Icecube

Dak dropped over 500 yards passing on them. The D has serious work to do. But after 4 weeks, the Browns are clearly in 3rd place of the North, no one can question that.

Baker blew it; if he hit that pass the game is over.

Wow. This is the worst Dallas team since 1989.

Peeps just got snot bubbled by his own player.

Who is in charge of clock management? A chimp? That gafe may cost them the game. Uneal. Dallas is a comeback team.

GW really seems like a d-ck head.

The spread is now 5. Apparently more bets were going on the Dallas side at -4.5.

CeeDee, Cooper, Gallup and now Wilson. Add in some Zeke. They will be a challenge.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/30015123/nfl-says-steelers-titans-game-played-week-4-two-more-positive-tests I fear it's just the beginning. This season may not happen.

Even if Dallas had lost the ATL game, their season would not have been over. The other 3 teams in the east are total bums. But, Dallas rushing D is weak as hell. The Browns SHOULD be able to rush Chubb and Hunt all day. If the Browns don't turn the ball over, but Dallas does, it could go well.

So, what do you think? It feels it's closer to a push, than Cowboys favored by 4.5. Who knows, I'd probably not bet it. It's not out of the realm that Browns win outright.

That's a sick team. Who is in your league, rookies? Great advice, Gumby.

For all the coverage Dallas gets, they are a losing football team. And they are damn lucky they aren't winless.

How is the production of Peeps vs. Claypool going so far? He's not even active? I'm pretty sure Claypool is.

Don't sleep on those WRs and Dak: Cooper, Gallup, CeeDee. Dak's tossing 420 a game. The Browns will need to put up 30+ to win, I am guessing.

Don't forget about Zeke and that rushing game. Zeke looks rejuvenated over 2019. And the Cowboys are right in the mix to win the NFC East which is just horrible. The Browns best hope is pounding Chubb and Hunt all game. You don't want to give Dak too much time hitting those 4 receivers.

You telling me DTs from the 60's were no smaller or slower than today's DTs? TEs? WRs? And mentioning ONE exception is not really an accurate representation.

A lot of those guys practiced, meaning they will play.

It's Baker time. This is a game he has to go from "just not losing it" to "laying it on" and getting his confidence back. The rush should be enough of a threat that it opens up big passing lanes downfield. As Chubb and Hunt keep rushing for chunks, those safeties will start moving up, then Baker can torch them. On D, I don't think Haskins is all that, just another big, tall pocket passer with a big arm, but doesn't seem like he has a feel for the game or reading defenses. I still think the old school, pocket passers can work out fine, but he ain't it. The Browns DL will get to him some in this one.

He's not.

I'd be real hesitant to give up 7. I'm not even sure if I'd take Browns even (but I probably would). Washington beat the Eagles, after being down by 17, and who look bad, and lost to AZ soundly, who look at least decent if not good. The Browns should win this game, but I'd be real nervous about having to give up 7 in this game. Quite honestly, I pass this game all together as far as betting on it. Haskins is only throwing for 56% completions, which pretty much sucks in the modern day, but he also has zero picks thus far. If the Browns have any chance of making the playoffs, they must win against teams like this.

If you had to wager your mortgage on it, who do you take?

And, as of now, it looks like the Pats are not tanking either. (Beat Fins, barely lost to Seattle). Jags dumped so many players, it didn't appear as they were even trying, but apparently they needed to cut/trade that many people to clean the team of malcontents.

OK, maybe I'm missing the point.