The Cysko Kid Posted October 27, 2015 Report Share Posted October 27, 2015 Doesn't mean I would want to elect a guy who would prefer a theocratic type of leadership. But there's other issues I have with Dr. Carson like his lack of understanding of foreign policy and how the economy works. I know there's checks and balances and he could surround himself with brilliant people - but it'd probably be preferable to have the president to be a guy who has a basic understanding of how the world works and doesn't believe that arming the Jews would have prevented the holocaust. Don't make any mistake I'll be voting for him if he gets the nomination against Clinton though, but he's not my favorite to win the nomination. Arming the Jews would certainly not have helped enable the Holocaust. Armed insurrections work. History is full of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2015 I'm glad those who fought the world power British army to force our independence.... weren't giveup sissies who think "well, we'll never win, so we may as well not even try" You didn't read the stuff about the resistance forces during WWII. Liberal sissies hate information that they don't get to cherrypick for political expediency. So, Edward, who WOULD you vote for? Because most of us can ascribe phoney conclusions about them, too, like you did with Ben Carson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gftChris Posted October 27, 2015 Report Share Posted October 27, 2015 "weren't giveup sissies who think "well, we'll never win, so we may as well not even try" Sounds like steve on most issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted October 27, 2015 Report Share Posted October 27, 2015 I'm glad those who fought the world power British army to force our independence.... weren't giveup sissies who think "well, we'll never win, so we may as well not even try" You didn't read the stuff about the resistance forces during WWII. Liberal sissies hate information that they don't get to cherrypick for political expediency. So, Edward, who WOULD you vote for? Because most of us can ascribe phoney conclusions about them, too, like you did with Ben Carson. I cite things he says and supposedly believes, not phoney conclusions. The large minorities were the ones targeted including the Jews - giving them all guns wouldn't have overthrown the majority of nazi germany but probably would have been quicker genocide. I'm not sure I'll vote in the primary yet, but I align closest to Rand Paul on the issues who has no chance of winning. I would vote for Trump over Carson though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 27, 2015 Report Share Posted October 27, 2015 I'm glad those who fought the world power British army to force our independence.... and yet we don't concede others their independence unless we approve of it huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 27, 2015 Report Share Posted October 27, 2015 "weren't giveup sissies who think "well, we'll never win, so we may as well not even try" Sounds like steve on most issues aaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 "It is important to remember that amateurs built the Ark and it was the professionals that built the Titanic." Dr. Ben Carson at Colorado Christian College. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browns149 Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 what ark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 "It is important to remember that amateurs built the Ark and it was the professionals that built the Titanic." Dr. Ben Carson at Colorado Christian College. How many lifeboats did they have aboard the ark if they hit an iceberg? Life on earth may not exist if Edward John Smith was captain of the ark #revelationOfTheDay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 We'd still have fish (and all fish can survive in fresh or salt water by the way. No difference) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 once again, birdbrain spouts off like he has some kind of idea, lol, that he is smart. ************************************************************* http://www.livescience.com/32167-can-saltwater-fish-live-in-fresh-water.html https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=A0LEVjSnZjNWESAALE4PxQt.;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?qid=20071119182219AA2leHl Best Answer: no. All living organisms have to maintain a certain level of a substance in order to survive. This is called homeostasis. Salt water fish need salt water to live because their cells have adapted to high concentration of salts being around them. Becasue they are in a high conc of salt their cells inside do not need as much water. The opposite is true for fresh water fish. If you put a salt water fish into fresh water the fishs cells would take in too much water and eventually burst. If you put a fresh water fish in salt water it would become dehydrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 hahaha Woody thinks there are only seven fish species on earth..... that's "all" *********************************************************** Seven Fish Species That Can Survive In Both Fresh ...scubadiverlife.com/2015/06/09/seven-fish-species-that... All fish, whether they live in salt water or fresh water, must maintain a certain level of salinity in their bloodstream to survive. Most are restricted to one ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 ... I see that went right over your head. Thank you for poking one of dozens of major holes in the Noah's Ark story though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 I see that you think that clears you of saying stupid stuff. (falls down stairs, breaks his beak) ... "I meant to do that" (stupidly drinks a lot of spoiled milk, pukes in flower pot".... "well, that plant need water, so that's why I ...." NOPE. If you ever go out on a date, woody.... would it be a gay male woodpecker, or a gay female woodpecker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clevfan4life Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 If you ever go out on a date, woody.... would it be a gay male woodpecker, or a gay female woodpecker? HA!! he really nailed you there woody. I just don't know how you can post here anymore after that kind of burn. I really don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 oh, pshaw, it weren't nothin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 30, 2015 Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 Again, you're missing the point on something. Do I really have to walk you through the fish comment step by step? And explain why your response was perfect and hilarious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 nah, I'm just not giving you any benefit of the doubt, because you've never once earned it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted October 31, 2015 Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 http://news.yahoo.com/carsons-boardroom-support-gay-rights-could-test-053612931--finance.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 31, 2015 Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 He was against discriminating against gays in the workplace? that monster! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted October 31, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 I am strongly against discrimation against gays in the workplace, too... there is no right to change the definition of marriage, or intimidate others to treat them like they aren't perverted. Regular normal folks don't have to accept the immoralness of the phony marriage. A baker refuses to sell a cake to a gay person, bad. A baker refuses to sell a cake for a gay "marriage"..... good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbedward Posted October 31, 2015 Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 Gays are cool until they want a marriage license. Obviously letting them get married is sick and perverted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted October 31, 2015 Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 "We shouldn't discriminate against gays in the workplace. They're just all perverted, and their marriage is immoral. Unlike regular, normal folk." riiiiight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted October 31, 2015 Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 "We shouldn't discriminate against gays in the workplace. They're just all perverted, and their marriage is immoral. Unlike regular, normal folk." riiiiight Perversion and immorality do not necessarily need to be illegal, right? WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MedinaDawg Posted November 30, 2015 Report Share Posted November 30, 2015 Agree on some, disagree on others. I still don't think he has the command over a room to be president. As soon as he is elected president, he has command over the room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted November 30, 2015 Report Share Posted November 30, 2015 As soon as he is elected president, he has command over the room. You don't get elected if you can't control the room. Soft spoken people don't win the presidency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted November 30, 2015 Report Share Posted November 30, 2015 There was that one guy who advised to speak softly and carry a big stick. I think he was a nobody though. The only place you can see him these days is on some dopey mountain in South Dakota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogicIsForSquares Posted November 30, 2015 Report Share Posted November 30, 2015 There was that one guy who advised to speak softly and carry a big stick. I think he was a nobody though. The only place you can see him these days is on some dopey mountain in South Dakota. Teddy Roosevelt was known as the great mumbler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbluhm86 Posted December 1, 2015 Report Share Posted December 1, 2015 There was that one guy who advised to speak softly and carry a big stick. I think he was a nobody though. The only place you can see him these days is on some dopey mountain in South Dakota. Greatest RINO president of all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cysko Kid Posted December 1, 2015 Report Share Posted December 1, 2015 The rino thing pisses me off because it is something you call someone who does the right thing and works across the aisle. That's what makes Obama such a horrible president. He doesn't work across the aisle at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.