Westside Steve Posted March 28, 2019 Report Share Posted March 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, tiamat63 said: I understood the reference plenty well. It was just incredibly unwarranted. If you want to treat Woody with the kid glove adjectives, you're welcomed to. I'd appreciate they avoid me. And as we have discussed before I do. Just in this particular instance it was only the two of you and the term you guys was not at all inappropriate. I guess if you completely understood the reference but were just being facetious you should have typed it in pink. 😉 WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 28, 2019 Report Share Posted March 28, 2019 Plus, Tia, if I need to invoke the Fairness Doctrine every time any money is cut from anybodys pet project one side or the other is going to shit the bed over it. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted March 28, 2019 Report Share Posted March 28, 2019 Steve ... It was understood what you were trying to get at. It was just more of your typical Steve bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 28, 2019 Report Share Posted March 28, 2019 1 hour ago, MLD Woody said: Steve ... It was understood what you were trying to get at. It was just more of your typical Steve bullshit. Sorry you are so oppressed. Funny nobody wants to be lumped in with you in the first place. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted March 28, 2019 Report Share Posted March 28, 2019 1 hour ago, MLD Woody said: Steve ... It was understood what you were trying to get at. It was just more of your typical Steve bullshit. woodpecker translation: "Tia, would you please come out and play with me? chirp chirp" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiamat63 Posted March 28, 2019 Report Share Posted March 28, 2019 5 hours ago, Westside Steve said: And as we have discussed before I do. Just in this particular instance it was only the two of you and the term you guys was not at all inappropriate. I guess if you completely understood the reference but were just being facetious you should have typed it in pink. 😉 WSS What do you mean " You guys" 5 hours ago, Westside Steve said: Plus, Tia, if I need to invoke the Fairness Doctrine every time any money is cut from anybodys pet project one side or the other is going to shit the bed over it. WSS While fair, I would hardly call the Special Olympics a "pet project". Given their numbers, the cut does little to nothing in terms of balancing the budget. Especially given the executive salary raises that far outpace the cost of inflation. In short, it looks like a soul-less, greedy move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted March 28, 2019 Report Share Posted March 28, 2019 25 minutes ago, tiamat63 said: What do you mean " You guys" While fair, I would hardly call the Special Olympics a "pet project". Given their numbers, the cut does little to nothing in terms of balancing the budget. Especially given the executive salary raises that far outpace the cost of inflation. In short, it looks like a soul-less, greedy move. Well you have a checkbook right? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.