ObaMao ordered it up, and now it's leftwing harrassment of Ben Shapiro in public with family

[calfoxwc]

Getting worse? "Get in their faces" he said. ObaMao directly inspired this, ordered this, and still condones this.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/ben_shapiro_harassed_by_holocaust_denier_nick_fuentes

[LogicIsForSquares]

Cal, do you know anything about Nick Fuentes? He is a conservative who Michelle Malkin got into deep shit for defending. 

[jbluhm86]

34 minutes ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

Cal, do you know anything about Nick Fuentes? He is a conservative who Michelle Malkin got into deep shit for defending. 

[calfoxwc]

3 hours ago, LogicIsForSquares said:

Cal, do you know anything about Nick Fuentes? He is a conservative who Michelle Malkin got into deep shit for defending. 

 Holocaust denying is the leftwing part of it. fuentes is just a nutjob.

Liberal denial - Conservapedia

https://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_denial

 Liberals deny that Hitler and the Nazi party were in fact Liberals (anti-Semitism is a well-documented characteristic of Liberal Christianity as is the PETA-like Green wing of the Third Reich.).

Fuentes, it says RIGHT IN THE OP, that he is a white supremist/racist/denier and controversial confronter.

He isn't a conservative - he's nuts. The OP still stands. ObaMao made extreme social harassment mainstream.

Most all conservatives are Pro-Israel. NOT ANTI-SEMITIC like the left.

ObaMao was anti-Semitic and racist. Fuentes is anti-Semitic and racist. You thought you had a gotcha? is that all you want out of a discussion? Fuentes is no conservative.

you lose.

 

[LogicIsForSquares]

21 minutes ago, calfoxwc said:

 Holocaust denying is the leftwing part of it. fuentes is just a nutjob.

Liberal denial - Conservapedia

https://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_denial

 Liberals deny that Hitler and the Nazi party were in fact Liberals (anti-Semitism is a well-documented characteristic of Liberal Christianity as is the PETA-like Green wing of the Third Reich.).

Fuentes, it says RIGHT IN THE OP, that he is a white supremist/racist/denier and controversial confronter.

He isn't a conservative - he's nuts. The OP still stands. ObaMao made extreme social harassment mainstream.

Most all conservatives are Pro-Israel. NOT ANTI-SEMITIC like the left.

ObaMao was anti-Semitic and racist. Fuentes is anti-Semitic and racist. You thought you had a gotcha? is that all you want out of a discussion? Fuentes is no conservative.

you lose.

 

Obama has as much to do with Fuentes as yogart has to do with the homerun derby. 
 

Fuentes is an alt right dummy with a following. It is the Storm Front part of the alt right who is at odds with Shapiro.

[LogicIsForSquares]

Looks like a liberal to me.

 

 

[calfoxwc]

he isn't conservative either. he's several slices of bread short of a whole load.

and he is anti-Semite and racist hugely, just like obaMao commie.

[tiamat63]

Not hard to admit you mis-fired and move on.  

It's a hallmark of a decent man.

[LogicIsForSquares]

2 hours ago, calfoxwc said:

he isn't conservative either. he's several slices of bread short of a whole load.

and he is anti-Semite and racist hugely, just like obaMao commie.

I am with you outside of the Obama nonsense. 

[calfoxwc]

4 hours ago, tiamat63 said:

Not hard to admit you mis-fired and move on.  

It's a hallmark of a decent man.

I didn't misfire at all. You want me to show maybe a hundred examples of quotes from your democrats on bashing Jews and Israel?

racist comments from dems? it's a liberal thing. and confronting people "getting in their faces" exploded on the national scene after obaMao gave the green light, and it became mainstream American political life. ObaMao started it all. That this nutjob copied the behavior ...is just as screwed up. It's a liberal behavior, initiated by obaMao.

 

[calfoxwc]

 

[Axe]

This thread

[The Cysko Kid]

14 hours ago, tiamat63 said:

Not hard to admit you mis-fired and move on.  

It's a hallmark of a decent man.

You meant double down until you uncover some basic similarity to an antifa type and then declare you were right all along, right?

Because...that's how Cal do. 

[MLD Woody]

Stop personally attacking Cal guys! 

 

 

 

This reminds me of when an example is posted showing a Christian in a negative light and OBF telling us they aren't real Christians and don't count. (missing any irony from when he generalizes from small samples of other religions)

[jbluhm86]

10 hours ago, The Cysko Kid said:

You meant double down until you uncover some basic similarity to an antifa type and then declare you were right all along, right?

Because...that's how Cal do. 

Popular Science: People with extreme political views have trouble thinking about their own thinking

Radical political views of all sorts seem to shape our lives to an almost unprecedented extent. But what attracts people to the fringes? A new study from researchers at University College London offers some insight into one characteristic of those who hold extreme beliefs—their metacognition, or ability to evaluate whether or not they might be wrong.

"It's been known for some time now that in studies of people holding radical beliefs, that they tend to… express higher confidence in their beliefs than others," says Steve Fleming, a UCL cognitive neuroscientist and one of the paper's authors. "But it was unknown whether this was just a general sense of confidence in everything they believe, or whether it was reflective of a change in metacognition."

He and his colleagues set out to find the answer by removing partisanship from the equation: they presented study participants with a question that had an objective answer, rather than one rooted in personal values.

They studied two different groups of people—381 in the first sample and 417 in a second batch to try to replicate their results. They gave the first sample a survey that tested how conservative or liberal their political beliefs were. Radicalism exists on both ends of the spectrum; the people at the furthest extremes of left and right are considered “radical.”

After taking the questionnaire, the first group did a simple test: they looked at two different clusters of dots and quickly identified which group had more dots. Then they rated how confident they were in their choice.

People with radical political opinions completed this exercise with pretty much the same accuracy as moderate participants. But “after incorrect decisions, the radicals were less likely to decrease their confidence,” Fleming says.

Unlike political beliefs, which often have no right or wrong answer per se, one group of dots was unquestionably more numerous than the other. But regardless of whether or not there was an objective answer, the radicals were more likely to trust their opinion was correct than to question whether they might have gotten it wrong.

This finding—which the team replicated with tests on the second group of participants—suggests that the metacognition of radicals plays a part in shaping their beliefs. In other words, they actually can’t question their own ideas the same way more moderate individuals can.

It’s not currently known whether radical beliefs help shape metacognition, or metacognition helps shape radical beliefs, Fleming says. That’s something his team is still trying to unravel. But their work already has potential social implications, he says.

There is a body of work out there—small, but growing, Fleming wrote in an email—showing it may be possible to help people gain better metacognitive skills. This might enable individuals to get along better and make shared decisions.

“Widening polarization about political, religious, and scientific issues threatens open societies, leading to entrenchment of beliefs, reduced mutual understanding, and a pervasive negativity surrounding the very idea of consensus,” the researchers write. Understanding the role that metacognition plays in this polarization may help us step back from it.

[tiamat63]

Gorka has used "jew boy" a couple times as an insult in the football side.   That is inherently an anti-semitic comment.      I guess that would make him part liberal because that's what they believe.

 

Hopefully he calls all his past hookups and tells them to get tested.               All two of them.  

[Gorka]

38 minutes ago, tiamat63 said:

Gorka has used "jew boy" a couple times as an insult in the football side.   That is inherently an anti-semitic comment.      I guess that would make him part liberal because that's what they believe.

 

Hopefully he calls all his past hookups and tells them to get tested.               All two of them.  

Ever have a Jewboy burger?

https://www.yelp.com/biz/jewboy-burgers-austin

Have you ever seen the movie "Jewboy" ?

There, that's two on the political side.  It's even now.

 

[OldBrownsFan]

12 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Stop personally attacking Cal guys! 

 

 

 

This reminds me of when an example is posted showing a Christian in a negative light and OBF telling us they aren't real Christians and don't count. (missing any irony from when he generalizes from small samples of other religions)

Radical Islam is not some small sample size but a huge problem world wide. As I have posted and documented radical Islam springs from the koran and the open ended verses of violence that Islamic radicals use to justify killing innocent people. 

[Gorka]

 Cal, although what you said about Obama and the democrats history of anti semitism is true, I don't believe Obama had any influence on Fuentes decision to confront Shapiro. Fuentes is his own man, a self made bigot and anti-Semite who chose to confront without being encouraged by anyone.

[Gorka]

On ‎12‎/‎22‎/‎2019 at 6:07 PM, tiamat63 said:

Not hard to admit you mis-fired and move on.  

It's a hallmark of a decent man.

I bet you lie in waiting for Cal to finally misfire then pounce.

The hallmark of a decent man is having the guts to condemn Ilhan Omar and "the squad"  for their anti Semetic comments and Maxine Waters for encouraging people to confront Trump staffers in public....or do you think Cal misfired on those stories too?

[The Cysko Kid]

54 minutes ago, Gorka said:

I bet you lie in waiting for Cal to finally misfire then pounce.

The hallmark of a decent man is having the guts to condemn Ilhan Omar and "the squad"  for their anti Semetic comments and Maxine Waters for encouraging people to confront Trump staffers in public....or do you think Cal misfired on those stories too?

Such a long wait. How long, you ask? One post? Maybe as many as three on a good day? And Cal might post 20 or more times a day. 

[Gorka]

Eh...3 misfires out of 20 aint so bad.

[Westside Steve]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nick-fuentes-fires-back-at-nikki-haley-others-over-ben-shapiro-confrontation

[jbluhm86]

40 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nick-fuentes-fires-back-at-nikki-haley-others-over-ben-shapiro-confrontation

On an interesting side note, scroll down to the comments section on this article.

Wow.

For all the talk of Trump Derangement Syndrome, whether true or not, that comment section is prime example of how the cult of personality that makes up a good portion of Trump supporters can play out if not checked. 

[Vambo]

27 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

On an interesting side note, scroll down to the comments section on this article.

Wow.

For all the talk of Trump Derangement Syndrome, whether true or not, that comment section is prime example of how the cult of personality that makes up a good portion of Trump supporters can play out if not checked. 

Cuomo vetoes bill letting all judges officiate weddings – because some were Trump-appointed

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cuomo-vetoes-bill-letting-all-judges-officiate-weddings-because-some-were-trump-appointed

“I cannot in good conscience support legislation that would authorize such actions by federal judges who are appointed by this federal administration,” Cuomo said in a statement Friday as he shot down the bill — which was passed overwhelmingly by the Democratic-controlled state legislature.

 

[jbluhm86]

25 minutes ago, Vambo said:

Cuomo vetoes bill letting all judges officiate weddings – because some were Trump-appointed

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cuomo-vetoes-bill-letting-all-judges-officiate-weddings-because-some-were-trump-appointed

“I cannot in good conscience support legislation that would authorize such actions by federal judges who are appointed by this federal administration,” Cuomo said in a statement Friday as he shot down the bill — which was passed overwhelmingly by the Democratic-controlled state legislature.

 

[Vambo]

7 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Direct Hit!

[Gorka]

59 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Really?  You happened to question the validity of TDS, and he addressed it. You "dodged" Steve's link in the same manner by calling your reply to it "a side note". No one had a problem with that.

 Why do you guys have to be triggered all the time? Makes no sense.

TDS is real by the way.

[MLD Woody]

Dig

Dig

 

Dig

 

 

 

Dig

[Westside Steve]

3 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

On an interesting side note, scroll down to the comments section on this article.

Wow.

For all the talk of Trump Derangement Syndrome, whether true or not, that comment section is prime example of how the cult of personality that makes up a good portion of Trump supporters can play out if not checked. 

I think when we talked about TDS we're talking about actual members of Congress and the Senate the FBI and the mainstream media. Not random fucks who leave a message on a board. Like here. 

 

WSS