ill add....that the coach obviously didnt have enough faith in the youth group to give them targets....(thats the Coach, not us, saying we're not gonna throw the ball to these guys) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted July 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 Pryor was a 15 yard unsportsman-like penalty waiting to happen. Undisciplined. He turned into a trash talker. But I don't remember him being a trash talker when he was a QB. I know it's not very popular to type anything good about Coleman; but I like that he organized offseason work with his WR teammates and Cody Kessler. Of his group of 'top of the draft' WR's, Coleman was the most productive. Every one of 'em got hurt. We need him to be a legitimate threat at WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Mike Posted July 7, 2017 Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 And, lets be honest guys,....the fact that Pryor had 1000 yds does not make him a #1 star WR....... When you're on a team w/o ANY receiver threats, someone is gonna get all the targets.....and that someone "should" get a 1000 yds(at least)... Looking back....last year was Pryor....year before that was Benji(who returned to average immediately).....Barny had a 1000 too and returned to avg immediately.....before that it was Hawkins......before that it was JG. - The only "legit WR" of the group and he had 1600(because he was the only target....like Barny, Benji, Hawk and Pryor...... This year, the Browns should pass for 3000 to 4000 yards and "someone" is gonna catch those passes.....and if they get 1000, it'll be more due to being the only(primary) target and not because they instantly became great..... Lets talk when one of these guys actually looks dominant and can consistently get open and catch passes with ease.....right now, none of them have shown they can do that.....but NO ONE is saying they cant.....just saying they have yet to show they can....(big diff)..... So.....it's all about how many targets you get and if there is another player on your team that also demands targets......right now(and the past several years) the Browns have basically targeted one guy.....and the numbers back that up....strongly And....Ill add....that the coach obviously didnt have enough faith in the youth group to give them targets....(thats the Coach, not us, saying we're not gonna throw the ball to these guys) Great post Mud & your comments back up my thoughts on Pryor....his stats were more a product of his being (by far) the main target, NOT his "superstar" abilities. Pryor was a 15 yard unsportsman-like penalty waiting to happen. Undisciplined. He turned into a trash talker. But I don't remember him being a trash talker when he was a QB. Of his group of 'top of the draft' WR's, Coleman was the most productive. Every one of 'em got hurt. We need him to be a legitimate threat at WR. "Undisciplined" has always been his middle name IMHO. I do not think losing Pryor was any great loss. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibleedbrown Posted July 7, 2017 Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 I guess that is a debate now, isn't it. Once upon a time, smurf like WRs were anathema to the game (I am talking pre late 70s/early 80s rule changes). You needed a big ass body to resist the bump and run defenses that were allowed. Now, with the rules, smurfs can play.......but still....which is better? Antonio Brown is a Lilliputian...but Calvin Johnson is the Brobdingnagian (Big Ass MotherFucker) type that you may want. Randy Moss like. (Terrelle Pryor like?). But, if a guy is fast and elusive and able to get open...is that better than having a Brobdingnagian to throw to? Of course....that all could depend on your QB. Tom Brady has done pretty well with smurfs.....but I don't know if the Big Ostrich could do so well. Dink and dunk Kessler may do OK...if they are open on shorter, quick hit passes. He has not shown as much capability when it comes to mid range or deep passes. So...maybe the idea is to have some of each? Lilliputians and Brobdingnagians? (see Gulliver's travels) Brobdingnagian? Good thinking material right here. Seems the rules have changed over the past few years to favor offenses. Contact between the DB and WR is pretty much inevitable, but it stands to reason that a snaller wideout just might fetch a few more PI calls because he gets laid out instead of misdirected like a larger WR would. Not that that's anything to be proud about, but could keep s drive alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Post Posted July 7, 2017 Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 The fact we cut Pryor after 2015, no one signed him, and then he was good sounds like an argument for giving DGB a shot to me.And you can throw Boldin in there as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flugel Posted July 7, 2017 Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 The fact we cut Pryor after 2015, no one signed him, and then he was good sounds like an argument for giving DGB a shot to me. Yeah, but we didn't cut him after 2015 War. We cut him right before the regular season of 2015 and re-signed him with 3 games remaining. The length of unemployment was 13 weeks of that regular season. DGB was actually given a chance by 2 different NFL teams that really needed help at WR and he failed to impress either. That's a little different than nobody but Cleveland willing to give Pryor a chance or 2. If Pryor wasn't somewhat impressive, I'm guessing he wouldn't have received the second chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gipper Posted July 7, 2017 Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 And, lets be honest guys,....the fact that Pryor had 1000 yds does not make him a #1 star WR....... When you're on a team w/o ANY receiver threats, someone is gonna get all the targets.....and that someone "should" get a 1000 yds(at least)... Looking back....last year was Pryor....year before that was Benji(who returned to average immediately).....Barny had a 1000 too and returned to avg immediately.....before that it was Hawkins......before that it was JG. - The only "legit WR" of the group and he had 1600(because he was the only target....like Barny, Benji, Hawk and Pryor...... This year, the Browns should pass for 3000 to 4000 yards and "someone" is gonna catch those passes.....and if they get 1000, it'll be more due to being the only(primary) target and not because they instantly became great..... Lets talk when one of these guys actually looks dominant and can consistently get open and catch passes with ease.....right now, none of them have shown they can do that.....but NO ONE is saying they cant.....just saying they have yet to show they can....(big diff)..... So.....it's all about how many targets you get and if there is another player on your team that also demands targets......right now(and the past several years) the Browns have basically targeted one guy.....and the numbers back that up....strongly And....Ill add....that the coach obviously didnt have enough faith in the youth group to give them targets....(thats the Coach, not us, saying we're not gonna throw the ball to these guys) But, to quote Queen: We want it all, and we want it all. We want all those holes on both sides of the ball to be filled. Even kick/punt returner. If we don't have it all and we don't have it now, we are going to bitch, bitch, bitch.....like not having at least 2 Pro Bowl WRs and a Pro Bowl TE. (and a Pro Bowl QB/RB/and at least 2-3 Pro Bowl OL)...and that is just the offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted July 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 ...well...it'd be nice to have a player or two that handles the ball to be of pro bowl caliber. All we got is Joe Thomas. And.....who is he blocking for? We need people to block for. -------- So, my own question... Here's who the OL blocks for. (minus WR's listed at outset) 8 Hogan, Kevin QB 6-3 218 24 2 Stanford 6 Kessler, Cody QB 6-1 215 24 2 USC 7 Kizer, DeShone QB 6-4 233 21 R Notre Dame 17 Osweiler, Brock QB 6-8 235 26 5 Arizona State 25 Atkinson III, George RB 6-1 220 24 2 Notre Dame 34 Crowell, Isaiah RB 5-11 225 24 4 Alabama State 37 Dayes, Matthew RB 5-8 205 22 R N.C. State 29 Johnson Jr., Duke RB 5-9 210 23 3 Miami (Fla.) 38 Magee, Terrence RB 5-9 220 24 2 LSU 87 DeValve, Seth TE 6-3 245 24 2 Princeton 88 Holtz, J.P. TE 6-3 240 23 1 Pittsburgh 89 McNamara, Taylor TE 6-5 251 22 Southern California 85 Njoku, David TE 6-4 246 20 R Miami 86 Telfer, Randall TE 6-4 250 25 2 USC ( I notice that RB, Winston, finally fell off the roster ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudfly Posted July 7, 2017 Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 Agreed.....I certainly dont expect pro-bowlers at every skill position.....but it'd be nice to get one or 2 for a start...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wargograw Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 The difference here is DGB disappointed 2 college programs before he showed zero heart to his first 2 NFL franchises in desperate need of help at WR (TN & Philly). DGB is Josh Gordon minus the talent. Big and tall with a War of the Roses divorce going on between his last 2 brain cells. He didn't disappoint Missouri on the field, and he never got on the field for OU (due to the transfer rules). Yes he disappointed them over all, but he performed when he was on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flugel Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 He didn't disappoint Missouri on the field, and he never got on the field for OU (due to the transfer rules). Yes he disappointed them over all, but he performed when he was on the field. Fair enough. That said, 2 different NFL teams in need of help at WR didn't hesitate to let him go. Part of that was work ethic and part was not knowing the plays, which doesn't reflect well on a guy competing against guys willing to bust tail for the opening. On the radio here in Nashville, Wycheck and Bishop sounded like they were intrigued and excited to see him until they got some chances to see him. This is a case of the story not being as good as the book cover IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unsympathetic Posted July 9, 2017 Report Share Posted July 9, 2017 but he performed when he was on the field. He did not perform at Philly. DGB was, is, and always will be a bum. that dog don't hunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoeticG Posted July 9, 2017 Report Share Posted July 9, 2017 Yeah, because a rookie WR is always able to grasp an NFL offense within the first year.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unsympathetic Posted July 9, 2017 Report Share Posted July 9, 2017 Good point, PG! However: 1) Philly was DGB's second season. No more "free pass" for being a rookie. 2) Grasping the offense wasn't DGB's biggest problem - grasping the ball was. 3) DGB made up for not being able to catch by not putting in the time to learn the offense. With 2 chances, DGB has now failed to learn 2 NFL offenses. That's a trend. DGB is a terrible teammate with no NFL skills. In other words, PG's ideal player! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoeticG Posted July 9, 2017 Report Share Posted July 9, 2017 Nelson Agholor had the exact same stats as DGB last season. The Eagles picked up DGB to help in their West Coast Offense. They needed a WR to come in there and stretch the field at the X spot... Sounds to me a lot like maybe trying to fit a square peg in a round hole like syndrome. Maybe DGB spent a lot of effort to learn the Titans system as having a pretty solid rookie year. Maybe he was expecting to have a break out 2nd year and instead ended up being a rookie again. Then maybe not responding as well as you'd like to a new coaching staff that expected him to be good to go. They obviously weren't patient enough, they already knee jerked him off of their team. Philly sucks, they traded the franchise to us to pick up a scrub dollar store QB in Wentz that netted us all these picks and good fortune we're having. You have DGB come in and mentor and nurture him in the ways of a truly great organization, like the one we have here. We have: Gordon (...still...loading...) Kenny Britt Corey Coleman and the bunch- Louis, Higgins, Payton That's 5/6 on the roster. Continue to develop the young talent. CC, Louis and Higgins are doing fine. We have Britt, our typical journeyman veteran WR to show these guys how to STAY in the league for a period of time. We have to continue to support Jordan Payton in getting better, he was suspended last year. I don't know if it was for steroids or PEDs of some kind but if it's a strength thing then we need to get on our trainers to help him legally. I'm all for supporting our guys and making them the best they can be, but these are also people and no two people are alike. We need counselors for these guys to help them with how to live normally. Everybody knows the stories about lottery winners that lose everything and throw their lives away... the payday and money and lifestyle these young men are given at an early age are life changing and of course, unless you are a choir boy the devil's gonna fuck with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wargograw Posted July 9, 2017 Report Share Posted July 9, 2017 He did not perform at Philly. DGB was, is, and always will be a bum. that dog don't hunt. Try reading my post next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.