Which Are You?

[Vambo]

2 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

Point out which of Woodrow's posts were not germane to a political discussion, then.

No

[tiamat63]

4 hours ago, Axe said:

 

Who the fuck is "you guys"? 

And the very definition of "forum".

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forum

 

So to post something that isn't meant to advance discourse is, by definition of how a forum is constructed, inherently spam.   Especially when done repeatedly.  Woody does it as do other characters here.

It's possible to call bullshit out as it presents itself and not be a "leftist".

Off topic, if anybody is driving tonight be extra careful.  Ton of state boys out tonight just looking to hand out tickets or worse.  Stay safe.

 

[jbluhm86]

6 hours ago, Vambo said:

No

Don't make a claim that you're unwilling to back up. Your whole argument is that he was spamming the board with non-politically related threads. 

[Westside Steve]

1 hour ago, jbluhm86 said:

Don't make a claim that you're unwilling to back up. Your whole argument is that he was spamming the board with non-politically related threads. 

Well I suppose it's possible to spam The Board WITH politically related Perez posts no? We could probably use the strict definition of spam as unwanted shotgun advertising but would you consider 30 posts in one day featuring the same thing, perhaps photoshopped Michelle Obama pictures with a penis, spam?

(by the way before anybody complains about that it was a hypothetical)

WSS

[Vambo]

2 hours ago, jbluhm86 said:

Don't make a claim that you're unwilling to back up. Your whole argument is that he was spamming the board with non-politically related threads. 

1.) I said mine was political I didn't mention woody you did...

2.) I don't have to do what you want the Republicans are in charge and the USA is still a free country...that will change if the Dems get back in sometime after 2024!

3.) I don't see you replying to woody's posts so there must not be very much content there.

 

 

 

[MLD Woody]

8 hours ago, tiamat63 said:

  Woody does it as do other characters here.

*Did

 

And, like I said, it's having the desired effect 

[jbluhm86]

4 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

Well I suppose it's possible to spam The Board WITH politically related Perez posts no? We could probably use the strict definition of spam as unwanted shotgun advertising but would you consider 30 posts in one day featuring the same thing, perhaps photoshopped Michelle Obama pictures with a penis, spam?

(by the way before anybody complains about that it was a hypothetical)

WSS

Point taken, but if there's to be action (or inaction) taken on excessive thread posting or relocation/deletion of threads as some posters are proposing, it'd be nice to have more concrete definitions of what constitutes political content and what constitutes spamming by the mods. Also, if such actions are taking in the future, I'm sure that the measures would be applied equally to all members here, regardless of which side of the political isle they fall on or if the mods like the posters or not, no?

[Westside Steve]

41 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Point taken, but if there's to be action (or inaction) taken on excessive thread posting or relocation/deletion of threads as some posters are proposing, it'd be nice to have more concrete definitions of what constitutes political content and what constitutes spamming by the mods. Also, if such actions are taking in the future, I'm sure that the measures would be applied equally to all members here, regardless of which side of the political isle they fall on or if the mods like the posters or not, no?

You know me well enough to know that there's not going to be any action taken even if somebody calls something spam. I know what spam is. And if I'm not going to bitch at any of the other guys for posting a mess of posts in a row why would I bitch at the woodpecker? (even if his were all primarily the same crap)  The only action I ever took was deleting some of his boyfriends porn. I didn't even give him warning points just clean them off.

WSS

[tiamat63]

6 hours ago, Vambo said:

1.) I said mine was political I didn't mention woody you did...

2.) I don't have to do what you want the Republicans are in charge and the USA is still a free country...that will change if the Dems get back in sometime after 2024!

3.) I don't see you replying to woody's posts so there must not be very much content there.

 

 

 

1) No, you indirectly did

2) I know gay people that would say you're talking like a faggot

3) Then again, seems like nobody replies much to yours.  You rival Cal in the amount of empty threads.

[Vambo]

3 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

You know me well enough to know that there's not going to be any action taken even if somebody calls something spam. I know what spam is. And if I'm not going to bitch at any of the other guys for posting a mess of posts in a row why would I bitch at the woodpecker? (even if his were all primarily the same crap)  The only action I ever took was deleting some of his boyfriends porn. I didn't even give him warning points just clean them off.

WSS

I respect you Steve you seem to be a fair person so if you want me to stop posting new threads I will.

[Westside Steve]

55 minutes ago, Vambo said:

I respect you Steve you seem to be a fair person so if you want me to stop posting new threads I will.

Dude I don't care. You're fine. I didn't even give Woody shit for posting primarily the same thread over and over. At least yours are different. the way I see it anybody that doesn't like somebody else's threads is free not to read them. You know it's like guys to go to Walmart and bich because nobody's wearing a mask. Well then don't go to Walmart and your problem is solved. 

👍💚😏

WSS

[Vambo]

14 minutes ago, Westside Steve said:

Dude I don't care. You're fine. I didn't even give Woody shit for posting primarily the same thread over and over. At least yours are different. the way I see it anybody that doesn't like somebody else's threads is free not to read them. You know it's like guys to go to Walmart and bich because nobody's wearing a mask. Well then don't go to Walmart and your problem is solved. 

👍💚😏

WSS

Thank you.

[jbluhm86]

1 hour ago, Vambo said:

I respect you Steve you seem to be a fair person so if you want me to stop posting new threads I will.

Don't come off your cross for my account 

 

[Vambo]

17 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said:

Don't come off your cross for my account 

 

It wouldn't be for you...just stay under your bridge.

[MLD Woody]

6 hours ago, Westside Steve said:

 (even if his were all primarily the same crap)  

WSS

Yes, if only those posts were as diverse, varied, and thought provoking as the ones we see from Vambo and Cal. Which are definitely NOT just the same basic premise over and over that biased political sites use to get emotional responses and click outs of people. Oh well.

 

But again, this talk like it's "a thing I do". I did once to make a point and it led to this discussion. 

 

I forgot the desire on here to equate others to the bullshit we see from some of our right wing posters. They need to pretend the other side is just as bad or worse than they are to justify their crusade. 

[Axe]

39 minutes ago, MLD Woody said:

 

But again, this talk like it's "a thing I do". I did once to make a point and it led to this discussion. 

 

And the vast majority of us have never done it.

[Westside Steve]

2 hours ago, MLD Woody said:

Yes, if only those posts were as diverse, varied, and thought provoking as the ones we see from Vambo and Cal. Which are definitely NOT just the same basic premise over and over that biased political sites use to get emotional responses and click outs of people. Oh well.

 

But again, this talk like it's "a thing I do". I did once to make a point and it led to this discussion. 

you are correct it is not. This was something of a rare occurrence. Not unheard of but at least somewhat rare

I forgot the desire on here to equate others to the bullshit we see from some of our right wing posters. They need to pretend the other side is just as bad or worse than they are to justify their crusade. 

 

[Gorka]

Even though they post a lot, Cals and Vambos actions don't seem to fit the definition of spamming. Being that there are many doesn't constitute spamming.

We should appreciate that they keep everyone abreast of the current events that are shielded from us from the mainstream media.

 

[calfoxwc]

This is just another childish prank - raise hell to try to get control of the content. Woody's posts - were about science, not politics. Maybe he'd like a science forum.

As to the point about threads with no response = sure ! the lefties avoid admitting that all their "lol"'s ...are flying back into their faces.

We have evidence now. If they want to not talk about it, that isn't spam. I post things I think are interesting - and the left has made it a point to only respond to lefty threads.

"haha".

I don't care - but to exaggerate it, with non-political science stuff to just post it to bitch about nobody...else doing it.....

seriously? even when woodpecker DOES post a thread, it's sarcasm about other poster's threads?

Liberals are more desperate to control the content - it's all coming down. "Big serious trouble" on the deep state.

Biden's gaffs are about politics, they don't want them to be posted.

boo hoo, bs.