MLD Woody Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 Yep, I don't think an actual, legitimate point has been made yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckofajobbrownie Posted May 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 Nope. Not yet. The only one I see (not on here, but out there) is that, yes, as a society we get to define what we think marriage is and what it's for. The problem is that most of the arguments for what it's for don't hold any water. So, basically they're left with "We want to keep marriage defined as between a man and a woman. Not because marriage is for having children, because clearly it isn't. Not because marriage has always been this way, because clearly it hasn't. But because well, just because." And that's why eventually they'll lose. Because this doesn't make sense to anyone who thinks there's nothing strange or abnormal about gay people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 Actually no. Whether or not it bothers you, or me, whether you believe in the divine providence of God almighty or the science of nature you are still talking about a man and a woman. If you are as analytical and intelligent as you want us to beliye you should be able to accept the fact that it's not the same even if you wish it were. It is neither right nor wrong but it is in fact not the same. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 Actually no. Whether or not it bothers you, or me, whether you believe in the divine providence of God almighty or the science of nature you are still talking about a man and a woman. If you are as analytical and intelligent as you want us to beliye you should be able to accept the fact that it's not the same even if you wish it were. It is neither right nor wrong but it is in fact not the same. WSS I'm not talking about man and woman. I'm talking about legal rights. I could give two shits if the religious want it to be about one man, one woman. If that's what they want to do, fine. Then call it a civil union, make it available to EVERYONE and give everyone in a civil union the same legal rights and benefits as those in a marriage. Nice try, I applaud your effort, but until then, it's about inequality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Steve Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 And if for nothing else than the law of nature homo sexuality is actually abnormal. That doesn't make it wrong or right. Not everything that happens in nature is normal. And society chooses which of these things will be accepted or not. WSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 And if for nothing else than the law of nature homo sexuality is actually abnormal. That doesn't make it wrong or right. Not everything that happens in nature is normal. And society chooses which of these things will be accepted or not. WSS Which law of nature are you referring to? [citation needed] But seriously, I'd love to hear your explanation of how homosexuality is abnormal. Do tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckofajobbrownie Posted May 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 Of course, homosexuality is pretty normal in nature. I guess you're talking about because they don't breed, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardBrownsFan Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 Of course, homosexuality is pretty normal in nature. I guess you're talking about because they don't breed, right? Yes, very natural. WTF are you talking about? Dogs butt fuking each other? LMAO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicopee John Posted May 11, 2012 Report Share Posted May 11, 2012 >>Because this doesn't make sense to anyone who thinks there's nothing strange or abnormal about gay people.>> But, I guess, it makes a hail of a difference to those who believe it is 'strange or abnormal'. I happen to believe it's strange and abnormal. But this thread is going nowhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckofajobbrownie Posted May 12, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 That's what I'm saying, John. You have to think it's strange or abnormal or immoral somehow to justify laws against it. Because the other arguments don't work. And that's why Shepard Smith says things like, "Republicans are on the wrong side of history on this." (Also because he's gay.) Because each year fewer and fewer people agree that there's something abnormal or immoral about homosexuality, and more and more think it's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairHooker11 Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 let me guess , Bill maher or George carlin? the libs go to guys..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 That was one of the stupidest things you ever posted, Vaporinyourowntrail. Seriously. But, your emotions rule again and again, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 That was one of the stupidest things you ever posted, Vaporinyourowntrail. Seriously. But, your emotions rule again and again, eh? I intend no offense, but I think you might be mentally Retarded. Please seek help. But, I guess, it makes a hail of a difference to those who believe it is 'strange or abnormal'. I happen to believe it's strange and abnormal. Well sure. But how do you define that legally? It's strange or abnormal to be mentally Retarded, like cal. And perhaps they shouldn't have some rights, like the right to drive, as they might kill someone. And that justifies the law preventing them from driving. But what threat does gay marriage pose to anything? Protip: It doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicopee John Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 >>Because each year fewer and fewer people agree that there's something abnormal or immoral about homosexuality, and more and more think it's fine.>> No argument there, Heck. I can only speak for myself but I don't recall ever calling for these people to be harmed in any way. I know gay people and they work hard, conduct themselves with dignity and - in the few I know of - offer a loving and safe environment for children who - otherwise - would live in a much worse environment. I do cringe if I begin to think of what they do when the lights are turned off but that is their own business. I don't like a lot of things. That doesn't mean legislation should be passed against them. OTOH, I can live in a parallel universe and not get caught up in that other universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 As much as I post, how could I be anything but pretty smart, albeit often wrong? But when I'm absolutely correct, Vapor, you suck your toes and whine, I'm sure. But, the truth is, gay whatever is nornal for you and Heck and mz the pussy the pussy and shep and... btw, I think daves is you brother "daryl", and vapor is your "other brother daryl" and pawning over abnormality and perversion is stupid. so, there ya go. 30 states - all those voters who made the DECENT, NORMAL DECISION, are "Retarded", Vapor? "Retarded" is a nasty, unnecessary slur against those with significant learning disabilities. Like, you don't want slurs about gays, right? But, when it suits your liberal emotional warping... slurs are fine. That's also stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 you know what's awesome? never giving a real reason for your stance... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 As much as I post, how could I be anything but pretty smart, albeit often wrong? But when I'm absolutely correct, Vapor, you suck your toes and whine, I'm sure. But, the truth is, gay whatever is nornal for you and Heck and mz the pussy the pussy the pussy and shep and... btw, I think daves is you brother "daryl", and vapor is your "other brother daryl" and pawning over abnormality and perversion is stupid. so, there ya go. 30 states - all those voters who made the DECENT, NORMAL DECISION, are "Retarded", Vapor? "Retarded" is a nasty, unnecessary slur against those with significant learning disabilities. Like, you don't want slurs about gays, right? But, when it suits your liberal emotional warping... slurs are fine. That's also stupid. Whatever, faggot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 And, another thing, Vapor - all I did was to rationally explain why I believe the way I do. I have valid reasons. All you have, you coward, is your friend who cried in church, and your personal attacks and slurs. That should tell you, you're on the wrong side of normalcy. I mean, liking achovies on pizza isn't all that usual either, but it is still normal. Abnormal is bad. You want to go hatemongering instead of explaining (and inventing?) some VALID reasons why you FEEL what you FEEL, and get with some RATIONAL ANALYSIS on the issue, and how your stance is the correct one.... that makes me absolutely brilliant in my appraisal of you libs. You got nothin but "feelins", because you don't THINK nor ANALYZE. Not very often, hardly ever. You live in a "glass house" Vapor, and it's stupid for you to throw stones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 Cal, I read over your last couple posts in this thread trying to find your "valid reasons" and I am not quite sure if I found them. Correct me if I am wrong but is your reasoning that it is abnormal and therefore bad so we shouldn't let gays marry? I'm really trying to find your reasoning here so let me know if I got that right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 There you go with the avoidance. Gosh, "you just don't get it". How convenient for you. Go back and read my other post. And, try to step out of liberal birgotry - and really read it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 There you go with the avoidance. Gosh, "you just don't get it". How convenient for you. Go back and read my other post. And, try to step out of liberal birgotry - and really read it. da fuck are you talking about? I am asking you straight up what your reasoning is. I am asking if I got it right. I am not avoiding it in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 And, another thing, Vapor - all I did was to rationally explain why I believe the way I do. I have valid reasons. All you have, you coward, is your friend who cried in church, and your personal attacks and slurs. That should tell you, you're on the wrong side of normalcy. I mean, liking achovies on pizza isn't all that usual either, but it is still normal. Abnormal is bad. You want to go hatemongering instead of explaining (and inventing?) some VALID reasons why you FEEL what you FEEL, and get with some RATIONAL ANALYSIS on the issue, and how your stance is the correct one.... that makes me absolutely brilliant in my appraisal of you libs. You got nothin but "feelins", because you don't THINK nor ANALYZE. Not very often, hardly ever. You live in a "glass house" Vapor, and it's stupid for you to throw stones. 1 - I never had a friend who cried in church. 2 - You clearly don't know the definition of "rational," "thought," nor "analysis," so we laugh it off when you pretend like you have a monopoly on these things. You fit the definition of "tinfoil hat-wearing crazy," and you really might be mentally Retarded (or at the very least, you probably have an undiagnosed learning disability). 3 - Go ahead. Throw some stones back. See if I care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calfoxwc Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 I'm sure it was you that had a gay friend who cried in church. Who else was it? I make mistakes - I'm farmin. But learning disability? LOL ALL THIRTY STATES in our country - all people who voted for REAL MARRIAGE, and PASSED THE BILL IN THOSE THIRTY STATES (btw, there's at least two more on the way), ... all those people who agree with me are also ignorant and have learning disabilities and wear tin foil hats? If I wasn't correct in my appraisal of you, you wouldn't protesteth so much in emotional angst. go ahead, Vapor - redefine all the English words if you want to. Redefine marriage, logical analysis, any word you want. Make your own dumbass dictionary. Don't forget to warp the definition of what "is" is...@@ You started the fire, and now you whine about getting burnt. Typical liberal emoting. See? You libs CAN"T stop it. At least, I haven't seen any of you stop it yet. If I wrote a book about it, it would be a best seller with conservatives, because it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosar_For_President Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 I'm sure it was you that had a gay friend who cried in church. Who else was it? I make mistakes - I'm farmin. But learning disability? LOL ALL THIRTY STATES in our country - all people who voted for REAL MARRIAGE, and PASSED THE BILL IN THOSE THIRTY STATES (btw, there's at least two more on the way), ... all those people who agree with me are also ignorant and have learning disabilities and wear tin foil hats? If I wasn't correct in my appraisal of you, you wouldn't protesteth so much in emotional angst. go ahead, Vapor - redefine all the English words if you want to. Redefine marriage, logical analysis, any word you want. Make your own dumbass dictionary. Don't forget to warp the definition of what "is" is...@@ You started the fire, and now you whine about getting burnt. Typical liberal emoting. See? You libs CAN"T stop it. At least, I haven't seen any of you stop it yet. If I wrote a book about it, it would be a best seller with conservatives, because it's true. Cal has 2 monitors for his computer. One open writing this past message and one open with some girl on girl playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 I'm sure it was you that had a gay friend who cried in church. Who else was it? I make mistakes - I'm farmin. But learning disability? LOL ALL THIRTY STATES in our country - all people who voted for REAL MARRIAGE, and PASSED THE BILL IN THOSE THIRTY STATES (btw, there's at least two more on the way), ... all those people who agree with me are also ignorant and have learning disabilities and wear tin foil hats? If I wasn't correct in my appraisal of you, you wouldn't protesteth so much in emotional angst. go ahead, Vapor - redefine all the English words if you want to. Redefine marriage, logical analysis, any word you want. Make your own dumbass dictionary. Don't forget to warp the definition of what "is" is...@@ You started the fire, and now you whine about getting burnt. Typical liberal emoting. See? You libs CAN"T stop it. At least, I haven't seen any of you stop it yet. If I wrote a book about it, it would be a best seller with conservatives, because it's true. If I wrote a book, I would call it "The Brown Islamic Menace: The Silent Takeover by Atheistic Neosocialists." It would sell millions of copies in the Bible Belt, and I would become the next Bill O'Reilly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporTrail Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 Bunker would be my first buyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLD Woody Posted May 14, 2012 Report Share Posted May 14, 2012 I think they are posting so many other threads to avoid this one, lol. Like what Bunker did in the other "Distraction " thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpeen Posted May 14, 2012 Report Share Posted May 14, 2012 Way too much discussion about queers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Z Posted May 15, 2012 Report Share Posted May 15, 2012 The president is gay. Two of his lovers were killed execution style in '08, one died of AIDS. I wonder who fathered the children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.