Jump to content
THE BROWNS BOARD

FBI Raids Mar-A-Lago


Axe

Recommended Posts

I guess they have him way much time to hide them somewhere else. 

National Archives tells Congress some Trump admin records still unaccounted for (axios.com)

The National Archives and Records Administration told the House Oversight Committee in a letter released Saturday that some Trump administration records have yet to be recovered.

Why it matters: The disclosure comes as Trump's legal team and the Justice Department wage a protracted legal battle over the ex-president's alleged possession of documents he was meant to turn over to the Archives upon leaving office.

  • The Archives didn't speak to whether any of the missing documents they referenced are in Trump's possession, citing the DOJ's probe into the matter.
  • Driving the news: In a letter to Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) dated Sept. 30, acting Archivist Debra Steidel Wall wrote, "While there is no easy way to establish absolute accountability, we do know that we do not have custody of everything we should."

  • Wall specifically cited official business that was conducted "using non-official electronic messaging accounts that were not copied or forwarded into their official electronic messaging accounts" as an area of particular concern.
  • "NARA has been able to obtain such records from a number of former officials and will continue to pursue the return of similar types of Presidential records from former officials," Wall said.
  • The letter comes in response to a Sept. 13 letter Maloney sent to Wall seeking an "urgent review" of "whether presidential records remain unaccounted for and potentially in the possession of the former president.”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justice Dept. Is Said to Believe Trump Has More Documents - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

A top Justice Department official told former President Donald J. Trump’s lawyers in recent weeks that the department believed he had not returned all the documents he took when he left the White House, according to two people briefed on the matter.

The outreach from the official, Jay I. Bratt, who leads the department’s counterintelligence operations, is the most concrete indication yet that investigators remain skeptical that Mr. Trump has been fully cooperative in their efforts to recover documents the former president was supposed to have turned over to the National Archives at the end of his term.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cccjwh said:

Justice Dept. Is Said to Believe Trump Has More Documents - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

A top Justice Department official told former President Donald J. Trump’s lawyers in recent weeks that the department believed he had not returned all the documents he took when he left the White House, according to two people briefed on the matter.

The outreach from the official, Jay I. Bratt, who leads the department’s counterintelligence operations, is the most concrete indication yet that investigators remain skeptical that Mr. Trump has been fully cooperative in their efforts to recover documents the former president was supposed to have turned over to the National Archives at the end of his term.

 

 

Groomer member cannot refute claim backed up by evidence. How did they respond?

a.Cry

b. Change sex

c. Link to CRT, DRAG QUEEN  nutjob "source"

d. Severe TDS

e. combination of a, b, c, or d


Your Hatred of your country. Sad.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democratic operatives disguise partisan websites as local news to influence midterms

Democratic operatives are reportedly behind dozens of outlets presenting themselves as local news websites while pushing pro-Democratic Party content.

https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/2022-midterm-election-updates-as-democrats-gop-fight-for-senate-house-of-representatives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Vambo said:

How will the Dems win then?

Oh lots of ways. Promises of free shit race baiting demonizing the successful fake news fake investigations taking away any effort for deadbeats to vote who would otherwise stay home and pandering to the absolute lowest common denominator.

WSS

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supreme Court rejects Trump's appeal to weigh in on Mar-a-Lago documents probe (axios.com)

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a petition from former President Trump, barring the special master from reviewing the classified documents seized at Mar-a-Lago.

Why it matters: The order is a major blow to Trump's efforts to get the high court to weigh in on the Justice Department proceeding with its investigation into the potential mishandling of classified material.

 

Another loss for the loser's cult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Late, but relevant.

 

 

Oh, there's another interesting nugget out about what else they were looking for in the Raid.

This one goes all the way back to Trumps cognitive test   .   .   .   recall they said they were looking for "Nuclear secrets"   .   .   .   

 

😁

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

o0ujojz.thumb.jpg.fbf5439264fda4678dafa0810c1f52e5.jpg

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2022/10/21/mar-a-lago-documents-included-top-secret-information-on-irans-missile-program-report/?sh=2b6a26f63648

Intelligence documents regarding China and Iran are among the most sensitive files the FBI uncovered in its raid of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-A-Lago estate, the Washington Post reported Friday, citing people familiar with the matter.

The documents included information about Iran’s missile program and intelligence-gathering operations in China, according to sources who spoke under the condition of anonymity to the Post.

The documents, if leaked, could pose serious risks to U.S. intelligence-gathering operations and prompt retaliation from adversaries, according to sources cited by the Post.

A spokesperson for Trump did not respond to the paper’s inquiry regarding the findings, but Trump has said he personally declassified all of the documents in his possession. (Forbes has reached out to Trump and the DOJ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judicial Watch Sues Secret Service for Records about Raid on Trump’s Home

mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcf.pr.judicialwat


Given that the Secret Service is charged with protecting former President Trump and his home, it’s critical that we know what it knew when Biden’s FBI stormed into Trump’s Florida estate.

We filed a FOIA lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for all communications of the U.S. Secret Service internally and with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) regarding the raid on President Trump’s home and for any video or audio recordings made during the raid on August 8, 2022 (Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:22-cv-03147)).

We sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the Secret Service ignored an August 11, 2022, FOIA request asking for:

  • All emails and text messages between officials in the Office of the USSS Director and officials of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the search warrant and/or execution of the search warrant on former President Trump’s home on or about August 8, 2022.
  • All emails and text messages sent to and from officials on President Trump’s USSS protective detail regarding the search warrant and/or execution of the search warrant on President Trump’s residence on or about August 8, 2022.
  • All video and audio recordings capturing the execution of the search warrant on President Trump’s home on August 8, 2022.

The FBI reportedly notified the Secret Service a few hours before the raid that it would happen and that Secret Service agents facilitated access to Trump’s home.

What is the Secret Service trying to hide about its involvement in the Biden FBI’s unprecedented and abusive raid of Trump’s home. This FOIA lawsuit, the fourth we’ve filed on the Trump raid, further highlights the Biden administration’s comprehensive cover-up about its latest abuses of the former president.

We are in the forefront on the court battle for transparency regarding the raid.

Last week, we announced that the National Archives is withholding 99% of the requested records about the raid in response to Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit.

In August, we forced the release of the raid affidavit through a court request to unseal the warrant materials used in the raid.

We also filed two lawsuits against the Justice Department for records of the raid search warrant application and approval, as well as communications about the warrant between the FBI, the Executive Office of the President, and the Secret Service.

More is coming…

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...