Westside Steve Posted January 27, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2022 12 minutes ago, jbluhm86 said: A further thought: it used to take a 60 vote supermajority for a Supreme Court Justice to be confirmed by the Senate. This was changed in 2017, when the then GOP majority used the "nuclear option" to make it a simple majority vote to push through Neil Goursch's nomination. So if Biden and the Democrats push through a woke liberal justice nominee with just a simple majority, everyone can go ahead and thank Cocaine Mitch for pulling the trigger on the nuclear option. Everyone reaps what they sow eventually. I said that when they ran through the nuclear option; that's going to come back and bite somebody in the ass. WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vambo Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 Media Sen. Hirono urges Republicans to be 'open-minded' to Biden SCOTUS pick as she continues bashing Trump justices Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 20 hours ago, DieHardBrownsFan said: You're not fishing. You been spouting the 'were going to get Trump' for years now, and never have you been correct. Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.😂 Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.👱♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 28, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 1 hour ago, TexasAg1969 said: Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.😂 Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.👱♂️ In other words There's Hope for you yet? Doesn't seem like a good bet but what the hell WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 1 hour ago, TexasAg1969 said: Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.😂 Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.👱♂️ Orange man much better than demented socialist. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 28, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex.... You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around. WSS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 34 minutes ago, Westside Steve said: We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex.... You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around. WSS This was Dementia Joe’s criteria for selecting his VP…and we both know how that worked out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorka Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 3 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said: Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.😂 Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.👱♂️ I'm glad that Trump continues to live in your head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorka Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 2 hours ago, Westside Steve said: In other words There's Hope for you yet? Doesn't seem like a good bet but what the hell WSS Doubt it. Not promising for someone who thinks of himself as a blind pig. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconHound Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 3 hours ago, Westside Steve said: We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex.... You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around. WSS I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 28, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 5 hours ago, BaconHound said: I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications. You are joking right? Since there really is no qualification required. WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 4 hours ago, Westside Steve said: We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex.... WSS That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/10/15/reagan-pledges-he-would-name-a-woman-to-the-supreme-court/844817dc-27aa-4f5d-8e4f-0ab3a5e76865/ https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html How's that foot taste Steve? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 But only a black woman. That is racists. Typical of you liberals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 Black is fine, woman is fine - but the left will nominate a puppet lefty that will vote however the left tells her to. Major problem. activist crap - the left justices break their promises every vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 28, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 29 minutes ago, TexasAg1969 said: That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/10/15/reagan-pledges-he-would-name-a-woman-to-the-supreme-court/844817dc-27aa-4f5d-8e4f-0ab3a5e76865/ https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html How's that foot taste Steve? I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too. Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback. WSS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 6 minutes ago, Westside Steve said: I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too. Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback. WSS It's obviously black privilege. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 34 minutes ago, Westside Steve said: Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback. WSS yeah, like there is one 😄 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 1 hour ago, TexasAg1969 said: That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/10/15/reagan-pledges-he-would-name-a-woman-to-the-supreme-court/844817dc-27aa-4f5d-8e4f-0ab3a5e76865/ https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html How's that foot taste Steve? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasAg1969 Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 2 hours ago, Westside Steve said: I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too. Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback. WSS Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.😂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canton Dawg Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 4 hours ago, BaconHound said: Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board I agree, any time someone is appointed because of the color of their skin….that’s the definition of racism. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted January 28, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 33 minutes ago, Canton Dawg said: I agree, any time someone is appointed because of the color of their skin….that’s the definition of racism. I'm disappointed Bacon can't see that. I consider him smarter than the rest of the squad. WSS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbluhm86 Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 1 hour ago, TexasAg1969 said: Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.😂 It's a sad thing when being a conservative African American is considered being an Uncle Tom. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 2 hours ago, TexasAg1969 said: Somebody black needs to balance out uncle whiteboy Thomas who no more represents black America than any of you crackers from the new Confederacy.😂 Boy, did you get fucked up in the head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted January 28, 2022 Report Share Posted January 28, 2022 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted January 29, 2022 Report Share Posted January 29, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorka Posted January 29, 2022 Report Share Posted January 29, 2022 9 hours ago, BaconHound said: I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications. You're a fucking nut job. First of all, the function of the SC is not to "represent people" that's the Congress' job. Neither do they preside over anyone. They are not there to represent the interest of a class of people. Their job is to ensure equal justice under the law and be the guardians and interpreters of the Constitution. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted January 29, 2022 Report Share Posted January 29, 2022 7 minutes ago, Gorka said: Their job is to ensure equal justice under the law and be the guardians of the Constitution. Fixed that for ya 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorka Posted January 29, 2022 Report Share Posted January 29, 2022 2 hours ago, Axe said: That reminded me of this: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorka Posted January 29, 2022 Report Share Posted January 29, 2022 9 hours ago, BaconHound said: Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board Point to it. Call the person out who made this racist comment. Don't be a pussy. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.