The Running Back Conundrum (Richardson Thread)

[cribbs is the man]

Do not ruin the thread with personal attacks. Either post something about the subject matter or join another thread and do your bashing there.

 

 

Link: http://theonsidekickpodcast.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/2012-nfl-draft-player-profile-trent-richardson/

 

2012 NFL Draft Player Profile: Trent Richardson

 

April 7, 2012

 

 

By: Ricky Widmer

 

There seems to be no disagreements that Trent Richardson of Alabama is the best running back going into the 2012 NFL Draft. Of course, the last image many football fans have of Trent Richardson was that exciting BCS National Championship game where he ran for 96 yards in the 21-0 win over LSU. Richardson had a very nice junior year at Alabama with 1679 rushing yards and 21 rushing touchdowns. I am going to break down Trent Richardson and discuss his strengths and weakness. Then, I might surprise you when I say which NFL team will bag the #1 running back in the 2012 NFL Draft.

 

When looking at Trent Richardson, his biggest strength is his size, bulk, and build. Richardson is explosive, powerful, and even balanced. Upon doing some research on Trent Richardson, some people have said that Richardson is the best running back in the draft since Adrian Peterson (7th overall in the 2007 NFL Draft). This might be true, but Richardson is a very different type of runner than Adrian Peterson of the Minnesota Vikings. I say this because I see Richardson as a “between the tackle” kind of runner. Because of his patience while running, Richardson is one of the best when it comes to waiting for the hole to open and then exploding through the hole. Also, he has the ability to use his size, bulk, and build to power through defenders and can break tackles better than any running back in the 2012 NFL Draft. That’s not all as his size and build can help with his blocks as he gets under the blitzer to get leverage. Richardson can also be used in screen plays especially on third-downs. His only weakness is that he needs a good blocking scheme in front of him to make the most out of his rushes. He has the talent to make plays on his own, but because of his patience he will rush more effectively if there is a good blocking scheme ahead of him. Remember that at Alabama Trent Richardson ran behind a very experienced offensive line.

 

Who will land Trent Richardson? I believe Richardson will be a top-5 pick in the 2012 NFL Draft. With the first two picks already figured out and the Minnesota Vikings at 3rd overall not needing a running back, I feel it comes down to the Cleveland Browns and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. There is no doubting that both of these teams would love to have Trent Richardson on their roster. The Browns are in need of many things going into the 2012 NFL Draft and the running back position is one of them. With the loss of Peyton Hillis to free agency, the Browns do need a running back that has the talent to step right in and be the starter. However, they also need a cornerback and a quarterback. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are not in as big of need at the running back position as the Cleveland Browns because they do have LeGarrette Blount, but they would take Trent Richardson if he was still available at the 5th pick overall. In my opinion, I see Trent Richardson going to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers with the 5th overall pick in the 2012 NFL Draft. The reason I say that is because I personally see the Cleveland Browns selecting Ryan Tannehill with the 4th overall pick in the 2012 NFL Draft. I feel like the Browns will think and talk over the options of Tannehill and Richardson, but will come to the decision that the teams needs a leader for the offense and someone who can run the offense. Also, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers could either use Trent Richardson as a everyday back or as a third-down back behind LeGarrette Blount.

 

So we have Thomas and Mack. Then...Lavauo and Pinkston and no one at RT... So, our interior line is probably below average in the league and we have no RT. According to the article T. Rich needs great blocking to succeed between the tackles (he is not going to run over many DTs, DEs or LBs in the NFL). I just dont see us being effectively able to utilize Richardson without spending numerous high picks on our O line as well. If he is not going to have success between the tackles then we might as well wait until the 2nd or 3rd round to pick a RB to adequately take us through this season and next without having to worry nearly as much about our #4 pick being injured...

[PoeticG]

The point is, Who the fuck cares if every muthafucking position is filled with the perfect player. This is an ONGOING PROCESS!!! We can take our Runningback NOW and then continue to build this muthafucker the rest of the way the rest of the way! God damnit, why is this so hard to understand? We will not have another chance to take an ELITE FUCKING RUNNINGBACK like Richardson for a long, long time... and do you know why? Because, runningbacks like Richardson only come around once in a blue moon. Lineman, QB's, DB's and WR's are there for the taking EVERY FUCKING YEAR!

 

For all the doubters and naysayers and people who think I'm fucking crazy, here this:

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1141357-nfl-draft-2012-cleveland-browns-rumored-to-have-interest-in-vontaze-burfict

 

According to Mark Sessler of NFL.com, the Cleveland Browns are showing interest in one of the most controversial prospects in the entire 2012 NFL Draft. Vontaze Burfict was once a top 15 prospect for the upcoming draft before a poor combine showing and weak interview process pushed him back to a second or third day selection.

 

The Browns currently have thirteen draft picks at their disposal and it is not surprising that they would be willing to take a risk on a huge upside player. Burfict has had plenty of issues throughout the draft process and has even been labeled undraftable by some of the top experts in the league.

 

However, on-field production speaks louder that interviews and in some cases it is worth the risk on a young player with great talent. Burfict was a dominating linebacker at Arizona State and imposed his will week after week with a stellar run defense. Burfict had 40 solo tackles in 2011 and compiled seven tackles for a loss combined with five sacks.

 

The Browns would be in a good position to draft Burfict because of the current state of the defense and the fact that they already have an established middle linebacker in place. Burfict would have the opportunity to sit behind D'Qwell Jackson for the next few seasons and hopefully develop into a player that can be productive. It is that type of player that teams hope for late in the draft because of a weakened talent pool.

 

According to Sessler's article "The Browns have shown interest in drafting Arizona State linebacker Vontaze Burfict, multiple sources told told ESPN Cleveland on Tuesday. "(Burfict) would be a late-round value pick""

 

Cleveland will likely be looking for additional linebackers in the later rounds of the draft due to injury concerns and age factor. Burfict will be one of the most controversial picks of the entire NFL draft, but could be a diamond in the rough for a team willing to risk adding him to their club.

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I've been calling for Vontaze and Minnifield since the get go, along with Trent...

 

Trent Richardson

Best WR/OL

Best OL/WR

Chase Minnifield

Vontaze Burfict

 

Read em and weep boys....

[choco]

are you gonna post every irrelevant writers musings that agree with your viewpoint? a fan-writer sourcing an nfl.com guy saying we're interested in the biggest disappointment in this years draft?

 

40 tackles? sounds like a fucking monster to me...

[PoeticG]

are you gonna post every irrelevant writers musings that agree with your viewpoint? a fan-writer sourcing an nfl.com guy saying we're interested in the biggest disappointment in this years draft?

 

40 tackles? sounds like a fucking monster to me...

 

Maybe. Are you ever going to write a complete and correct sentence?

[PoeticG]

Here's an article from another "irrelevant" writer named Steve Doerschuk, chocobo, you fuckface.

 

LINK: http://www.cantonrep.com/browns/x403921978/NFL-Draft-analyst-says-Richardson-could-be-rookie-of-the-year

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Steve Doerschuk

 

CantonRep.com staff writer

 

Posted Apr 11, 2012 @ 03:01 PM

 

 

The ex-Browns have an All-Pro in their backfield in Ray Rice.

 

A leading draft analyst thinks Trent Richardson could become the current Browns’ Ray Rice.

 

“They’re comparable,” Pro Football Weekly’s lead draft scout, Nolan Nawrocki, said in a national conference call today. “Richardson is bigger and obviously has more strength. Rice runs lower to the ground.”

 

The 5-foot-8, 212-pound Rice was a Round 2 steal in 2008 who led the NFL in yards from scrimmage in 2011.

 

The 5-foot-9, 228-pound Richardson is rated behind only Andrew Luck and Morris Claiborne on the Pro Football Weekly draft board. Nawrocki sees Richardson as an obvious fit for the Browns at No. 4 overall.

 

“In terms of toughness,” Nawrocki said, “they don’t come much tougher than Ray Rice or Trent Richardson.”

 

When The Repository asked Nawrocki if it is obvious that Richardson would be preferable, on a talent level, to Pittsburgh’s feature back, 2008 Round 1 pick Rashard Mendenhall, Nawrocki didn’t hesitate.

 

“To me, coming out of college, Mendenhall was too soft,” Nawrocki said. “I think he’s shown it in the NFL. I never thought he was a great fit for that division. I’m not sure he has a future in Pittsburgh.”

 

Nawrocki said Richardson’s future is bright — and starts now.

 

“There’s a good chance Trent Richardson is going to be rookie of the year,” Nawrocki said, “no matter what team he goes to.”

 

The well-connected Nawrocki has been making the rounds through the league as draft anticipation builds.

 

“I talked to a GM this morning who said he thought there will be more busts across the board than in any draft in recent years,” Nawrocki said. “The big reason teams are going to overdraft on need and on hype.”

 

Browns fans have digested a line of thinking that the Browns will take Richardson or wideout Justin Blackmon if they stay at No. 4 overall. Nawrocki is extremely suspicious of Blackmon as being worth that price.

 

“To me, Richardson grades out considerably higher than Blackmon,” Nawrocki said. “There are GMs who have graded him in the second round ... they do not believe he has the speed after watching every stitch of tape on him in the last two years.

 

“He’s not especially physical, and he’s not a blazer.”

 

Nawrocki cited “red flags” as to Blackmon’s maturity, including “concerns raised to me recently.” One that stood out: Rather than taking a charter flight back to school after Oklahoma State’s bowl win over Stanford ...

 

--------------------------------------------------------------

 

Are you THAT jealous of me that you REFUSE to listen to any sound reasoning that I propose? It seems that if I stated the world was round, you'd say something stupid like a child would, something like, "Nahuh, it looks flat to me, you's a dummy!"... Dude, really?

[PoeticG]

Here's Jon Gruden's take on Cleveland going to Richardson...hmmm, sound familiar?

 

Link: http://www.espncleveland.com/common/more.php?m=49&post_id=884

 

 

ESPN analyst Jon Gruden says Trent Richardson a better pick for Browns over Justin Blackmon

Apr 11, 2012 -- 12:17pm

 

By Tony Grossi

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Add Jon Gruden to the Trent Richardson bandwagon.

 

The former NFL coach, ESPN analyst and good friend of Mike Holmgren held a conference call today. I asked him if Cleveland is committed to supporting quarterback Colt McCoy, which player would do it better – Richardson, the running back from Alabama, or Justin Blackmon, the wideout from Oklahoma State.

 

“The easiest thing to do is turn around and hand the ball to somebody 300 times a year,” Gruden said. “Everybody says, ‘Don’t take a running back. You can get those guys in the fifth, sixth or seventh round. You go try to find Trent Richardson in the fifth, sixth or seventh round.

“He’s a beast. He broke all of Emmitt Smith’s high school rushing records in Florida. I’ve seen him run over people, run around people, he protects the ball, he can catch it, can pick up blitzes. He might be the strongest human being on the planet. I think his weightlifting proves that. He was a team captain of a two-time national championship team.

 

“No disrespect to Blackmon, but Adrian Peterson and Trent Richardson as prospects kind of remind me of each other. Maybe A.P. had a little bit more home-run speed. But these are punishing, difference-maker backs.

“I think Richardson, with Jim Brown and Leroy Kelly, the history of great backs in Clevealnd, I think that would be pretty neat.

 

It’s not as if Gruden doesn’t like Blackmon, either.

 

“If you don’t like Justin Blackmon, you don’t like football,” he said. “There’s not a lot you can’t like about Blackmon. The one thing is I thought he was 6-6, 240 pounds when I watched him. He’s not as big as I thought he was and he didn’t run the blinding time. But he fits any offense. He’s smart, and he’s clutch.”

 

For the record, Blackmon measured a shade under 6-1 and weighed 207 at the NFL combine.

 

Later in the call Gruden speculated the Browns would add to McCoy’s supporting cast rather than select Ryan Tannehill or Brandon Weeden to compete with him.

 

“Obviously, he’s got to continue to get better and I think improving the supporting cast would help any quarterback, let alone Colt.”

 

 

Team Richardson= 11,777,246 votes

Other players @ 4= Mary Kay and 11 other armchair QBs...

[choco]

The words....attention whore...come to mind.

[Mark O]

The word "homo" comes to mind as well.

[PoeticG]

Why would you call Jon Gruden a homo... or attention whore for that matter?

[BrownsTown9]

What's Up Dogg Pound?!??!?

 

Two weeks from tonight! I cannot wait to glimpse into are future. ANYONE BUT TANNEHILL!!!!

 

Anyway, the guys at SPORTSMASHER just released another mocj draft (version 4.0) and it's really detailed and interesting.

 

They have use going with Richardson at #4 (which I think is the right move, I'd rather wait on a back, but we need one and he's the best since Peterson)

 

And Mike Adams, the big right tackle out of Dublin by way of Ohio State at #22.

 

I'd be okay with this, we need to improve on offense, our defense is not awful and just needs some tweaking.

 

Here is their mock, check it out:

 

SPORTSMASHER'S MOCK DRAFT

 

Plus the rumor is they are live blogging the draft, good stuff!

[Unsympathetic]

I hope we take the following:

 

Blackmon

J Martin (Stanford)

D Martin (Boise)

 

I think Doug Martin will have a better career than Richardson. He is the best back the Browns can draft - over Trent.

[Zombo]

I hope we take the following:

 

Blackmon

J Martin (Stanford)

D Martin (Boise)

 

I think Doug Martin will have a better career than Richardson. He is the best back the Browns can draft - over Trent.

 

Well, you are on the record. I don't think anybody agrees with you ... but you are on the record.

 

Zombo

[Harry Buffalo]

Well, you are on the record. I don't think anybody agrees with you ... but you are on the record.

 

Zombo

 

Your best bet is for Martin to play better than his draft position as in play like a mid 1st round pick even though he was selected beginning of the 2nd. Regardless of where he is picked he will NOT have a better career than Richardson he can only hope to have had slightly better value for his production.

[PoeticG]

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/04/alabamas_nick_saban_is_bullish.html

 

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Alabama head coach Nick Saban was standing just a few feet away from Browns running backs coach Gary Brown during Alabama's Pro Day when Saban's star running back, Trent Richardson, exploded into the stout Brown during a routine blocking drill and knocked him on his backside.

 

It was the block heard 'round the NFL world, and it made Saban chuckle, just like the dozens of other scouts and coaches in the 'Bama fieldhouse.

 

"I thought it was funny," Saban, the former Browns defensive coordinator, said Wednesday in a phone interview. "Trent's a very powerful guy and [brown] found that out first-hand, I guess."

 

The Browns would see plenty more of Richardson's punishing, smash-mouth style if they draft him No. 4 in next Thursday's opening round of the NFL draft. He's far and away the top choice of most observers for the Browns at No. 4, and one of a handful of players they're considering with their top pick.

 

"Trent is a very special player," said Saban. "He has a really good, complete skill set to play running back. He's got size and he's powerful, but he's got some quickness and can make you miss. He's got really good speed for his size, he's a good receiver and a good pass blocker.

 

"I think 'bruising back' would be an insult to all that he is, even though he does that, too, because he's really tough and physical."

 

Saban spent some time at the Pro Day talking about Richardson (5-9, 227) to Browns head coach Pat Shurmur, who was an assistant under Saban at Michigan State from 1995-97. Also in attendance was Browns General Manager Tom Heckert.

 

"I have nothing but great things to say about Trent," said Saban. "He's a fantastic team player and very, very productive. He has the rare combination of being not only a great player but a real quality person. He cares about his teammates and wouldn't even think about the draft or talk about it before the national championship game."

 

In three seasons, Richardson never had to be summoned to Saban's office to be reprimanded.

 

"He's one of the lowest-maintenance great players I've ever had the opportunity to coach," said Saban.

 

Having spent four seasons in Cleveland from 1991-94, Saban says Richardson would be a terrific fit for the team and the city.

 

"He'd be great in the community, he'd be a great player for them and he's somebody that I think a lot of young people could really relate to for the kind of person he is, the example he sets," said Saban. "If they wouldn't be excited, they really should be."

 

He said Richardson, who churned out 1,679 yards and 21 touchdowns last season, would be well-suited to the West Coast offense run by the Browns. Richardson also caught 29 passes for 338 yards and three TDs.

 

"I don't think the running plays are a whole lot different and he's a really good receiver," Saban said. "So if they wanted to use him as a receiver in more of those circumstances, he'd really fit that role extremely well, too. I don't think there'd be an issue with him making that kind of adaptation."

 

Saban declined to compare Richardson to Minnesota's Adrian Peterson, whom many experts have Richardson rated equally to coming out of college. But he did stack him up against Alabama's Mark Ingram, who went No. 28 to the Saints last year.

 

"They're both great players, but they're a little different styles," said Saban. "Mark is a little bit more of a quick, elusive change-of-direction burst kind of guy, but also a good receiver and good hands. Trent's a little bit bigger than Mark and a little different style of runner but very effective and can do all the pass-blocking, receiving and all of that stuff very effectively as well."

 

Richardson touched the ball 614 times at Alabama with only one lost fumble. He closed out his career with 550 fumble-free touches.

 

"For a guy to carry the ball as much as he has against some pretty good competition in some really big games, the ratio of carries to turnovers is pretty phenomenal," said Saban.

 

The rock-solid, muscled up Richardson made no apologies for putting Gary Brown on his back. Brown is no shrinking violet. He played eight NFL seasons, rushing for 1,000 yards twice.

 

"Any time someone's in my way, I'm going to try to knock them over," Richardson said after his Pro Day. "Either they're going to hit me or I'm going to hit them. Nine times out of 10, I'm trying to throw the lick."

 

Richardson even had the guts to promise at the combine that he'll take on Ravens linebacker Ray Lewis, which should endear him even more to Browns fans.

 

"[being physical] is a mindset thing with me and I'm not saying that Ray Lewis ain't going to take me out, because when it comes down to it we're going to have to see each other in the hole," said Richardson. "And I love Uncle Ray to death and he's going to bring me all the contact he can and beat me up in the hole, but why would you stand down in front of that?"

 

Richardson underwent a minor arthroscopic knee procedure after the season and sat out combine drills, but rebounded at his Pro Day. Most draft observers, including ESPN's Mel Kiper Jr., think the Browns should take Richardson ahead of Oklahoma State receiver Justin Blackmon because Richardson is the superior talent.

 

"Fear-factor players scare you and open up things for other players," Kiper said. "Richardson is a multi-dimensional player who never has to leave the field. And he never fumbles. For Cleveland, for what Richardson brings, you wouldn't need anybody else at that spot. He catches. He runs inside and outside. Richardson is my third-best player in this draft. [Cleveland's] picking fourth."

 

Said Saban, the former Dolphins head coach: "I just know that if I was involved with the draft ... he's a guy that I'd want on my team."

 

On Twitter: @marykaycabot

----------------------------------------------------------------

 

That speaks for itself. If you are a fan of Cleveland or football in general- GET ON BOARD! The only people who don't want Trent in a Browns Uni are Steeler fans or confused... well, that's basically the same thing...

[PoeticG]

Richardson Vs. Lewis? The smart money is on Trich! Button down that chin strap AFCN the "Midnight Express" is coming through!

[Hunt Daddy]

I have a feeling we're going to pass on Richardson. It's upsetting.

[Harry Buffalo]

I have a feeling we aren't. We shall see.

[PoeticG]

http://www.ajc.com/sports/trent-richardson-adds-value-1420187.html

 

 

Trent Richardson adds value to the running back position

 

 

 

 

ShareThis

Print

E-mail

.

By D. Orlando Ledbetter

 

 

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

 

While Trent Richardson doesn’t have a Heisman Trophy on his mantel, he’s projected to go much higher than former Alabama back Mark Ingram Jr. in the NFL draft.

 

 

This year’s draft is set for April 26-28 in New York. It’s unlikely that Richardson will slip out of the top 10. In 2011, Ingram was selected with the 28th pick by New Orleans.

 

Both running backs led the Crimson Tide to national championships, for the 2009 and 2011 seasons, respectively. But there is a difference between the two, and that’s why Richardson is projected to get drafted much higher.

 

Richardson is considered by NFL scouts to be a better all-around back because of his hands, better speed and power.

 

“Both of us run hard, and both of us just want to play the game of football,” Richardson said. “I have [nothing] negative to say about his game. I’m pretty sure he has [nothing] negative to say about my game. When it comes down to it, we kind of play alike.”

 

When pressed, Richardson said that he admires Ingram’s vision, but concluded that he prefers to run to contact instead of trying to elude defenders.

 

Ingram had an injury-filled rookie season. He managed only 474 yards on 122 carries and scored five touchdowns.

 

Richardson had minor surgery on his left knee after the season and didn’t compete at the scouting combine. He was disappointed that he couldn’t participate, but knows that NFL teams are well aware of his body of work.

 

“I always wanted to [attend the combine] and show all my skills,” Richardson said. “That’s what the top guys do.”

 

Richardson envisions himself playing a major role early in his NFL career.

 

“When it comes down to it, I’ll be the dude that’s on the field and getting the ball on third-and-3 or fourth-and-1, and not to be cocky or anything, but I work on my game every day. ... I work in the classroom learning plays and learning the defensive line and what the linebackers and safeties are doing so I can pick up my blitzes,” he said. “I love to block.”

 

Richardson touched the ball 614 times for the Crimson Tide and lost only one fumble. He had no fumbles lost over his last 550 carries.

 

Despite not having any apparent weaknesses, Richardson is not satisfied.

 

“I don’t say one part of my game needs work, all of my game [needs improvement],” Richardson said. “When it comes down to being a football player, you need to work on everything, not just one part of your game. That’s not me. I work on every part of my game when it comes to playing football.”

 

Richardson is aware that teams have de-valued the position. Over the past 10 drafts, only eight running backs have been selected in the top 10 and just 28 in the first round.

 

The outcomes of the 2005 and 2006 drafts have led to the change.

 

In 2006, Reggie Bush (second overall) Laurence Maroney (21), DeAngelo Williams (27th) and Joseph Addai (30th) were selected in the first round. In 2005, Ronnie Brown (second), Cedric Benson (fourth) and Cadillac Williams (fifth) were picked in the first round.

 

Addai is the only player in that group who still is with the team that drafted him. NFL teams have been able to find good running backs late in the draft and among undrafted players. Houston’s Arian Foster, one of the league’s top backs, was not drafted in 2009. He led the league in rushing with 1,616 yards in 2010.

 

“[Richardson is] the best running back to come out since Adrian Peterson,” ESPN draft analyst Todd McShay said. Peterson was selected seventh overall in 2007 by the Vikings.

 

After Richardson is selected there will be a long wait before the next running back is drafted. Boise State’s Doug Martin, Virginia Tech’s Dave Wilson, Oregon’s LaMichael James and Miami’s Lamar Miller round out the top five running backs.

 

 

-----------------------------------

 

I'm giving "the people" what they want. Now Heckert needs to deliver on his end... We need to have a "walk for Richardson" around the Stadium a couple days before the draft... Let Heckert know what's up Brownies!

[PoeticG]

Here's one that the critics might like... or is it not like?

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Link: http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nfl--rb-trent-richardson-exception-to-rule-as-positional-value-keeps-sliding-.html

 

 

RB Trent Richardson exception to the rule as positional value keeps sliding

 

 

 

..By Jason Cole | Yahoo! Sports – 8 hours ago...

 

 

Trent Richardson cradles the national championship trophy after Alabama beat LSU. (US …It appears that just about anybody who plays running back is the new Mr. Irrelevant of the NFL draft.

 

Even someone as good as Trent Richardson of Alabama.

 

"I love Trent Richardson, everything about him," a personnel executive with an NFC team said in March. "Great football player, loves the game. Great kid, very mature, a leader. Physically, he reminds me of George Rogers and I mean the good George Rogers …"

 

 

That's high praise considering that Rogers was the No. 1 pick of the 1981 draft, was the 1980 Heisman Trophy winner and later helped the Washington Redskins win Super Bowl XXII.

 

Of course, all of that was build-up to the eventual, "But …"

 

"If you're asking me if I'd take him in the top 10 picks, the answer is no. Not the way the game is played today," said the executive, who is also a former NFL player. "It kind of hurts me to say it, but that's just reality. Look around the league: It's not a running back league anymore."

 

The 2012 NFL draft figures to further illustrate the accelerating decline in the value of running backs. In 2011, Mark Ingram was the only running back selected in the first round. The only other time that happened since the NFL and AFL merged drafts was in 1984.

 

This year, it may happen again. Richardson is the only running back considered a lock to go in the first round. Many people believe Richardson will go either No. 4 to the Cleveland Browns or No. 5 to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Sources with both teams strongly hinted that Richardson is a consideration at those spots.

 

Then again, if he doesn't go one to one of those teams, Richardson could be on the board for awhile. After the Bucs, no team has an overwhelming need for a running back until the Cincinnati Bengals at No. 17. And even if Richardson is joined by Boise State's Doug Martin in the first round, this will mark the fewest running backs to go in the opening stanza in back-to-back years.

 

 

In other words, one of the most dominant positions in the game's history has become little more than an afterthought.

 

"You spread people out, try to get the defense out of position, look for a mismatch and then try to hit a crease," said St. Louis Rams coach Jeff Fisher, who coached Chris Johnson in Tennessee when Johnson ran for 2,006 yards in 2009. Johnson, only 195 pounds, excels in large part because of his exceptional quickness and speed.

 

"We don't line up and run out of I-formation that much anymore" Fisher said. "The days when you lined up with the running back deep in the backfield and let him watch the blocking develop, that's done. Maybe once in a while or after you've been lucky enough to build up a lead and you're grinding it out in the second half. But that's situational stuff, not your base offense."

 

The evolution of the NFL as an elaborate seven-on-seven league has been obvious by the explosion of passing numbers. Not only did New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees obliterate the single-season record with 5,476 passing yards (breaking Dan Marino's mark of 5,084 in 1984) in 2011, but Tom Brady (5,235) would have and Matthew Stafford (5,038) was close. Until last year, Marino and Brees were the only passers to eclipse the 5,000-yard mark).

 

Trent Richardson approaches the goal line in the national championship vs. LSU. (US Presswire)"The idea that you throw to score and run to win has been taken to the extreme," said Atlanta Falcons coach Mike Smith, whose cowbell rusher Michael Turner finished third in ground yards (1,340) last season. "It's hard, especially for a defensive coach like me, to sometimes accept that, but that's the nature of the game. It's four and five wideouts, and the short passing game has become the running game."

 

Receivers such as Wes Welker, Roddy White, Brandon Marshall and Marques Colston have become the extension of the running game. That is particularly true in the regular season, when the officiating tends to tilt toward the passing game.

 

"You throw it up there and you either get 15 or 20 yards or you get a pass-interference call half the time," New York Jets coach Rex Ryan said, half-joking.

 

All of that means the running back has become an endangered species, the in-line blocking tight end is no more than a reserve and the true fullback is all but a dinosaur.

 

[ Jason Cole: Winners and losers from NFL free agency ]

 

During the five drafts from 2007 to 2011, only 14 first-round running backs were selected and just 28 total drafted in the first two rounds. Only Darren McFadden in 2008 was taken with one of the top five picks.

 

By comparison, from 1988 to 1992 – when eventual Hall of Famers Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith were chosen – 21 running backs were taken in the first round and 38 in the first two. From 1978 to 1982, the numbers were 26 in the first round and 44 overall. Both of those five-year periods came when the NFL had only 28 teams rather than the current 32.

 

While teams shy away from drafting workhouse-type backs, they're also very protective of their veteran rushers.

 

"If you have a good running back, you don't want to burn him out. It's all about keep him fresh now," said San Francisco 49ers coach Jim Harbaugh, who limited bullish running back Frank Gore to 282 carries last season. "Frank wants the ball every down and I love that mentality. But you have to be smart, too, and it's my job to make sure he's healthy all season."

 

Which gets back to Richardson. He's a fabulously talented runner who might have been an overwhelming candidate to be the No. 3 overall pick … 20 years ago.

 

"Even 10 years ago, you see a player like that and you don't think twice about him," an AFC executive said. "You watch the way he played in those two games against LSU last season [including the national title game] and that's all you really need to know about him. He was everything for Alabama. He was their whole offense. LSU knew it, all the fans knew it and it didn't matter. He was the best offensive player on the field."

 

For all that praise, the executive stopped short of saying Richardson was a lock to go in the top 10.

 

"It really just all depends on how you want to build your team," the AFC executive said. "If you're in the minority and you try to build around the running game and defense or you're trying to protect your quarterback because he's limited, then maybe you do it. But there's a lot of thinking that goes into it."

 

[ Jason Cole: Important issues still linger going into NFL draft ]

 

General managers such as Cleveland's Tom Heckert and Tampa Bay's Mark Dominik have to weigh the value of a running back that high in the draft against players who might help the passing game.

 

Or help defend against it.

 

"You have to look at all the angles of how a player can help you today versus over the long haul," Dominik said. "I think that one thing that helps is the new structure for rookie contracts. Without the burden of the big signing bonus and making sure that player is going to be with you for five or six years because of the money, you can focus a little more on today."

 

So, that means the pick is Richardson?

 

Dominik flashed a wicked grin and walked off without even a hint of an answer.

[PoeticG]

I can't wait for Polypoopoo to try and blitz on Colt while Trent is waiting to sandwich his ass into oblivion... and trust me Trent is strong and badass enough to do it... that alone is worth both first rounders to me...

[calfoxwc]

If the Browns pass on this guy, and I believe they will draft him....

 

they will have a better plan.

 

I just can't imagine what the better plan is. LOL

[Harry Buffalo]

That's right, no other second round or later running back has ever out-performed a first rounder...lmao

 

Not one line this. Who out performed AP that was drafted behind him, who out performed LT? This is the type of RB we would be drafting, a truely elite talent. Last year when NO draft Ingrem they knew they were not drafting an elite talent, he was just the highest guy on their board in a position where they had need so they traded back up to get him. Same can be said about other backs in other years. C.J. Spiller was a known luxury pick for the Bills who had a lot of question marks surrounding him. If Spiller didn't have return ability he would have went in the 2nd half of the first round.

 

Regardless of what people think about the RB position there is such a thing as elite talent and as much of a pre draft sure thing as you can get just like with other positions (Luck for QB, Green for WR, Long and Thomas for LT, Williams for DE, ect). I think Martin is going to have a good career that point I am not arguing. But is his career, especially his first season or two, going to be on par or better than Richardson's. I highly doubt it.

[miktoxic]

and TR is not mark ingram 2.0? really?

 

AND

 

poetic G. can you stop reposting evey fucking story about this guy? you're already repeating yourself 2fold.

 

do you know how gay u guys look?

 

man i'd hate to be around you MFers on thursday night if the browns DON'T pick him. tell your girlfriends (well in your guy's case.....your boyfriends) to stay out of the house that night.

[PoeticG]

and TR is not mark ingram 2.0? really?

 

AND

 

poetic G. can you stop reposting evey fucking story about this guy? you're already repeating yourself 2fold.

 

do you know how gay u guys look?

 

man i'd hate to be around you MFers on thursday night if the browns DON'T pick him. tell your girlfriends (well in your guy's case.....your boyfriends) to stay out of the house that night.

 

 

Some people are afraid to click on links, so instead of having them go "off site" I'm just posting the articles I find in here for the fans to read... at least I'm not starting new threads for each of these articles. Give me a break yo. Some really like Richardson and want him to be in Cleveland and enjoy reading the articles about him. Yes I agree, not all are captivated by his strength and talents but those who aren't are in the minority.

 

7 days to go... then it will all be over toxic.

[miktoxic]

7 days to go... then it will all be over toxic.

can't wait brother!

 

i won't hate richardson at 4. but you also have got to keep an open mind and think about value....as in what is the position on the team in the most need of help. some say RB, then richardson. some say WR, then blackmon. not QB or TE. sure IMO i like defense first so i'd take claiborn. but hey, they might just trade down and be able to address all 3 of those positions with great talent. who knows?

 

maybe i'll see you in the browns tavern and we can tip one to whoever we pick, may it be @4 @8 or @157.....................

 

it will be exciting, that's for sure.

[PoeticG]

I like the combination of Richardson and Blackmon as well, but- we're gonna have to figure out how to pull that off without involving Joe Thomas... he's just gotten a seven year deal and he'll retire Brown.

 

 

I love Defense as well! I'd be okay with drafting all defense in all 7 rounds if we have any kind of offense last year. It's vital that we surround Colt with weapons and find out if he can be our Franchise guy or not. Until we give him weapons then we're just spinning our wheels. If we give him a couple targets at WR and an Elite runningback, an Oline that can provide him the time a QB needs to run a play he might be something special.

 

In any case by going offense early this year it really paints the picture of where we go from here. If Richardson, Martin, and Jeffery prove to be enough to get this offense going again and they score points and win games, then next year we can go back to making this defense Elite.

 

If Colt fails with a bunch of talent around him then we know that Colt just can't hack it in the Big Leauges. We then KNOW that we've gotta go and get a Franchise QB that can do it.

 

I believe in Colt, that if given a Runningback that won't take plays off, if WRs catch the ball when given the chance to do so, if our line holds up and does their jobs, and Colt makes accurate throwns like we all know he should be able to- then we might have ourselves a nice little offense.

 

How nice would it be if RB, OL, WR fixes this offense and Colt throwns for 4500 yards? Little will be a number 1 WR this year, I've got a good feeling about that. He'll be in his second NFL season- he got work last year and I think that he'll be twice the player come week 1 this year. Momass can still contribut here and there, he just has to get back to not playing scared- I think the hits by Harrison made him somewhat timid. Cribbs will be a lot better this year, he's growing up into a fine #2/#3 WR... plus we're not sure how good Mitchell and Norwood could be. Add one more WR in the second and this group could be set.

 

Runningback would be set nicely with Richardson. Plus it gives us insurance on Hardesty if he should continue to get injured. But between Hardesty, Jackson and Smith it should provide Trent with some rest here and there. Owen needs to get stronger and bulk up or it's gonna be a long year for him.

 

I'd like to snag Brock Osweiler latter in the draft because I see him as being a good QB to groom and could be an excellent backup to Colt.

 

Our Oline is not that bad, it's pretty good. Who knows maybe Eric comes back in a limited role? But even without ES we're still pretty solid with Mack and Thomas. Pinkston looks good at LG and hoping Lava does work at RG- he's supposed to be really strong! I think that Jonathan Martin could be a solid RT for us. He protected Andrew Lucks blindside and moving to RT should allow him to continue to be dominant on the Oline and protect Colt.

 

Thomas, Pinkston, Mack, Lava, Martin - I can't find too many problems with that, can you?

 

The D line is set up nicely with depth and talent this year so there's no need there. Benard is gonna beast this year, I think.

 

The linebackers appear to be set with some depth. Add Burfict in the latter rounds to groom and train him up and he could be a steal learning behind DQ.

 

Corner is set up nicely with Dockery, Patterson, Skrine, Brown and Haden. Hoping TJ gets it and becomes that Elite guy we hope he does! We just need a FS- I like Chase Minnifield in this spot. He's pretty fast and instinctive, catches well and isn't afraid to stick his nose in there and tackle either. I think this gives us a really good team with no glaring needs or weaknesses!

[Socalbamafan]

As an Alabama fan all I can say is Trent is a great guy and a hellava football player. This would a great pick for u guys. btw, we refer to Trent on our boards as MFBATR. Figure it out.

[Harry Buffalo]

and TR is not mark ingram 2.0? really?

 

AND

 

poetic G. can you stop reposting evey fucking story about this guy? you're already repeating yourself 2fold.

 

do you know how gay u guys look?

 

man i'd hate to be around you MFers on thursday night if the browns DON'T pick him. tell your girlfriends (well in your guy's case.....your boyfriends) to stay out of the house that night.

 

Richardson is leaps and pounds more talented than Ingram is and it doesn't take a genius to see it.

 

Honestly though the closer we get to the draft, if the guy we get isn't Richardson I really think it will and should be Claiborne or a trade back.

[PoeticG]

As an Alabama fan all I can say is Trent is a great guy and a hellava football player. This would a great pick for u guys. btw, we refer to Trent on our boards as MFBATR. Figure it out.

 

Mother Fuckin Bad Ass Trent Richardson?

[Tour2ma]

And now for something completely different...

 

===========================================================================================================

 

http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2012/4/12/2907735/an-exercise-in-value-why-the-browns-still-should-not-draft-trent

 

An Exercise in Value: Why the Browns Still Should Not Draft Trent Richardson

by rufio on Apr 12, 2012 1:50 AM EDT

 

I think Trent Richardson will go extremely high in this April's NFL draft. I see him as easily one of the top 10 players available, I think he'll be a great running back in the NFL, and he reminds me more of Jamal Lewis than Cedric Benson. Recently, experts like Mike Mayock have agreed that Richardson is pretty damn good.

 

I still don't think we should draft him.

 

The prospect of adding a weapon of that caliber to this talent-thirsty offense is hard to pass up. But the NFL draft does not occur in a vacuum; every time you choose a player you are also passing on all of the other available players. You also aren't magically adding a player to your roster, you are spending limited resources (draft picks) in order to acquire him.

 

I'd like to highlight some of the thinking that goes into my desire to pass on Richardson. It boils down to one word: value.

 

Value I: What are you "spending"?

 

4th overall

We would have to spend the fourth overall pick on Richardson. 4th overall isn't just another draft pick, it's a potentially franchise-altering pick, and it carries weight that no other pick we currently possess does.

 

Cutting a former top-10 pick isn't an easy thing for competitors like coaches and GMs to do, and former top draft choices carry that legacy throughout their careers--especially if they play well. Once Richardson's rookie contract would be up, we would be forced to sign him for a record-breaking deal and have a huge cap number invested in an aging running back. Or we could let a star player walk. Not to mention that in 2011, top tier RBs were overpaid by 50%***. Does 6 million/year sound like the kind of deal a former 4th overall pick who has performed well would sign?

 

Value is especially important at the very top of the draft because of the plethora of alternate choices available. If you consider classic coachspeak line of "its not just who you take, its who you don't take," you are not taking hundreds of other players with the 4th overall pick.

 

The cost of this pick simply cannot be understated.

 

Where can you find good players?

If you look at the rounds in which good players are chosen at a given position it can tell you a few things. Looking at Quarterback, the good ones historically are taken in the first round. The same goes with cornerback.

 

But if you look at running back, you'll see players like Frank Gore (3rd), LeSean McCoy (2nd), Ray Rice (2nd), Arian Foster (Undrafted), Matt Forte (3rd), Jamaal Charles (3rd), Ahmad Bradshaw (7th), Michael Turner (5th), and all are doing more than getting the job done.

 

This doesn't tell us that we can just draft any guy in the 3rd round and he'll magically end up being that good, but it does tell us that good running backs can be found later on. Good quarterbacks, cornerbacks, and left tackles, not so much. If you want a great player at one of those positions, you almost assuredly have to pick him in the first round.

 

 

 

Value II: What are you getting for the "money"?

 

Disparity in talent between top of the NFL and average

At any given position, NFL starters are only going to be so good and they are only going to be so bad. At some positions, the disparity is enormous; a pass rusher like DeMarcus Ware, for example, is much better than a starter like Jayme Mitchell. At other positions (like punter) there isn't a whole lot of dropoff from the top all the way to the bottom.

 

Even if you can draft the best punter in the league, so what?

 

There simply isn't a world of difference athletically between good NFL running backs. While Adrian Peterson is a great player and a probable hall of famer, how much better is he than LeSean McCoy? Ray Rice? Maurice Jones Drew? I can probably list a dozen backs who aren't quite as good as Peterson, but are able to deliver only slightly less production.

 

While there certainly are positions with less disparity in talent between the top and bottom (punter), no running back we are seeing right now is truly able to take over a game by himself. There simply aren't human beings alive today who are physically capable of being able to run over and around NFL defenses like they used to. We aren't living in an era when we'll see another Jim Brown who is that much bigger, that much faster, and able to run the ball that much better than the next guy.

 

Talent over other available

This should factor in not only other players available in the draft, but also players that typically come available in free agency and trades. For example, it is extremely rare for a franchise QB to be found anywhere at all, and once teams do find them they typically don't let them go. In recent years I can only think of Jay Cutler as a relatively young franchise QB to switch teams. Meanwhile, it seems like very good OGs and WRs hit the market every year.

 

Obviously, other players available in the draft and their relative talent levels should be considered. There appears to be a huge dropoff at the QB position after Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III--which is exactly why the St. Louis Rams were able to get so much for the 2nd overall pick (and the last superstar QB draft prospect).

 

I just don't see so much of a dropoff between Richardson and a more easily-assembled backfield by committee to warrant the pick. He's good, but how much more than Lamar Miller, David Wilson, Isaiah Pead, or Doug Martin does he give us?

 

Length of career

While it shouldn't be the primary consideration, the potential length of a player's career should come into play when making a selection. You don't even know if the guy is going to be good yet, but you at least want an idea of a best-case scenario.

 

A quarterback can be "your guy" for 10-15 years, as can a lineman. Running backs have relatively short careers in the NFL, and even shorter periods of time when they "carry the load" and do it well.

 

Running backs have the shortest average career length in the NFL. If you see that stat being heavily influenced by training camp roster filler, I'd agree with you. But I would also point you to the rule of 370. While not a magical barrier of 370 carries, the "rule of 370" is statistical analysis that reinforces common sense: relatively small guys who get hit hard by bigger guys tend to wear down and wear out. A rough analysis also details that RBs peak (and decline) earlier in their careers than other offensive players.

 

370 carries/year is 23.125 carries/game. With a 4.5 YPC average, that's just over 100 yards per game.

 

Value III: How much is your "purchase" worth to you?

 

Current roster composition

Obviously, the more the Browns' roster lacks talent at a given position, the more "impact" a draft choice at that position would have. This is the one area that I think makes Richardson more valuable to us. We need offensive talent, and we could really use another running back.

 

Still, other positions on the team are clearly more lacking than RB. With the release of Tony Pashos, RT became a pressing need and probably the most urgent one on the entire depth chart. Yet, because of the reasons cited in the rest of this article I do not believe RT would be a wise pick at 4th overall.

 

Positional impact

How much a position impacts the game can vary widely. Quarterbacks touch the ball every play. Monster defensive tackles and other "unblockable" players can shred your entire gameplan.

 

How much impact does a running back bring to a team? I would say about an average amount. Sure, they can break big plays now and then, but unless you call 200 yards of total offense a good day no individual RB will be the engine that makes your offense go. Walter Peyton had the most all purpose yards per game of any RB in NFL history,and he only averaged 114.7 per game. Even Barry Sanders averaged under 120 total yards/game.

 

Blueprint

The Browns simply do not want to be a running team. They are comfortable with the passing game, they've hired coaches who like to pass, and the organizations who's success we'd like to model (the Green Bay Packers and the Philadelphia Eagles) both pass the ball a lot.

 

Yes, Mike Holmgren ran the ball a lot with Shaun Alexander (who is the poster boy for the rule of 370, by the way). Yes, "the" West Coast Offense can be a run-first offense. But Holmgren didn't draft Alexander with a top-5 pick, and he didn't even start him in his rookie season.

 

We want a back like Ahman Green (3rd round), LeSean McCoy (2nd), or Brian Westbrook (3rd). We don't necessarily want a back that can pound the rock between the tackles, we are looking for a back to run effectively but also to be effective in the passing game. Spending such a high pick on the downhill running of Richardson simply wouldn't be a good match. We just don't want or need a back that good at pounding the rock.

 

Putting it all together

When examining the combination of the franchise-level of importance of the 4th overall pick, the availability of other good running backs, the lack of extreme difference in talent between the top running backs in the league and other good ones, and the short length of careers for running backs, I can only determine that drafting Trent Richardson is not worth it.

 

If there are people out there who believe Richardson is an all-time talent who is just tremendously better than other prospects in this draft, I can see why they would want us to take him. But the lack of value at the fourth spot in the draft cannot be debated.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

***though I think he clings to his "kooky made-up" stats too closely, this is solid analysis by Burke. I tend to believe total yardage is actually a good measure of a back, but that debate is best saved for another time.

==========================================================================================================