Flugel

Another temper tantrum? Stay on topic Poindexter. You're a Revenge of the Nerd effort gone sloppy, spastic and wild. How many more replies do you need to make to my 1 post above? Trump was elected last time; and he did so great he lasted only 4 years. Here's where you get really stupid. Sure the liberals were a significant part of firing his ass - but the winning difference was all the women your messiah continued to piss off. The whole truth is always better than just sticking to the convenient parts of it. Last but not least, we're not talking about him cheating on his wives - we're talking about allegations of sexual harassment. You're pulling out every high school debate team trick you ever learned while all your peers were playing sports.

Let's baby step here. One of those guys was about to be running for President in 2016. The absolute carelessness of what he said to a guy he just met that was asking him questions and taping him without his knowledge strikes you as what's the big deal? Females heard this right? What percent of the vote do you suppose they make up?

😆 Well played Diehard. I'm trying to figure out what guy looks younger.

Not so fast. Look at you trying to get out of this. 🤣 Damage was already done from age 20 through 68 as a sample size of 5 decades of sexual harassment/misconduct allegations. Trump was also convicted of sexual harassment and misconduct in court and what he owes has been well covered in the news. Here is his unfiltered mouth below describing what he was able to do/get away with as a celeb; but he is WHITE and a Republican today so guess who gets the benefit of the doubt from you and Cal? In conclusion, Watson isn't the only dirt bag with Sexual harassment and misconduct allegations in this comparison with Trump. When you start counting inconvenient truth from beginning to end - you won't be so angry and disappointed all the time when people have to straighten you out with it. My time here is done. My once every 1-2 years visit to this board has run it's course. As you were...

😆

Yeah, you're all voting for a lifetime liberal unless you want to subtract him being a huge liberal in his 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s (up to 68 or 69). If you can't beat them since 2005 - you're joining them. Got it. That was quite a dynasty over the weaker party.

PEEK-A-BOO! He was fired fired fired fired fired. 😍 America didn't like the dirt bag. When the court convicted Trump of sexual harassment how much does the dirt bag have to pay? He's been treating women this way since his 20s? That's not really a nice guy you worship but he is WHITE. Maybe DeShaun Watson can lend him some money or at least buy some gold high top sneakers. That fake ignore sure ended fast. I usually leave this board alone - that courtesy got me nowhere. Can you guess why I'm suddenly here?

He got FIRED in the election. Check Mate! I just Trumped your Trump!

Still got fired in the election. 😁 And yet - he got fired in the election. The guy that won had the highest volume of WINNING votes ever so you keep spewing your red dot equivalent of the National Enquirer Calsies. WINNERS WIN and losers make up conspiracy theories and point fingers. He even does that with his countless court cases.

Still got fired in the election no matter how much you cry conspiracy theories.

Here comes the ignorant liberal label from another one of Trump's male cheerleaders. Gee, that wasn't predictable. I didn't read anything you wrote after that. I'm sure that'll give you all the reach arounds you need in here. Not wanting Trump to be the face of America doesn't mean someone is a liberal. Is that what you're calling all the Republicans that left the party because of him? I don't register in either party today - why should I? They're both weaker than they've ever been so I vote for the lesser of 2 evils. Again, this election is a do over between the guy MOST of America fired and 1 very tired old man. How exciting! I'll ask this again, what have the Republicans done to make themselves a stronger party? You were all the way down to Nikki Haley being the only one to take on Trump (the liberal for life that has mentioned we should throw away the Constitution 😆). If 8 years of Obama didn't light your fannies to make your party stronger - then you deserve the fraud selling gold high tops, stop the cheat tantrums and bibles for $59. You're not embarrassed by that? Oh wait, here's where you insert all your whiney conspiracy theories. I'll let you get back to worshipping your messiah's ass if you could ever get your nose out of it.

Interesting! That's good for Watson to know Trump could sell bibles after being convicted in court of sexual harassment if he ever gets convicted like Trump did. Isn't it funny how Watson's biggest morals critics (Cal and Gorka) worship a 77 year old man that has been sexually harassing women since his 20s? 😁

Excuses are for losers crying "STOP THE CHEAT!" The wall never got built and he got fired. Now, we're heading toward a do over with America voting for the lesser of 2 evils.

Phew! You've found your excuse for 8 years of going O for Obama. Not to worry - a lifetime Democrat ended up saving the Republican party; and why was this possible? There wasn't 1 Republican in that entire party strong enough to even take on Mrs Clinton? Prove me wrong here.... Unfortunately, it only took 4 years after Trump guaranteed Mexico would pay for this border wall he would have built for America to fire him for a guy with Sundowners. Uh-oh, this very fragile man most of America chose was Obama's VP. That means the Republican party is actually 0-3 against men and 1-0 against the only woman in the last 4 elections covering 16 years. Even worse, that O for 3 is vrs the Biden/Obama tandem and you're STILL not demanding better from the Republican party. I see why you're always angry. Penis envy is probably pretty common among little fellers like you. If Tom Thumb had a bigger stinger than me, I'd probably be just as angry as you. I think there's a lot of little Keebler Elves like you in cyberspace pretending they're big bad tough guys in a place where they have the comfort of knowing nobody can see their physiques.

Not to be early responding or anything but OUCH! You hate to start the year off with devastating news like this. My FREAKIN team growing up was via the affiliation of the Rochester Red Wings, who won a lot of Championships in the Minors btw. That made me a Baltimore Orioles fan back in the day it was actually okay to like a pro team in Baltimore. Brooks Robinson, Don Baylor, Boog Powell, Mark Belanger, Bobby Grich, Paul Blair, Al Bumbry, Jim Palmer, Dave McNally, Mike Cuellar, Grant Jackson, etc. Later on Cal Ripken, Mike Boddicker and others came a long. Back in the day, we'd see a lot of these guys in Rochester before they were promoted up to the Orioles. Here's the thing - Rochester was always one of the top teams getting the player accustomed to winning, which definitely carried over to the Orioles. That's how they became our home team so to speak from long distance. Unfortunately, Peter Angelos bought the team and ended it's relationship with the Rochester Red Wings. I've been very happy about that team sucking ever since. I'm ecstatic that they gagged last year when it looked like a blind squirrel finally found a nut. If all that wasn't enough, that's the FREAKIN same city that took our Browns - so that is the last fanbase I'd ever want to be a part of. I haven't really cared for MLB ever since (seeing the Houston Asterisks rewarded for cheating solidified this feeling); but that's my baggage. There's a lot of passionate sports fans in here that deserve to see their ALL of their teams succeed...

😆 It was really something to see. What a way to show an opponent we're gonna gut you today. Here's a little something about that Cal-Mum football program during the 70s, 80s and 90s. The cool thing about it is they were just a small school in the middle of nowhere. They had a unique way of thinking; and a surprising amount of talent. I was hoping I'd see a picture of that kickoff team in the article but I didn't see it. Unfortunately, they ended up needing to their football program with Byron-Bergen somewhere in 2016. https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/sports/high-school/2018/09/19/photos-caledonia-mumford-red-raiders-through-years-section-v-rochester-ny-leroy-oatkan-knights/1345773002/

There was small school in the Greater Rochester Area called Caledonia Mumford that ranked #1 in the State. In fact, they ranked #1 in the state frequently in the 80s and 90s if memory serves me right. Roland Poles, the current GM of the Bears played there - as did his older brothers Junior and Ronnie. Junior went to BC. Ronnie or Roland or both played at Tennessee. Anyway, that team used to lay the football down the long way on the white line; and the big huge tackle would kick freakin line drives at the 5 guys on the front line of the return team (usually all linemen shittin their pants). You wouldn't believe the chaos that generated for opposing teams. It was brilliant!

I didn't realize anyone would ever miss the 1-15 football followed by 0-16 football we had to endure a couple years or so before Stefanski arrived. I was wrong...

I haven't seen you guys talking to each other in a while. I hope you guys have at least been sending post cards to one another. If I ever wrote the re-do/sequel to The Parent Trap - You and Nicks are gonna star as the long lost twins that met at a football camp. BTW, some of the funniest pranks I've ever seen took place at football camps.

If I could choose 1 already employed proto-type at the 35 blocking for our Kickoff Return man - it would be this 6-3 305 lb FB/John Deere Tractor. His name is Patrick Ricard and he will be the lead blocker for Derrick Henry this year. Sound like fun? It will be when they play Pittsburgh TWICE...

Except for the 2 NFL Coach of the Year Awards he received in his 1st 4 years in Cleveland. Winning 11 games without Nick Chubb, 2 starting tackles and in spite of the need for 5 different QBs must be a lot easier than I've been giving it credit for.

I don't have a problem with you disagreeing at all. That said, I had coffee in my mouth when I read your comment you sick bastard. Key word in that sentence is had.

Their biggest cheerleader is unavailable for comment. Apparently, he's been so excited about the Ken and Barbie Doll movie he's been writing adorable critiques of it. Rumor has it, he's been stalking the writers to do a sequel that will add his blonde haired GI Joe to the mix. I don't know if that's any healthier than him thinking about his favorite football team the year after lost ethics. Looks like he's headed right back to football without asterisks is like a season without sunshine.

I think you're correct with that part I bolded above. This will eventually be a lot like calling holding except this rule was added for player safety instead of preventing one from gaining an unfair advantage. I'm guessing this means they will probably be reminded they can't exercise as much discretion on limiting how many times they will be calling what they're seeing like they can with holding in the beginning of all this. I do expect the frequency to subside after a while. We'll start to hear a lot of "this was totally unintentional" from the Tony Romos and Troy Aikmans covering the game. Back to the holding for just a second. We had guys in here sharing a lot pictures and videos of opponents getting away with blatant holding on Myles Garrett with officials right there observing it. This was in during the final 6 weeks of the season where a total of only 1 flag was thrown for holding on Garrett's opponents. If you want to handcuff a team that sets up the entire/overall success of their defense on Garrett's pass rush - failure to enforce that rule of the game can be a significant factor in whether this team wins or loses. After the 1st 11 of 17 games - Garrett had 13 sacks. Over the final 6 games - that pace took a cliff dive down to just 1 sack. During this span, back to back weeks out west vrs Denver and the LA Rams - Garrett had 0 sacks in back to back losses this defense didn't look at all like a top rated defense. Coincidentally, the Browns lost both of those games. I'm sure this happens to other great pass rushers like Watts-hisname and former Penn State grad Micah Parsons (who said film didn't lie about why Garrett was the obvious Defensive Player of the Year). Way back when I coached high school football in BC (Before Cellphones) - all the coaches in the county met with officials every year before the regular season got under way. They explained spirit of the rules where if there is a guy running for a TD down the left sidelines and one of his teammates is back 25 yards on the opposite hash holding someone that has no chance to make the tackle or effect the play - was the TD scored because of an unfair advantage? No, spirit of the rule says outcome of the play wasn't caused from the hold in another area code. On the other hand, clipping is different because it's a player safety thing so it should be called regardless of where it is spotted. Spirit of the rule is player safety. I think that'll be a challenge with this new rule for a while. Then I'm guessing it eventually morphs into using discretion on whether this could have been avoided or it needs to be flagged which will reduce the frequency of flags. Maybe? Flugel needs to stop sniffing glue? I'd be interested in hearing from anyone that played football in here if you were ever taught this hip drop tackle at any level or at any football camps you attended. NFL Films has reminded us what Vince Lombardi used to think of his defensive players trying to grab jerseys in lieu of squaring up to plant a text book form tackle on somebody. Having said that, trying to tackle someone from behind or via a pursuit angle doesn't always put defenders in ideal position to make a nice safe form tackle.